Factors Affect the Social Responsibility among Universities in Saudi
Arabia: The Role of Government Support
MONA ABDULLA AL-SAMHAN
King Saud University,
Riyadh,
SAUDI ARABIA
Abstract: - Research into Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) focused on business organizations in
developed countries. The purpose of this research is to examine the factors that affect the CSR in public
universities in Saudi Arabia. Building on stakeholder theory and transformational leadership (TL) theory, this
study proposed that TL and its dimension will have a significant effect on CSR. Training is expected to affect
CSR and mediate the effect of TL on CSR. Government support (GS) is expected to moderate the effect of TL
on CSR. Data was collected from 319 academic staff in eight public universities in Saudi Arabia. The data was
analysed using Smart PLS. The findings showed that TL and training affected the CSR. All the dimensions of
TL have significant effects except for the individualized consideration. Training mediated the effect of TL on
CSR while GS moderated the effect of TL on CSR. Decision makers are recommended to implement effective
training and TL style. Government support is critical for improving the role of CSR by universities.
Key-Words: Social Responsibility, Transformational Leadership, Government Support, Training,
Individualized Influence Public Universities, Saudi Arabia
Received: July 12, 2022. Revised: August 2, 2022. Accepted: August 25, 2022. Available online: September 15, 2022.
1 Introduction
Universities are the source of knowledge. Countries
around the world compete in developing their
universities to attract more students and increase the
economic growth [1][3]. Generally, there are three
main objectives of university which are related to
the research, teaching and community services [4],
[5]. The role of university in spreading knowledge
and awareness and contributing to the society is
considered as important objectives that increase the
reputation of universities and enhance their
responsibility toward the community [6], [7].
Accordingly, universities are similar to other
institutions aim to enhance their corporate social
responsibility (CSR) to benefit the society. For this
reason, CSR has become one of the critical issue for
all organizations [8]. CSR practices are widely
known and practiced in developed economies while
when it comes to the developing countries, the
practices are limited [9].
In Saudi Arabia, the vision of 2030 focused on
the role of university and higher education to help in
fulfilling the vision and develop the skills and
capabilities of students to help in improving the
productivity of private and public sector [10][12].
This fits with the mission of universities to develop
knowledgeable graduates who are capable of
producing knowledge and employing it efficiently in
all areas of community activity, and actively
participating in various community institutions [13].
Social responsibility is a concept that includes many
areas that revolve around moral responsibility,
community responsibility, and national
responsibility. In business context, researchers
divided CSR to economic, ethical, legal, and
philanthropic responsibility and found that CSR
improved the public image of organizations [14].
One of the factors helping to achieve the role of
CSR in a university is the creation of a positive
university climate that allows a degree of social
interaction, in which the spirit of cooperation,
harmony and collectively prevails, and the creation
of positive opportunities to support and praise the
national culture and adhere to its content without
closing or rejecting the product of knowledge
development, and developing the feeling of each
individual that he has an active role within the
organization and the community. This can be done
by implementing effective leadership such as the
transformational leadership (TL) [15]. Additionally,
effective training can help in improving the skills
and capabilities of the organizational member to
achieve their role in fulfilling the organizational
objectives [16].
Most of prior literature focused on the role of
CSR among business organization while limited
studies have examined the CSR of educational
institutions. Several studies indicated that there is
limited studies that examined the social
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
61
Volume 20, 2023
responsibility among organizations in developing
countries. A review of CSR using scientometric
approach and including 2,583 articles between
1973-2018 indicated that research on CSR is still
dominated by Western countries with recent
increase in other non-western countries [17].
Several studies referred to the importance of
leadership of the university as well as the training
and government support. Leadership is critical for
improving the contribution of a university to the
community. One important type of leadership is the
transformational leadership (TL) [18]. Along with
leadership, training is important to support the
capability of academic staff in the university to
achieve their role in educating the community [19].
In this regard, the government support plays
essential role in enable public and private
institutions to fulfil their roles [20][22]. However,
few studies examined these factors in the context of
higher education in developing countries.
There has, in recent times, been an increasing
interest in understanding CSR reporting in
developing countries. However, many of these
studies fail to investigate fully the contextual factors
that influence CSR and reporting in those countries,
preferring to rely on theories and hypotheses
developed from studies undertaken in the West,
particularly the US, UK and Australasia [23].
Therefore, this study aims to examine the factors
that affect the CSR among university in Saudi
Arabia. The study aims is to examine the effect of
TL and training on the CSR of public university in
Saudi Arabia. The study aims to examine the
mediating role of training and the moderating role of
government support between TL and CSR of public
universities in Saudi Arabia. The next sections
discusses the literature, research methodology,
findings, discussion, and conclusion.
2 Literature Review
This section discusses the literature of this paper.
The section discusses the concept of CSR as well as
the conceptual framework.
2.1 CSR in Educational Institutions
Universities as organization are more into providing
the teaching and learning services. The role of CSR
by higher educational institution is still emerging.
Studies indicated that universities are paying less
attention to the role of CSR compared with business
organizations [8]. Prior literature examined the
factors that might lead to effective CSR by
universities. Among the findings that size, status
(public or private) and ranking are critical factors
for the CSR by universities [8]. Studies of CSR are
mostly dominated by the business organizations as
well as developed countries. This has motivated us
to conduct a study on the CSR among public
universities which in developing countries.
2.2 Theoretical Framework
Several theories that can explain the role of CSR by
organizations. One of the widely used theory is the
stakeholder theory. Stakeholder theory argues that
corporations should treat all its stakeholders fairly
and by doing so, can improve their performance
[24] and thereby secure their future. Freeman [25]
stated that if organisations want to be effective, they
need to pay attention to their stakeholders.
Stakeholder theory suggests that those who benefits
from an organization, will be more satisfied when
the organization took care of their stakeholders.
Public universities are one of the leading sources of
education and have responsibility toward the
citizens, government, and country. Educating
students and creating effective graduates can
contribute to the community. In addition, educating
citizens about emerging issues such as outbreak of a
pandemic or general knowledge regarding an issue
is a contribution of the universities toward the
community. This study deploys the stakeholder
theory to explain the CSR activities of a university.
Along with this theory, the TL theory suggests that
leaders will focus on the development of skills and
capabilities of organizational member to develop the
overall performance of an organization [26], [27]. In
this context, the transformational leaders have the
ability to develop the skill of academic staff in
universities and in turn those academic staff will
contribute to the CSR of a university.
2.3 Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses
Development
Based on stakeholder theory and the TL theory,
this study proposed that the effects of TL and its
dimensions on the CSR of public universities in
Saudi Arabia are positive. In addition, the study
proposed training as a mediating variable
between TL and CSR and government support
as a moderating variable between TL and CSR.
Figure 1 shows the conceptual framework.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
62
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 1: Conceptual Framework
2.3.1 Transformational leadership and CSR
TL is defined as the one that creates valuable and
positive changes in its followers through a process
of helping members individually [28]. It differs
from the transactional leadership because it has four
components that are individualized consideration,
intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation,
and idealized influence [29]. The first components is
individualized consideration and it is defined as the
degree to which the leader attends to each follower's
needs, acts as a mentor or coach to the follower and
listens to the follower's concerns and needs. The
second components is intellectual stimulation and it
is defined as the degree to which the leader
challenges assumptions, takes risks and solicits
followers' ideas. Third components of TL is the
inspirational motivation and it refers to the degree to
which the leader articulates a vision that is
appealing and inspiring to followers. The last
components is idealized influence: this elements
provides a role model for high ethical behaviour,
instils pride, gains respect and trust [30][32].
TL was examined in business context, and few
examined its effect on CSR. For instance, the effect
of TL on CSR of SMEs was found positive [33]. TL
affected positively the CSR of hospitals [34].
Further, in non-for-profit organizations, the TL
affected significantly the CSR [35] and a positive
effect of TL on CSR was found in higher education
[36], [37]. Accordingly, this study expects that the
TL and its dimensions will have a positive impact
on the CSR of public universities in Saudi Arabia.
Thus, the following is hypothesized:
H1: TL affects positively the CSR of public
universities.
H2: Individualized Consideration affects
positively the CSR of public universities.
H3: Intellectual stimulation affects positively the
CSR of public universities.
H4: Inspirational motivation affects positively
the CSR of public universities.
H5: Idealized influence affects positively the
CSR of public universities.
2.3.2 Training and CSR
Training is defined as the planned intervention that
is designed to enhance the determinants of
individual job performance [19]. Training is critical
for achieving the organizational objectives. Prior
literature examined the moderating role of training
between employee involvement and CSR and found
that high level of training is important for CSR [38].
The mediating role of training was also examined
and it was found that training mediated the effect of
stakeholder pressure and adoption of environmental
sustainability [39]. Training also affected positively
the green initiatives in higher education and
shareholder value [40], [41]. Training also was
found to be a critical factors for the job satisfaction
of employees in the public organizations [42].
Accordingly, this study examines the role of training
on CSR, and it also examines its mediating role
between TL and CSR. Thus, it is hypothesized:
H6: Training has a positive effect on CSR of
public universities.
H7: Training mediates the effect of TL on CSR
of public universities.
2.3.3 Government Support as a Moderator
Government support can be in several forms such as
providing training, tax exception, and financial
support [21], [22]. In this study, the public
universities are examined, and government support
these universities by providing direct fund of the
activities of these universities. Government support
Transformational leadership
Individualized Consideration
intellectual stimulation
inspirational motivation
idealized influence
Training
Government
Support
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
63
Volume 20, 2023
can play a moderating role. High government
support encourages research and development
activities which lead to better performance [43].
Government supported moderated the effect of
research intensity on diversified performance [44].
It also moderated the effect of green innovation on
sustainable development [45]. In this study,
government support is proposed to moderate the
effect of TL on CSR. Accordingly, the following is
hypothesized:
H8: Government support moderates the effect of
TL on CSR of public universities.
3 Research Methodology
This study is a quantitative in nature. The study is
conducted among universities in Saudi Arabia.
Public universities in Riyadh are selected as the
population of this study. There are eight public
universities working in Riyadh. The administrative
staff or the academic staff are the population of this
study. These are 18,883 academic staff. The random
sampling technique was used, and the data was
collected using a questionnaire. The sample size
based on [46] is 377. The questionnaire was adopted
from previous studies. Measurement of
transformational leadership and its dimensions were
adopted from [47], [48], [49]. Measurement of
government support was adopted from [50], training
was adopted from [51]. Measurement of CSR was
adopted from [52]. The questionnaire was translated
into Arabic and validation was conducted by three
experts. The comments and feedback of experts
were used for improving the questionnaire. A pilot
study was conducted prior to data collection. A total
of 377 questionnaire were distributed on the
academic staff in the eight universities. The contact
details were collected from the websites of the
universities. A total of 343 responses were collected
after follow ups. These responses were further
filtered based on missing value (MV), outliers,
normality, and multicollinearity. Missing value
analysis resulted in removing seven of the responses
and the outlier’s analysis has resulted in removing
17 responses. This has made the valid responses
319. Table 1 shows the results of data examination,
and it shows that the data is distributed normally
because the skewness (SK) and kurtosis (KU) is less
than 1. In addition, the table shows that there is no
high correlation between the variables because the
Variation inflation factor (VIF) is less than 5 and the
tolerance (T) is greater than 0.20.
Table 1. Data Examination
Variable
Normality
Multicollinearity
SK
KU
T
VIF
TL
-.61
-.51
.51
1.31
IS
-.31
-.79
.32
1.46
IC
-.51
-.71
.44
1.35
II
-.34
-.93
.58
1.43
IM
-.34
-.34
.66
1.34
TR
-.41
-.81
.54
1.66
GS
-.43
-.43
.56
1.33
CSR
-.61
-.59
.51
1.93
LE
-.20
-.69
.51
1.93
ET
-.45
-.51
.53
1.85
PH
-.40
-.55
-
-
Note: TL: Transformational leadership, IS:
Intellectual stimulation, IC: individualized
consideration, IM: Inspirational motivation, II:
idealized influence, TR: Training, GS: government
support, CSR: corporate social responsibility, LE:
Legal, ET: Ethical, PH: Philanthropic
4 Findings
This section presents the background of the
respondents as well as the hypotheses testing of this
study.
4.1 Background of Respondents
A total of 319 respondents have participated and
answered the questionnaire of this study. The
respondents are majority males (81%) working as
academic staff (65%) and have experience in
teaching of more than 5 years (78%). The
respondents have participated at least one time in
CSR activities during the last year (100%).
4.2 Measurement Model
Researchers indicated that the measurement model
(MM) can be assessed by examining the factor
loading which is supposed to be larger than 0.70 and
the reliabilities (Cronbach’s Alpha (CA), Composite
Reliability (CR)) which are expected to be larger
than 0.70 for both. In addition, the convergent
validity which assessed using the average variance
extracted (AVE) is supposed to be greater than 0.50
[53], [54]. The first order and second order models
were assessed. As shown in Table 2, all the values
achieved the required level, and this is because
some items with low factor loading from CSR,
government support, and training were removed.
For the discriminant validity it is also achieved
because the value of root square of AVE as shown
in bold in Table 2 is greater than the cross loading.
Table 2 shows the results of the measurement
model. It shows the bold values are greater than the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
64
Volume 20, 2023
cross loading. In addition, CA and CR are greater than 0.70. the AVE is greater than 0.50.
Table 2. Result of the Measurement Model for First Order and Second Order
First order variable
CA
CR
AVE
ET
II
IC
IM
IS
LE
PH
Ethical
0.944
0.960
0.857
0.926
Idealized influence
0.932
0.941
0.719
0.607
0.920
Individualized Consideration
0.915
0.925
0.810
0.652
0.230
0.901
Inspirational Motivation
0.921
0.927
0.789
0.652
0.630
0.401
0.904
Intellectual Stimulation
0.938
0.930
0.806
0.661
0.557
0.562
0.420
0.920
Legal
0.956
0.968
0.883
0.673
0.542
0.536
0.306
0.506
0.841
Philanthropic
0.947
0.960
0.826
0.683
0.433
0.667
0.433
0.433
0.526
0.874
Second order variables
TR
TL
GS
CSR
Training
0.960
0.962
0.763
0.818
Transformational Leadership
0.923
0.942
0.765
0.652
0.939
Government Support
0.960
0.966
0.782
0.652
0.341
0.891
CSR
0.913
0.909
0.741
0.661
0.541
0.432
0.883
4.3 Structural Model
Based on the suggestions of [53], the structural
model is assessed by examining the R-square, F-
square, Q-square, and path coefficient. Figure 2
shows the structural model of this study. It shows
the effect of TL on CSR as well as the mediating
role of training and the moderating role of
government support.
Fig. 2: Structural Model
For the R-square, the model showed that R-square
of CSR is 0.631 indicating that 63.1% of the
variation in CSR can be explained by the TL and
TR. The R-square of TR is 0.183 indicating that
18.3% of the TR can be explained by TL. For the q-
square, the value is greater than zero as shown in
Table 3. Lastly, for the f-square (f2), the acceptable
value is 0.02. For all the paths, the f-square (effect
size) is acceptable except for the ICCSR.
However, this value is low because the related
hypothesis is rejected. Table 3 shows the hypotheses
(H), path, path coefficient (B), standard deviation
(Std.), T-value (T), P-value (P), f-square (f2), Q-
square (Q2), and R-square (R2).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
65
Volume 20, 2023
Table 3. Results of Hypotheses Testing
H
Path
B
Std.
T
P
f2
Q2
R2
Remark
H1
TL -> CSR
0.288
0.068
4.239
0.000
0.161
0.231
0.631
Supported
H2
IC-> CSR
0.101
0.100
0.961
0.341
0.002
Rejected
H3
IS-> CSR
0.383
0.081
4.573
0.000
0.049
Supported
H4
IM-> CSR
0.221
0.083
2.844
0.000
0.091
Supported
H5
II-> CSR
0.213
0.094
2.241
0.031
0.081
Supported
H6
TR -> CSR
0.474
0.065
7.300
0.000
0.181
Supported
H7
TL -> TR
0.771
0.034
22.912
0.000
0.391
0.198
0.183
TL -> TR -> CSR
0.365
0.049
7.457
0.000
0.092
Supported
H8
GS*TL -> CSR
0.066
0.017
3.798
0.000
0.048
Supported
GS -> CSR
0.102
0.050
2.023
0.044
0.037
The findings in Table 3 shows that the effect of TL
on CSR is positive (B=0.288, P<0.05). Thus, H1 is
supported. For H2, it is rejected because the effect
of IC on CSR is positive, but the p-value is greater
than 0.05. H3, H4, and H5 are supported because
the effect of IS, IM, and II on CSR are positive at p-
value less than 0.05. Accordingly, H3, H4, and H5
are supported. For H6, the effect of training on CSR
is positive and significant because the value of
B=0.474 and the P-value is less than 0.05.
For the mediating effect of training, it is a partial
mediation because the direct and the indirect effect
(TLTRCSR) is positive and significant at
B=0.365 and p-value is less than 0.05. Thus, H7 is
supported, and training can explain part of the
relationship between TL and CSR. For the
moderating effect of GS, the findings in Table 3
shows that GS moderated the effect of TL on CSR
at value of B=0.066 and P-value less than 0.05.
Additionally, the findings showed that GS also has a
direct positive significant effect on CSR. Thus, H8
is supported.
5 Discussion and Implications
This study examines the factors that affect the CSR
among public universities in developing countries
such as Saudi Arabia. The study responded to the
call for more studies in developing countries and
enrich the literature of CSR in the context of non-
business organizations such as universities. The
study combined the stakeholder theory with TL
theory and managed to explain large percentage
(63.1%) of the CSR. In addition, the study
contributed to the literature by examining the
mediating role of training and the moderating role of
GS in the context of higher education in developing
countries. The study also contributed to the
literature by examining the effect of TL and its
dimensions on the CSR in the context of public
universities.
The findings of the study showed that TL,
training, and GS are critical for the CSR. TL
affected positively the CSR, and this indicates that
universities in Saudi Arabia should practice this
type of leadership to improve the level of CSR
among the universities. The most important element
of TL is the intellectual stimulation (IS) followed by
inspirational motivation (IM) and idealized
influence (II). This indicates that decision makers
have to focus on IS and urge their followers to come
up with new idea and help them to sharpen the idea
and to point out their opinion. These findings
regarding the effect of TL and its dimension IS, IM,
and II are in line with the findings of previous
studies [33][37]. The study found that
individualized consideration is not significant, and
this could be due to the fact that number of those
who are under the dean or head of department is
high which makes it difficult to consider the need of
everyone.
Training has a direct and mediating role between
TL and CSR. This indicates that training is a critical
factor for CSR, and it can explain part of the
association between TL and CSR. This finding is in
agreement with the findings of prior literature [38]
[42]. The findings also showed that GS is a
significant positive moderator between TL and
CSR. This indicates that the high level of the GS
can improve the positive relationship between TL
and CSR. Accordingly, decision makers are
recommended to enhance the GS because it will
lead to a better CSR by public universities in Saudi
Arabia.
Overall, it is recommended that head of
department, dean, and chancellor of universities to
implement TL style of leadership. It is also
recommended that effective training policy to focus
on developing the skills and capabilities of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
66
Volume 20, 2023
academic staff in general and in CSR area in
particular. Further, the GS is critical for improving
the level of CSR among universities and decision
makers are recommended to enhance the GS for
universities.
6 Conclusion
This study was conducted in Saudi Arabia among
public universities to examine the factors that lead
to effective CSR by universities. The findings
showed that TL and its dimensions except the
individualized consideration are critical
determinants of the CSR. Training is also important
predictors and mediator between TL and CSR.
Further, GS is a significant moderator between TL
and CSR, and it has a direct effect on CSR. The
study is limited to Saudi Arabian context and to
public universities. Further work is recommended to
examine the CSR among universities in other Gulf
countries or other developing countries. Future
works are also recommended to examine the CSR
among private universities. This study focuses on
administrative and academic staff. Future studies
can examine the CSR initiatives among students.
Future studies are also recommended to examine
other factors such as the organizational justice,
organizational commitment, and job security in the
context of CSR. Examining these factors might lead
to a significant increase in the variation of CSR
among universities. Decision makers can benefit
from the findings of this study in improving the
CSR and the role of universities in fulfilling the
vision of 2030 in Saudi Arabia.
References
[1] S. Heaton, D. S. Siegel, and D. J. Teece,
“Universities and innovation ecosystems: a
dynamic capabilities perspective,” Ind. Corp.
Chang., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 921939, 2019.
[2] M. Klofsten, A. Fayolle, M. Guerrero, S.
Mian, D. Urbano, and M. Wright, “The
entrepreneurial university as driver for
economic growth and social change-Key
strategic challenges,” Technol. Forecast.
Soc. Change, vol. 141, pp. 149158, 2019.
[3] G. Dalmarco, W. Hulsink, and G. V Blois,
“Creating entrepreneurial universities in an
emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil,”
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 135,
pp. 99111, 2018.
[4] W. M. Purcell, H. Henriksen, and J. D.
Spengler, “Universities as the engine of
transformational sustainability toward
delivering the sustainable development
goals:‘Living labs’ for sustainability,” Int. J.
Sustain. High. Educ., 2019.
[5] S. Albareda-Tiana, S. Vidal-Raméntol, and
M. Fernández-Morilla, “Implementing the
sustainable development goals at University
level,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 19,
no. 3, pp. 473497, 2018.
[6] K. Bielaczyc and A. Collins, “Learning
communities in classrooms: A
reconceptualization of educational practice,”
Instr. Des. Theor. Model., vol. 2, pp. 269
291, 2009.
[7] Z. Qazi, W. Qazi, S. A. Raza, and S. Q.
Yousufi, “The antecedents affecting
university reputation and student
satisfaction: a study in higher education
context,” Corp. Reput. Rev., pp. 119, 2021.
[8] R. G. Sanchez, M. P. R. Bolívar, and A. M.
L. Hernandez, Which are the main factors
influencing corporate social responsibility
information disclosures on universities’
websites,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public
Health, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 123, 2021.
[9] A. Bhatia and B. Makkar, “CSR disclosure
in developing and developed countries: a
comparative study,” J. Glob. Responsib.,
2019.
[10] E. A. R. Alharbi, “Higher education in Saudi
Arabia: Challenges to achieving world-class
recognition,” Int. J. Cult. Hist., vol. 2, no. 4,
pp. 169172, 2016.
[11] A. Aldiab, H. Chowdhury, A. Kootsookos,
and F. Alam, “Prospect of eLearning in
higher education sectors of Saudi Arabia: A
review,” Energy Procedia, vol. 110, pp.
574580, 2017.
[12] A. Alsayyari, A. Alblawi, M. Nawab, and A.
Alosaimi, “A conceptual framework for
facility management in Higher education
institutions in Saudi Arabia,” TEM J., vol. 8,
no. 1, p. 157, 2019.
[13] M. Bataeineh and O. Aga, Integrating
sustainability into higher education curricula:
Saudi Vision 2030,” Emerald Open Res.,
vol. 4, p. 19, 2022.
[14] Z. Al Mubarak, A. Ben Hamed, and M. Al
Mubarak, “Impact of corporate social
responsibility on bank’s corporate image,”
Soc. Responsib. J., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 710
722, 2019.
[15] Bass, “From transactional to
transformational leadership: Learning to
share the vision,” Organ. Dyn., vol. 18, no.
3, pp. 1931, 1990.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
67
Volume 20, 2023
[16] A. W. Ijigu, “The Effect of Selected Human
Resource Management Practices on
Employees’ Job Satisfaction in Ethiopian
Public Banks,” EMAJ Emerg. Mark. J., vol.
5, no. 1, pp. 116, 2015.
[17] S. Ferramosca and R. Verona, “Framing the
evolution of corporate social responsibility
as a discipline (19732018): A large-scale
scientometric analysis,” Corp. Soc.
Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 27, no. 1,
pp. 178203, 2020.
[18] H. U. R. Khan, M. Ali, H. G. T. Olya, M.
Zulqarnain, and Z. R. Khan,
“Transformational leadership, corporate
social responsibility, organizational
innovation, and organizational performance:
Symmetrical and asymmetrical analytical
approaches,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ.
Manag., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 12701283, 2018.
[19] W. Hassan, A. Razi, R. Qamar, R. Jaffir, and
S. Suhail, “The effect of training on
employee retention,” Glob. J. Manag. Bus.
Res., 2013.
[20] J. A. Bamgbade, A. M. Kamaruddeen, M. N.
M. Nawi, R. Z. Yusoff, and R. A. Bin, “Does
government support matter? Influence of
organizational culture on sustainable
construction among Malaysian contractors,”
Int. J. Constr. Manag., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 93
107, 2018.
[21] G. O. C. Bongomin, J. C. Munene, J. M.
Ntayi, and C. A. Malinga, “Determinants of
SMMEs growth in post-war communities in
developing countries: Testing the interaction
effect of government support,” World J.
Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev., 2018.
[22] N. Ngisau and A. Ibrahim, “Technological
Innovation Adoption in Manufacturing
Sector: The Moderator Role of Government
Support,” J. Econ. Bus. Manag, vol. 8, pp.
200205, 2020.
[23] C. A. Tilt, “Corporate social responsibility
research: the importance of context,” Int. J.
Corp. Soc. Responsib., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19,
2016.
[24] J. W. Weiss, Business ethics: A stakeholder
and issues management approach. Berrett-
Koehler Publishers, 2014.
[25] R. E. Freeman, “Divergent stakeholder
theory,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 24, no. 2,
pp. 233236, 1999.
[26] H. Haliday, “Healthcare management serving
professionals’ quality of working life,”
Ethique et Sante, 2018.
[27] G. A. Sulamuthu and H. M. Yuso,
“Leadership Style and Employee Turnover
Intention,” in Proceedings of the
International Conference on Industrial
Engineering and Operations Management,
2018, no. 2001, pp. 22982306.
[28] N. Z. Talib, N. B. Ramli, Z. B. Hussin, S.
Bin Jamaluddin, and J. Saputra,
“Transformational Leadership and Teacher’s
Performance: The mediating role of
motivation and commitment,” Opción Rev.
Ciencias Humanas y Soc., no. 21, pp. 306
322, 2019.
[29] O. B. Sihite, C. B. Andika, and A. B.
Prasetya, “A Literature Review: Does
Transformational Leadership impact and
Effective in the Public Bureaucratic,” Int. J.
Soc. Policy Law, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4450,
2020.
[30] B. M. Bass and R. E. Riggio, “The
transformational model of leadership,” Lead.
Organ. Perspect. a new era, vol. 2, pp. 76
86, 2010.
[31] B. J. Avolio, B. M. Bass, and D. I. Jung,
Reexamining the components of
transformational and transactional leadership
using the Multifactor Leadership,” J. Occup.
Organ. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 441462,
1999.
[32] M. H. Reza, “Components of
transformational leadership behavior,” EPRA
Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp.
119124, 2019.
[33] F. Manzoor, L. Wei, M. Nurunnabi, Q. A.
Subhan, S. I. A. Shah, and S. Fallatah, “The
impact of transformational leadership on job
performance and CSR as mediator in SMEs,”
Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 436, 2019.
[34] Y. Deng, J. Cherian, N. Ahmad, M. Scholz,
and S. Samad, “Conceptualizing the Role of
Target-Specific Environmental
Transformational Leadership between
Corporate Social Responsibility and Pro-
Environmental Behaviors of Hospital
Employees,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public
Health, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 3565, 2022.
[35] A. Demir and T. Budur, “Roles of leadership
styles in corporate social responsibility to
non-governmental organizations (NGOs),”
Int. J. Soc. Sci. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 4, pp.
174183, 2019.
[36] M. Bahzar, “Effects of green
transformational and ethical leadership on
green creativity, eco-innovation and energy
efficiency in higher education sector of
Indonesia,” 670216917, 2019.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
68
Volume 20, 2023
[37] K. Alshihabat and T. Atan, “The mediating
effect of organizational citizenship behavior
in the relationship between transformational
leadership and corporate social responsibility
practices: Middle eastern example/Jordan,”
Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 4248, 2020.
[38] A. P. Srivastava and S. Shree, “Examining
the effect of employee green involvement on
perception of corporate social responsibility:
Moderating role of green training,” Manag.
Environ. Qual. An Int. J., 2018.
[39] J. Sarkis, P. GonzalezTorre, and B.
AdensoDiaz, “Stakeholder pressure and the
adoption of environmental practices: The
mediating effect of training,” J. Oper.
Manag., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 163176, 2010.
[40] M. E. Lópezrez, I. Melero, and F. Javier
Sesé, “Does specific CSR training for
managers impact shareholder value?
Implications for education in sustainable
development,” Corp. Soc. Responsib.
Environ. Manag., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 435
448, 2017.
[41] J. Liu, Y. Liu, and L. Yang, “Uncovering the
influence mechanism between top
management support and green procurement:
The effect of green training,” J. Clean.
Prod., vol. 251, p. 119674, 2020.
[42] B. Basa, A. Erari, and M. Y. Setiani, “The
Effect of Training, Career Development,
Empowerment and Work Discipline on Job
Satisfaction at Class I Airport Operator Unit
of Mopah Merauke,” Budapest Int. Res.
Critics Inst. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1,
pp. 18321845, 2022.
[43] S. Kim, E. Kim, Y. Suh, and Z. Zheng, “The
effect of service innovation on R&D
activities and government support systems:
The moderating role of government support
systems in Korea,” J. Open Innov. Technol.
Mark. Complex., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 5, 2016.
[44] Q. Xia, Q. Cao, and M. Tan, “Basic research
intensity and diversified performance: the
moderating role of government support
intensity,” Scientometrics, vol. 125, no. 1,
pp. 577605, 2020.
[45] R. Ullah, H. Ahmad, F. U. Rehman, and A.
Fawad, “Green innovation and Sustainable
Development Goals in SMEs: The
moderating role of government incentives,”
J. Econ. Adm. Sci., 2021.
[46] U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research
methods for business: A skill building
approach. john wiley & sons, 2019.
[47] R. (Moh’d T. Masa’deh, B. Yousef Obeidat,
D. Shawqi Zyod, and A. Hamdi Gharaibed,
“The Associations among Transformational
Leadership, Transactional Leadership,
Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and
Firm Performance: A Theoretical Model,” J.
Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 848866, 2015.
[48] A. Tajasom and Z. Ariffin, “Principals’
leadership style and school climate: teachers’
perspectives from Malaysia,” Int. J.
Leadersh. Public Serv., vol. 7, no. 4, pp.
314333, 2013.
[49] B. M. Bass and B. J. Avolio, “Developing
Transformational Leadership: 1992 and
Beyond,” J. Eur. Ind. Train., 1990.
[50] M. Anwar, K. Tajeddini, and R. Ullah,
“Entrepreneurial finance and new venture
successThe moderating role of government
support,” Bus. Strateg. Dev., vol. 3, no. 4,
pp. 408421, 2020.
[51] A. Elnaga and A. Imran, “The Effect of
Training on Employee Performance,” Eur. J.
Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 22222839,
2013.
[52] CSR Questionnaire, “Questionnaire about
Corporate Social Responsibility,” Implement.
Chang. Chinese Organ., pp. 200201, 2009.
[53] Hair, T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M.
Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares
structural equation modeling, 2nd ed.
Thousand Oakes, 2017.
[54] S. Alaarj, Z. Abidin-Mohamed, and U. S. B.
A. Bustamam, “Mediating Role of Trust on
the Effects of Knowledge Management
Capabilities on Organizational
Performance,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.,
vol. 235, pp. 729738, Nov. 2016.
.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.7
Mona Abdulla Al-Samhan
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
69
Volume 20, 2023
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
The author contributed in the present research, at all
stages from the formulation of the problem to the
final findings and solution.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare that
is relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US