Investment Strategy for the Development of Human Capital of the
Enterprise
VIKTORIA BORSHCH
Odesa National Medical University,
65000Valikhovsky lane, 2, Odesa,
UKRAINE
OLEH SHEREMET
National University of Food Technologies,
01033Volodymyrska str., 68, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
IRYNA MYKOLAICHUK
State University of Trade and Economics,
02000, Kyoto str., 19, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
BASHUK HANNA
«Kryvyi Rih Fahovy Medical College» of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council,
50051 Medichna str., 14, Kryvyi Rih, Dnipropetrovsk region,
UKRAINE
PAVLENKO OLENA
Dnipro National University the name оf Oles Honchar,
49000Gagarina avenue, 72, Dnipro,
UKRAINE
MYKHAYLO DANILKO
Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University,
02000 Mahnitogorsky Lane, 3, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
Abstract: - The development of human capital has become increasingly important for enterprises in the context
of global transformations, where the parameters of human capital development are influenced by various
factors in the external and internal environment. The purpose of this study is to substantiate the theoretical and
applied principles of forming an investment strategy for the development of the human capital of the enterprise.
The results of the study made it possible to establish that the development of human capital of the enterprise
takes place in the context of global transformations, as a result of which the parameters of human capital
development are influenced by factors of the external environment and internal environment. The most
significant of them is the number of investments in human resources, the involvement of innovations, and the
improvement of the professional qualities of personnel. Overall, the results of this study highlight the
importance of forming an investment strategy for the development of human capital of an enterprise that takes
into account external and internal factors, such as the number of investments in human resources, innovation,
and professional development. By investing in human capital, enterprises can improve their competitive
position, adapt to changes in the market, and achieve sustainable growth.
Key-Words: - investment, Human Development Index, human capital, investment, competitiveness, innovative
development
Received: February 26, 2023. Revised: June 23, 2023. Accepted: June 30, 2023. Published: July 7, 2023.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1517
Volume 20, 2023
1 Introduction
The structural restructuring of the economy and the
society, reinforced by the emergence of new
destabilizing factors in the development of the
external and internal environment and the military
resistance to the armed aggression of the Russian
Federation, have given rise to the aggravation of the
issue of effective functioning of enterprises,
institutions, and organizations, as a result of which
their competitiveness is constantly reduced and the
uncertainty of their future existence increases.
Ensuring the dynamic development of business
entities of various forms of ownership is one of the
priority directions for the formation of strategic
vectors to provide their development, stability of
operations, and the achievement of high profitability
indicators. In the conditions of globalization and the
strengthening of mega-regionalization, an effective
tool for achieving the desired results is the strategic
planning of the development of the enterprise's
human capital and the formation of an effective
internal company policy of its systematic and
continuous investment. Taking into account the
outlined trends, in current conditions, the issue of
investigating the investment strategy for the
development of the human capital of the enterprise is
actualized, which requires in-depth study.
The purpose of the research is to substantiate the
theoretical and applied principles for the formation
of an investment strategy for the development of the
human capital of the enterprise.
2 Literature Review
Ensuring competitiveness and the formation of
competitive advantages at the stage of the
enterprise’s functioning is one of the priority
directions of the business entity’s activity. It is the
human capital that plays a significant role in this
process, because, according to the viewpoint of [1],
it can create such competitive advantages that make
it possible to successfully implement strategic
development targets. Human capital combines the
totality of knowledge available to personnel, their
professional abilities, and managerial effectiveness.
It is worth noting that the ability to attract
innovations depends on the level of development of
the enterprise's human capital. It is obvious that
human capital within the functioning of a business
entity turns into a key factor in stimulating the
development of the company; consequently, it is
important to finance it in time and meet existing
requirements. The outlined theory has been proven
and substantiated in the studies of [1], where a close
interrelationship between the indicators of the
competitiveness of enterprises and the human
development index across the countries of the world
was established.
[2], adhere to a similar position; they have
established that human capital is valuable, and it is
an important component of the implementation of
innovative strategies, as well as a driving force for
improving the effectiveness of the business entity.
Along with this, scientists argue that the human
capital management system should be consistent with
the goals and structure of the development strategy
of the enterprise itself, and also provide for the
possibility of forming investment strategies.
[3], suggests considering two categories of human
capital: (1) general and (2) specific. Moreover, the
scientist associates general human capital with the
availability of basic education and initial practical
experience of employees and identifies specific
human capital with knowledge, skills, and abilities to
carry out activities in a specific field. It becomes
obvious that it is the presence of specific human
capital in the company that gives grounds for testing
innovations and moving to the principles of
innovative and sustainable development of the
enterprise.
At the same time, [4], are convinced that the
development of human capital is important not only
for the implementation of innovations but also for the
introduction of strategic projects of the enterprise,
which require certain additional resources that can be
obtained through investment. The opinion of
scientists is shared by [5], who connects the theory of
human capital development with constant investment
in human resources and believes that the introduction
of innovations is more efficient and effective when
the organization has powerful modern human capital.
Along with this, [6], considers human capital to
be the key to the competitiveness of the company
and its stable development. Complementing
Pelinescy, the scientific discussion in the given
direction, [7], has concluded that the sustainable
development of human capital contributes to the
economic growth not only of the enterprise but also
of the entire country. Therefore, the scientist
proposes to carry out further investigations by
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1518
Volume 20, 2023
comparing indicators of human capital development
and innovation and investment development at the
level of the whole country with indicators of foreign
countries, which will allow identifying common
features and problematic aspects, one of which,
according to her viewpoint, is the interdependence of
low volumes of investment in human capital and the
slowdown in economic growth.
At the same time, as noted by [8], the issue of the
long-term impact of human capital on current
innovations and the stable development of the
company requires in-depth study, forasmuch as it has
been established that the factor of regionalization has
a significant impact on it, which involves the uneven
development of regions, its significant disparities and
the possibility of ensuring various conditions for
economic activity.
Particular attention should be paid to the
scientific developments of [9], who argues that
ensuring high competitiveness indicators for highly
developed countries depends significantly on
investment in the development of human capital.
Developing this idea, [10], proves that enterprises
invest in human capital to improve their performance
results. However, scientists are convinced that in the
modern scientific discourse, investigations in the
direction of studying the issues of the investment
strategy for the development of human capital are
quite limited, which requires additional exploratory
work.
In this context, the observations of [11], are
justified; the scholars have proven the need for
strategic management of human capital development,
which consists of the perception of human capital as
one of the elements of the company's assets,
forasmuch as it is a sustainable competitive
advantage and a factor in the efficiency and
effectiveness of the enterprise's activities. However,
[12], argues that it is impossible to ensure the
sustainable development of human capital without
investing in human capital; consequently, each
company should develop its investment strategy for
the development of human capital. From among the
most significant and often implemented investments
in the development of human capital, [13], single out
such as the systematic training of employees,
advancing their level of education, and improving
knowledge and skills that influence the enterprise's
effectiveness. Under such conditions, mechanisms
for promoting investment in human capital
development, which, according to the viewpoint of
[14], should be divided into public and private ones,
become of particular importance.
Taking into account the existing scientific
approaches to the issues of human capital
development of the enterprise, it is worth
highlighting the urgent necessity for the formation of
an investment strategy to ensure its implementation.
3 Research Method
The methodological base of the research was formed
using both special and scientific methods of
economic analysis and other fundamental
investigations, namely: the methods of analysis,
synthesis and scientific abstraction were used to
identify the essence of the scientific category
“human capital”, its development features and
significance; the methods of system analysis,
comparison and analogy were used to carry out
applied studies of existing trends in the development
of human capital and its impact on indicators of
competitiveness and innovative activity of economic
entities; by applying the method of comparative
analysis, the study of the features of investing in the
development of human capital was carried out;
methods of generalization and systematization were
applied to form conclusions based on the results of
the research of the issues outlined; cluster analysis
based on the k-means method was used to group the
countries of the European Union according to
indicators of the Human Development Index, the
Global Competitiveness Index, and the Global
Innovation Index; graphical and tabular methods
made it possible to visually display the applied
results of the conducted research.
The countries of the European Union were chosen
for the research.
The information base of the research is based on
the reporting data of leading international
organizations for 2018-2021, namely: Human
Development Report according to the human
development index indicator; the Global
Competitiveness Index according to the global
competitiveness index indicator, the Global Talent
Competitiveness Index according to the talent
competitiveness index and the Global Innovation
Report according to the global innovation index.
4 Result
The growing role of human capital in the modern
world is driven by its value and significant
development potential, not only in the current period
but also in the long shot. It becomes obvious that the
stable development of the human potential of
business entities is a priority task and the driving
force of intellectual and technological progress,
which depends on the level of competitiveness of the
enterprise and its ability to attract innovations.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1519
Volume 20, 2023
It should be stated that the existing development
tendencies of the world countries do not have
stability and uniformity; after all, they position
different opportunities for the population to get
access to education, acquire professional skills, and
implement existing opportunities. As a result, the
outlined features cause a discrepancy between human
potential and the needs of the economy, and
economic entities are not able to provide high levels
of competitiveness.
In analyzing the effectiveness of using human
potential in modern conditions, it is necessary to take
into account the influence of the innovation factor
and the level of attracting investment resources to
stimulate its development. Some indicators have
been developed at the international level, which
allows for determining the state of human capital
development across countries of the world and
conducting comparative correlation in various
analyzed groups. One of these important indicators is
the Global Competitiveness Index, which makes it
possible to assess the state of functioning of
enterprises in the country and the efficiency of using
human capital. The dynamics of the Global
Competitiveness Index in the countries of the
European Union for the period 2018–202,1 [15],
[16], [17], [18], is reflected in Figure 1.
According to the results of the research
conducted, the highest indicators of the Global
Competitiveness Index are observed in such
countries as Finland (GCI: 79–82), the Netherlands
(GCI: 72–82), and Denmark (GCI: 72–81); however,
the lowest ones are recorded in Greece (GCI: 45–63),
Cyprus (GCI: 46–66), Malta (GCI: 47–69), Hungary
(GCI: 46–65) and Croatia (GCI: 46–62), which
unequivocally proves the uneven level of
development of human capital and the efficiency of
its user. At the same time, it is worth noting that
significant differences exist in the countries of the
European Union regarding the investment of human
capital, which is manifested in the amount of funding
for the development of human resources in
enterprises. As a result, this significantly affects the
formation of knowledge, skills, and motivation of
employees. It is obvious that in those countries
where the amount of investment in the development
of human capital is lower and there are no strategies
for its implementation, there is a problem of leaving
competitive, highly educated, and capable employees
outside the country and carrying out activities on the
territory of foreign countries, as a rule, highly
developed ones. This thesis is confirmed by the
indicators of the Talent Competitiveness Index; it is
expedient to demonstrate the dynamics of the
European Union's states in 2020–2021 in Figure 2.
Fig. 1: The state and tendencies of changes in the Global Competitiveness Index in the countries of the
European Union in 2018–2021
Compiled based on: [15], [16], [17], [18]
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1520
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 2: The state and tendencies of changes in the Talent Competitiveness Index in the countries of the
European Union in 2020–2021
Compiled based on [19], [20]
The results of applied studies make it possible to
state that according to the Talent Competitiveness
Index, the leading positions are held by such
countries as Denmark (TCI: 75–78), Luxembourg
(TCI: 72–77), the Netherlands (TCI: 74–77), Finland
(TCI: 73 –77) and Sweden (TCI: 74–78), and
outsiders are Croatia (TCI: 47–50), Romania (TCI:
44–50), Bulgaria (TCI: 46–52) and Greece (TCI: 49
53), respectively. Accordingly, it is possible to state
the substantiation of the proposed hypothesis,
forasmuch as it has been established that highly
developed countries provide higher indicators of
talent competitiveness, which indicates a higher
efficiency of human capital management.
After all, the investigation of human capital in
the system of economic development of a certain
country allows analyzing the state of development of
human capital according to such criteria as the
standard of living of the population, its education,
literacy, and life expectancy. As a result of the
analysis, it has been established that in terms of the
level of human capital development, the highest
indicators are positioned in the following countries,
namely: Ireland (HDI: 0,94–0,95), Germany (HDI:
0,94), Denmark (HDI: 0,93–0,95 ), the Netherlands
(HDI: 0,93–0,94), Austria (HDI: 0,91–0,92), Finland
(HDI: 0,92–0,94), Belgium (HDI: 0,92–0,94),
Luxembourg (HDI: 0,90–0,93), Slovenia (HDI:
0,90–0,92) and Sweden (HDI: 0,93–0,95). At the
same time, the lowest values of the analyzed
indicator have been revealed in Bulgaria (HDI: 0,80
0,82) and Romania (HDI: 0,81–0,82), respectively.
When studying the development of human
capital in the countries of the European Union, it is
expedient to pay attention to the indicators of the
implementation of innovative activities by economic
entities. After all, the innovative type of human
capital development indicates the attraction of
investment resources for its improvement and
effective use.
At the international level, it is customary to use
the Global Innovation Index for such assessments,
which makes it possible to provide insight into the
level of balancing of the real needs of the economy
and the capabilities of human capital to involve
innovations in practical activities. The conducted
studies of the dynamics of the Global Innovation
Index in the countries of the European Union in
2018–2021 (Figure 4) give grounds to assert that the
most innovative enterprises are located in the
territory of such countries as Sweden (GII: 62–64),
the Netherlands (GII: 59–63) and Finland (GII: 57–
60). On the other hand, the lowest indicators in the
analyzed group of countries have been recorded in
Romania (GII: 36–38), Greece (GII: 36–39), and
Croatia (GII: 37–41). The state and tendencies of
changes in the Human Development Index in the
countries of the European Union in 2018–2021 are
shown in Figure 3.
Aus
tria
Bel
giu
m
Bul
gari
a
Gre
ece
Den
mar
k
Esto
nia
Irel
and
Spai
n
Ital
y
Cyp
rus
Lat
via
Lith
uani
a
Lux
emb
our
g
Mal
ta
Net
herl
and
s
Ger
man
y
Pola
nd
Port
ugal
Ro
man
ia
Slo
vaki
a
Slo
veni
a
Hun
gary
Finl
and
Fra
nce
Cro
atia
The
Cze
ch
Rep
ubli
c
Swe
den
2020 72 72 52 53 78 67 73 62 59 62 61 60 77 66 77 74 56 63 50 57 63 54 77 69 50 65 78
2021 68 68 46 49 75 62 68 58 54 56 56 55 72 61 74 68 50 59 44 51 58 51 73 65 47 61 74
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Talent Competitiveness Index
Countries
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1521
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 3: The state and tendencies of changes in the Human Development Index in the countries of the
European Union in 2018–2021
Compiled based on [15], [16], [17], [18]
Taking into account the outlined tendencies in
studying the development of human capital in the
countries of the European Union, we consider it
expedient to deepen our calculations and carry out
the grouping of the specified countries according to
the indicators selected for evaluation. Such
calculations will be carried out using the technology
of cluster analysis by applying the k-means method,
and the obtained results will be systematized in Table
1.
As a result of the clustering of the European
Union’s states according to the indicators of the
Global Competitiveness Index, the Human
Development Index, and the Global Innovation
Index, it was possible to single out three groups of
countries characterized by common features of the
parameters of human capital development, namely:
highly developed countries, countries with the
medium level of development, and developing
countries.
The first group for all indicators has included
such countries as Austria, Belgium, Denmark,
Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Germany,
Finland, France, and Sweden, where the highest
values of the analyzed indicators have been recorded,
and the development of human capital takes place
based on efficiency, innovation, and pioneering
work. This allows organizations to constantly ensure
the relevant level and permanently increase the
indicators of competitiveness.
These countries also have highly developed labor
markets that enable workers to fully utilize their
skills and contribute to the country's economic
growth.
Overall, the success of these countries in human
capital development has contributed significantly to
their economic growth and competitiveness. The
highly skilled and educated workforce enables these
countries to innovate, adapt to new challenges and
opportunities, and maintain a high level of
productivity.
The second group consists of Spain, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Slovenia, the Czech
Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, and Malta, which position
medium, and in some cases, high indicators of
human capital development. However, these states
have certain problems regarding the effectiveness of
its use, in particular, in terms of intensification of the
processes of outflow of highly qualified employees
outside the country. The lack of job opportunities,
low salaries, and limited career growth prospects
often drive highly skilled workers to seek
employment opportunities in other countries with
more favorable conditions. This brain drain results in
a loss of valuable human capital and a reduced
capacity for innovation and economic growth.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1522
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 4. The state and tendencies of changes in the Global Innovation Index in the countries of the European
Union in 2018–2021
Compiled based on [21], [22], [23], [24].
To address this challenge, these countries need
to create an enabling environment that encourages
highly skilled workers to stay and contribute to the
country's economic development. This includes
providing competitive salaries, creating job
opportunities, improving working conditions, and
offering career growth prospects.
The third group includes Bulgaria, Greece,
Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, and Croatia, which
belong to countries of the transitive type and have
significant problems with the development of
human capital and insufficient resources for
investing in it. Therefore, characterizing the
countries of the European Union according to the
parameters of human capital development, it is
possible to note the following pattern: in highly
developed countries, more attention is paid to the
problems of human capital development and the
amount of investment is significantly higher than in
developing countries.
The pattern observed in the development of
human capital in the European Union indicates that
highly developed countries pay more attention to
the problems of human capital development and
invest more resources in it than developing
countries.
However, it is essential to recognize that
investing in human capital development is not only
a responsibility of highly developed countries but
also a requirement for the development of all
countries, regardless of their level of economic
development.
In conclusion, the development of human
capital is critical for the success of organizations
and the economic development of countries. The
European Union has different levels of human
capital development, with highly developed
countries investing significantly more resources in
it than developing countries. However, it is
important to recognize that investing in human
capital development is essential for all countries to
remain competitive in the global market and ensure
sustainable economic growth.
Bel
giu
m
Bul
gari
a
The
Cze
ch
Rep
ubli
c
Den
mar
k
Ger
man
y
Est
onia
Irel
and
Gre
ece
Spa
in
Fra
nce
Cro
atia
Ital
y
Cyp
rus
Lat
via
Lith
uani
a
Lux
emb
our
g
Hun
gar
y
Mal
ta
The
Net
herl
and
s
Aus
tria
Pol
and
Port
ugal
Ro
man
ia
Slo
veni
a
Slo
vaki
a
Finl
and
Swe
den
2018 51 43 49 58 58 51 57 39 49 54 41 46 48 43 41 55 45 50 63 51 42 46 38 47 43 60 63
2019 50 40 49 58 58 50 56 39 48 54 38 46 48 43 41 53 45 49 61 51 41 45 37 45 42 60 64
2020 49 40 48 58 57 48 53 37 46 54 37 46 46 41 39 51 42 46 59 50 40 44 36 43 40 57 62
2021 49 42 49 57 57 50 51 36 45 55 37 46 47 40 40 49 43 47 59 51 40 44 36 44 40 58 63
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Global Innovation Index
Countries
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1523
Volume 20, 2023
Table 1. Grouping of the countries of the European Union according to the indicators of the Global
Competitiveness Index, the Human Development Index, and the Global Innovation Index
Indicator
І
ІІ
ІІІ
Global
Competitiveness
Index
Austria
Spain
Bulgaria
Belgium
Italy
Greece
Denmark
Latvia
Cyprus
Estonia
Lithuania
Malta
Ireland
Portugal
Poland
Luxembourg
Slovenia
Romania
The Netherlands
The Czech Republic
Slovakia
Germany
Hungary
Finland
Croatia
France
Sweden
Human
Development
Index
Austria
Greece
Bulgaria
Belgium
Estonia
Latvia
Denmark
Spain
Portugal
Ireland
Italy
Romania
Luxembourg
Cyprus
Slovakia
The Netherlands
Lithuania
Hungary
Germany
Malta
Croatia
Slovenia
Poland
Finland
France
Sweden
The Czech Republic
Global
Innovation
Index
Denmark
Belgium
Bulgaria
Germany
The Czech Republic
Greece
Ireland
Estonia
Croatia
France
Spain
Latvia
The Netherlands
Italy
Lithuania
Finland
Cyprus
Hungary
Sweden
Luxembourg
Poland
Malta
Romania
Austria
Slovakia
Portugal
Slovenia
Compiled based on: [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24].
5 Discussion
Investment in human capital is essential for the
long-term success of an enterprise. Developing an
effective investment strategy for human capital is
critical to achieving a competitive advantage,
attracting and retaining talented employees, and
fostering a culture of continuous learning and
growth.
The strengthening of the destructive impact of
global challenges and dangers has led to a decrease
in the level of competitiveness of business entities in
many countries of the world. Particularly noticeable
negative phenomena and processes regarding the
development of human capital are observed in the
countries belonging to the European Union;
however, they have not completed the
transformational restructuring yet. Comparative
studies of the main tendencies in the development of
human capital make it possible to identify certain
patterns that are related to the level of social-
economic development of the country. In particular,
countries with high indicators of investment in
human capital can implement the highest standards
of innovative development and combine the
introduction of innovations with the progressive
development of human capital. Along with this,
developing countries put the main emphasis on
preserving the existing level of development of
human capital, as a result of which they do not focus
on improving the quality and efficiency of its use.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1524
Volume 20, 2023
Human capital is positioned as a multi-level set
of interdependent components, each of which
requires investments, in particular: educational,
professional, social, and cultural ones. Therefore, its
development significantly affects society and the
economy, and also determines the main trends of
innovative development not only of business entities
but also of the entire country.
An effective investment strategy for the
development of human capital is critical to the
success of any enterprise. By prioritizing the
development of critical skills and competencies,
leveraging a variety of training and development
methods, and incorporating performance
management and career development, the enterprise
can create a culture of continuous learning and
growth and achieve a competitive advantage in the
marketplace. In this context, we consider it quite
reasonable to propose a further improvement of
human capital development tools, one of which is
the establishment of a public-private partnership in
this direction, which, at the current stage, is the
perspective of further scientific investigation.
6 Conclusions
Therefore, the results of studying the main
tendencies and problematic issues regarding the
formation of an investment strategy for the
development of the enterprise's human capital give
grounds for asserting that there is no single
approach to the formation of such an investment
strategy at the level of the European Union. The
conducted assessments of the main parameters of
this economic category have made it possible to
establish its significant dependence on the level of
financing in the form of long-term investments, the
level of innovative development of the national
economy and business entities, and on favorable
conditions for conducting business activities. A
significant problem of the loss of human capital has
been revealed in those countries that are classified
as a transitive type of development and have not
completed structural restructuring yet (Bulgaria,
Greece, Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, and Croatia),
in which the values of all analyzed indicators are
within crisis limits, and the movement of highly
qualified employees takes place in those countries
that are highly developed (Austria, Belgium,
Denmark, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
Germany, Finland, France, and Sweden). As a result
of the clustering of the European Union's states
according to the indicators of the Global
Competitiveness Index, the Human Development
Index, and the Global Innovation Index, the
hypothesis that highly developed countries can
ensure a higher level of development of the
enterprise's human capital while developing
countries need advisory assistance, has been proven.
References:
[1] Lonska, J. & Mietule, I. (2015). The impact of
human capital development on the economic
and social development of a country: an
empirical study. Environment. Technologies.
Resources. Proceedings of the International
Scientific and Practical Conference, 2, 174–
180. Available at:
DOI: 10.17770/etr2015vol2.268
[2] Lipych, L., Khilukha, O., Kushnir, M. &
Zagoruiko, V. (2019). A Strategic human
capital management as part of Business
Development. Economic Journal of Lesya
Ukrainka East European National University,
1 (17), 45–55. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2019-01-
45-55.
[3] Timothy, V.L. (2022). The effect of top
managers’ human capital on SME productivity:
the mediating role of innovation. Heliyon, 8
(4), 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09330.
[4] Shamsuzzoha, I. & Tanaka, M. (2020). The
Role of human capital on the performance of
manufacturing firms in Bangladesh.
Managerial and Decision Economics, 42 (1),
21–33. Available at: DOI: 10.1002/mde.3210.
[5] Koo, K.J. 2019). Do not change horses:
specialist CEOs enhance innovation.
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,
31, 8, 875–887. Available at:
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2019.1566525.
[6] Liu, J. (2021). Impact of enterprise human
capital on technological innovation based on
machine learning and SVM algorithm. Journal
of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized
Computing. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03045-8.
[7] Pelinescy, E. (2015). The Impact of Human
Capital on Economic Growth. Procedia
Economics and Finance, 22, 184–190.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-
5671(15)00258-0
[8] Diebolt, C. & Hippe, R. (2018). The long-run
impact of human capital on innovation and
economic development in the Regions of
Europe. Applied Economics, 51, 5, p.542–563.
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2018.1495820.
[9] Paunoviç, M. (2021). The Impact of Human
Capital on Financial Performance of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1525
Volume 20, 2023
Entrepreneurial Firms in Serbia. Management:
Journal of Sustainable Business and
Management Solutions in Emerging
Economies, 26 (2), 29–46. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2020.
0010.
[10] Choudhary, S., Memon, N.Z. & Mishra, K.
(2020). Examining the Influence of Human
Capital on Empoloyees Innovative Work
Behaviour: A Moderated Serial Mediation
Model. South Asian Journal of Human
Resources Management, 7, 2, 189–213. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093720942660.
[11] Pasban, M. & Nojedeh, S.H. (2016). A Review
of the Role of Human Capital in the
Organization. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 230, 249–253. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.032.
[12] Dawud, S.A. (2020). The Impact of Human
Capital Development on Economic Growth in
Ethiopia. American Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Business, 64 (4), 47–51.
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20200604.11
[13] Rahman, M. & Akhter, B. (2021). The Impact
of investment in Human Capital on bank
performance: evidence from Bangladesh.
Future Business Journal, 7, 61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-
00105-5.
[14] Tereshchenko, D. (2020). Formation of
Government Regulation Mechanisms with
Human Capital Development. Investments:
practice and experience, 4, 103–108.
DOI: 10.32702/23066814.2020.4.103
[15] The Global Competitiveness Report 2018.
Available at:
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05
FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2
018.pdf [Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[16] The Global Competitiveness Report 2019.
Available at:
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlo
balCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[17] The Global Competitiveness Report 2020.
Available at:
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlo
balCompetitivenessReport2020.pdf
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[18] The Global Competitiveness Report 2021.
Available at: https://www.8-
international.com/competitiveness-report-
2021/pdf/competitiveness-report-2021.pdf
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[19] The Global Talent Competitiveness Index
2020. Available at:
https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/asset
s/dept/fr/gtci/GTCI-2021-Report.pdf
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[20] The Global Talent Competitiveness Index
2021. Available at:
https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/asset
s/dept/fr/gtci/GTCI-2022-report.pdf
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[21] The Global Innovation Report 2018. Available
at: https://tind.wipo.int/record/28174
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[22] The Global Innovation Report 2019.
Available at:
https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.js
p?id=4434 [Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[23] The Global Innovation Report 2020. Available
at:
https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_
pub_gii_2020.pdf
[Accessed on 17 January 2023].
[24] The Global Innovation Report 2021. Available
at:
https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/
en/2021/ [Accessed on 17 January 2023].
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The authors equally contributed in the present
research, at all stages from the formulation of the
problem to the final findings and solution
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare
that is relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.134
Viktoria Borshch, Oleh Sheremet,
Iryna Mykolaichuk, Bashuk Hanna,
Pavlenko Olena, Mykhaylo Danilko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1526
Volume 20, 2023