the trust of the brand spokesperson (Table 5,
Appendix).
Analysis results can be seen from Table 5,
(Appendix), charm is verified to have a meaningful
effect on reliability. The group with high
attractiveness (M=4.64, SD=1.63) showed higher
trust than the group with low attractiveness
(M=3.37, SD=1.40). Statistically significant (t=-
7.20, p<.001). Therefore, study hypothesis 4 holds.
4.7 The Main Effect of Reliability
A simple regression analysis (Regression analysis)
was conducted to examine the effect of trust on
consumer response (content attitude, brand attitude,
purchase intention).
The study hypotheses are as follows:
Study hypothesis 5. Trust will have a positive
(+) impact on consumer response (Table 6,
Appendix).
The analysis results are shown in Table 6,
(Appendix) and the explanatory power of trust on
advertising attitude, brand attitude, and purchase
intention are 20%, 19%, and 38% respectively, and
has significant statistical significance (β=.45,
p<.001) (β=.44, p<.001) (β=.51, p<.001). It has been
confirmed that the higher the trust of the
spokesperson, the more positive the consumption
reaction. So, the study hypothesis 5 holds true.
4.8 The Mediation Effect of Trust Degree
This study sought to explore whether
trustworthiness plays a mediating role between
spokesperson type, perceived humanity, self-
consistency, and charm, and consumer response.
Previously, the test of research hypotheses 1, 2, 3,
and 4 confirmed the statistically significant
relationship between the type of spokesperson and
the perception of humanity, self-consistency, and
charm on trust. Through the verification of study
hypothesis 5, we confirmed that trust has a
meaningful impact on consumer response. To verify
the medium effect of trust, the hierarchical multiple
regression analysis method proposed in [34], is
implemented. The research question is as follows.
Research question 2. Will there be a media
effect between the type of spokesperson, perception
of humanity, charm, self-consistency, and consumer
response?
4.8.1 Model Type, Perception of Humanity, Self-
Consistency, Charm and Advertising
Attitude
Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was
performed to investigate whether trust plays a
mediating role between model type, perceived
humanity, charm, self-consistency, and advertising
attitudes (Table 7, Appendix).
The results are shown in Table 7 (Appendix).
First of all, the test passed the first stage and
determined that the type of spokesperson,
perception of humanity, self-consistency, and charm
have a meaningful influence on trust, respectively (β
=.375, p<.001) (β=.467, p<.001) (β=.420, p<.001)
(β=.468, p<.001), Secondly, through the test of step
2, the model type, perception of humanity, self-
consistency and charm have meaningful effects on
advertising attitude, respectively (β =.465, P<.001)
(β=.434, P<.001) (β=.430, P<.001) (β=.436,
P<.001). Again, through the test of step three, the
influence of model type, human nature perception,
self-consistency, charm, and trust on advertising
attitude is confirmed. The results showed that the
influence of model type, perceived humanity, self-
consistency, charm, and trust on advertising attitude
were respectively (β=.344, P<.001) (β=.284,
P<.001) (β=.291, P<.001) (β=.286, P<.001) are
lower than the standardized coefficient values of the
second stage, which means that the trust degree has
a partial mediating effect between them.
Specifically, in terms of the explanatory power of
advertising attitude, the first stage was 14%, 22%,
18%, and 22% respectively, and the intermediary
effect of trust increased to 31%, 27%, 28%, and
27% respectively. Thus, the partial mediating effect
of reliability was verified.
4.8.2 Model Type, Perception of Humanity, Self-
Consistency, Charm and Brand Attitude
A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was
conducted to investigate whether trust plays an
intermediary role between model type, perceived
humanity, personal innovation, charm, and brand
attitude (Table 8, Appendix).
The results are shown in Table 8 (Appendix).
First of all, the test passed the first stage, and
determined that the type of spokesperson,
perception of humanity, self-consistency, and charm
have a meaningful influence on trust, respectively
(β=.375, p<.001) (β=.467, p<.001) (β=.420, p<.001)
(β=.468, p<.001), Secondly, through the test of step
2, the model type, perceived humanity, self-
consistency and trust have meaningful influence on
brand attitude, respectively (β =.367, P<.001)
(β=.421, P<.001) (β=.382, P<.001) (β=.388,
P<.001). Again, through the test of step 3, the
influence of the model type, human nature
perception, self-consistency, charm, and trust on the
brand attitude is confirmed. The results showed that
the influence of model type, perceived humanity,
self-consistency, charm, and trust on brand attitude
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.64
Li Li, Shanshan Liu, Jong-Yoon Lee