The Import Substitution Practices of Russia as a Model for the Nigerian
Soft Drinks Market
ADEJUMO DAUDA A.1, CHERNIKOV SERGEY U.2, GBADEYAN ROTIMI A.3,
VALE VERA T.1
1Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism,
University of Aveiro,
PORTUGAL
2Department of Marketing,
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia,
Moscow, Miklukho- Maklaya,
RUSSIA
3Faculty of Management Studies,
University of Ilorin,
P.M.B, 1515, Ilorin,
NIGERIA
Abstract: - The present study focuses on the issues of import substitution practices in Russia and Nigeria that can
be useful in the current reality of the world economy. However, the Nigerian economy has great potential for
import substitution in the current process of de-globalization. However, it is crucial to use the Russian experience.
The study revealed that the comparison of Nigerian and Russian Soft drink markets is an excellent example of the
drawbacks that can occur upon realizing protectionism governmental policies. Therefore, the paper recommends
for import substitution policy that will promote economic diversification that supports local production and
increases exports. The research concludes that import substitution policy can be successfully implemented if it is
focused on economic growth and development of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) in the partnering
countries.
Key-Words: - Russia, Nigeria, soft drink market, import substitution, economic development, localization.
Received: August 5, 2023. Revised: March 6, 2024. Accepted: April 26, 2024. Published: May 17, 2024.
1 Introduction
Today, experts have decided to single out several
interrelated phenomena as the basis of global
political, economic, and technological patterns: the
fading processes of globalization and the increasing
political regionalization, technological development,
economic integration, and the strengthening of
environmental and terrorist threats. All these are of
critical importance for large developing countries
aimed at maintaining their influence in the emerging
new structure of the world economy. An analysis of
the topics of discussions at high-level forums (for
example, Davos, Switzerland) shows that a range of
issues that have been causing concern for a long time
are being identified [1]. These are the growing
economic and political disunity of the countries of
the world, the deep crisis of the globalization process
as a phenomenon and the institutions created in it, the
frequent and undisguised use of protectionism to
promote national or corporate interests, the use of
sanctions and large-scale trade wars, the crisis of
international law, the growing income inequality, the
crisis and the decline in the role and scale of the
middle class, etc. It is evident that in these
conditions of the unfolding process of structural
adjustment of the world economy, reformatting the
existing economic structures of both developed and
developing countries is inevitable, and, significantly,
changing the existing partnership and cooperative
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1242
Volume 21, 2024
corporate and interstate ties. In recent years, there has
been an increase in the trend of "self-reliance" among
large countries, which was manifested in the
progressive growth of protectionism in the
development of world trade. Many countries are
implementing their programs to restore national
production, especially in simple consumer goods,
energy, and agricultural support. However, this
process is undertaken, with multiple influencing
factors and high requirements for internal
governmental cooperation. Therefore, it is essential
to carefully evaluate the experience of other countries
on this path to understand the potentially problematic
areas and incorporate measures that can prevent
damage to a governmental strategic goal.
The theoretical perspective for Import
Substitution emerged due to the criticism of the
international division of labor strategy, which states
that less-developed economies engaged in the export
of primary products, and imported highly costly
finished manufactured goods, which are produced in
developed countries such as America and Europe [2].
However, the strategies used by these developed
countries became more unsustainable during the
Second World War when there was a shift from the
production of consumer goods to military artilleries
or capital goods. This resulted in a decline in the
primary commodity prices after the war. As a result,
the primary producing economies had no option but
to export more to balance trade deficits, while there
was an increase in the prices paid for imported
manufactured goods [3], [4]. The success stories of
the Import-Substitution Strategy in Latin American
and Asian countries have contributed significantly to
its continued implementation in the global
community to support the sustained development of
weak economies, such as that of Africa and some
parts of Asia. The Import Substitution policies failed
in most African countries due to the design of the
Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) in the 1980s,
as well as the mounting debt crisis faced by these
countries during that period [5], [6]. Also, the failure
of the import substitution policy in Africa may be
attributed to the unproductive entrepreneurship
culture, which is manifested in the form of high
dependence on the export of primary agricultural
products in the international division of the labor
market. Therefore, the way forward in narrowing the
development gap in Africa with that of its
counterpart in Asia partner is to implement a policy
that will favor the growth of Small and Medium-
Sized Enterprises in Africa (SMEs) [7]. This study is,
therefore, an attempt to examine how the Import -
Substitution strategy between Russia and Nigeria in
the soft trade drinks can benefit the two countries.
2 Material
Import-substitution as a concept has been defined by
several scholars to connote different meanings, an
attempt will be made in this paper to consider some
of the definitions. According to [8], import
substitution is a trade and economic strategy used by
a nation to replace goods that are typically imported
with locally produced alternatives. In this case,
import-substituted products could be those that were
originally imported from Russia but were later
produced locally in Nigeria. This process can be
likened to when a nation produces goods locally that
it previously imported from other nations which is
known as the import-substitution policy [9], [10]. A
critical analysis of this definition demonstrates how
similar it is to the preceding one. Import substitution
policy may also be defined as an economic theory
that developing or emerging-market nations adhere to
encourage a decrease in their dependency on
developed nations [11].
In this definition, the import substitution policy is
an economic theory that emphasizes less dependence
on developed countries and increases effort toward
self-sufficiency and industrial growth. The essential
purpose of Import-Substitution is to emphasize local
production by utilizing local raw materials for
economic development. Furthermore, the local
production of the products or services will lead to
establishing a market both at the domestic and
international levels. The significant import-
substitution benefits, therefore, include increased
industrialization, low dependence on imports, and
increased accumulation of foreign exchange and
local productivity.
This paper focuses on how Nigeria can benefit
from the import substitution policy in the soft drink
trade with Russia. There is a general slowdown in the
economies of major emerging markets, of which
Russia is a key player; the other major emerging
markets are India, China, and Brazil. Manufacturers
need to focus on emerging markets to increase
product sales due to the saturation in the developed
market. This development has resulted in
manufacturers deciding on the ideal plan for their
medium to long-term investment strategies. Russia is
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1243
Volume 21, 2024
considered one of the top ten import trade partners
with Nigeria, and the main items imported from the
country are herrings, blue whiting, durum wheat, and
mackerel [12]. There is a chance of shifting focus to
importing other goods if this is a viable commercial
proposal for the two countries. This means that the
soft drink trade can be of economic interest to the
two countries if a trade partnership in the form of an
Import Substitution policy is consummated
between the two countries. An examination of the
soft drink market between Russia and Nigeria
revealed that the non-alcoholic or soft drink markets
in Nigeria are divided into three: Fizzy or Carbonated
drinks, Energy drinks, and Healthy drinks.
Carbonated drinks include Coke, Sprite, Pepsi, etc,
while Energy drinks contain caffeine such as Red
Bull, Amber, etc. Healthy drinks are predominantly
bottled water, yogurt, and fruit drinks. There are over
one hundred brands of soft drinks produced by
manufacturers, of which two-thirds are indigenous
Nigerian Firms [13]. In Russia, the main groups of
soft drinks include juices, bottled water, carbonated
beverages, and other drinks. Bottled water and
carbonated drinks account for 67% of the market
share; fruit juices take about 12% of the market share
and other drinks account for 21% of the market
share. Other beverages, such as cold drinks or kvass
in recent times have recorded increased demand [14].
The objective of this study is to show the great
potential, in terms of economic benefits, that will
accrue if Russia can enter into a soft drink trade
partnership with Nigeria due to its vast market and its
ranking as the fifth-largest soft drink market in the
world [15].
3 Methods
This cross-sectional study aims to explore the
challenges and opportunities that could arise from
implementing an import substitution policy in the
soft drinks trade between Nigeria and Russia. The
study utilizes a descriptive research design, which
focuses on describing a phenomenon and its
characteristics, rather than explaining how or why it
occurred. The data from this kind of research may be
collected qualitatively but can be quantitatively,
using frequencies, percentages, averages, or other
statistical analyses. In the present study, there is no
statistical computation done from the data obtained
because they are from a secondary source, so it is
analyzed qualitatively. The discussion and results are
based on the deductive and inductive exploration of
the data. On the other hand, a cross-sectional study
examines a group of subjects at one particular point
in time. Therefore, it is easy and quick to conduct
[16], [17]. This study examines the import–
substitution practices for Russia and Nigeria’s soft
drink trade during the period under review. There is
scanty literature that connects Import Substitution
practices in Russia with the Nigeria Soft Drinks
Market. The paper, therefore, relies heavily on
secondary data sources obtained from Statista, trade
journals, and other relevant scholarly journals. It can
be regarded as a qualitative study that involves a rich
collection of data from various sources. It enables
the researcher to gain a deeper understanding of
individual participants, including their opinions,
perspectives, and attitudes. This research obtains data
qualitatively and uses a qualitative analysis method
[18]. A systematic review of the literature from the
secondary data was done to provide the most
efficient and reliable knowledge that enables a
comprehensive discussion on the topic. [19], [20];
[21] & [22].
4 Results and Discussion
As a result of the sanctions imposed on Russia in
2014, an import substitution program for agriculture,
mechanical engineering, and pharmaceuticals was
developed and launched. As a result, it was assumed
that by 2020, most of the production chains of
products in these industries will be carried out on the
territory of Russia. Nevertheless, despite the limited
success, it can be said that by 2022 these goals will
have primarily failed, which is a big lesson for the
Governments of other large developing countries,
which will now also have to increase efforts in this
direction. According to the original meaning of the
word "import substitution", this implies replacing the
import of goods from abroad by transferring most of
its production value chain into the country. However,
in reports on the progress of import substitution in
various sectors of Russia, officials soon began to use
the word "localization" as a synonym. However, the
term "localization" means that Russia should be the
place of production of only the final product a car,
TV, telephone, etc. Unfortunately, the semantic
differences between the terms "import substitution"
and "localization" in the reports and strategies of
officials have been accidentally or intentionally
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1244
Volume 21, 2024
erased for a long time, and it is challenging to
analyze the reasons for the failure.
In the cost of the final product sold in Russia, 90
percent may fall on raw materials, parts, and
components of foreign production. Still, at the same
time, it is counted as produced in Russia in the
import substitution format. Of course, such "import
substitution" is not difficult to carry out for consumer
goods, especially in the form of "screwdriver
productions", and in the long term, it leads to a
decrease in imports of finished goods. At the same
time, the import of hundreds and even thousands of
individual parts and assemblies increases. This is
clearly shown in the Rosstat table of commodity
groupings of goods (consumer, production,
intermediate) (Table 1), based on the Harmonized
System (HS) and the International Standard Trade
Classification (ISTC).
As seen from Table 1, the share of consumer
goods in Russian imports for the period 2006-2020
decreased by one and a half times from 46.2 to
32.8%. Russian officials refer to this when reporting
on the success of "import substitution". However, the
share of investment goods, on the contrary, increased
by about one and a half times from 17.0 to 25.3%,
which means Russia has significant dependence on
the import of foreign equipment, and especially
intermediate goods, the share of which increased
from 36.8 to 41.9%. This problem is well displayed
in a relatively simple market of soft drinks and can
present an interesting case for Nigeria. The Russian
soft drink market is, of course, incomparable to its
Nigerian counterpart. However, it is rather
significant. The volume of juice production in Russia
is annually 2500 million liters. Soft drinks are
produced in the amount of 7000 million liters, and
packaged drinking water 8000 million liters. More
than 3500 enterprises produce water and soft drinks,
and more than 200 companies produce juices.
Table 1. Structure of imports of goods by the Russian Federation by main groups, %
Year
Consumer products
Production goods
2006
46.2
17.0
36.8
2010
40.7
19.5
39.8
2014
37.8
24.5
37.7
2016
38.7
26.7
34.6
2019
33.8
24.4
41.8
2020
32.8
25.3
41.9
Fig. 1: Volume comparison of soft drink markets of Russia and Nigeria
Source: Statista (2020)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1245
Volume 21, 2024
Fig. 2: Revenue comparison of soft drink markets of Russia and Nigeria,
Source: Statista (2020)
Fig. 3: The average price of carbonated soft drinks in Russia
Source: Statista (2022)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1246
Volume 21, 2024
Figure 1 shows a comparison of the volume of
soft drink markets in Russia and Nigeria [23].
Considering the current situation in the Russian
economy and the behavior of several foreign
companies, the projected dynamics of the cost and
volume of commodity flows will have a multi-vector
orientation with high fluctuation dynamics. Over the
last decades, the market was developed by two global
giants, which are the prominent leaders of the
category: Coca-Cola, with a share, according to [23],
of more than 31%, and PepsiCo, with a share of 25%.
Speaking of Russian manufacturers, the leading
player was the Aqualife company. In contrast, the
rest of the players are retail chain brands that have
yet to gain a strong position or local, regional players
who tend to concentrate on a small assortment of
drinks with the best-selling flavors. For instance, the
current pattern of de-globalization brings both
challenges and opportunities to Nigeria [24]. While
the country's economic growth heavily depends on
global trade, it also exposes Nigeria to risks of supply
chain disruptions and fluctuations in international
markets. Nevertheless, these challenges can also pave
the way for Nigeria to establish a robust and self-
sustaining industrial economy that can compete
globally, as seen in some EU countries. But despite
persistent problems with development and poverty,
Nigeria boasts one of sub-Saharan Africa's highest
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) and has been a
lucrative market for thousands of international
companies. Nigeria represents a key gateway to the
West African and African market with already
existing free trade relations with 14 other West
African countries [25], [26] and the African
Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). These
agreements represent the potential markets for
Nigeria's future developing domestic industries if it
would choose to continue on the path of import
substitution first of its consumer goods, and then
the industrial equipment growth. The Nigerian soft
drink market is a multibillion-dollar industry with
many prominent companies such as the Coca-Cola
Corporation, PepsiCo, Suntory, Red Bull, and Keurig
Dr Pepper. According to [27], the market for Non-
Alcoholic Drinks is structured into retail sales for at-
home consumption and on-premises or food service
sales for out-of-home consumption. Furthermore, at
4.6 billion dollars, Nigeria’s soft drink consumption
is more significant than almost the rest of sub-
Saharan Africa combined.
Figure 2 shows a revenue comparison of the soft
drink markets of Russia and Nigeria. On March 8th,
2022, Coca-Cola announced the suspension of
operations in Russia. Later, the distributor of the
company’s products, Coca—Cola HBC Russia,
announced that it plans to raise prices for its
assortment by 30%. Additionally, on the same day,
PepsiCo also announced the suspension of sales of
Pepsi-Cola, 7up, and Mirinda brands, as well as a
stop of further investments and advertising activities
in the Russian jurisdiction. PepsiCo, during this
period, continues to sell its products in Russia, such
as dairy products, infant formula, and baby food. In
this way, the company supports 20,000 of its
employees in Russia and 40,000 agricultural workers
in its supply chain. The local producers have
immediately announced their plans to increase
production and occupy the free market share
drastically. One of the largest regional retail chains
Magnit has declared a drastic increase in the
consumption of domestic carbonated beverages. The
statistics for May and June 2022 showed a rise in
Russian-origin product sales by 36% in units
compared to the same period last year. Interestingly,
over 43% belong to carbonated drinks in large-
volume packages 1.5 and 2-liter bottles. Generally,
Russian carbonated beverages in the Magnit chain
currently occupy a 37% share in sales of the
category, which is an incredible 14-point rise
compared to 2021. The buyers are positively
switching to domestic products due to a decrease in
the marketing activity of famous international brands
and changes in the range of their products [28]. This
occurs despite the staggering rise in prices of soft
drinks, being regarded as an “easy joy” for customers
in a low-income situation.
However, this growth can be severely
undermined by the abovementioned “import
substitution” pattern of the Russian economy [29].
The beverage industry is one of the most dependent
on foreign equipment and ingredients in the entire
food industry. Due to current sanctions, it is
experiencing serious problems in logistics, supply of
spare parts, and even packaging materials. The
current situation made companies include additional
costs in the cost of products. Over 90% of the
industry equipment is foreign, with a large share
coming from Western producers (Figure 4), and
failure in supply components may result in
production problems or the shutdown of lines.
Replacing equipment with Russian analogs in the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1247
Volume 21, 2024
current reality is close to impossible. This leads not
only to the rise in prices that can be seen in Figure 3
but also to a restructuring of logistics routes, leading
to the dampening of established business processes.
It is also worth noting that the imports in Russia of
such equipment are over 500 mln. USD, which is
approx. 4% of the world total (compared to less than
100 mln. USD in Nigeria). Currently, some Russian
industrial companies are looking into the possibility
of providing the necessary bottling lines for
enterprises. However, their capacity is limited by the
need for more computer chips and microelectronics.
Chips are used in almost every type of equipment
(packaging, filling, bottling) for production and
labeling. Currently, however, up to 80-90% of chips
used worldwide derive from Taiwan, which has been
struggling to cope with the demand since the 2020
pandemic lockdowns. Origin of industrial equipment
used in Russia’s soft drink industry.
Nigeria Africa’s largest economy and middle-income
country, started to incorporate protectionist measures
in its international trade over a decade ago [30] while
their most significant implications occurred in 2018
upon the non-signing of trade liberalization treaties
and border closure in 2019 [31]. As of 2021, the
World Bank affirmed that Nigeria is the 27th largest
economy in the world with a Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) of almost 200 million.
The population cannot rely entirely on the free
trade” commandments of an economics textbook.
The development of an internal industrial economy is
of utmost importance, which the government fully
understands. For example, the assessment
recommends diversifying the economy through
strategic programs to enhance growth, instead of
remaining a mono-economy, to positively impact
government revenue mobilization and economic
growth in Nigeria [32]. While oil and gas account
for an overwhelming proportion of Nigeria’s exports,
it remains a small part of the country’s overall
economy. Domestically, Nigeria boasts several
thriving industries, especially its food and agriculture
industry employing approximately—70% of the
population and comprising nearly 22% of GDP.
Fig. 4: Custom code import data of Russian Federal Customs Service.
Source: Composed by authors
Table 2. Nigeria’s soft drink market (showing prices are in millions of dollars)
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Carbonated Soft
Drinks
1782
2140
2691
3390
4566
5620
6915
8028
11282
13024
Energy & Sports
Drinks
1051
1072
1172
1313
1604
1850
2148
2388
3253
3663
Non-Carbonated
Soft Drinks
1803
2357
3166
4190
5817
7355
9303
10911
15349
17581
Total
4637
5569
7029
8892
11987
14825
18366
21327
29885
34268
Source: Statista, (2021)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1248
Volume 21, 2024
Table 2 shows the year-on-year growth of the
soft drink market in Nigeria. The table shows the
development of the main sub-categories of the
market: carbonated soft drinks, energy, and sports
drinks, and non-carbonated soft drinks. The table
shows a steady growth of the industry across all sub-
categories. In particular, non-carbonated soft drinks
remain the most lucrative market in the country.
Figure 5 shows a per capita revenue of $158.10
in 2022 and a projected per capita revenue of
$269.72 by 2026. This shows a continuous upward
trend in Nigeria's average spending on soft drinks
expenditures Sales of soft drinks have never declined
in the country; it has always continued an upward
trend. Therefore, significant firms in this industry
are almost always guaranteed to increase sales.
Furthermore, Nigerian soft drink provides a range of
opportunities for any company, [33]. The country’s
youthful population, with 97.26% of the Nigerian
population between the ages of 14 to 64, represents
the prime working-age population and the biggest
consumers of soft drinks.
Table 3 shows the consumers of soft drinks in
Nigeria by age group. It shows that the most
significant share of consumers is between the ages of
18 and 24, closely followed by the 25 to 34 age
group. Overall, 95.2% of soft drink consumers are
between the ages of 18 and 44. Combining this with
the population data of the country, this represents a
huge target market, with over 100 million people, for
NRGet. Additionally, soft drink consumption in
Nigeria is expected to surpass 15 million per year by
2026, presenting a huge profit opportunity for the
industry.
Fig. 5: Soft drink revenue per capita, Statista (2022)
Table 3. Soft drinks users by age
Age group
2020
18-24years
38.5
25-34years
36.5
35-44years
20.2
45-54years
4.9
Source: Statista (2021)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1249
Volume 21, 2024
Fig. 6: Soft drink users per income 2022
Source: Statista (2021)
Fig. 7: Soft drinks volume per capita
Source: Statista (Statista, 2021)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1250
Volume 21, 2024
Figure 6 shows soft drink users per income in
Nigeria, low income 29%, 39.2%, and 31.7%, in
2022. However, the Nigerian soft drink industry has
potential challenges. In particular, the volatile
macroeconomic environment presents a considerable
risk for any business. Declining living standards and
rising unemployment are significant market entry
weaknesses [34]. Furthermore, while Nigeria’s soft
drink industry remains the leader in Africa, growth
has either remained stable or slowed in recent years.
Figure 7 shows the soft drink volume per capita
in Nigeria. While it shows that soft drinks are highly
consumed in the country, it also shows slowing
growth in recent years. Across all the sub-categories,
growth slowed between 2018 and 2020. Among the
three sub-categories, the annual average volume was
31.18 liters for carbonated soft drinks, 2.65 liters for
energy and sports drinks, and 27.71 liters for non-
carbonated soft drinks. Figure 7 also shows that the
sub-category of energy and sports drinks has
experienced limited growth since 2013. One of the
market’s difficulties is the presence of established
powerful competitors - Coca-Cola and Pepsi, sharing
the market, just like in Russia. Their vast market
experience, industry knowledge, limitless financial
resources, political/economic clout, and almost
universal brand identity, present a severe challenge
for any new market entrant. Furthermore, there is
also an increasing threat of regulations from the
Nigerian government. [35] the Nigerian Government
signed into law a policy that mandates the payment
of excise duty of 10 NGN (about US$0.02) per liter
on soft drinks and sweetened beverages in the
country. This is done to discourage excessive sugar
consumption in beverages that may result in health
problems such as diabetes and obesity and to increase
excise duties and revenue for healthcare and other
spending. However, current and future regulations
such as this could impede the profitability of
companies in the soft drinks industry.
The following factors need to be put into
consideration for a profitable trade partnership to be
achieved between Russian and Nigerian investors,
among which are; Foreign investors will need to
determine which market segment to enter due to the
differences in the demand and growth rate of each
market segment. In Nigeria, for example, there is a
decreased demand in both the carbonated and energy
drink segments, while there is an increase in demand
for the healthy drinks segment. The Seven-Up
Bottling Company’s recent withdrawal from the
Nigerian Stock Exchange might not be unconnected
with the losses suffered from her trade, while the
Coca-Cola Company's continuing market share
dominance in the healthy drinks segment in Nigeria
is further shown by her good performance in the
Stock Exchange and the acquisition of the Chi Vita
Group of Company. Therefore, there may be a need
for the investors to differentiate their products and
also be sensitive to the competition from the local
manufacturers. This differentiation will enable
manufacturers to compete effectively with
competitors producing similar local products or
substitutes.
The price strategy that the investors should use is
also very crucial to the success of the import
substitution policy. This should either be a price
penetration (low price) or a price skimming (high
price) strategy. A lower price strategy can attract
more customers and, at the same time, can be
perceived in terms of product quality. Some
customers associate high prices with superior quality,
while some perceive low prices with inferior quality.
Therefore, there is a need for investors to be able to
determine the best pricing strategy to adopt for its
product. The Rite Food company, which is a new
entrant into the soft drink market, for example, has
been able to compete favorably with Coca-Cola
Cola which is a critical player in the industry through
its offer of Bigi Cola at a lower price and more
volume to the market.
There is no market leader in the bottled water
industry due to many local competitors. Therefore,
there is a need for foreign investors to know that
regional strategy may not be the best option to use in
this situation. Using regional strategy will be
challenging to have a competitive advantage over
local competitors in their territory because they are
closer to the customer and enjoy short delivery time
and cost. This explains why Heritage Bottled water is
in high demand in Nigerian cities more than Eva and
other bottled water produced by Multinational
Companies. The local competitors have created a
niche market for their products, enabling them to
understand their customers' needs and give them a
strong market presence. Therefore, it will be
complicated for a new entrant to compete with the
local manufacturers, and the market may likely not
be attractive to it.
The following are the alternative options, as
suggested by [36], that can be taken in a situation
where the consumers decide to resist price increase:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1251
Volume 21, 2024
Reducing the size, volume, or content of
the product instead of increasing the
price (for example Coca Cola dilutes its
content and still retains the cost, while
some soft drinks companies reduce the
size of their content and increase the
price).
Substituting less-expensive materials,
concentrates, or ingredients for the
product to reduce the cost of production.
For example, in the Import Substitution
agreement between Russia and Nigeria,
Russia may import concentrates for soft
drinks to Nigeria, while Nigeria may
export bottled water to Russia.
Currently, Russia depends on suppliers
from other countries for its water
consumption.
Reducing or removing product features.
Removing or reducing product services,
especially for lower-priced products that
require installation or free delivery.
Use less-expensive packaging material
or larger package sizes for products.
Reducing the number of sizes and
models of products offered.
Introducing new, cheaper brands of
products.
Foreign investors just settling in the market and
the existing local competitors can decide to take any
of the above options to serve as a guide where a price
increase may not be the best pricing strategy.
Advertising cannot be underestimated, most
significantly, in influencing consumers’ purchase
decisions. Therefore, the manufacturer, either foreign
or local investors should endeavor to effectively
utilize advertising tools and other local factors such
as weather, price, product availability, and persuasion
to increase demand for their products. Some products
are rarely seen in restaurants, eateries, or other
outlets but are made available to consumers through
hawking and sales vendors. For example, the La-
Casera and Bigi Cola soft drinks in Nigeria are made
available to consumers by hawkers in motor parks,
highways, and public places. Through their
persuasion, the hawkers and the sales vendors'
influence can attract customers for these products.
5 Policy Options and Conclusion
This study has shown from the discussion that there
is much to benefit from if Russia and Nigeria can
enter into a soft drink trade agreement that would
result in a successful import substitution policy
between the two countries. The research concludes
that import substitution policy can be successfully
implemented if it is focused on the economic growth
and development of Small and Medium Scale
Enterprises (SMEs) in the partnering countries. In
this regard, both academics and professionals in the
field of entrepreneurship need to promote a trade
policy framework of possible new international
arrangements for trade in primary products; and the
possibilities offered by international monetary reform
for benefiting less developed countries like Nigeria.
The divergence between the well-being of developed
and less-developed countries remains one of the key
problems of our time. The study's limitation includes
the constrained capacity of the domestic market,
expanding it through exports of goods and services
which is also necessary for economic growth to have
a positive dynamic. Import substitution may be a
viable strategy for promoting local production and
reducing dependence on imports in Nigeria's soft
drinks market, but it is important to consider the
unique market dynamics and limitations that may
impact its success.
Furthermore, important to take into account is
how less competitive sectors are that have not
embraced protectionist policies. The paper
recommends an import substitution policy that will
promote economic diversification that supports local
production and increases exports. This is the only
way the weaker economies countries like Nigeria and
some African countries can sustain their economic
development and become self-sufficient through the
industrialization of their local industries. As a result,
there will be less dependence on the importation of
capital goods and, at the same time, increased export
promotion will result in improved overall terms of
trade in the developing countries.
References:
[1] Papakonstantinou, V. (2019). 2019 World
Economic Forum Annual Meeting, Davos,
Switzerland: Report on infrastructure sessions.
Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable
Development, 1(1), 104-107.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1252
Volume 21, 2024
[2] Siddiqui, K. (2018). David Ricardo’s
comparative advantage and developing
countries: Myth and reality. International
Critical Thought, 8(3), 426-452.
[3] Magee, S.P. (1973) Currency contracts, pass
through and devaluation, Brooking Papers on
Economic Activity, Vol. 1: pp. 303–25.
[4] Bahmani-Oskooee, M & Ratha, A. (2004). The
J-Curve: a literature review. Applied
Economics, Vol. 36(2004): pp. 1377-1398.
[5] World Bank. (1994). Adjustment in Africa:
Reforms, Results and the Road Ahead. World
Bank / Oxford University Press: UK and
Washington, [Online].
https://www.worldbank.org/ (Accessed Date:
April 25, 2024).
[6] Jackson, E. A., & Jabbie, M. N. (2021). Import
Substitution Industrialization (ISI): An
approach to global economic sustainability. In
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (pp.
506-518). Cham: Springer International
Publishing.
[7] Ogujiuba, K., Nwogwugwu, U., and Kike, E.,
(2011). Import Substitution Industrialization as
Learning Process: Sub Saharan African
Experience as Distortion of the “Good”.
Business and Management Review, Vol. 1(6):
pp.8-21.
[8] Thom-Otuya, V.V., Ikechi, P.O. & Tamuno,
M.P. (2010). The role of Import –Substitution
Industrialisation Policy in the Economy of
Nigeria. Journal of Business Administration
and Management. Duncan Science Company.
5(3): 55-61.
[9] Abreu, M.P., Bevilacqua, S.A. and Pinho,
M.D. (1996). Import Substitution and Growth
in Brazil, 1890s1970s. An Economic History
of Twentieth-Century Latin America. St
Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595682_6.
[10] Monogbe, T. G., & Okah, O. J. (2017). Export
Promotion, Import Substitution and Economic
Integration in Nigeria. iBusiness, 9(4), 134-
148.
[11] Shuaib, K. M. (2020). The changing pattern of
international trade: Import substitution policy
and digital economy in Nigeria. A Review.
International Journal of Economics and
Business Management, 6(4), 13-25.
[12] Ovefia, K. K., & Orhero, A. E. (2023).
Nigeria-Russian Economic Relations in the
Post-Cold War Era: Current Dynamics And
Future Prospects. Journal of Public
Administration, Finance & Law, (28), 382-392.
[13] Christian, I. C., Amadi, L., Asemota, K. U., &
Bameyi, A. M. (2022), Brand Innovation
Strategies and Customer Retention of Soft
Drink Firms in South-East Nigeria, Journal of
Economics, Finance and Management Studies,
5(08), 2213-2216.
[14] Zhao, H., Qu, S., Guo, S., Zhao, H., Liang, S.,
& Xu, M. (2019). Virtual water scarcity risk to
global trade under climate change. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 230, 1013-1026.
[15] The Africa Report (2022). Nigeria’s soft drink
market offers a blueprint for how to boost local
production, [Online].
https://www.theafricareport.com/225115/nigeri
as-soft-drink-market-offers-a-blueprint-for-
how-to-boost-local-production/ (Accessed
Date: July 22, 2022).
[16] Campbell, M. J., Machin, D., & Walters, S. J.
(2007). Medical statistics: A textbook for the
health sciences (4th ed.). Chichester, UK:
Wiley.
[17] Turner, S., Menzies, C., Fortier, J., Garces, I.,
Struck, S., Taillieu, T., & Afifi, T. O. (2020).
Child maltreatment and sleep problems among
adolescents in Ontario: A cross-sectional study.
Child Abuse & Neglect, 99, 104309.
[18] Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive
research: Data type versus data analysis.
Language teaching research, 19(2), 129-132.
[19] Cook, D. (1997). Systematic reviews: the case
for rigorous methods and rigorous reporting.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 44(4), 350–
353.
[20] Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using
qualitative research synthesis to build an
actionable knowledge base. Management
Decision, 44(2), 213–27.
[21] Cooper, H. (2010). Research Synthesis and
Meta-analysis: A Step-by-step Approach (4th
ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
[22] Hinson, R. E., Avornyo, F., Kuada, J., &
Asante, F. A. (2017). Corporate social
responsibility and international business:
examining the nexus and gaps from a
developing economy perspective. International
Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2,
1-14.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1253
Volume 21, 2024
[23] Statista (2020). Soft Drinks Russia, [Online].
https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/non-
alcoholic-drinks/soft-drinks/russia (Accessed
Date: July 12, 2022).
[24] Michalopoulos, C. (2022). Toward an equitable
re-globalization. In Aid, Trade and
Development: The Future of Globalization (pp.
359-391). Cham: Springer International
Publishing.
[25] Aning, E. K. (2013). Investing in peace and
security in Africa: the case of ECOWAS. In
Security and Development (pp. 337-352).
Routledge.
[26] Mamba, E. (2021). Role of governance in open
trade policies–growth nexus in ECOWAS
countries: The use of extended IV approach in
panel data. The Journal of International Trade
& Economic Development, 30(5), 661-684.
[27] Statista (2021). Soft Drinks Nigeria,
[Online].
https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/non-
alcoholic-drinks/soft-drinks/nigeria (Accessed
Date: July 12, 2022).
[28] Borzekowski, D. L., & Pires, P. P. (2018). A
six-country study of young children’s media
exposure, logo recognition, and dietary
preferences. Journal of Children and Media,
12(2), 143-158.
[29] Statista (2022), The average price of
carbonated soft drinks in Russia. Accessed on
307 10/ 2023, [Online].
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1314718/rus
sia-carbonated-soft-drinks-price-
monthly/#:~:text=Price%20of%20carbonated%
20soft%20drinks%20in%20Russia%20monthl
y (Accessed Date: April 25, 2024).
[30] Alayande, F. (2020). Understanding Shifts in
Nigeria’s Trade Policy: From Realism to
Protectionism. Africa Development. Vol. XLV
No 1:149-162.
[31] Ugwuja, A.A. (2021). Trade Protectionism and
Border Closure in Nigeria: The Rice Economy
in Perspective. UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts
and Humanities. Vol 22. No 1. Africa. ISSN:
0850 3907.
[32] Rotimi, C. O., John, N., Rotimi, M. E., &
Doorasamy, M. (2022). Assessment of the
Impact of Government Revenue Mobilisation
on Economic Growth in Nigeria. Studia
Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad–
Economics Series, 32(4), 81-108.
[33] Bussell, J. (n/d). Import Substitution
Industrialization, [Online].
https://www.britannica.com/topic/import-
substitution-industrialization (Accessed Date:
February 5, 2020).
[34] The World Bank. (2018). World Development
Report 2019: The changing nature of work,
[Online].
https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr
2019 (Accessed Date: April 25, 2024).
[35] Adedeji, O. J., & Lucero-Prisno III, D. E.
(2022). Taxation on beverages in Nigeria:
Impact and burden of the new policy.
Population Medicine, 4(March), 1-2.
[36] Kotler, P and Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing
Management, 14th Edition. Pearson Education,
Inc., publishing as Prentice Hall, One Lake
Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed to the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.101
Adejumo Dauda A., Chernikov Sergey U.,
Gbadeyan Rotimi A., Vale Vera T.
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1254
Volume 21, 2024