The Impact of Employee Engagement and Employee Motivation on
Employee Turnover Intention and the Mediating Role of Organizational
Commitment
MERLIN, PANDE KETUT TAMARA ARDHANARESWARI, YOVITA HASTIKA,
ABDUL ROHMAN
Department of Management,
Binus Business School Master Program,
Bina Nusantara University,
11480, Jakarta,
INDONESIA
Abstract: - This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of reducing Turnover Intention (TI) by
examining the role of Organizational Commitment (OC) in mediating the relationship between Employee
Engagement (EE) and Employee Motivation (EM) toward TI. This study is designed as quantitative research
that surveyed 105 employees using online questionnaires in the Sales Marketing division of Fast Moving
Consumer Goods (FMCG) companies in the Jabodetabek area, Indonesia. SmartPLS 3.0 was used to analyze
the data to obtain the SEM model form and hypothesis outcomes. This study found that EE had an insignificant
positive effect on OC, while EM had an insignificant negative effect on OC. This study also remarkably found
that OC did not serve the role of mediating the relationship between EE on TI and EM on TI. However, the
study has revealed that EM and OC have a significant negative effect on TI, while EE has a significant positive
effect on TI. In conclusion, these existing results indicate that, besides these three variables, other variables
may affect TI in FMCG industrial organizations.
Key-Words: - Employee Engagement (EE), Employee Motivation (EM), Organizational Commitment (OC),
Turnover Intention (TI), FMCG, Sales, Marketing, Consumer Goods.
Received: August 11, 2023. Revised: November 29, 2023. Accepted: December 31, 2023. Published: January 12, 2024.
1 Introduction
COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated three trends
among employees in terms of the pursuit of
meaning, the desire for flexibility, and the speed of
technological transformation, which has enabled
hybrid and virtual working but has also
fundamentally changed jobs and the skills required,
[1]. A study conducted by McKinsey discovered
that within the next six months, several employees
will resign or plan to leave their jobs, [2]. In a
survey conducted by Microsoft of more than 30.000
employees globally in 2021, 41% considered
quitting or switching jobs. A phenomenon where
companies experienced high turnover rates, and
experts predicted a new wave of voluntary
resignations and retirements is known as the great
resignation. Dr. Anthony Klotz first coined the term
Great Resignation, referring to the estimated
number of employees leaving their jobs during or
towards the end of the pandemic. Klotz argued that
individual awareness has increased due to the
pandemic, especially about family time, remote
work, passion for work, and life and death, which
has changed how individuals view work, [3]. As
stated by, [3], that great resignation can also be
interpreted as an intention to resign, posing a severe
risk to the organization. With this great resignation
phenomenon, companies in ASEAN countries face
an increasing shortage of skilled labor and the
challenge of transitioning employees’ work set-up
from working at home to working in the office, [4].
This research focused on the Fast-Moving
Consumer Goods (FMCG) industry. The FMCG
industry refers to companies that sell products
quickly with prices that tend to be cheaper so that
their products have a short shelf life. The FMCG
industry sells products in large quantities and has a
relatively high product turnover rate, so its market
share is small and competitive. Therefore, as the
primary source of the company's revenue, the Sales
Marketing division becomes the organization's front
line because the organization is required to achieve
high sales volume to compensate for low profit
margins. The FMCG industry is also experiencing
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
512
Volume 21, 2024
changes due to the pandemic, ranging from
difficulties in obtaining candidates, challenges
related to retention, flexibility, and hybrid working,
and problems from external pressures related to the
competition to acquire high-quality talents, [5].
TI reflects the withdrawal behavior and the
encouragement of employees' awareness to leave
the organization shortly, [6]. When an organization
is aware of the risk of the intention to resign among
its employees, it can keep its key talents and attract
the best talents so that they do not desire to move to
the competitors, [3]. In order to avoid these negative
impacts, organizations must be wise and creative to
retain their best talents, develop critical skills to fill
the existing gaps and attract prospective new talents
to join the company.
Organizations will be more successful with
engagement among employees and can improve
business performance when organizations treat
employees as stakeholders for their future and
organizations. It means focusing on actual
management performance activities such as
clarifying job expectations, giving directions to
employees about what they need to do with their
work, providing professional and career
development, and building positive coworking
relationships. Engaged employees will deliver better
performance and do more than expected. The
challenges of organizations today are maintaining
existing talents, engaging them, and understanding
their thoughts and feelings at every stage of their
work, [7].
About 81% of employees surveyed had an
engagement, and 19% had no engagement.
Employees who do not engage tend to perform
poorly, actively seek other jobs, and say bad things
about the management or organization in which
they work, [8]. This research, [9], shows the
achievements Caterpillar can make as a
manufacturer of assembly construction equipment
due to EE that can save about $8.8 million in cost
turnover. In addition to EE, OC is critical in
determining more value in the organization,
increasing EM and EE, [10]. Research by, [11],
[12], also stated that EE positively correlates with
OC. An organization will look attractive when it has
employees with high commitments because when
employees are committed to the organization, it will
result in low turnover levels, increase EM, improve
the organization, and provide sustainable support,
[13]. OC is critical in determining more value in the
organization, and increasing EM and EE, [10].
Employee turnover within an organization is
considered normal. However, it should be noted that
if the organization involves its employees, the
chances of an employee with good quality and
motivation for work, experienced and skilled,
suddenly resigning can be minimized, [14]. TIs can
occur due to the influence of several variables, such
as motivation and OC, [15], [16], [17], [18]. In
addition to the motivation and commitment of the
organization, other factors also affect the TI of EE.
Employee involvement in an organization will put
much effort into its work and tend to surpass the
expected work goals, [7]. Based on this research,
[19], affirmed that engagement affects the level of
OC among employees. Previous research has shown
that EE has a significant positive impact on OC,
[20], [21]. Based on the research, it can be
concluded that EE and EM positively impact OC,
which has a negative impact on TI. However, no
research has examined OC as a mediation variable
that will mediate EE and EM with TI. In this study,
we want to investigate whether the impact of EE
and EM on TI will increase after being mediated by
OC.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Employee Engagement (EE)
EE is an exploration of conditions in the workplace
where people are personally involved, express and
employ themselves, and disengage or withdraw and
defend their values, [22]. EE is a positive behavior,
satisfaction, and state of mind related to work
characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption,
[19], [23].
EE consists of three dimensions, including: (1),
vigor, referring to the employee's level of energy
and perseverance in dealing with difficulties, (2),
dedication, referring to a sense of involvement and
pride in the work, and, (3), absorption, referring to
the point at which the employee becomes so
absorbed in the work that time passes quickly, [19].
2.2 Organizational Commitment (OC)
OC is defined as a feeling of obligation by
employees towards their organization to remain
together due to normative internalization that
employees experience both before and after entering
the organization, [24]. Employees' commitment to
the organization is essential as it affects their
engagement and contributes to their retention, [25],
[26]. OC can be summarized as the loyalty and care
shown by employees and the desire to stay in the
organization.
The three-dimensional model of OC includes:
(1), affective commitment (reflects the emotional
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
513
Volume 21, 2024
attachment to the organization), (2), continuance
commitment (reflects the need to stay due to the
calculation of costs and benefits or economic
benefits obtained from the organization), (3),
normative commitment (the employee's feeling of
responsibility or 'obligation' to the organization due
to the implementation or appreciation of the loyalty
norms given by the employee to the organization),
[27].
2.3 Employee Motivation (EM)
Motivation is the process that initiates, guides, and
maintains behavior to achieve goals. Motivation
leads individuals to take action to achieve their
expected goals, [28]. Motivation is encouraging
employees' behavior to contribute better to their
work, [29].
Based on theory, [30], they found out that what
makes people happy is what they do or the way
they’re utilized, and what makes people unhappy is
the way they’re treated. Two factors influence
employees' motivation: (1), motivating factors, and,
(2), hygiene factors. Motivating factors are
motivated by changing the nature of the work
related to achievement, recognition, the job itself,
job advancement opportunities, and growth
opportunities. Hygiene factors are those that the
employee expects to be in good condition including
salary, status, company policies, physical
workspace, relationships with coworkers, and job
security.
2.4 Turnover Intention (TI)
According to, [31], TI is an employee's desire to
leave the organization due to an incompatibility
between individual and organizational values.
Research by, [32], stated that TI is an employee's
desire to leave the organization due to
dissatisfaction with the job or the workplace.
Proposed that three indicators measure TI: (1),
thoughts of quitting (employee has the thought to
quit or stay in the current workplace), (2), intention
to quit (employee's intention to seek a position in
other organizations), (3), intention to search for
another job (employee's intention to resign from
their job), [33]. The hypotheses put forward in this
study are as follows:
H1: EE has a significant positive effect on OC.
Engagement is a process in which employees
invest themselves emotionally, cognitively, and
physically in what they do, [22]. Engagement is one
of the essential factors in forming employee
commitment to the organization, [34]. A recent
study, [35], found that engagement is related to
several aspects of commitment, including affective,
normative, and continuous commitment. EE has a
significant positive effect on OC, so the more
employees are involved at work, the higher their
commitment to the organization or institution, [36].
H2: EM has a significant positive effect on OC.
A study by, [37], suggested that employees'
motivation and commitment are critical to the
organization's success. Employees' motivation and
commitment to the organization are essential factors
in an organization because the relationship between
these two aspects has an influence that provides
strength and helps employees achieve their targets.
Research by, [38], showed that motivation is
positively related to OC. The positive effect of EM
on OC automatically indicates the organization's
success. Employees with high motivation will
develop a commitment to the organization because
they feel their needs are fulfilled by joining the
organization, [39]. Therefore, EM needs to be
developed at various levels in the organization to
build employee commitment to their work, [40].
H3: OC has a significant negative effect on TI.
A recent study by, [41], suggested that
maintaining OC is essential because employees with
a higher sense of commitment to the organization
will stay longer. The higher employees'
commitment to their organization, the lower the
level of TI, [42]. This is aligned with research
conducted in Western, Asian, and African countries
showing a negative relationship between OC and
TI, [43].
H4: OC mediates the relationship between EE
and TI.
As mentioned in, [23], explained that EE can
grow a solid OC that gives employees a sense of
connection and belonging to the organization, so
they tend to choose not to leave their organization.
Sufficient resources and supportive supervision
influence employee commitment to the
organization, so these committed employees will
choose to stay in the organization, [44]. EE needs to
be built in an organization because when employees
are not engaged, it will reduce their enthusiasm and
commitment to the organization, impacting
employees' desire to leave the organization, [45].
H5: OC mediates the relationship between EM
and TI.
Basic human needs must be fulfilled for
individuals to feel motivated in their work, [46].
When these basic needs are being fulfilled, highly
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
514
Volume 21, 2024
motivated employees tend to have higher levels of
OC and less desire to resign. EM will contribute to
an increase in OC and reduce the level of TI.
Fig. 1: Research Model
H6: EM has a significant negative effect on TI.
A study by, [47], defined motivation as an
attribute that forces individuals to do something or
not. This motivation is divided into two types,
which are intrinsic and extrinsic, which are the
driving forces for individuals to do something.
These intrinsic and extrinsic motivation factors are
crucial in building long-term relationships between
companies and employees, [48]. As mentioned in,
[49], conducted empirical research that examined
the effect of motivation on TI, and the result was
that motivation has a negative effect on TI.
H7: EE has a significant negative effect on TI.
Based on this research, [50], reported that
employees with a high level of engagement are
confident that they can positively impact the quality
of the company's products and provide good
customer service,. The research also showed that
employees with a higher engagement level are more
likely to plan to stay with the organization.
Emotional, cognitive, and behavioral engagement
significantly enables employees to invest in their
knowledge, skills, and abilities back to the
organization by voluntarily maintaining their jobs
by offering their resources, [51]. Therefore,
engagement plays a significant role in employees'
desire to stay or not in an organization. This study
by, [12], found that disengaged employees are more
likely to seek new jobs actively.
Based on the explanations, the study model
framework can be illustrated in Figure 1.
3 Methodology of Research
3.1 Methodological
This research is a quantitative study using a
hypothetico-deductive approach. Hypothesis testing
is based on the results of the survey data that has
been collected so that it can accurately determine
whether the research hypothesis can be supported or
not and to what extent the research problem can be
solved. Thus the theoretical framework becomes an
essential step in the research process, [52]. This
study aims to gain a deeper understanding of TI and
how OC can mediate the effect of EE and EM on TI.
The survey was conducted by distributing
questionnaires to all respondents electronically
through Google Forms. The questionnaire is divided
into 4 (four) sections. Section 1 measures EE
variables using the Utrecht Work Engagement
Scale, [34]. This scale measures the three
dimensions of EE: vigor, absorption, and
dedication. Section 2 measures EM variables using
Herzberg's Two Factors Motivation Theory
indicators which are applied by measuring two
dimensions: motivating factors and hygiene factors.
Section 3 measures the OC variable using the OC
Questionnaire indicators developed by Allen and
Meyer to describe affective, continuance, and
normative commitment, [26]. Section 4 measures the
TI variable using indicators such as, I often think
about quitting my current job,’ I will probably look
for a new job next year,’ and, As soon as possible, I
will leave the organization.’ Measurement of all
indicators uses Likert scale elaborated into five
points, 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 =
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
515
Volume 21, 2024
Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, which
describes the level of respondent agreement with the
statements in each variable measuring instrument.
3.2 Population and Sampling
The sampling population in this study are employees
who work in the FMCG industry in Indonesia,
particularly those located in the Jabodetabek area.
The population parameters used aim at employees
with an age range of 24-40 years and a minimum
length of work of 1 (one) year with the assumption
that during 1 (one) year, the employees have been
able to adapt well and understand the company
culture in which they work. The technique sampling
used a purposive sampling approach to lead to
employees who specifically served in the Sales
Marketing division but were not limited to positions
from staff level to top-level management. The
number of samples taken was 105 respondents. The
survey-questionnaire was distributed through
Google Forms, and respondents who met the criteria
filled in the form.
3.3 Data Analysis
Based on the data collection methods and variable
measurements above, it is known that this research
is a Structural Equation Model (SEM) modeling,
that EE and EM are independent variables, and OC
as a mediator variable that mediates the influence of
EE and EM on TI as the dependent variable.
Therefore, this study used the PLS-SEM approach
to examine the validity and reliability of research
instruments and to test the complexity of the
relationship between latent variables through
SmartPLS 3.0 software, [53]. SmartPLS 3.0 is used
to examine the direct relationship between the
independent variable and the dependent variable as
well as indirect relationships such as mediation
effects that arise from mediator variables, which
will provide more detailed and accurate results of
testing the relationship between variables.
4 Results
4.1 Demographic Results
All respondents were from the sales marketing
division in the FMCG industry. A total of 105
respondents were divided into 64 men and 41
women.
Most extended working experience ranges from
10 to 15 years 28.6%, 5 to 10 years 25.7%, over 15
years 19.6%, 3-5 years 11.4%, and last ranked with
less than two years (minimum 1 year) of work
which was 5.7%.
4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)
CFA tests measure whether a construct is consistent
with a latent variable. To provide an in-depth
analysis, we meticulously refined our model by
excluding indicators that did not meet the validity
requirements as illustrated in Figure 2.
Fig. 2: SEM analysis results
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
516
Volume 21, 2024
Table 1. Outer Loadings
Referring to Table 1 can be concluded that not
all particles have outer loading >0.708, there are
some particles such as EEA1 (0.61), EEV3 (0.60),
EMHG1 (.656), EMHg2 (.564), EMHPC1 (0.693),
EMHSB1 (0.641), EMMC1 (.0695), EMMO2
(0.59), EMMP1 (0.63), OCN3 (0.624), OCC2 (0.7).
Details below 0.78 are retained because if referring
to the second criterion, the AVE value is >0.5.
4.3 Validity Test
For the validity test, convergent and discriminant
were used. In assessing convergent validity, factor
loadings were examined to ensure they exceeded the
threshold of 0.500. Test for convergent validity
using the Average Variance Extracted (AVE).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
517
Volume 21, 2024
Table 2 shows the results of AVE for each
dimension and variable. The AVE value is above
0.5, meaning all constructions qualify for
convergent validity based on outer loading and
AVE.
Several methods for discriminant validity testing
were employed, the Fornell Larcker results were
presented, considered the most accurate test. Table
3 shows the Fornell Larcker ratios for all variables.
All variables have no discriminant validity problem
if observed from the available results.
In addition, it is also done by looking at the
cross-loading value on the measurement of the
structure that can show the magnitude of the
correlation value between each structure with its
indicator as well as the indicator of the construction
on the other blocks.
Table 2. Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
Table 3. Fornell Larcker Criterion
4.4 Reliability Test
Table 4. Construct Reliability & Validity
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
518
Volume 21, 2024
In Table 4, Construct reliability will be seen
from Cronbach's Alpha and composite reliability
with a minimum limit of 0.7. If we look at the
available data, everything already meets the
minimum limits that have been set.
4.5 Effect of F-Square and R-Square
A determination coefficient is a coefficient that
indicates how far a free variable's contribution in a
regression model can explain the variation of a
bound variable.
From Table 5, this R-Square value shows that
both variables, EM and EE, can explain the
variability of OC of 100%. Whereas OC can explain
the variability of the TI of 50.5%.
Table 5. The R-Square
Table 6. The F-Square
Refer to Table 6, F-Square value is divided into
three: 0.02 is meant to have a small influence, 0.15
has a moderate influence, and 0.35 has a large
influence. Based on the table, small influences with
a value of 0.02 to 0.15 are the influence of EE on
OC, EM on OC, and EM on TI. A medium influence
with a value of 0.15 to 0.35 is the impact of OC on
TI of 0.2.
4.6 Hypothesis Testing
As mentioned in, [54], defined OC as the extent to
which an individual identifies himself with an
organization and is committed to its goals. Likewise,
OC refers to the loyalty and commitment of
employees to their organization. Meanwhile, EE
refers to employee loyalty and commitment to their
work. It means that individuals who commit to their
work are not necessarily highly committed to the
organization. In Table 7 showed a non-significant
positive relationship between EE and OC (H1).
Statistically, p-value 0.488> 0.05 and t value 0.31 <
1.645. It means that increasing EE does not mean
increasing OC. OC is defined as the extent to which
an individual identifies himself with an organization
and is committed to its goals, [54]. OC refers to the
loyalty and commitment of employees to their
organization. EE refers to employee loyalty and
commitment to their work. It means that individuals
who commit to their work are not necessarily highly
committed to the organization. The individual's
characteristics are mainly on the dispositional
variables that play a significant role because the
experience between individuals to an organization is
different, affecting the higher or lower individual
commitments to the organization, [26].
In the second hypothesis (H2), refer to Table 7,
EM has a negative significance to OC is rejected.
Individuals are motivated because they enjoy doing
actual tasks or the challenge of completing tasks,
[37]. Such motivations influencing individuals'
behavior include responsibility, freedom of action,
scope to use and develop skills and abilities,
attractive and challenging jobs, and advancement
opportunities. OC refers to the loyalty and
commitment of employees to their organization. A
different concern between EM is that the motivated
individual has an inward urge for personal
achievement unrelated to the individual's
commitment to the organization. This study also
proved that EM has a negative influence not
significantly on OC with p values 0.325 > 0.05 and
0.454 < 1.645, which indicates that employees
motivated or not in work do not influence their
commitment to the organization.
Table 7. Direct Hypothesis Test
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
519
Volume 21, 2024
Table 8. Indirect Hypothesis Test
Individuals who have a high commitment to an
organization will influence the level of desire to
resign from an organization. Three dimensions that
build OC are affective, normative, and continuance
commitment. OC is one of employees' most critical
and sensitive attitudes toward their organization. At
the same time, a decrease in turnover rates
demonstrates the positive effect of OC, [56]. For the
third hypothesis (H3), OC has a significant negative
influence on the TI shown with a statistical value p
value 0.036 < 0.05 t value 1.805 > 1.645. Path
coefficient -0.259. Individuals who have
commitments to the organization, their behavior
within the organization can be predictable about
their decision to stay in the organization or not, [57].
In some previous studies, such OC is a form of
individual loyalty to the organization and
willingness to dedicate themselves to jointly
achieving the goals of the organization, [58]. The
level of employee commitment to the organization is
influenced by adequate resources and supportive
supervision so that these committed employees will
choose to survive in the organization, [44].
Therefore, strategies are needed to increase OC to
overcome TI. EE becomes an important concept that
needs to be built in an organization because when an
employee does not engage, it will reduce employee
enthusiasm and commitment to the organization,
affecting the employee's desire to move out of the
organization, [45].
From our research, Table 8 showed that the
results refute the existing theory. Our fourth
hypothesis (H4), OC has proved not to mediate the
relationship between EE and TI because the focus of
these two variables is different. EE refers to
employee loyalty and commitment to their work.
OC is the extent to which an individual identifies
with the organization and is committed to its goals.
Therefore, in line with the results of this study, it is
obtained that the p-value is 0.49 > 0.05, and the t-
value is 0.025 < 1.645 (where the condition to be
met is t-value> 1.645). The data results mean that
OC does not play the role of mediation that mediates
between EE and TI.
In addition to engagement, there is another
concept that has been proven to increase
commitment to the organization and lower TI,
namely, EM. Recent studies, [38], showed that
motivation is positively linked to OC. The positive
impact of EM on OC automatically indicates the
organization's success and, of course, lowers TI. Our
fifth hypothesis (H5) hypothesis was rejected, the
study showed that the role of OC was not proven to
mediate the relationship between EM and TI with a
p-value of 0.358> 0.05 and t value of 0,363 < 1.645
(where the requirement to be met is t value > 1.645)
and positive path coefficient of 0.00. It aligns with a
direct test between EM and OC. It has no significant
positive impact because OC refers to employee
loyalty and commitment to the organization. It
differs from EM, where a motivated individual has
an inward urge for personal achievement unrelated
to the individual's commitment to the organization.
Ultimately, OC does not mediate the relationship
between EM and TI.
A significant inverse correlation was revealed,
resulting in the validation of sixth hypothesis (H6).
The study results showed a significant negative
relationship between EM and TI. Statistically, the p-
value is 0.00 < 0.05, and t value 3.891 > 1.645. Path
coefficient -0.507 which means that the higher the
level of EM in the workplace, the lower the degree
of the employee's desire to leave the organization.
Motivation has a significant relationship to
employee TI because, without EM, employee
turnover in an organization will increase, [59]. The
research by, [60], conducted research at a bank and
found a positive impact of motivation on employee
retention. According to this research, [61], who
stated that unmotivated employees leave the
organization when they see an opportunity.
Employees who are highly committed to the
organization will lower the TI rate. EE is a crucial
aspect of a business, [62]. EE becomes one of the
most important factors because of the declining
intention of employees to resign, [63]. According to
Kahn, employees feel happier when they are
involved in organizations, and this involvement
results in positive things such as higher levels of
creativity and fewer employee absences, [22].
The seventh hypothesis (H7) that proposed EE
has a negative significant to TI. Contrarily, the study
did not validate this hypothesis. The study results
show a significant positive relationship between EE
and TI. Statistically p value 0.067 > 0.05 and t value
1.499 < 1.645. Path coefficient 0.174, means that
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
520
Volume 21, 2024
the higher the employee's level of engagement
towards the organization, does not affect the
employee's desire to exit organization. EE comes
from the internal willingness of every individual to
engage with the organization. According to, [64],
failure in EE as a predictor of TI is due to factors
both inside and outside the organization, such as
organizational culture, quality of working life,
employee experience, [64], [67].
5 Discussion
5.1 The Impact of EE on OC and TI
EE refers to employee loyalty and commitment to
their work. OC refers to the loyalty and commitment
of employees to their organization. It means that
individuals who commit to their work are not
necessarily highly committed to the organization.
This study also showed that EE had a positive,
insignificant influence to OC, [54]. In terms of OC,
several factors influence the commitment of an
organization, such as: (1), individual personal
characteristics are divided into two variables,
namely demographic variables (gender type, age)
and disposal variables, these dispositional variables
are strongly linked to OC due to differences in
individual experience within the organization, (2),
organizational characteristics such as organizational
structure, design of wisdom in the organization, and
the way such wisdom is socialized, (3),
organizational experience that includes EM
throughout the organization, role, and relationship
between employees and their superiors, [55]. Of the
factors that influence commitment to an
organization, the individual's characteristics are
mainly on the dispositional variables that play a
significant role because the experience between
individuals to an organization is different, affecting
the higher or lower individual commitments to the
organization.
EE becomes one of the most important factors
because of the declining intention of employees to
resign, [63], employees feel happier when they are
involved in organizations, and this involvement
results in positive things such as higher levels of
creativity and fewer employee absences. According
to, [64], failure in EE as a predictor of TI is due to
factors both inside and outside the organization,
such as organizational culture and quality of
working life.
5.2 The Impact of EM on OC and TI
EM consists of two dimensions, motivating factor,
and hygiene factor. From the results of this study,
the motivating factor dimension has a value of 0.001
and the hygiene factor value of 0,000, which means
from this research, the average respondent is
motivated in work due to the presence of
achievement, recognition, the job itself, job
advancement opportunity, and growth opportunity.
The motivating factor is the same as intrinsic
motivation. Defines intrinsic motivation as “a
positive value experience that an employee has
directly from their job duties,” [65], arising from the
direct relationship between the perpetrator and the
job, [66], depending on the employee’s desire to
predict his/her behavior, [68]. Individuals are
motivated because they enjoy doing actual tasks or
the challenge of completing tasks, [37].
OC refers to the loyalty and commitment of
employees to their organization. A different target
between EM is that the motivated individual has an
inward urge for personal achievement unrelated to
the individual's commitment to the organization.
The high or low level of OC is influenced by several
factors, one of which is the individual's
characteristics, specifically on the disposition
variable, which plays a significant role because of
the experience between individuals to a different
organization, and this affects the higher or lower
level of individual commitment to the organization,
[26]. The results of this study also proved that EM
has a negative influence not significantly on OC
which indicates that employees motivated or not in
work do not influence their commitment to the
organization.
As stated by, [40], that there are several
strategies to improve EM. There are two dimensions
of EM: hygiene and motivating factors.
Organizations can do a combination of these two
dimensions to increase EM. From the results of the
tests that have been carried out, the higher EM
dimension is in the hygiene factor aspect of -0.001
compared to the motivating factor of -0.001. It
suggests that respondents involved will be more
motivated by both factors, arguing that in managing
dining talent, managers need to analyze well the
factors that motivate employees, [69]. The employee
turnover rate can be controlled by meeting the
factors that can motivate employees, [70].
5.3 Implication and Recommendation
According to the findings of the research, the
researchers aim to provide implications and
recommendations for the FMCG industry, focusing
on the sales marketing division.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
521
Volume 21, 2024
5.3.1 Implication for the FMCG Industry
As we can see, the role of EM and OC have a
significant influence on the employee's intention to
leave the organization, so the organization,
specifically the HR division, must have the right
strategy to enhance those aspects so that employee
turnover can be suppressed. The retention strategy
for each industry will be different because each
industry has its uniqueness and challenges, [71],
[72]. Industries with high employee turnover rates
result in significant loss of investment in HRM and
training, [55], and quality of service, profitability,
and corporate success, [73]. It is becoming a severe
problem, especially in the FMCG industry, known
for its fast-paced business patterns, so organizations
must use the right strategy to suit their needs to
reduce employee turnover rates.
Despite a survey by Microsoft on more than
30,000 global employees in 2021, 41% of
employees are considering quitting or changing
jobs. The phenomenon where companies experience
high turnover rates, and experts predict a new wave
is linked to resignation and voluntary resignations.
Great resignation occurs as the impact of an
individual's increasing awareness of the pandemic is
mainly related to family time, remote work, passion
for work, and life and death, which has changed the
way individuals think about a job, [3]. However, in
2023, when faced with a recession, lay off occurs in
many companies, it makes employees think
repeatedly about leaving the current organization
without getting a new job. It creates the possibility
that individuals are not motivated or not engaged
with the organization but are forced to stay because
there is no choice, thus provoking another
phenomenon of quiet quitting. The organization
must be able to identify such things so they do not
have a more severe impact.
5.3.2 Theoretical Implications
The theoretical implications of the study were that
EM and EE had no significant influence on OC. It is
due to the motivating factors of the individual,
whether or not motivated in work and engage or not
come from the internal factors of an individual.
However, it does not necessarily increase his
commitment to the organization because the
individual's experience in a different organization
will influence his commitment to that organization.
5.3.3 Recommendation
Researchers’ recommendations for companies,
especially in the FMCG industry, to overcome
employee turnover is to improve employee
experience in the organization. From the results of
discussions, it was found that the level of individual
commitment in an organization, one of which is
influenced by the individual’s characteristics and
values, specifically dispositional variables, plays a
great role because an individual in an organization
varies and this influences the high or low level of
commitment, [26]. Employee experience is the
accumulation of all interactions that occur between
the employees and organization, [74]. The concept
of employee experience as something personal, the
result of feelings, beliefs, emotions, cognitive
perspectives, about external stimuli, directed
inward, [75], [76], [77], [78]. This experience will
be targeted to actualize certain needs or emotions
which will have an impact on increasing loyalty and
stronger bonds, [79]. Employee experience is
developed by creating a conducive work
environment and atmosphere, developing
employees, listening, and providing feedback. This
is important to do because employee experience will
have an impact on employee turnover, [67].
5.4 Limitations and Future Research
The suggestion that can be given for further research
is that the study needs to look specifically at the
differences between EE, EM, and OC versus TI
between generations. As is well known, each
generation has different characteristics and
perspectives in looking at a job. It will be exciting to
study further. Besides, the factors behind EE are
also interesting to study because employees who
engage alone are not enough, other factors can
influence their intention to resign from a company.
6 Conclusions
The research was conducted to examine the impact
of the role of mediation of OC between EE and EM
and TI in the FMCG industry, specifically in the
Sales Marketing division. From the various tests that
have been carried out, the following conclusions are
direct testing of existing variables found that two
hypotheses resulted in an inverse compared to the
existing theory. The two hypotheses are that EE has
a non-significant positive impact on OC and EM has
an insignificant negative impact on OC. It turns out
that because the individual has an engagement with
his work and is motivated to do his work, both of
these indicators come from within him, who desires
to be engaged and motivated in the work. However,
engaged and motivated individuals are not
necessarily individuals who have a high
commitment to the organization. It may be due to
the presence of specific individual personal
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
522
Volume 21, 2024
characteristic factors in the dispositional variables
that play a significant role because the experience of
each individual in the organization is different, and
this affects the high or low level of individual
commitment to the organization [26], rather than
employee involvement or motivation. EM and OC
have been shown to influence TIs significantly
negatively. It suggests that when an employee is
motivated either from within himself or by external
factors (such as salaries, benefits, and good
relationships with colleagues and superiors) will
decrease the desire to leave the organization. The
aspect of commitment to the organization is also an
important aspect. Employees with a high
commitment to their organization will lower their
desire to leave it. EE has a significant positive
influence on TIs, meaning that employees who have
a high engagement with the organization do not
necessarily have a low resignation intensity. Many
factors can influence an individual to resign or not
from an organization.
The mediating role of OC has been found to have
an undetermined negative influence in mediating EE
and EM variables against TIs. It is because the
factor in shaping the organization's commitment is
highly dependent on the experience gained by each
individual in the organization, which is different, so
it is concluded that when employees feel engaged or
motivated, with the presence of the mediation role
of the organization commitment does not influence
lowering the level of employee intensity.
References:
[1] K. George, “Competing in the New Talent
Market,” Harvard Business Review, 2022,
[Online]. https://hbr.org/2022/10/competing-
in-the-new-talent-market (Accessed Date: July
2, 2023).
[2] C. M. Montaudon-Tomas, A. Amsler, and I.
N. Pinto-López, “The Great Resignation and
Organizational Culture,” in Implementing
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in
Educational Management Practices, IGI
Global, 2022, pp. 218–233. doi: 10.4018/978-
1-6684-4803-8.ch011.
[3] J. Noakes and J. Landmann, “The Great
Resignation’: A Global Risk?,” Norton Rose
Fullbright, 2021, [Online].
https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-
us/knowledge/publications/cc03a277/the-
great-resignation-a-global-risk (Accessed
Date: July 2, 2023).
[4] DFWTrends editors, “The great resignation
has begun in ASEAN,”
DigitalWorkforceTrends, 2021, [Online].
https://www.cdotrends.com/story/14735/great-
resignation-has-begun-asean (Accessed Date:
July 2, 2023).
[5] N. Kennerley and K. Legarth, “Employment
trends in FMCG,” OCG Career Makers, 2022,
[Online]. https://www.ocg.co.nz/blog-
article/employment-trends-in-fmcg?i=167
(Accessed Date: July 2, 2023).
[6] V. L. Harpert, “Job satisfaction, perceived
availability of job alternatives and turnover
intentions: the case of the alumina industry in
Suriname,” Maastricht School of
Management, 2013.
[7] N. Lockwood, “Leveraging Employee
Engagement for Competitive Advantage: HR’s
Strategic Role,” Society for Human Resource
Management (SHRM) Research, 2007.
[8] E. Gubman, “From engagement to passion for
work: the search for the missing person,”
Human Resource Planning Society, vol. 27,
no. 3, 2004.
[9] R. J. Vance, “Employee engagement and
commitment,” SHRM Foundation, vol. 1, pp.
1–53, 2006.
[10] S. M. Azeem, “Job satisfaction and
organizational commitment among employees
in the Sultanate of Oman,” Psychology, vol. 1,
no. 4, pp. 295–300, 2010.
[11] B. L. Rich, J. A. Lepine, and E. R. Crawford,
“Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on
Job Performance,” Academy of Management
Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, 2010, doi:
10.5465/amj.2010.51468988.
[12] Z. Y. Yalabik, P. Popaitoon, J. A. Chowne,
and B. A. Rayton, “Work engagement as a
mediator between employee attitudes and
outcomes,” The International Journal of
Human Resource Management, vol. 24, no.
14, pp. 2799–2823, 2013, doi:
10.1080/09585192.2013.763844.
[13] I. G. Kwon and D. W. Banks, “Factors related
to the organizational and professional
commitment of internal auditors,” Managerial
Auditing Journal, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 606–622,
2004, doi: 10.1108/02686900410537748.
[14] E. Dane and B. J. Brummel, “Examining
workplace mindfulness and its relations to job
performance and turnover intentions,” Human
Relations, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 105–128, 2014,
doi: 10.1177/0018726713487753.
[15] M. W. Astiti and I. B. K. Surya, “Role of
Organizational Commitments in mediating the
effect of work motivation and job satisfaction
towards turnover intentions on nurses private
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
523
Volume 21, 2024
hospital,” International Research Journal of
Management, IT and Social Sciences, vol. 8,
no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.21744/irjmis.v8n1.1101.
[16] A. L. Hakim, Sudarmiatin, and Sutrisno, The
Effect of Work Stress on Turnover Intentions
with Work Satisfaction and Commitment as
Intervening Variable (Study at PT Infomedia
Solusi Humanika in Malang),” European
Journal of Business and Management, vol. 10,
no. 12, 2019.
[17] S. Z. Maryam, F. Ali, M. Rizvi, and S. Farooq,
“Demonstrating the motivational scale for
commitments toward teachers’ turnover
intentions using self-determination theory: a
case of higher education institutions in
Pakistan,” International Journal of
Educational Management, vol. 35, no. 2, pp.
365–381, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-02-2020-
0058.
[18] M. I. Nasution and M. I. Nasution, “Pengaruh
stres kerja, kepuasan kerja dan komitmen
organisasi terhadap turnover intentions
medical representative,” MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah
Manajemen, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 407–428, 2017.
[19] W. B. Schaufeli and A. B. Bakker, “Work
Engagement A Critical Assessment of the
Concept and Its Measurement,” Handbook of
Positive Psychology Assessment
(Psychological Assessment Science and
Practice, Hogrefe Publishing), pp. 273–295,
2022.
[20] A. Khalid and S. Khalid, “Relationship
between organizational commitments,
employee engagement and career satisfaction
a case of university of Gujrat,” Pakistan.
Journal of South Asian Studies, vol. 03, no.
03, pp. 323–330, 2015.
[21] M. Shoko and A. Z. Zinyemba, “Impact of EE
on OC in national institutions of higher
learning in Zimbabwe,” International Journal
of Advanced Research in Management and
Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 9, 2014.
[22] W. A. Kahn, “Psychological Conditions of
Personal Engagement at Work,” Academy of
Management Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 692–
724, 1990, doi: 10.2307/256287.
[23] S. L. Albrecht and M. Andreetta, “The
influence of empowering leadership,
empowerment and engagement on affective
commitment and turnover intentions in
community health service workers,”
Leadership in Health Services, vol. 24, no. 3,
pp. 228–237, 2011, doi:
10.1108/17511871111151126.
[24] D. A. Yousef, “Organizational Commitment,
Job Satisfaction and Attitudes toward
Organizational Change:A Study in the Local
Government,” International Journal of Public
Administration, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 77–88,
2017.
[25] B. Al-Jabari and I. Ghazzawi, “Organizational
Commitment: A Review of the Conceptual
and Empirical Literature and a Research
Agenda,” International Leadership Journal,
2019.
[26] N. J. Allen and J. P. Meyer, “The
measurement and antecedents of affective,
continuance and normative commitment to the
organization,” Journal of Occupational
Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1990,
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.
[27] J. Meyer and N. Allen, Commitment in the
Workplace: Theory, Research, and
Application. SAGE Publications, Inc, 1997.
doi: 10.4135/9781452231556.
[28] K. Cherry, Motivation: The Driving Force
Behind Our Actions. Verywellmind, 2023,
[Online].
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-
motivation-2795378 (Accessed Date: July 2,
2023).
[29] D. A. Jain, D. B. Gupta, and D. M. Bindal, “A
Study of EM in Organization,” International
Journal of Engineering and Management
Research, vol. 09, no. 06, pp. 65–68, 2019,
doi: 10.31033/ijemr.9.6.11.
[30] F. Herzberg, B. Mausner, and B. Synderman,
The Motivation To Work. John Wiley & Sons,
1959.
[31] T. W. Lee and T. R. Mitchell, “An Alternative
Approach: The Unfolding Model of Voluntary
Employee Turnover,” The Academy of
Management Review, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 51,
1994, doi: 10.2307/258835.
[32] R. P. Tett and J. P. Meyer, “Job satisfaction,
Organizational Commitment, Turnover
Intentions, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based
on Meta-Analytic Findings,” Personnel
Psychology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 259–293, 1993,
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x.
[33] W. H. Mobley, S. O. Horner, and A. T.
Hollingsworth, “An evaluation of precursors
of hospital employee turnover,” Journal of
Applied Psychology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 408–
414, 1978, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.408.
[34] J. J. Hakanen, A. B. Bakker, and W. B.
Schaufeli, “Burnout and work engagement
among teachers,” Journal ofJournal of School
Psychology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 495–513, 2006,
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
524
Volume 21, 2024
[35] W. H. Macey and B. Schneider, “The Meaning
of Employee Engagement,” Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.
3–30, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1754-
9434.2007.0002.x.
[36] J. Hanaysha, “Examining the Effects of
Employee Empowerment, Teamwork, and
Employee Training on Organizational
Commitment,” Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, vol. 229, pp. 298–306,
2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.140.
[37] F. Mohsan, M. M. Nawaz, M. S. Khan, Z.
Shaukat, and N. Aslam, “Are Employee
Motivation, Commitment and Job
Involvement Inter-related: Evidence from
Banking Sector of Pakistan,” International
Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 2,
no. 17, pp. 226–233, 2011.
[38] S. Warsi, N. Fatima, and S. Sahibzada, “Study
on Relationship Between Organizational
Commitment and its Determinants among
Private Sector Employees of Pakistan,”
International Review of Business Research
Papers, 2009.
[39] K. M. Gambino, “Motivation for entry,
occupational commitment and intent to
remain: a survey regarding Registered Nurse
retention,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol.
66, no. 11, pp. 2532–2541, 2010, doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05426.x.
[40] A. Tella, C. O. Ayeni, and S. O. Popoola,
“Work Motivation, Job Satisfaction,”
Organisational Commitment of Library
Personnel in Academic and Research
Libraries in Oyo State, Nigeria, 2007.
[41] A. Chughtai and S. Zafar, “Antecedents and
Consequences of Organizational Commitment
Among Pakistani University Teachers,”
Applied HRM Research, 2006.
[42] L. Avanzi, F. Fraccaroli, G. Sarchielli, J.
Ullrich, and R. Van Dick, “Staying or leaving:
A combined social identity and social
exchange approach to predicting employee
Turnover Intentions,” International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management,
vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 272–289, Apr. 2014, doi:
10.1108/IJPPM-02-2013-0028.
[43] J. Van Dyk and M. Coetzee, “Retention
factors in relation to organizational
commitment in medical and information
technology services,” SA Journal of Human
Resource Management, vol. 13, no. 1, 2012,
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v10i2.433.
[44] Y. Brunetto, S. T. T. Teo, K. Shacklock, and
R. Farr-Wharton, “Emotional intelligence, job
satisfaction, well-being and engagement:
explaining organisational commitment and TIs
in policing,” Human Resource Management
Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 428–441, 2012,
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-583.2012.00198.x.
[45] D. A. C. Ortiz, W. K. Lau, and H. Qin,
“Quantitative analysis of impacts of employee
engagement on continuance and normative
commitment,” International Journal of
Services and Standards, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 315,
2013, doi: 10.1504/IJSS.2013.058227.
[46] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-
determination theory and the facilitation of
intrinsic motivation, social development, and
well-being,” American Psychologist, vol. 55,
no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0003-.
[47] J. Smith and A. Spurling, “Understanding
Motivation for Lifelong Learning,” National
Institute of Adult Continuing Education, 2001.
[48] S. Farooq and N. Hanif, “A Descriptive Study
of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Factors
and Their Role in Employee Retention in
Banking Sector Lahore Pakistan,” Int. Journal
of Innovative and Applied FinanceIJIAF, vol.
1, no. 1, 2013.
[49] B. Kuvaas, R. Buch, A. Weibel, A. Dysvik,
and C. G. L. Nerstad, “Do intrinsic and
extrinsic motivation relate differently to
employee outcomes?,” Journal of Economic
Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 244–258, 2017, doi:
10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004.
[50] T. Perrin, “Working Today: Understanding
What Drives Employee Engagement,” Towers
Perrin Talent Report, 2003.
[51] B. Shuck, J. L. Adelson, and T. G. Reio, “The
Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence
for ConstructValidity and Implications for
Theory and Practice,” Human Resource
Management, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 953–977,
2017, doi: 10.1002/hrm.21811.
[52] U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research methods
for business: a skill-building approach,
Seventh edition. Chichester, West Sussex,
United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[53] C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker,
“SmartPLS, SmartPLS GmbH,
Boenningstedt, 2015, [Online].
https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/getti
ng-started/cite (Accessed Date: July 2, 2023).
[54] B. Little and P. Little, “Employee
Engagement: Conceptual Issues,” Journal of
Organizational Culture, Communication and
Conflict, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2006.
[55] P. C. Bryant and D. G. Allen, “Compensation,
Benefits and Employee Turnover: HR
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
525
Volume 21, 2024
Strategies for Retaining Top Talent,”
Compensation & Benefits Review, vol. 45, no.
3, pp. 171–175, 2013, doi:
10.1177/0886368713494342.
[56] A. Gatling, H.J.A Kang, and J.S Kim, “The
effects of authentic leadership and
organizational commitment on turnover
intention,” Leadership & Organization
Development Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 181-
199, 2016.
[57] E. M. Nunes, M. F. Gaspar, “Modelo de
Comportamento Organizacional de Meyer e
Allen: Estudo com os Enfermeiros,” Pensar
Enferm, vol. 18, pp. 14–26, 2014.
[58] M. Anggakara, “Mengenal Ciri dan
Karakteristik Gaya Kepemimpinan
Demokratis, ” 2022.
[59] M. Shah and M. Asad, “Effect of motivation
on employee retention: mediating role of
perceived organizational support, European
Online Journal of Natural and Social
Sciences, vol. 7 No. 2, p. 511, 2018.
[60] S. Ramlall, “A review of employee motivation
theories and their implications for employee
retention within organizations,” Journal of
American Academy of Business, vol. 5, no. 1,
pp. 52-63, 2004.
[61] V. C. Ganta, “Motivation in the Workplace to
Improve the Employee Performance,
International Journal of Engineering
Technology Management and Applied
Sciences, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 221-230, 2014.
[62] I. T. Robertson and C. L. Cooper, “Full
Engagement: The Integration of Employee
Engagement and Psychological Well-Being,”
Leadership & Organization Development
Journal, vol. 31, pp. 324-336, 2010, doi:
10.1108/01437731011043348.
[63] A. N. AbuKhalifeh and A. P. M. Som, “The
Antecedents Affecting Employee Engagement
and Organizational Performance,” ASS, vol. 9,
no. 7, p. p41, May 2013, doi:
10.5539/ass.v9n7p41.
[64] J. Sahni, “Role Of Quality Of Work Life In
Determining Employee Engagement And
Organizational Commitment In Telecom
Industry,” International Journal for Quality
Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 285–300, 2019,
doi: 10. 24874/IJQR13.02-03.
[65] K. W. Thomas and B. A. Velthouse,
“Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An
‘Interpretive’ Model of Intrinsic Task
Motivation,” The Academy of Management
Review, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 666, Oct. 1990, doi:
10.2307/258687.
[66] L. George and T. Sabapathy, “Work
Motivation of Teachers: Relationship with
Organizational Culture,” European Journal of
Educational Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, 2014.
[67] K. Stone, “Understanding employee
experience vs employee engagement,”
Engagedly, 2022, [Online].
https://engagedly.com/blog/understanding-
employee-experience-vs-employee-
engagement/ (Accessed Date: July 2, 2023).
[68] R. Dwivedula and R. Müller, “Work
Motivation as a Determinant of Organizational
and Professional Commitment in Case of
Temporary Organizations: Theoretical
Perspectives,” International Research Network
on Organising by Projects (IRNOP), pp. 1–27,
2011.
[69] N. Santhanam, J. R. Kumar, V. Kumar, and R.
Saha, “Employee turnover intentions in the
milieu of human resource management
practices: moderating role of work-life
balance,” IJBIR, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 57, 2021,
doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2021.111979.
[70] S. Skripak, A. Cortes, A. Walz, G. Walton,
and R. Parsons, “Fundamentals of Business,
VT Publishing, vol. 2, 2018, doi:
10.21061/fundamentals-of-business-
vtechworks.
[71] D. I. C. Mapelu and L. Jumah, “Effect of
Training and Development on Employee
Turnover in Selected Medium Sized Hotels in
Kisumu City, Kenya,” Journal of Tourism,
Hospitality and Sports, vol. 1, pp. 43–47,
2013.
[72] M. Knani, “Ethics in the Hospitality Industry:
Review and Research Agenda,” IJBM, vol. 9,
no. 3, 2014, doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p1.
[73] G. R. Hancock and R. O. Mueller, “Structural
Equation Modeling: A Second Course,” IAP,
vol. 2, 2013.
[74] J. Morgan, “The employee experience
advantage: how to win the war for talent by
giving employees the workspaces they want,
the tools they need, and a culture they can
celebrate, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1, 2017.
[75] R. Belk, “Situational variables and consumer
behaviour, Journal of Consumer Behaviour,
vol. 2, no. 3, pp, 157-164, 1975, doi:
10.1086/208627.
[76] M. Gardner, “Mood states and consumer
behaviour: A critical review, The Journal of
Consumer Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 281-
300, 1985, doi: 10.1086/208516.
[77] E. C. Hirschman and M. B. Holbrook,
“Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
526
Volume 21, 2024
methods, and propositions, Journal of
Marketing, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 92–101, 1982,
doi: 10.1177/002224298204600314.
[78] M. Zuckerman, “Dimensions of sensation
seeking, Journal of Consulting Psychology,
vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 1971, doi:
10.1037/h0030478.
[79] T. Davenport and J. Beck, “The attention
economy: Understanding the new currency of
business, Boston: Harvard Business School
Press, 2002.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
- Merlin contributed to the preparation and
formation of the thinking framework, processing
and analyzing data.
- Tamara contributed to refining the flow of
overarching research, strengthening the literature
review, and enhancing the employed research
methods.
- Yovita contributed an extensive literature review,
developed hypothesis, and data collection
processes.
- Abdul Rohman, alongside his contribution to the
authoring of the manuscript, was actively engaged
in the investigative aspects of the study. His role
in data collection, observance of processes, and
meticulous investigation added another layer of
accuracy to our work, enhancing its credibility
and validity.
Notably, all authors were involved in the final
review of the manuscript. After comprehensive and
critical readings of the document, each author
expressed their approval for the final manuscript.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2024.21.43
Merlin, Pande Ketut Tamara Ardhanareswari,
Yovita Hastika, Abdul Rohman
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
527
Volume 21, 2024