
Cultural heritage and the environmental stock of
a region are reasons tourists may choose a
destination, and by combining the environment with
the cultural heritage, “cultural routes” could come
up as a solution that can attract tourists, [7].
In Greece, a country where one of the main
industries is tourism, specific areas, like the island
Symi, could further increase the touristic period, but
in a sustainable way. Acquiring tourism through
highlighting cultural and environmental reserves in
the context of sustainable development and
sustainable tourism is a great deal for islands, which
are considered remote areas, [8].
This paper aims to showcase the socio–
economic effects of sustainable development on the
island of Symi. We develop a regional input-output
model to measure the structural effects (in terms of
economic benefits) of a series of investments that
target to utilize the environmental and cultural stock
of the island and upgrade its potential for
sustainable tourism.
Sustainable tourism is defined by the UN
Environment Program and the UN World Tourism
Organization as "tourism that takes full account of
its current and future economic, social and
environmental impacts, meeting the needs of
visitors, industry, the environment and of host
communities", [9].
Furthermore, sustainable tourism “refers to the
environmental, economic, and socio-cultural aspects
of tourism development and an appropriate balance
must be struck between these three dimensions to
ensure its long-term sustainability”, [10].
Tourism has negative and positive impacts, and
it is needed to reduce the negative impacts and
increase the positive ones. The World Tourism
Organization identifies the following principles and
practices that should be applied in the context of
sustainability and sustainable tourism:
1. To make optimal use of environmental
resources
2. To respect the social and cultural
authenticity of local communities.
3. To ensure the sustainable economic activity
of businesses, providing socio-economic
benefits to all stakeholders which are fairly
distributed.
4. To ensure stable employment and social
services in the host communities,
contributing to the fight against poverty,
[11].
Based on the above and the 4 specific criteria,
Sustainable management, Socioeconomic Impacts,
Cultural implications, and Environmental impacts,
[12], that The World Council on Sustainable
Tourism provides as standards for sustainable
tourism, the ‘cultural routes’ mentioned above, are
an excellent solution for Symi, in which the existing
routes will be used and the creation of 4 more will
be implemented. To measure the socioeconomic
activity from this action and the direct and indirect
effects on the local and national economy in GDP
and production value, due to the sustainable tourism
increase and the investment in the environmental
and cultural stock, the input-output model will be
used (Leontief model).
The methodological framework of input-output
analysis was developed by Wassily Leontief. In the
1930s he published ‘Quantitative Input-Output
Relations in the Economic System of the United
States’ in the Review of Economics and Statistics,
[13], for which he won the Nobel Prize in
Economics in 1973. He described the input-output
model and developed the model’s applications for
solving economic problems.
Input-output analysis provides a representation
of the output structure of an economic system,
which can be as large as the world economy or as
small as a region or even an individual firm, [14]. In
this case, it will refer to the investment made on the
island.
Input-output analysis provides a proper setting
to capture the functions and interindustry linkages
of an economic system, [15], by showing how
domestic production and imports of goods and
services in an economy are used by industries for
intermediate consumption and final use (EU Science
Hub), offering a useful methodological approach to
quantify the interdependencies between individual
domains, [16].
Quantification is translated through a system of
linear equations that quantitatively expresses the
relationships of inputs and outputs of the system,
[13].
A simpler approach to economically assess the
direct impact of a series of investments would be a
straightforward cost-benefit analysis, that enables
the user to directly compare costs and expected
revenues and evaluate the feasibility of a project
from its direct outcomes. In detail, this involves
adding up all the projected costs and deducting them
from the expected benefits or opportunities of the
project at hand, often represented as a ratio. If the
benefits outweigh the costs, it may be considered a
good decision to pursue. However, if the costs
exceed the benefits, it may be necessary for the
company to reconsider the project or decision.
However, this approach is limited to the production
unit/organization that is responsible for the
development and implementation of the project (in
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.204
Ioanna Mikrou, Petros Dimas,
Georgia Skoulaki, Anastasia Vythoulka,
Aspasia Fafouti, Ekaterini Delegou,
Aggelos Tsakanikas,
Antonia Moropoulou