Navigating Ethics: Insights into External Auditor Compliance from
Financial Managers and Internal Auditors in Jordanian Companies
ABDELRAZAQ FARAH FREIHAT
School of Accounting,
Faculty of Business,
Al-Balqa Applied University,
JORDAN
Abstract: - This study aims to assess to what extent Jordanian external auditors comply with the Code of Ethics
for Professional Accountants, as perceived by financial managers and internal auditors. The hypotheses are
tested using one sample and an independent sample t-test for a sample of 53 industrial public shareholding
companies listed on the Amman stock exchange during 2020–2023. The study utilized the survey instruments
to collect the necessary data from 200 participants. The findings show that the external auditor complies with
the code of professional ethics at a high to moderate level per the Relative Important Index from the viewpoint
of both financial managers and internal auditors. Moreover, the outcomes also show there are no significant
variances between their beliefs regarding the adherence of external auditors to the code of ethics. The study
consequences indicate that the enacted regulations that organize the work of the auditors can effectively
enhance the compliance of Jordanian auditors with the code of professional ethics. Nevertheless, it emphasized
the need for more shared efforts for more compliance with professional ethics in the auditing profession. The
study suggests Many recommendations to enhance auditors’ compliance such as continuous oversight of
auditor compliance from the Jordanian Association of Certified Public Accountants, ethical awareness, research
and development in the area of ethics, and training programs to explain ethical complexities. This study
assures the importance of enhancing ethical compliance in the auditing profession in an emerging country to
increase public trust, attract investment, and improve financial statements integrity.
Key-words: - professional ethics, compliance, external auditors, financial managers, internal auditors, public
companies, Jordan.
Received: April 22, 2023. Revised: February 17, 2024. Accepted: March 9, 2024. Published: April 5, 2024.
1 Introduction
In the past few years, there has been an accelerated
rise in the failures of huge worldwide companies
such as Enron and WorldCom in 2002. These
scandals shed light on different causes such as the
failure of management in reporting and financial
disclosure. In addition, these collapses highlight the
role of management in oversight and internal
control, the importance of the quality of the auditing
process, and the importance of the code of ethics for
professional accounting.
Locally in Jordan, many company failures
occurred during the last decades. Petra Bank, the
second largest bank in early 1990 was dissolved
because of deception fraudulent activities,
counterfeit documents, and theft, [1]. Additionally,
recently many public shareholding companies listed
on the Amman Stock Exchange were going into the
path of mandatory liquidation. Such as Unified
Holding Corporation in 2017, Jamil Investment
Company in 2018, Amana Agricultural and
Industrial Investments Company in 2019, and
Jordan Garments in 2019, [2].
Building on the causes of the above-mentioned
global financial collapses and the recent compulsory
corporate liquidations in Jordan, the role of the
auditor and the role of the professional conduct of
the auditors in the accounting and auditing
profession has become increasingly doubtful.
Therefore, the accounting and auditing profession
has encountered a constant and escalating ethical
challenge that regulators and scholars must address
to reinstate confidence in the auditing profession
and reestablish credibility in financial reporting.
Ethical misconduct like fraud schemes, stealing,
theft, and document deception comprise the triggers
for the above high-profile corporation failure
worldwide and locally. Accordingly, the ethical
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
908
Volume 21, 2024
predicament for professional accountants is a
prominent issue and a subject of debate between the
auditing legislators, the scholars, and the
professionals themselves. Therefore, this study
intended to investigate the compliance of auditors
with ethical norms in an emerging country,
specifically Jordan.
The ethical conduct standards that external
auditors should maintain are established by the
International Ethical Standard Board (IESBA).
These standards include independence, objectivity,
integrity, professional competence, confidentiality,
and Professionalism. Upholding such standards can
have significant benefits to the investors and
economic systems among these benefits such an
increase the public trust in the auditing profession
through enhancing audit quality and uplifting the
credibility of the financial statements.
Previous studies concluded that compliance
with the code of professional ethics controls the
auditors' attitude to achieve and meet their duties
and liabilities towards their corporation clients,
investors, and other stakeholders, [3]. On the other
side, various previous research indicates that
nonadherence with independence, integrity, and
other codes of ethics leads to many corporate
collapses, [4]. For example, the Enron and
WorldCom scandals inversely impacted the image
of the auditing profession and the reliability of the
financial statements and caused huge financial
losses, [5].
Accordingly, it is of great benefit to investigate
the degree of compliance with the code of ethics in
an emerging country with a specific focus on
Jordan. By finding vulnerabilities and gaps within
existing systems, research endeavors contribute to
the enhancement of measures designed to mitigate
the occurrence of fraudulent activities. Therefore, it
sheds light on important aspects of the auditing
profession, such as its resilience and commitment to
ethical principles, thereby filling a notable
knowledge gap.
The purpose of this study is to assess the level
of conformity of external auditors with the Code of
Ethics for Professional Accountants as perceived by
the financial managers and internal auditors of
industrial publicly traded companies listed on the
Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). It is anticipated
that the study will provide clear insight and
substantial advantages to auditing profession
regulators who wish to improve auditing quality,
such as the Jordanian Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Amman Stock Exchange, the
Ministry of Industry and Trade, the Central Bank,
and the Jordanian Association of Certified Public
Accountants (JACPA).
Enhancing adherence can lead to fostering the
sustainability and resilience of the auditing
profession, in turn bolstering and protecting the
national economy and capital market against future
shocks.
2 Theoretical Background, Previous
Studies, and Hypothesis
Development
2.1 Theoretical Background
Adherence to professional behavior guidelines plays
a crucial role in shaping the credibility of audit
reports and securing public trust, [6]. The
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE)
has provided significant insights into the financial
consequences that arise from straying away from
ethical norms. On average, firms experience losses
of approximately 5% of their annual revenues
because of fraudulent behavior. Almost 1.6% of the
total companies’ losses are due to fraudulent
financial statements, [7].
The public trust in the external auditor's
adherence to the code of ethics deteriorated, due to
the series of corporation collapses over the past few
decades and due to the twenty-one century financial
crises. Accordingly, the ethical dilemma is
significant for the external auditor to sustain and
retain some of the public confidence, [8].
The compliance of external auditors with the
code of ethics is underpinned by the agency theory
and the social responsibility theory.
From the viewpoint of the agency theory, the
auditor is legally obligated to uphold professional
ethics as an agent to provide the shareholders with
valuable auditing services, [9]. Adherence to a
robust code of ethics such as independence,
integrity, and objectivity by external auditors can
solve the conflict of interest between management
and shareholders per this theory.
Social responsibility theory on the other side
emphasizes that auditors should take the societal
consequences of their auditing process. Therefore,
under this theory auditors are required to ensure
integrity, independence, and transparency of
financial reporting in the best interest of
shareholders, [10].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
909
Volume 21, 2024
Accordingly, and based on solid theoretical
foundations auditors are required to maintain
various principles of ethical conduct while
performing the auditing process to enhance the trust
of the investors and other stakeholders.
2.2 Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants
Adherence of auditors with ethical principles was of
great concern to legislators after the worldwide
financial crises. Therefore, various legislation has
been enacted to enhance auditor independence,
transparency, and integrity, [11].
The globally recognized code of ethics for
auditors was set by the International Ethics
Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA). These
standards aim to maintain the public interest and
represent a guideline for professional accountants.
These principles comprise independence,
objectivity, integrity, competence, confidentiality,
and ethical behavior.
Likewise, in the United States, an external
auditor is obliged to maintain integrity,
independence, objectivity, and expertise. Moreover,
under the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Standard 101 (SAS 25)
members are required to reveal any conflict of
interest, preserve client information undisclosed,
report any commission fees from their clients, and
keep the public interest at the top, [12], [13].
Mandatory compliance with the code of ethics
has several advantages for diverse parties, for
auditors, it enhances the reliability of financial
reporting, for industry, it increases the trust in the
profession, and for the public, it advances their
welfare, [8].
Independence is the most important ethical
principle where the auditor must ensure their mental
and actual independence. Auditors maintain
independence, they do not participate in any
personal relationship, get any contingent fees, and
do not have any financial interest. The second
principle is integrity, and integrity has a direct
relationship with public trust and dependence on
auditors' reports. So, auditors must maintain honesty
and fairness during their auditing process. Integrity
is enhanced by adhering to implementing auditing
standards.
The third ethical principle is objectivity. Per this
principle, auditors should actively protect their
professional judgment. To promote objectivity
auditors must avoid any conflict of interest that
harms all parties depending on audited financial
statements. Competence is the fourth ethical
principle. Auditors, to achieve their task effectively
must have auditing knowledge, experience, and
education. To fulfill the requirement of this
principle, auditors must be updated about the latest
auditing and accounting standards and business
legislation. Moreover, they must understand their
clients’ financial system and industry.
Keeping the client's information confidential
represents the fifth ethical principle. Through the
auditing duration, auditors are not allowed to release
client information to unauthorized parties, unless
there is a legal requirement. Professional conduct is
the last ethical principle. Abiding by this principle
means that auditors comply with applicable laws
and regulations and depart from any action that
impairs the image and reputation of the auditing
profession.
These are the code of ethics principles where
upholding these ethical standards can enhance the
public trust and the reliability of financial reporting.
2.3 Enhancing Ethics: The Role of the
Jordanian Association of CPAs in
Jordan
To preserve the interest of investors and other
stakeholders, enhance the transparency of the
Jordanian capital market, and attract more investors,
Jordan, like other countries of the world, paid
attention to the auditing profession and valued the
importance of auditors’ adherence to the highest
standards of professional conduct.
In Jordan to get a license to practice the auditing
profession you must pass a strict and comprehensive
exam in accounting, auditing, and related
legislation. This exam is administered by the
Jordanian Association of Certified Public
Accountants (JACPA). Therefore, all certificated
public accountants are affiliated with JACPA. many
objectives driven the establishment of JACPA, [14].
The main role of the JACPA has been to oversight
and enhance the auditing profession, and make sure
that auditors adhere to the auditing standards and
comply with the code of ethics. To fulfill its
objectives the association carries out many training
and educational programs to provide auditors with
national professional certificates, this enhances the
auditor's competence by expanding their skills and
knowledge with the latest auditing and accounting
standards. In turn, this role for JACPA increases the
public trust and enhances the capital market in
Jordan.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
910
Volume 21, 2024
Additionally, The JACPA has set guidelines
and instructions for a code of professional ethics.
All members of the association should maintain
independence, uphold objectivity, integrity,
confidentiality and preserve professional conduct.
These guidelines enhance auditors' performance. To
oversight compliance with the guidelines, the
JACPA established an inspection team. These
disciplinary measures were following Article 12 of
the 2006 Law on the Practice of the Legal
Accounting Profession. These procedures show how
important the role of the JACPA is in enforcing the
ethical standards in auditing practices in Jordan.
2.4 Previous Studies
2.4.1 Code of Ethics and Audit Quality
Several previous studies conducted in the
accounting literature have confirmed that there is a
significant relationship between auditors’ adherence
to applying the rules of professional conduct and
both the quality of the auditing process and the
credibility of the financial statements. This enhances
public trust in audits and financial reporting. [6],
conducted a qualitative study that addressed the
importance of adhering to the code of ethics and the
repercussions associated with a deficiency in
accountants' independence within Indonesia's public
accounting firms. The findings demonstrated that
implementing a code of ethics within the public
accounting profession significantly secures public
trust. Furthermore, auditors' independence
impairment significantly breaches their objectivity
in their professional judgment. Also, in Indonesia,
[15], utilizes the survey of auditors in public
accounting firms to explore the effect of auditors’
adherence to a code of ethics on audit quality. The
study showed that there is a significant correlation
between the levels of auditor compliance with ethics
and audit quality. The same findings were supported
by [16], in Nigeria, where they studied the impact of
professional ethics on the quality of auditing
processes. The study showed that there is a
significant association between compliance with
auditing ethics, especially auditor independence, and
quality assurance. Additionally, they showed that
adherence to ethics enhances investor confidence in
the reliability of audited accounts.
In a study conducted by [17], in Gaza, the focus
was on investigating the various factors that
influence audit quality. The study highlights that
auditors' quality is influenced by multiple factors.
The components that comprise auditor ethics
encompass professional expertise, academic
qualifications, ongoing education, and the
objectivity and independence of the audit business.
A study conducted in Sweden by [18], discovered a
noteworthy association between the adherence to
ethical conduct inside auditing businesses and the
objectivity and quality of audits. The research
findings indicate that adhering to a code of
professional behavior reduces the likelihood of
errors in professional judgment and improves
objectivity and precision.
2.4.2 Adherence with the Code of Ethics and its
Consequences
There was plenty of previous research that studied
how adherence to a code of professional conduct
may enhance corporate governance, decrease the
rate of financial failure occurrence, and in turn, lead
to protecting the public interest. In [19], Studied the
association between professional ethics and
financial fraud and failures. The researcher
specifically concentrates on the auditors' non-
compliance with the code of ethics and its
consequences. The researcher surveys previous
literature related to the research question. The study
concluded that auditors should strictly adhere to
ethical principles which in turn enhance the
credibility and reliability of the financial reporting
and minimize fraudulent activities. [20],
investigated how adherence to the code of ethical
standards could be a significant pillar of corporate
governance mechanisms. The researcher analyzes
different economic cases and different accounting
and managerial scenarios. The study shows that
adherence to a code of ethics at both the
professional level and the personal level enhances
the control environment, strengthens the corporate
controlling system, and leads to a robust governance
regime. It is apparent from this study that many
gains result from compliance with the code of ethics
such as minimizing financial risk, elevating the
reputation of the auditing practices, and diminishing
any potential collapses.
According to [21], study in Nigeria in 2021, the
commitment to independence and ethical behavior
plays a crucial role in protecting public interests,
clients, and businesses. According to the study,
intimidation emerged as the primary concern when
it comes to the challenges faced by accountants in
maintaining ethical behavior. The findings suggest
that when management provides encouragement and
motivation, auditors are more likely to adhere to the
code of ethics.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
911
Volume 21, 2024
[22], surveyed in Jordan to explore the relationship
between professional ethics and the audit
expectation gap among auditors. The results show
that adhering to values like honesty, independence,
competence, and professionalism can reduce the
audit expectation gap.
2.4.3 The Extent of Compliance with the Code of
Ethics and Factors Influencing Ethical
Compliance
Different previous studies have discussed the extent
of compliance with professional standards and the
factors that influence ethical compliance. These
prior studies prove that compliance with robust
ethical principles is fundamental to warranting audit
quality. Departure from these standards can have
severe outcomes, such as professional censure and
the potential compromise of financial statement
accuracy. From this perspective, [23], examined
Ethiopian external auditors' conformity with
professional accounting ethics. Data was acquired
by a questionnaire from 68 auditors and 29 tax
auditors. Results show that professional misconduct
and accounting standards non-compliance are
substantial issues in chosen cities. The researchers
suggest that the accounting profession establish a
monitoring system, impose punishments, suspend
auditors who break professional norms, and provide
professional and ethical training to solve this issue.
In this regard, [24], in Maputo, Mozambique,
evaluated accountants' ethical behavior and the
elements that motivate it. 180 Mozambique Institute
of Accountants-registered accountants and auditors
contributed primary data. Results show that most
professional accountants follow the code of ethics
concepts and systems. The study indicates that
potential sanctions, ethical principles, company
internal legislation, and religious and social
traditions urge auditors to observe the code of
ethics.
[25], found many reasons that hinder external
auditor independence in Egyptian enterprises. The
lack of a law requiring Egyptian companies to
change auditors was the biggest factor. Also,
Egyptian external auditors violated international
auditing norms' professional ethics. They also fell
behind Egyptian auditing legislation and standards
in their efforts to adapt to the changing business
climate.
According to the above studies, ethical behavior
is the foundation of the accounting and auditing
profession, preventing company collapses, reducing
dishonest management, and boosting stakeholder
confidence. Many high-impact studies emphasize
the importance of ethical guidelines for auditors and
the financial environment.
The preceding literature differs from this study.
Prior research examined the influence of a code of
ethics on the quality of audits and the reliability of
financial statements. Alternatively, some studies
have examined the factors that lead to a higher level
of adherence to the code of ethics. In contrast, the
study carried out by [23] and [24], examined many
facets of adherence to professional ethics as seen by
external auditors. The research is distinctive because
it examines compliance measurement from the
viewpoint of the customers of the auditing firm,
specifically the financial managers and internal
auditors, who are the main pillars of the financial
systems of publicly listed firms. Considering this,
their convictions on the perpetual adherence to
ethical standards by auditors would, to some extent,
be devoid of bias.
2.5 The Study Hypotheses
Based on the literature review, the following study
hypotheses are proposed in the null format: H01:
Financial managers in Jordanian industrial
companies do not perceive a high level of
compliance with (independence, integrity,
objectivity, competence, confidentiality, and
professional behavior principles) among external
auditors. H02: Internal auditors in Jordanian
industrial companies do not perceive a high level of
compliance with (independence, integrity,
objectivity, competence, confidentiality, and
professional behavior principles) among external
auditors. H03: The perception of compliance with
independence, integrity, objectivity, competence,
confidentiality, and professional behavior principles
by external auditors does not differ significantly
between financial managers and internal auditors in
Jordanian industrial companies.
3 The Study Methodology
The study's methodology will outline how data
sources, the study population, the sample, and the
development of the measurement tool, represented
by the "questionnaire," were chosen. This section
will also clarify the essential components that make
up this tool.
3.1 Study Participants
The main objective of this study is to investigate the
level of compliance of external auditors with the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
912
Volume 21, 2024
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants as
perceived by financial managers and internal
auditors. According to the Jordanian Securities and
Depository Center, there are 53 industrial
companies, [26]. Then, a questionnaire was drafted
and disseminated to a sample of financial managers
and internal auditors employed by publicly traded
industrial companies. A research sample of 170
questionnaires was successfully collected from the
study population of 200 participants. Within the
examined cohort, a total of 120 individuals were
identified as internal auditors, while 50 individuals
held the position of financial managers.
3.2 Data Sources
This study relies on two data sources: secondary
sources, which include a comprehensive
investigation of prior research and relevant
theoretical frameworks pertinent to the research
topic, and primary sources, which include the design
of questionnaire-based research instruments. This
questionnaire was meticulously crafted to answer
the researchers' pragmatic questions and provide
insight into their research needs and hypothesis
testing. The study also examines the Company
Guide published by the Amman Stock Exchange to
get knowledge about companies' financial managers
and internal auditors, where the questionnaires were
sent to them to provide a comprehensive assessment
of their prospects.
3.3 The Questionnaire Instruments.
The questionnaire contained two primary sections.
The first part pertains to the sample's demographic
variables. The second section included queries
regarding auditors' professional ethical standards.
On a five-point Likert scale, financial managers and
internal auditors were asked to indicate the extent to
which they believe external auditors adhere to each
aspect of code professional ethical standards when
conducting audits in your company (Table 6, Table
7, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11).
3.4 Statistical Tools
The means, percentages, and standard deviations
were calculated using descriptive statistics to meet
the goals of the research and evaluate its hypotheses.
This provided a preliminary overview of the replies
provided by the participants and their compliance
with the Code of Conduct. An investigation of the
reliability of the compliance-related questionnaire
questions was carried out to assess the degree of
internal consistency among them. To evaluate the
views of compliance with external auditors held by
internal auditors and finance managers, a t-test with
a single sample was used. To compare the mean
compliance evaluations of internal auditors and
finance managers, this research used a t-test on
independent samples.
The computation of the hypothetical mean is
required to conduct a single sample t-test study.
This hypothetical mean is the average of a Likert
scale with five points, and it may be stated
mathematically as illustrated in equation (1).
The hypothetical mean is equal to the sum of the
upper limit of the Likert scale (five) and the lower
limit of the Likert scale (one) divided by two, which
equals three.
To determine the degree of adherence, the
Relative Importance Index (RII) was used, which
also served as the basis for the ranking list. It is
possible to compute the RII by using the formula
[27], as well as by referring to the equation (2) and
Table 1 that pertain to the five-point scale:
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐇𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐧 = Upper Limit of Likert scale(5)+ Lower Limit of Likers Scale(1)
2 = 3 . (1)
The Relative Importance Index (RII) =W
𝐴 × 𝑁 100 . . (2)
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
913
Volume 21, 2024
Table 1. The Relative Important Index Variables
Variable
Description
W
The weighting given by each participant on a scale from 1 to
5 (1 = lowest weighting, 5 = highest weighting)
A
Weight with the highest Value
N
Total number of participants in the study
RII Value
Range
Adherence Level
0.8 ≤ (RI)I ≤ 1
(H), High
0.6 ≤ (RII) <
0.8
H–M, High to medium
0.4 ≤(RII) < 0.6
M, Medium
0.2 ≤ RII < 0.4
M-L, Medium to Low
0 ≤ RII < 0.2
L, Low
4 Findings
This section will examine the reliability of the
research instrument as well as provide a detailed
analysis of the demographic characteristics of the
respondents and the information they provided. This
section will finish by examining the theories that
have been subjected to empirical verification.
4.1 Internal Consistency of the Research
Instruments
Table 2 shows that the internal consistency
coefficient Cronbach's alpha for the items of the
study tool varied between 0.73 and 0.91. The
Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all items in the
study was determined to be 0.83, indicating a high
level of internal consistency. This number surpasses
the recommended threshold of 0.60, affirming the
reliability of the study tool and its suitability for
conducting statistical analysis.
Table 2. Internal consistency Cronbach's alpha
coefficients
No.
coefficient
1
0.73
2
0.80
3
0.84
4
0.81
5
0.77
6
0.91
0.83
4.2 Study Sample Demographics Analysis
The following tables provide a comprehensive
depiction of the group of participants, including
their employment position, specialty, and
professional credentials.
Table 3 displays the participants categorized by
their profession. Table 3 reveals that 70.59 percent
of the participants were internal auditors. The
explanation is that every corporation has an internal
audit department staffed with several internal
auditors. while each corporation has just one
financial manager.
Table 3. Participants According to Occupation
Occupation
Frequency
Percentage
Internal Auditors
120
70.59
Financial Managers
50
29.41
Total
170
100
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
914
Volume 21, 2024
Table 4. Participants According to Educational Disciplines
Disciplines
Frequency
Percentage
Financial Managers (%)
Internal Auditors (%)
Accounting
125
73.53
21.76
51.76
Business Administration
4
2.35
0.59
1.76
Economics
8
4.71
1.18
3.53
Finance
33
19.41
5.88
13.53
Total
170
100.00
29.41
70.59
Table 5. Participants by Professional Credential
Professional Credential
Frequency
Percentage
Financial Managers (%)
Internal Auditors (%)
CPA
7
4.12
1.18
2.94
CMA
26
15.29
4.71
10.59
JCPA
114
67.06
19.41
47.65
CFA
3
1.76
0.59
1.18
Others
20
11.76
3.53
8.24
Total
170
100
29.41
70.59
Table 4 indicates that a significant majority of
the participants, particularly 73.53%, had
accounting credentials. This is significant since
accounting plays a vital role in the finance and
auditing industry. This highlights the responsibilities
of finance management and internal auditors. The
inclusion of persons from the domains of Business
Administration, Economics, and Finance enhances
the diversity of the sample and bolsters the overall
breadth of the research, underscoring the importance
of accounting practices in the fields of finance and
auditing.
According to Table 5, the Jordanian Certified
Public Accountant (JCPA) stands out as the most
prevalent professional certification among the
participants, making up 67.06% of the sample. The
majority of individuals holding this certification are
financial managers and internal auditors.
Specifically, 19.41% of the respondents are financial
managers, while 47.65% are internal auditors. The
distribution of JCPA certification underscores its
significance in the financial industry, showcasing a
comprehensive grasp of ethical conduct and
standards. Additional credentials like CPA, CMA,
and CFA add diversity to the evaluation process.
4.3 Descriptive Analysis of Questionnaire
Respondents' Responses
This part of the study provides a comprehensive
descriptive analysis of replies obtained from the
participants of the questionnaire. The statistical
measurements employed for data description
include the mean, standard deviation, Relative
Importance Index (RII), ranking, and importance
level.
Table 6 indicates that respondents generally
have a positive perception of external auditors'
adherence to independence aspects, with an
adherence level of high to moderate and mean
scores of 3.84, 3.77, and 3.79 obtained for financial
managers, internal auditors, and all respondents,
respectively. The perceptions show moderate
variability, as indicated by a standard deviation of
0.506.
For financial managers, the aspect "Audit
committee role: isolation and appointment of
independent auditors" is ranked first, with a Relative
Importance Index (RII) of 0.930, a high level of
adherence (H), and an average score of 4.65. On the
other hand, the category of "demonstration of
apparent and intellectual independence" exhibits the
lowest ranking with a (RII) of 0.650 and an
adherence level as high to moderate (H-M).
Additionally, it ranks tenth with the lowest mean
score of 3.25.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
915
Volume 21, 2024
Table 6. Perceptions of External Auditor Independence Descriptive Analysis
Financial Managers
Internal Auditors
Total
No.
Independence Aspect
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
SD
1
Demonstrate both
apparent and intellectual
independence.
3.25
0.650
9
H-M
4.35
0.870
1
H
4.03
0.806
1
H
1.52
2
Ensure no financial
interests in the audited
company.
3.62
0.724
6
H-M
3.72
0.744
5
H-M
3.69
0.738
6
H-M
1.09
3
Audit committee’s role:
isolate and appoint
auditors for
independence.
4.65
0.930
1
H
3.44
0.688
9
H-M
3.8
0.760
5
H-M
1.54
4
Identify and mitigate
potential risks effectively.
4.42
0.884
2
H
3.79
0.758
4
H-M
3.98
0.796
2
H-M
1.13
5
Personal relationships
don't influence external
auditors' work.
3.69
0.738
5
H-M
3.87
0.774
2
H-M
3.82
0.764
4
H-M
1.09
6
Provide impartial
information to
stakeholders.
3.89
0.778
4
H-M
3.52
0.704
8
H-M
3.63
0.726
8
H-M
0.87
7
Auditor's fees relative to
total income ensure
objectivity.
3.61
0.722
7
H-M
3.65
0.730
7
H-M
3.64
0.728
7
H-M
0.91
8
Assess the company's
bankruptcy susceptibility
adeptly.
4.1
0.820
3
H
3.86
0.772
3
H-M
3.93
0.786
3
H-M
0.78
9
Remain independent from
consulting fees and
services
3.31
0.662
8
H-M
3.7
0.740
6
H-M
3.59
0.718
9
H-M
0.82
The overall scale
3.84
0.768
H-M
3.77
0.754
H-M
3.79
0.758
H-M
0.506
From the viewpoints of internal auditors, the
aspect of "demonstration of both apparent and
intellectual independence" received the highest
grade, with a RII of 0.870, a significant level of
adherence (H), and a mean score of 4.35, placing it
at the pinnacle of the ranking. The dimension under
"Audit Committee Role: Isolation and Appointment
of Independent Auditors" was rated the lowest by
internal auditors, as indicated by a (RII) of 0.688
and having a "high to medium compliance" (H-M)
level and is ranked tenth in terms of its 3.44 mean
score.
Both participants share the perception that
auditors place great emphasis on the component of
"demonstrating both apparent and intellectual
independence" within the principle of independence,
which is considered the highest priority. The
solidification of this element's position as widely
recognized in assuring auditor independence is
supported by its high (RII) of 0.806, high adherence
level (H), and an average score of 4.03. In contrast,
the element of "remaining independent of
counseling fees and services" was scored by all
participants with a high to moderate degree of
adherence (H-M) at the ninth position (RII) of 0.718
and a mean score of 3.59. Therefore, to preserve
independence from impairments, it is necessary to
allocate more attention to the audit fees associated
with consulting and non-audit services.
Table 7 shows that the respondents' perception
of external auditors' adherence to integrity aspects is
generally positive, with a high to medium level of
adherence (H-M) and an overall mean score of 3.84,
3.90, and 3.88 for financial managers, internal
auditors, and all respondents, respectively. The data
also suggests moderate variability, as indicated by a
standard deviation of 0.55.
Within the cohort of financial managers, the
statement "Reports are perceived as credible and
representative" holds the highest rank, as indicated
by a Relative Importance Index (RII) of 0.822,
denoting a significant level of importance (H).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
916
Volume 21, 2024
Table 7. Perceptions of External Auditor Integrity Descriptive Analysis
Financial Managers
Internal Auditors
Total
No.
Integrity Aspect
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
SD
1
Uphold honesty and
impartiality in audits.
3.86
0.772
4
H-M
4
0.800
3
H
3.96
0.792
4
H-M
1.38
2
Follow international audit
standards for account
Auditing.
4.07
0.814
2
H
4.23
0.846
1
H
4.18
0.836
1
H
0.83
3
Comply with Applicable
local regulations and laws.
3.97
0.794
3
H-M
4.05
0.810
2
H
4.03
0.806
2
H
0.77
4
Transparently declare
responsibilities and
services to the Client
3.72
0.744
7
H-M
3.58
0.716
9
H-M
3.62
0.724
9
H-M
0.75
5
Interact with prior auditors
for information
3.67
0.734
8
H-M
3.69
0.738
8
H-M
3.68
0.736
8
H-M
1.27
6
Decline client gifts,
material, or non-material.
3.65
0.730
9
H-M
3.92
0.784
5
H-M
3.84
0.768
5
H-M
0.92
7
External auditors offer
transparent data about
senior management
3.72
0.744
6
H-M
3.81
0.762
7
H-M
3.78
0.756
7
H-M
1.15
8
Maintain transparency and
integrity in audits.
3.74
0.748
5
H-M
3.88
0.776
6
H-M
3.84
0.768
6
H-M
1.01
9
Reports are perceived as
credible and representative.
4.11
0.822
1
H
3.97
0.794
4
H-M
4.01
0.802
3
H
0.89
The overall scale
3.84
0.768
H-M
3.9
0.780
H-M
3.88
0.776
H-M
0.55
Furthermore, this statement attains a mean score
of 4.11, positioning it in the top rank. On the other
hand, the behavior of "decline client gifts, material
or non-material" is perceived as having the lowest
rating among financial managers, with an (RII) of
0.730. This behavior is classified as having high-
medium importance (H-M) and has a mean score of
3.65, placing it in the ninth position in terms of
ranking.
According to the findings, internal auditors have
assigned the highest rank to "Follow international
audit standards for account auditing" with a (RII) of
0.846, signifying a high level of importance (H).
Following auditing standards was ranked at the
highest with a mean score of 4.23. In contrast, the
internal auditors provide the least significant rating
to the action "Transparently declare responsibilities
and services to the client," which has a (RII) of
0.716, indicating a high-medium-important level.
Additionally, this aspect has a mean score of 3.58,
positioning it in the ninth rank.
Among all participants, the item "Follow
international audit standards for account auditing"
retains its foremost position with a (RII) of 0.836,
denoting high importance (H), and an average score
of 4.18, placing it at the top rank as a crucial factor
in maintaining external auditor integrity. However,
there is room for improvement in "Transparently
declare responsibilities and services to the
client," which received the lowest rating in terms of
importance from all participants, a (RII) of 0.724,
which denotes a high-medium level of importance.
Additionally, it has a mean score of 3.62, placing it
in the ninth position in terms of ranking.
Table 8 shows that financial managers and
internal auditors perceive external auditors as
adhering positively to the principles of objectivity,
with an adherence level of high to moderate (H-M).
The average scores for their perception were 3.77,
3.70, and 3.72 for financial managers, internal
auditors, and all participants, respectively. The
perception variability was low, as shown by a
standard deviation of 0.58.
Within the realm of financial managers, the
attribute of "commitment to objectivity while
performing tasks" holds the first rank, as indicated
by a (RII) of 0.800 and supported by a mean score
of 4.00. In contrast, the aspect titled "Use of
statistical methods in selecting audit samples"
received the lowest rating, placing it in sixth place
with a (RII) of 0.692, an adherence level of high-
medium (H-M), and a mean score of 3.46.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
917
Volume 21, 2024
Table 8. Perceptions of External Auditor Objectivity Descriptive Analysis
Financial Managers
Internal Auditors
Total
No.
Objectivity Aspect
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
SD
1
Commitment to objectivity
while performing tasks.
4.00
0.800
1
H
3.63
0.726
5
H-M
3.74
0.748
5
H-M
0.78
2
Use of statistical methods
in selecting audit samples.
3.46
0.692
6
H-M
3.37
0.674
6
H-M
3.39
0.678
6
H-M
0.63
3
Adherence to the work
plan set by the responsible
auditor.
3.60
0.720
5
H-M
3.87
0.774
2
H-M
3.79
0.758
2
H-M
0.85
4
Documenting observations
in working papers and
retaining them.
3.93
0.786
2
H-M
3.89
0.778
1
H-M
3.90
0.78
1
H-M
0.94
5
Audit firm Instilling the
concept of objectivity
among auditors.
3.67
0.734
4
H-M
3.77
0.754
3
H-M
3.74
0.748
3
H-M
1.16
6
Estimating the materiality
of financial statement items
and the possible risks they
face.
3.93
0.786
3
H-M
3.66
0.732
4
H-M
3.74
0.748
4
H-M
1.09
The overall scale
3.77
0.754
H-M
3.70
0.740
H-M
3.72
0.744
H-M
0.58
Within the internal auditors, the activity of
"documenting observations in working papers and
retaining them" is regarded as having the highest
rank, with a RII of 0.778 and an adherence level of
high to moderate (H-M). These findings are
supported by an average score of 3.89. On the other
hand, the topic of "Use of statistical methods in
selecting audit samples" ranked at the bottom, with
a (RII) of 0.674, a high-medium adherence level (H-
M), and a mean score of 3.37, placing it in the sixth
position.
The findings suggest that the element of
"documenting observations in working papers and
retaining them" is perceived as highly significant by
all respondent groups. The mean score for this
aspect is 3.90 (H-M). Conversely, the element of
"use of statistical methods in selecting audit
samples" had the lowest level of importance
according to all categories of respondents, as
indicated by a mean score of 3.39 (H-M).
Accordingly, employing statistical methodologies
within the audit process is pivotal to upholding
objectivity.
Table 9 presents respondent responses
regarding the extent to which auditors adhere to
competency principles. Financial managers and
internal auditors positively perceived that auditors
adhered to the proficiency code of ethics. The mean
scores for financial managers, internal auditors, and
all respondents were 3.83, 3.82, and 3.82,
respectively, with high to moderate levels of
compliance and a standard deviation of 0.53, which
signifies a moderate degree of diversity.
The statement "Securing the necessary license
from auditing regulatory bodies" received the
highest average score among all respondents, with
an average score of 4.37 for financial managers,
4.34 for internal auditors, and 4.35 overall. The
observed high scores, along with RII values of 0.87,
which indicate a high adherence level, suggest that
the acquisition of the requisite license from auditing
regulatory authorities is seen as a significant
indicator of the competency of Jordanian auditors.
In contrast, there was variation observed in the
lowest mean score between finance managers and
internal auditors. Among financial managers, the
variable "accuracy of the auditor in identifying
client risks" ranked at the bottom and obtained the
lowest average score of 3.28 and a (RII) of 0.656,
indicating a high to moderate level of adherence.
While internal auditors assigned the lowest rating to
the statement "Auditors obtaining international
professional certifications," with a mean score of
3.51, a RII of 0.702, and a high to medium
adherence level, they placed it in the tenth position
in the ranking.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
918
Volume 21, 2024
Table 9. Perceptions of External Auditor Competence Descriptive Analysis
Financial Managers
Internal Auditors
Total
No.
Competence Aspects
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
SD
1
Securing the necessary
license from auditing
regulatory bodies
4.37
0.874
1
H
4.34
0.868
1
H
4.35
0.87
1
H
0.73
2
Training sessions
organized by the audit
office for auditors
3.46
0.692
9
H-M
3.57
0.714
8
H-M
3.54
0.708
9
H-M
0.83
3
Auditors obtaining
international
professional
certifications.
3.74
0.748
6
H-M
3.51
0.702
10
H-M
3.58
0.716
8
H-M
0.75
4
Selection of a qualified
academic and practical
work team.
3.58
0.716
8
H-M
3.73
0.746
7
H-M
3.68
0.736
6
H-M
1.18
5
Auditor's familiarity
with international audit
regulations, laws, and
standards.
4.28
0.856
2
H
4.08
0.816
2
H
4.14
0.828
2
H
0.78
6
Role of penalties in
cases of incompetence.
4.09
0.818
3
H
3.91
0.782
4
H-M
3.96
0.792
3
H-M
0.83
7
Exercising necessary
and sufficient
professional care.
3.95
0.790
4
H-M
3.85
0.770
5
H-M
3.88
0.776
5
H-M
0.93
8
Accuracy of the auditor
in identifying client
risks.
3.28
0.656
10
H-M
3.76
0.752
6
H-M
3.62
0.724
7
H-M
0.85
9
Presence of a quality
control system for
auditors' work.
3.6
0.720
7
H-M
3.52
0.704
9
H-M
3.54
0.708
10
H-M
0.81
10
Understand and fulfill
their Civil or criminal
responsibilities.
3.95
0.790
5
H-M
3.94
0.788
3
H-M
3.94
0.788
4
H-M
0.76
The overall scale
3.83
0.766
H-M
3.82
0.764
H-M
3.82
0.764
H-M
0.53
Table 10. Perceptions of External Auditor Confidentiality Descriptive Analysis
Financial Managers
Internal Auditors
Total
No.
Confidentiality Aspect
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
SD
1
Auditor's commitment to
client confidentiality when
providing information
4.09
0.818
3
H
3.97
0.794
2
H-M
4.01
0.802
2
H
0.89
2
Protecting company secrets
from competitors
4.09
0.818
4
H
3.9
0.78
4
H-M
3.96
0.792
4
H-M
0.83
3
information is provided
impartially, without
favoring certain parties
with relationships.
3.88
0.776
5
H-M
3.66
0.732
6
H-M
3.72
0.744
6
H-M
1.05
4
Compliance with auditing
standards and laws in the
Disclosure of information
4.28
0.856
1
H
4.18
0.836
1
H
4.21
0.842
1
H
0.95
5
Auditor's safeguarding of
client secrets through
disposal of working papers
3.56
0.712
6
H-M
3.89
0.778
5
H-M
3.79
0.758
5
H-M
1.14
6
Auditor's preservation of
client privacy through
Safeguarding client
confidentiality.
4.16
0.832
2
H
3.91
0.782
3
H-M
3.98
0.796
3
H-M
0.98
The overall scale
4.01
0.802
H
3.92
0.784
H-M
3.95
0.79
H-M
0.76
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
919
Volume 21, 2024
From all participants, it was observed that the
component with the lowest average score of 3.54
was "Presence of a quality control system for
auditors' work,". which ranked last and had a RII of
0.708, indicating a high to moderate level of
adherence. Therefore, fortifying quality control
systems can contribute to the enhancement of the
overall perception of competence among financial
managers, internal auditors, and all individuals
involved.
Table 10 shows that respondents have a positive
perception of auditors' adherence to confidentiality
principles. With a standard deviation of 0.76, the
mean scores for financial managers, internal
auditors, and all respondents were 4.01, 3.92, and
3.95, respectively, indicating a moderate degree of
heterogeneity. The adherence level was high to
moderate from the perspective of internal auditors
and both respondents combined. while a high
adherence level is observed from the perspective of
financial managers.
The statement "Compliance with auditing
standards and laws in disclosure of information"
ranked first for both respondents, with a high
adherence level (RII) of 0.856, 0.836, and 0.842, as
indicated by a mean score of 4.28, 4.18, and 4.21 for
financial managers, internal auditors, and all
respondents, respectively. This suggests that both
participants place great weight on the adherence of
external auditors to auditing standards and legal
requirements when sharing information.
In contrast, the financial manager ranked
"Auditor's safeguarding of client secrets through
disposal of working papers" at the bottom, at the
least important component, with a mean score of
3.56 and a RII of 0.712. and an adherence level of
high-medium. The dimension that received the
lowest rating in terms of importance, as assessed by
internal auditors and all respondents combined, is
"information is provided impartially, without
favoring certain parties with relationships,", with a
mean score of 3.66, 3.72, and a RII value of 0.732,
0.744, respectively, suggesting a high to moderate
level of importance. placing it in the lowest position
among the evaluated criteria.
In essence, enhancing the perceived competence
of external auditors in terms of confidentiality can
be achieved by directing attention towards two key
areas: bolstering auditor commitment to client
confidentiality during information provision and
safeguarding client secrets, as well as ensuring the
correct disposal of working papers.
Table 11. Perceptions of External Auditor Professional Behavior Descriptive Analysis
Financial Managers
Internal Auditors
Total
No.
Professional Behavior
Aspect
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
M
RII
Rank
Importance
SD
1
Auditor conducting work
honestly and with integrity.
3.92
0.784
1
H-M
3.93
0.786
2
H-M
3.92
0.784
1
H-M
0.94
2
The audit fees are
appropriate for the time
spent on an audit
3.73
0.746
6
H-M
3.87
0.774
5
H-M
3.83
0.766
4
H-M
1.12
3
Auditors not tarnishing the
reputation of fellow
auditors.
3.84
0.768
4
H-M
3.9
0.780
3
H-M
3.88
0.776
2
H-M
0.89
4
Auditors do not use
promotional methods that
violate professional ethics.
3.77
0.754
5
H-M
3.79
0.758
6
H-M
3.78
0.756
5
H-M
1.11
5
Auditor performing work
that serves the company's
interests.
3.32
0.664
8
H-M
3.95
0.790
1
H-M
3.76
0.752
7
H-M
0.81
6
Auditor's ability to service
various financial statement
users equally
3.42
0.684
7
H-M
3.78
0.756
7
H-M
3.67
0.734
8
H-M
0.79
7
The auditor not accepting
contingent fees.
3.89
0.778
3
H-M
3.73
0.746
8
H-M
3.77
0.754
6
H-M
0.89
8
Auditor's ability to use
international standards.
3.91
0.782
2
H-M
3.87
0.774
4
H-M
3.88
0.776
3
H-M
1.22
The overall scale
3.73
0.746
H-M
3.85
0.770
H-M
3.81
0.762
H-M
0.57
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
920
Volume 21, 2024
Table 11 indicates that compliance with
professional behavior by external auditors is
generally regarded positively, with mean scores of
3.73 for financial managers, 3.85 for internal
auditors, an overall mean score of 3.81, and a
modest degree of heterogeneity with a standard
deviation of 0.94.
Financial managers ranked the feature of
"auditor conducting work honestly and with
integrity" as the most significant, with a (RII) of
0.784. placed it in the first position with a high to
moderate level of adherence, as indicated by a mean
score of 3.92. This underscores the utmost
significance of ethical behavior as perceived by
financial managers. On the other hand, financial
managers consider the role of an "auditor
performing work that serves the company's
interests" to be of lesser significance (RII 0.664),
with an average rating of 3.32 and a high to
moderate level of adherence.
According to the findings, internal auditors
ranked "auditor performing work that serves the
company's interests" at the top, as indicated by a
(RII) of 0.790 and a mean score of 3.95. This
highlights the significance internal auditors place on
external auditors aligning their work with the best
interests of the firm. Nevertheless, there is a
relatively diminished significance placed on the
concept of auditors refusing to accept contingent
compensation. The RII of 0.746 and the mean value
of 3.73 indicate that internal auditors hold the belief
that external auditors should prioritize minimizing
the use of contingent fee arrangements to improve
their professional behavior.
Among the entire sample, the attribute "auditor
conducting work honestly and with integrity" was
evaluated as the most important. as supported by a
mean score of 3.92 and a RII of 0.784, with a high
to moderate level of adherence. The feature
"Auditor's ability to provide equal service to various
users of financial statements" received the lowest
rating with a mean score of 3.67 and a (RII) of
0.734, indicating a high to moderate level of
importance. Accordingly, to uphold professional
behavior, external auditors should enhance their
capacity to provide equitable service to diverse users
of financial statements, refrain from accepting
contingent payments, and guarantee that audit fees
align with the effort expended on audits.
4.4 Hypothesis Testing
To evaluate hypotheses one and two, a one-sample t-
test is used. The one-sample t-test is a statistical test
that is used to assess whether or not the sample
mean of a single group varies significantly from the
hypothesized population mean, which is calculated
to be (3), see equation 1. Based on this information,
the null hypothesis (Ho) states that "the sample
mean is less than 3," whereas the alternative
hypothesis (Ha) states that the sample mean does
not fall below 3 (a one-tailed right-tailed t-test).
4.4.1 Testing the First Hypothesis
The first hypothesis of this study asserts that
financial managers in Jordanian industrial
companies do not perceive a high level of
compliance with (independence, integrity,
objectivity, competence, confidentiality, and
professional behavior principles) among external
auditors.
Table 12 displays the results of a one-sample t-
test for all aspects of the code of ethics for
professional accountants from the perspective of
financial managers. The table demonstrates that the
p-value for each code of professional conduct was
less than the significance threshold of 0.05.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is not accepted, and
we adopt the alternative hypothesis, which states
that the financial manager perceives that the external
auditor complies with the code of ethics in every
respect.
Table 12. The one-sample t-test Results for the first hypothesis
* p<.05
Code of Ethics Principles
Mean
Calculated t value
p-value
Independence
3.84
5.2761
0.0004*
Integrity and transparency
3.84
14.2576
0.0000*
Objectivity
3.77
8.5717
0.0002*
Competence
3.83
7.3318
0.0000*
Confidentiality
4.01
9.6652
0.0001*
professional behavior
3.73
8.8977
0.0000*
All code of ethics
Principles
3.85
16.8004
0.0000*
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
921
Volume 21, 2024
4.4.2 Testing the Second Hypothesis
The second hypothesis asserts that internal auditors
in Jordanian industrial companies do not perceive a
high level of compliance with (independence,
integrity, objectivity, competence, confidentiality,
and professional behavior principles) among
external auditors.
Table 13 shows the results of the one-sample t-
test conducted to test the second hypothesis. The
table illustrates that the p-value for each code of
ethics principles, as well as for their combined
effect, was found to be below the predetermined
significance level of 0.05. As a result, the null
hypothesis is not accepted, and the alternative
hypothesis is supported, indicating that internal
auditors perceive that the external auditor adheres to
the code of ethics in all aspects.
4.4.3 Testing the Third Hypothesis
The third hypothesis posits that there is no
significant difference in the perception of
compliance with principles of independence,
integrity, objectivity, competence, confidentiality,
and professional behavior by external auditors
between financial managers and internal auditors in
industrial companies in Jordan. This study employed
an independent sample t-test to compare the mean
compliance judgments of internal auditors and
finance managers.
Table 14 displays the outcomes of the
independent sample t-test. The result shows that the
statistical significance of the variables of
independence, integrity, objectivity, competence,
confidentiality, and professional behavior was
assessed using p-values. The p-values obtained for
these variables were found to be 0.6999, 0.4414,
0.5874, 0.9496, 0.4792, and 0.1604, respectively.
Moreover, it was found that the p-value for all the
principles delineated in the Code of Ethics was
calculated to be 0.9877. Remarkably, it was noted
that all of the p-values obtained in this investigation
were above the predefined threshold of 0.05.
As a result of the study, the null hypothesis for
the third hypothesis has not been challenged. This
means that there is not a statistically significant
difference between the perceptions of financial
managers and internal auditors. The discovery is of
significant importance as it highlights the notable
convergence in ethical perspectives among diverse
professional groups. The implementation of this
alignment serves to enhance trust in the precision of
financial reporting, bolster the dependability of the
external audit process, and hold significant
implications for regulatory considerations and the
scholarly contributions of this study.
Table 13. The one-sample t-test Results for the second hypothesis
* p<.05
Table 14. Independent sample T-test Results for the third hypothesis
Code of Ethics Principles
Financial Manager
Mean
Internal Auditor
Mean
Calculated t value
p-value
Independence
3.84
3.77
0.3925
0.6999
Integrity
3.83
3.9
-0.7895
0.4414
Objectivity
3.77
3.7
0.5606
0.5874
Competence
3.83
3.82
0.0641
0.9496
Confidentiality
4.01
3.92
0.735
0.4792
professional behavior
3.73
3.85
-1.4822
0.1604
All code of ethics Principles
3.83
3.83
0.0155
0.9877
* p<.05
Code of Ethics Principles
Mean
Calculated t value
p-value
Independence
3.77
8.7878
0.0000*
Integrity
3.90
13.9572
0.0000*
Objectivity
3.70
8.886
0.0002*
Competence
3.82
9.8782
0.0000*
Confidentiality
3.92
13.4873
0.0000*
professional behavior
3.85
30.927
0.0000*
All code of ethics Principles
3.83
24.5798
0.0000*
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
922
Volume 21, 2024
5 Conclusion and Recommendations
5.1 Study Conclusion
This study examines the perceptions of financial
managers and internal auditors in Jordanian
industrial companies regarding the adherence of
external auditors to the IFAC's Code of Ethics. The
study findings show that both financial managers
and internal auditors perceive that external auditors
strictly follow the Code of Ethics. This congruence
of their agreement enhances the ethical competency
of the external auditor, thereby strengthening the
confidence and credibility of auditing practices in an
emerging country like Jordan. The findings give
insight into adherence to ethical standards in the
auditing landscape in Jordan, which in turn reflects
the role of the auditing regulating bodies'
effectiveness and stakeholder confidence.
The outcomes of this study agree with the study
of [24], on the other side our findings disagree with
the results of [23]. Moreover, the results are
consistent with prior research of [6], [16], [17], [19],
[20], [21], and [18]. All of the above studies
confirmed that strictly following a robust code of
ethics can improve auditing quality, lead to financial
statement reliability, foster public confidence, and
pave the way for a healthier investment
environment.
The consensus of the participant's perception of
external auditor compliance has a significant impact
on auditing practices and financial statement users.
The finding implies that ethical values are
prioritized in the auditing landscape in Jordan. This
is consistent with the auditing profession, which
advocates for a unified ethical framework. The
alignment of financial reporting and auditing
systems is anticipated to enhance trust and
confidence levels. The absence of significant
differences in ethical perceptions suggests that
existing regulations can promote ethical conduct
within the industry. This aligns with the ethical
perspectives of key professionals, such as financial
managers and internal auditors, which can enhance
stakeholder trust, resulting in a more transparent and
reliable financial reporting environment.
5.2 Study Recommendations
The outcome demonstrates that external auditors
comply with the code of ethics. Accordingly, this
study concludes that existing regulations are capable
of effectively promoting ethical behavior among
auditors. Descriptive statistics indicate that there is
room for improvement in some areas of the code of
ethics in the Jordanian auditing landscape, such as
ensuring independence from consulting and non-
audit services, incorporating statistical methods for
greater precision, enhancing the accuracy of risk
identification, maintaining confidentiality when
providing information, providing equitable financial
statement services, and avoiding contingent
payments.
Based on the above it is therefore recommended
that the auditing regulatory bodies elevate auditors'
adherence by considering the following
recommendations: the need for continuous
monitoring, industry education, ethical awareness,
research and development, public awareness, and
future research. Regulatory authorities have to
emphasize the need to continuously monitor and
evaluate the effectiveness of current legislation and
adapt to evolving sector dynamics. Industry
education is crucial for establishing the foundation
for ethical behavior, and comprehensive education
and training programs are essential for auditors to
understand ethical complexities and maintain their
dedication to ethical conduct. Ethical awareness is
essential for auditors to make ethical decisions
within their organizations, and promoting open
dialogues and discussions can help them handle
complex ethical dilemmas. Research and
development are crucial for auditors to maintain a
competitive edge in ethical deliberations and
anticipate emerging ethical concerns. Public
awareness should be guided by transparency and
openness, ensuring that all stakeholders, including
investors and the broader public, understand the
commitment of auditors to uphold ethical principles.
5.3 Limitations and Directions for Future
Research
The study has been conducted in Jordan as an
example of an emerging market. It would be
interesting to evaluate the adherence level of
external auditors in other emerging countries. In
addition, the study's limitation lies in its focus on
examining adherence solely from the perspective of
financial managers and internal auditors.
Considering other stakeholders, such as audit
committee members, the board of directors, and
shareholders of public companies, may provide a
more comprehensive understanding of external
auditors' compliance. Additionally, the study
focused only on the auditors of publicly listed
businesses in the industrial sector. Future research
should aim to investigate the external auditors of
other sectors, such as banks, insurance companies,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
923
Volume 21, 2024
and service organizations. Finally, it is imperative to
explore auditor ethics and performance in the
context of emerging technologies like AI and
blockchain.
References:
[1] Mayer, J. (2004). The manipulator. The New
Yorker, 80(15), 58.
[2] SEC (2023), Liquidated Public Shareholding
Companies. Jordan Securities and Exchange
Commission, [Online].
http://tinyurl.com/4nky6rzj (Accessed Date:
February 13, 2024).
[3] Freihat, A. F., Al-Shaar, I. H., & Farhan, A.
(2021). Code of ethics for professional
accountants and change the external auditor:
A study of the emerging markets. Corporate
Ownership & Control, 18(3), 201-212.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i3art16.
[4] Al-Farah, A. (2007). An investigation of an
audit expectation gap concerning the use of
computer-assisted audit techniques in
developing countries - the case of Jordanian
audit firms (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Newcastle University,
Australia, [Online].
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=
&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=
8&ved=2ahUKEwjWn9b76q-
EAxUVA9sEHTSjAmgQFnoECBUQAQ&ur
l=https%3A%2F%2Fnova.newcastle.edu.au
%2Fvital%2Faccess%2Fservices%2FDownl
oad%2Fuon%3A6879%2FATTACHMENT0
2&usg=AOvVaw0byaQ8ZaSsIlYqEpIHAIZb
&opi=89978449 (Accessed Date: February
16, 2024).
[5] Clarke, F., Dean, G. & Oliver, K. (2003)
Corporate Collapse: Accounting, Regulatory
and Ethical Failure, 2nd ed., Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
[6] Chang, A., Stefy, S., & Winny, W. (2022).
Compliance Analysis of the Implementation
of the Public Accountant Professional Code
of Ethics by Public Accountants in Indonesia.
Sinomics Journal, 1(5), 731-733.
https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v1i5.82.
[7] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
(2014). Report to the Nation on Occupational
Fraud and Abuse [PDF file]. Austin, TX:
Author [Online]. https://www.acfe.com/-
/media/files/acfe/pdfs/2014-report-to-
nations.pdf (Accessed Date: February 16,
2024).
[8] Papachristou, G., & Bekiaris, M. (2020).
Ethics in auditing. In E. Taylor & T. Williams
(Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of
Accounting Ethics (1st ed., pp. 17-28).
Routledge.
[9] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976).
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,
agency costs, and ownership structure.
Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-
360.
[10] Laptes, R. (2019). Ethics and integrity of the
professional accountant. Bulletin of the
Transilvania University of Braşov Series V:
Economic Sciences, 12(61), 11-18.
https://doi.org/10.31926/but.es.2019.12.61.2.
11.
[11] García Hernandez, B., Duréndez, A., & Rojo
Ramírez, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness of new
safeguards and prohibitions to protect audit
independence: an empirical research with
auditors. Spanish Journal of Finance and
Accounting / Revista Española de
Financiación y Contabilidad, 52(11), 1-31.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2022.2082
225.
[12] American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. (2014, July 1). Professional
Responsibilities, [Online].
https://us.aicpa.org/interestareas/personalfina
ncialplanning/resources/practicecenter/profes
sionalresponsibilities (Accessed Date:
February 13, 2024).
[13] Semba, H. D. (2016). The regulator's view of
audit quality: A focus on IAASB's proposed
framework from the perspective of
institutional theory. Academy of Accounting
and Financial Studies Journal, 20(3), 37-47.
[14] Al-Farah, A., Abbadi, S., & Al Shaar, E.
(2015). The Accounting and Auditing
Profession in Jordan: Its Origin and
Development. Developing Country Studies,
5(8), 167-179.
[15] Zurriah, R. (2020). The Influence of Auditor
Ethics, Audit Fee, and Auditor Motivation on
Audit Quality in Public Accounting.
International Proceeding of Law and
Economics, 2020(IPLE), 151. ISBN: 978-
623-6763-07-0.
[16] Azubuike, O., & Okegbe, T. (2015). The
Impact of Professional Accounting Ethics in
Quality Assurance in Audit. International
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
924
Volume 21, 2024
Journal of Academic Research in Business
and Social Sciences, 5(8), 64-78.
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i8/1761.
[17] Al-Naasan, S. (2018). Influencing factors on
audit quality from the viewpoint of external
auditors - A field study (Unpublished
master's thesis). The Islamic University of
Gaza, Gaza, Palestine [Online].
https://search.mandumah.com/Record/10143
08 (Accessed Date: February 16, 2024).
[18] Svanberg, J., & Öhman, P. (2016). Does
ethical culture in audit firms support auditor
objectivity? Accounting in Europe, 13(1), 65-
79.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.1164
324
[19] Giriraj, K. (2020). Ethics in accounting: An
analysis of current financial factors and role
of accountants. International Journal of
Management, 11(2), 241-254.
[20] Makarenko, E. N. (2021). The code of ethics
for professional accountants: Modern
tendencies and principles. Intelligenza
Artificiale, 22, 128-141.
[21] Ilemona, S. A., & Nwite, S. (2021).
Accounting Code of Ethics: Severity
Analysis of Threats to Compliance of
Auditors in Nigerian Business Environment.
Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 16-
22.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210901.13.
[22] Qtaish, H. (2021). Ethical rules of the audit
profession and the role of compliance in
narrowing the expectations gap between
auditors and financial statement users.
Studies of Applied Economics, 39(11), ISSN:
1697-5731. Editorial Universidad de
Almeria.
https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i11.5917.
[23] Uvaneswaran, S. M., & Muhammed, S.
(2022). Public accountants’ adherence to
professional standards and accounting ethics.
International Journal of Research in
Management, 4(1), 15-22.
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648792.2022.v4.i
1a.51.
[24] Bulo, A., Mahaluça, F., Vilanculos, A.,
Mabjaia, E., Maite, A., Macuacua, J., &
Manhique, O. (2020). Analysis of the level of
compliance with the code of ethics in the
accounting profession. Journal of Accounting
and Taxation, 12(10), 142-150.
[25] Mostafa, D., & Hussien, M. (2010). The
impact of auditor rotation on the audit
quality: A field study from Egypt [Working
paper]. The German University in Cairo,
Faculty of Management Technology.
[26] SDC. (2023). Public Shareholding
Companies - Industry Sector. Securities
Depository Center, [Online].
https://www.sdc.com.jo/english/index.php?m
ember_cat=900&member_sub_cat=4&option
=com_public (Accessed Date: February 16,
2024).
[27] Akadiri, O. P. (2011). Development of a
Multi-Criteria Approach for the Selection of
Sustainable Materials for Building Projects
[Doctoral Dissertation, University of
Wolverhampton], UK, [Online].
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215
568358_DEVELOPMENT_OF_A_MULTI-
CRITERIA_APPROACH_FOR_THE_SELE
CTION_OF_SUSTAINABLE_MATERIALS
_FOR_BUILDING_PROJECTS (Accessed
Date: February 16, 2024).
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.76
Abdelrazaq Farah Freihat
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
925
Volume 21, 2024