Abstract: - Every business relies on its employees, and their attitude toward their job and the results they

achieve directly impact the organization's stability and performance. To ensure that the organizational

effectiveness process runs smoothly, motivating employees to participate actively is crucial. Without their

analyzed using several statistical techniques. The study results indicate that out of the five tested factors, four of

them significantly influence productivity. These factors are health issues, stress, workplace environment, and

personality traits. On the other hand, sleep deprivation was found to have no impact on productivity.

Accordingly, employees in government organizations acknowledge that addressing health issues, reducing

stress levels, improving the work environment, and developing positive personality traits are all critical aspects

of enhancing the organization's productivity and achieving its objectives.

Key-Words: - Organizational effectiveness, Global Environment, Productivity, Efficiency& effectiveness,

example, higher productivity seeks to better social

progress, appropriate economic growth, and great

profitability, [2], [3]. In addition, the employees can

be more productive can have preferable working

conditions, better wages/ salaries, and favorable

of employees' efficiency, [6]. It is commonly

measured by evaluating the output of work during

specific periods. Generally, an employee's

productivity is assessed based on the average

performance of other workers who perform similar

tasks. The productivity of the entire workforce is

crucial for the success of any organization, and

of a worker in each period, [7], [8], [9]. Assessment

of an individual worker's productivity is commonly

based on the average performance of other workers

who perform similar tasks. The efficiency of a

workforce is critical to the success of any

organization, making employee productivity a

critical factor for businesses to consider, [10].

Assessing employee productivity is a crucial aspect

of human resource management, and both

governments and firms invest significant resources

profitability and economic as well as social

progress, [4], [12], [13], [14]. These strategies can

enable responses to problems that are partial and

provisional, allowing for shared understandings

about their nature and how to address them.

productivity can gain appropriate employment

opportunities, perfect work conditions, and perfect

salaries. Further, higher productivity leads to a

raised competitive advantage for the organization by

potential damage to the department's reputation and

revenue loss. To initiate the process, it is advisable

to focus on common issues that could potentially

impact productivity, [16], [17]. The smallest of

things can cause lower levels of productivity in the

workplace. Take note and improve on the little

aspects of your work habits. Productivity in the

workplace is something that does not come

overnight. The development process into a culture

of doing things, [18].

total productivity measurements, such as those

aggregated for a country, area, or industry, can be

highly beneficial, [30], [31], [32], [33]. Enhancing

staff productivity is a critical challenge for most

businesses. Employee productivity serves as an

indicator of individual or group workers' efficiency

and directly affects a company's profitability in

tangible terms. Productivity can be measured in

terms of staff output over a certain time period. In

particular, the worker's productivity will be

outputs are the services or items generated.

Employees are considered productive if their

outputs equal their inputs, [12]. If the same number

of employees start producing more goods or

services than in the previous period, productivity

of employee participation in performance and

affirmative action outcomes, albeit there is little

empirical data to back up these claims. Participation

should also be considered a fundamental

organizational approach, according to the report.

There is a link between employee productivity and

sleep deprivation. Employee Productivity and Sleep

Deprivation, A review of the literature indicated a

discrepancy. The majority of studies show that sleep

deprivation of fewer than 5 hours per day has

detrimental consequences on behavioral, cognitive,

physiological, and emotional variables. It is based

detrimental effect on not only individual

performance but also team dynamics and overall

organizational effectiveness, [54]. Therefore,

employers must recognize the importance of

managing stress in the workplace and implementing

strategies to promote employee well-being. By

providing resources such as mental health support

of concern. The questionnaire was adapted from

previous literature and refined with the help of a

group of experts, [42], [51], [53], [56], [72], [73].

The first section of the questionnaire deals with

sleep deprivation. In this section, participants are

asked about their sleep patterns and habits. The

second section focuses on health issues. This part of

the questionnaire asks about an individual's overall

health status, as well as any specific health concerns

they may have, such as chronic conditions or

recommended by [74], was implemented, which

entails computing and recording the standard

deviation value for each respondent. Respondents

who provided identical or near-identical responses

to most or all of the survey questions, such as

consistently selecting "strongly agree" (1) or

"strongly disagree" (5), were deemed non-engaged

The sleep deprivation hypotheses suggest that there

is a significant relationship between sleep

deprivation can also lead to decreased

concentration, impaired decision-making, and

difficulty with problem-solving. In addition, people

who are sleep deprived often feel tired and

unmotivated, which can further reduce their

productivity. However, as shown in Table 1, the rest

result shows that there is no relationship between

sleep deprivation and productivity. The statistical

results of the equation indicated the significance of

the estimated model. As part of the analysis, we

decreased productivity and missed deadlines. On the

other hand, increased productivity can lead to

improved physical and mental health. Working hard

and achieving goals can give people a sense of

accomplishment and satisfaction that can help

improve their overall well-being. Additionally,

increased productivity may also lead to improved

productivity. 62.56% either agreed or strongly

agreed that health directly affects their productivity.

As part of the analysis, we took the age, income,

and education versus productivity factors and found

the following result.

the significance of the estimated model. Where the

value of the age at F =0.026 - and R2 =0.00003,

which means that about 0.003% of the changes in

health issues are due to the age level. Which means

F=0.008- and R2= 0.0001, which means that about

.01% of the changes in health issues are due to the

level of education. This means there is no effect of

education on health issues. The age group 30-40

scored the highest in finding a strong relationship

between health issues and productivity. Employees

with an income of more than 8000 strongly agreed

positively with the relationship, as well as

employees who have bachelorism's degrees strongly

agreed. The graph confirms that there is a

factor. However, 57.61% is strong enough to

suggest the relationship exists.

The Stress and Anxiety hypotheses suggest that

there is a significant relationship between stress and

between stress and productivity is complex. In

general, high levels of stress can lead to decreased

productivity due to fatigue, distraction, and

between work environment and productivity is a

complex one. A positive work environment can lead

to increased productivity, while a negative work

environment can lead to decreased productivity.

Factors that can influence the relationship between

work environment and productivity include job

satisfaction, job security, physical comfort, and the

lacks these factors can lead to decreased motivation

and lower levels of productivity.

or strongly agreed, we found that there is a

relationship between personality traits and

productivity; it found 63.22% of participants

strongly agreed or just agreed that there is a

relationship between personality traits and

productivity. As part of the analysis, we took the

age, income, and education versus productivity

Where the value of income at F =53.94 and R2=

0.104, which means that about 10.4% of the changes

in personality traits are due to the level of income.

The positive effect of the income level also shows

one increase in the variable by 0.32. Also, the value

of education at F =18.93 and R2= 0.127, which

means that about 12.7% of the changes in

personality traits are due to the level of education.

The positive effect of the education level was also

shown to increase the variable by 0.19.

stay focused and motivated to complete tasks. Other

personality traits that can influence productivity

include extroversion, agreeableness, openness to

experience, and emotional stability. Extroverted

people may be more likely to collaborate with others

and take initiative in their work. Agreeable people

may be better at working with others and resolving

conflicts. Openness to experience can lead to

creative problem-solving and new ideas. Finally,

Saudi Vision 2030, the study was done, and it has

the expectation and expected findings. However,

Organizations should focus on health issues, stress,

work environment, and personality traits. It is an

important finding for all these four factors, as the

study confirmed their impact on productivity in

62.56% for health issues, 57.61% for stress, 61.78%

sleep has minimal effect in this regard. The study's

findings contradict earlier literature that indicated

adverse effects of sleep deprivation on productivity,

including studies, [73] and others, [40], [73], [75],

[86], [87]. In Powell and Copping's study, for

example, sleep deprivation was shown to

significantly affect the productivity of construction

workers. However, the difference in results between

these studies may be attributed to differences in

sample selection. Specifically, Powell and

several previous literature regarding health

problems and adverse effects on productivity at

work, [76], [77], [78], [79]. Therefore, health

problems should be considered an important risk

factor for productivity and hence the main focus of

health interventions (in the workplace).

Furthermore, there is evidence that a number of

employees have been reported to be under stress.

Employees whose job expectations are in

contradiction with each other and whose roles are

consistent with previous survey studies and

indicates that at least part of the personality impact

has an influence on work through productivity.