Corporate Entrepreneurship and Employee Performance: The Coca-Cola
Nigeria Experience
PRECIOUS UCHECHI IKEBUJO, DORCAS OMANYO OLUWADE,
HAUWA LAMINO ABUBAKAR
Department of Business Administration, Post Graduate School,
Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja
NIGERIA
Abstract: - The study examined corporate entrepreneurship and employee performance in West Africa: The Coca
Cola Company experience. The specific objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of proactiveness, risk
tolerance, and corporate venturing on employee satisfaction in Coca Cola Company. The research design for the
study was a survey using the quantitative approach. The total population under investigation was 5,364. The
sample size was 372; determined by using Yamane (1964) model. Tables were used to present data in the study.
Descriptive statistics tools utilized in the study were mean and standard deviation while a structural equation model
(SEM) with MLE regression model was employed to test plausibility of the hypotheses using AMOS statistical
Package version 24. The study concluded that proactiveness, risk tolerance, and corporate venturing as elements of
corporate entrepreneurship in the Company have the propensity of boosting employee performance. The study
recommended that the management of Coca Cola Company should adopt and work more to improve on the
dimension of proactiveness, risk tolerance, and corporate venturing with a view to boosting employee performance.
Key-Words: - Corporate Entrepreneurship, Proactiveness, Risk Tolerance, Corporate Venturing, Employee
Performance, Employee Satisfaction
Received: March 23, 2022. Revised: July 19, 2022. Accepted: August 15, 2022. Available online: September 8, 2022.
1 Introduction
Corporate Entrepreneurship is an area in research that
has become topical in international business; and at
the same time recognises employee performance in
addition to other resources contributing to the
sustenance of increased capability in the international
market [1]. In recent times, corporate entrepreneurship
has become the engine of economic growth in many
West African countries, including Nigeria. It has been
quite pivotal to the successful transformation of
organisations and global economy. Furthermore,
corporate entrepreneurship makes way for job
creation, poverty reduction, healthy competitive
environment, promotion of growth in the economy
and investments [2]. [3] stated that corporate
entrepreneurship is linked to improved employee
performance in manufacturing firms.
However, despite the gigantic efforts made by
various government administrations to promote
economic growth by corporate entrepreneurship, a lot
is still expected in the food and beverages industry
including Coca Cola Company. Like other developing
countries, most West African countries are bedevilled
with a whole lot of challenges in connection with
corporate entrepreneurship, ranging from institutional
to environmental challenges. In addressing these
challenges, this study examined corporate
entrepreneurship and employee performance in West
Africa (Coca Cola Company). The study focused on
how corporate entrepreneurship elements
(proactiveness, risk tolerance and corporate venturing)
affect employee performance (measured by employee
satisfaction) of Coca Cola Company [4][7].
Corporate entrepreneurship in West Africa faces a
whole gamut of challenges that are similar to what is
experienced in other developing countries; and
according to [8]) these challenges have been made
severe by the prevalence of transition of institutions
that are specific on context. However, only a few
manufacturing firms according to [9] have recorded
success in the transition and other similar situations in
the Nigerian context. Despite the array of empirical
studies present on the effect of corporate
entrepreneurship on employee performance, a lot of
studies [10], [11] concentrated on organisations in
western countries and not much was done in the West
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
40
Volume 20, 2023
African business environment. With the scarce
empirical studies done in Nigeria, it is not certain
whether or not corporate entrepreneurship has been
conducted on the Coca Cola Company. This has
created research gap and a rising preference by
scholars and policymakers in establishing the use of
corporate entrepreneurship strategy for enhancing
competitiveness and performance in Nigerian major
enterprises. In addressing this research gap, this study
examined corporate entrepreneurship (measured by
proactiveness, risk tolerance and corporate venturing)
and employee performance (measured by employee
satisfaction) of Coca Cola Company.
1.1 Study Objectives
The study examined corporate entrepreneurship as it
relates to employee satisfaction in the Coca Cola
Company. Specifically, the study (i) evaluated the
effect of proactiveness on employee satisfaction in
Coca Cola Company, (ii) examined the effect of risk
tolerance on employee satisfaction in Coca Cola
Company, and (iii) investigated the effect of corporate
venturing on employee satisfaction in Coca Cola
Company. This objective is therefore described in
figure 2.1, the study conceptual framework illustrating
the link between the dependent and independent
variable.
2 Literature Review
In this section, the various basic issues are discussed
as they relate to Corporate Entrepreneurship and
employee performance.
Corporate entrepreneurship according to [12] is a
process that promotes the formulation and
implementation of idea creation needed in starting a
business and risks taking [3] opined that corporate
entrepreneurship allows people in an existing business
pursue opportunities in entrepreneurship with a view
to innovating them by using the resources at the
disposal of the firm. [13] was of the opinion that
corporate entrepreneurship is an emerging behaviour
deviating from the traditional business methodology.
In addition, [14] stated that corporate entrepreneurship
is the process where individuals or group of persons,
in connection with an already business entity, create a
new business or promote innovation within an existing
business entity.
Proactiveness according to [15] is the process of
seeking for opportunities, forward-looking perspective
attributed by the introduction of new goods and
services ahead of competition and future demands
projection. Similarly, [13] defined proactiveness as the
determination of chasing attractive opportunities;
instead of responding to competition. In addition, they
opined further that proactiveness involves going after
opportunities and the initiative to respond aggressively
to competition. In the view of [14], proactiveness
refers to the way business entity connect with market
opportunities in the process of new entry.
Proactiveness according to [15] defines a business
aggressive pursuit for opportunities in a market and a
strong emphasis in the process of becoming very fast
towards implementing innovation in the industry.
Risk tolerance according to [14] is the disposition of a
business in support of innovative projects, even when
the payoff is uncertain in these activities. In the same
vein, [3] revealed that these business firms allow
personnel and groups to swing into action
independently and exercise their creativity by
accommodating risks with a view to generating new
ideas, goods, and services. [16] opined that risk
tolerance is a business’s disposition to initiate projects
irrespective of how uncertain such firm activity may
be. Additionally, risk tolerance involves business
disposition to be courageous in assigning reasonable
amount of resources to ventures with outcome that are
doubtful, encroaching into markets that are not
familiar, as well as the propensity to borrow in a big
way with the hope of anticipating high yield [17],
[18].
According to [19] is the ratio of real output of an
employee to its output; or compare with the output of
a different business outfit in the same sector.
Employee performance according to Madeniyi, Oke
and Ajagbe (2015) cited in [1] defined as the
employee’s will to establish its objective given
resources in a structured manner. Determinants of
employee performance are x-rayed differently by
researchers [15][17], [19] as productivity,
satisfaction, and interpersonal relations.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
41
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 1: Conceptual Framework
Source: Created by the Author
2.1 Theoretical Background
This study is driven by Benneth theory of corporate
entrepreneurship as was also enunciated by [1], [8],
[9], [12]. The theory examined the impact of strategic
renewal and corporate venturing on internationalizing
banks in Nigeria as well as proactiveness and risks
tolerance in internationalizing banks in Nigeria. The
assumption of the theory was that there are five
factors of corporate entrepreneurship (proactiveness,
risk taking, corporate venturing, innovation, and
strategic renewal). The theory emphasizes that the
activities of corporate entrepreneurship of business
firms tend to promote performance and expansion
globally. The model was used to test (i) the impact of
innovation on banks internationalization; (ii) corporate
entrepreneurship and the performance of servicing
business outfits; and (iii) corporate entrepreneurship
and banks’ global performance. [20] also established a
sustained model of corporate entrepreneurship which
centres on critical factors of organisation that must be
present and felt within the organisation with a view to
promoting the activities of entrepreneurial
sustainability. The model focused on ensuring
entrepreneurial sustainability. It presented some
significant sustainability measures; which are: (i)
management perception and appreciation to allocate
necessary resources for entrepreneurship in addition to
their employees’ ability to innovate; (ii) the model is
further based on the assumption that a trigger is
needed for transformation to occur. According to [21],
the model focused on the decision of every employee
to behave as entrepreneur. Sustained entrepreneurial
responsibility, therefore, is a function of the employee
performance and other antecedents in an organisation,
such as senior management approval, autonomy,
compensation, resources, and flexible organisational
scope. It is undisputable that Kuratko’s model
contributes to sustained entrepreneurship, however
this study believed that employee satisfaction will
immensely contribute to corporate entrepreneurship
especially in the food and beverages manufacturing
company in Nigeria.
2.2 Empirical Review
In line with this, [22] examined the role of the triggers
of strategic entrepreneurship and market share
sustainability with reference to flexibility in strategy,
adaptability, innovation, strategic leadership, risk
tolerance and capability in dynamism. Quantitative
method was used in the study through cross-sectional
data and survey research design was adopted. Primary
source of data was sourced through the administration
of questionnaires. The reliability of the instrument was
confirmed through instrumentation; while the validity
was acknowledged through content, construct, and
criterion. Three textile manufacturing outfit out of the
fifteen textile organisations in Lagos State were
studied. The sampling technique used was purposive;
and the population of the study was 253 top
management personnel. 237 questionnaires were
retrieved. Multiple linear regression model was
adopted. The study discovered that strategic
entrepreneurship has significant impact on market
share (p = 0.000, F (6, 230) = 22.444 and adjusted R2
= 0.353). Nevertheless, the different coefficient
results, specified that dynamic capabilities, strategic
elasticity, and adaptability have maintained positive
and considerable impact on the firm’s financial
performance. The study, therefore, recommended
institutionalizing adaptive creativity, elasticity in
adaptability, strategic elasticity, and capability in
dynamism to maintain improved market share.
The view of [14] who assessed the impact of corporate
entrepreneurship proxied by proactiveness, risk
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
42
Volume 20, 2023
taking, innovation, corporate venturing and strategic
renewal on service organisation non-financial
productivity as evaluated by employee satisfaction,
market share, productivity, workforce development
and efficiency. Survey research design was employed
in the study through administering structured
questionnaires distributed to 636 employees of 21
service organisations selected by purposive sampling.
The result was 0.78, implying that the text instrument
was reliable. Stata12 was used to analyse the data; and
the findings revealed that the factors of corporate
entrepreneurship amount to 56% variation in the
performance of servicing organisation (Adjusted R-
squared = 0.5604). The findings revealed that
proactiveness, risk taking, innovation and corporate
venturing have significant effect on the performance
of servicing organisation. On the contrary, strategic
renewal had no significant effect on the performance
of servicing organisation. Their study recommended
that while effecting the factors of corporate
entrepreneurship with a view to promoting non-
financial performance, servicing organisation should
concentrate on proactiveness, risk taking, innovation
and corporate venturing, while strategic renewal
should be executed with caution.
Furthermore, [23] evaluated corporate
entrepreneurship and the performance of business of
Logistic Companies in Indonesia. The study employed
a quantitative method to establish the objective. The
research design for the study was survey; thus, making
it mandatory to use questionnaire to collect the data
from employees from logistics companies. The study
revealed that corporate entrepreneurship significantly
impacts on the performance of logistic business.
Management assistance, availability of time, and
organization boundaries play very significant role with
a view to boosting the performance of logistic
business. In addition, work discretion increases the
positive impact of corporate entrepreneurship on the
performance of business. Their study recommended
that logistics organisation should concentrate on
corporate entrepreneurship in other to manage the
challenges relating to entrepreneurship.
In line with this, [20] evaluated corporate
entrepreneurship and the performance of an
organization. The purpose of their study was to
investigate the effect of corporate entrepreneurship
and on organizational performance at Dangote Group.
The research design used was survey. While using
stratified-proportionate sampling, 238 respondents
was the sample size collected from a population of
592 management staff of Dangote Group. Closed
ended questionnaire was used and a Likert’s rating
scale of 5 was adopted. The instrument was tested
with the help of face validity, and to also examine the
internal consistence. A test and retest approach were
relied upon. Pearson Linear Correlation was used to
determine the strength in relationship amongst the
variables. Multiple linear regression was adopted for
its model specification; while version 21 of Statistical
Package for Social Science (SPSS) was the computer
software that was used. The study revealed that both
risk-taking and innovation do not have positive
relationship with the performance of the organization.
On the contrary, proactiveness has positive
significance on the performance of organisation at
Dangote Group, Nigeria. The recommendation for the
study was that the management should beam their
search light on proactiveness when increasing the
performance of organisation at Dangote Group,
Nigeria.
Accordingly, [24] assessed the impact of corporate
entrepreneurship on the performance of organisation
in the banking sector in Rivers State. Their study had
a population of 369 executives from 17 banks in
Rivers State. While using Yamane (1964) model, the
sample size became one hundred and ninety-two
(192). Because the study adopted a survey research
design, questionnaires were administered. The
questionnaire was structured on five-point Likert scale
(Strongly Agree = 5 point; Agree = 4 points; Neutral =
3 points, Disagree = 2 points and Strongly Disagree =
1). Hypotheses were tested, and as a matter of fact,
they failed the null hypothesis test. The study found
out that a major relationship exists between risk
tolerance, innovation, proactiveness and profitability
in the banking sector in Rivers State. They opined
that corporate entrepreneurship is instrumental to the
continued existence, growth, and expansion of any
organisation. As a matter of fact, corporate
entrepreneurship has the capability of stimulating
advancement in order to promote a business
organisation in an existing market by entering new
and profitable development fields.
The view of Abosede, [13] further evaluated the
impact of corporate entrepreneurship on Nigerian
international bank performance. The proxies used for
measuring corporate entrepreneurship were
proactiveness, risk taking, innovation, corporate
venturing, and strategic renewal. In the same vein, the
proxies for performance were managers’ perceived
measures. Survey research design was the design for
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
43
Volume 20, 2023
the study. This was done through questionnaire
administration to top management staff in finance,
foreign operations, and strategy departments. The
questionnaires were distributed to 427 top
management staff of 10 Central Bank of Nigeria
(CBN) licensed international banks constituting the
population of the study. Ordinary least square method
was used to estimate the model through the use of
STATA 14 software. The study revealed that the
elements of corporate entrepreneurship combined
have significant positive impact on international
performance of banks at 95% confidence level: with
innovation having the most impact on international
banks’ performance. The study concludes that most
Nigerian banks outside the shore of the country help
to increase market expansion and boost both employee
and organisational performance. This study is relative
in the proxies considered here but contributes to
measuring the effect of corporate entrepreneurship on
employee performance in the Coca Cola Company.
3 Methodology
In this section, the adopted methodology is briefly
discussed.
3.1 Research Philosophy and Research Design
The research paradigm used in this study was
positivism, putting into cognizance the problem under
study. Positivism perspective, like the natural
sciences, is quantitative and employs an interpretive
paradigm based on quantitative data and broad in
scope. It creates hypothesis and then aims to verify it
by collecting and analysing quantifiable evidence. It is
empirical in nature. The research design was survey.
Similarly, the data used for the study was quantitative
and were obtained through the administration of
questionnaires. The data generated was statistically
analysed using the quantitative approach.
3.2 Research Respondents
The total population under investigation was 5,364.
The sample size as stated in table one was determined
by using Yamane (1964) model. The distribution of
the questionnaire was biased towards top and middle
level managers since they are involved in strategic
decision like corporate venturing and talent
management.
Table 1. Sample Size
Name of Institution
Top Level Sample
Middle level Sample
Coca Cola Company (Coca-
Cola)
 
 
 
 
Source: Author’s Compilation (2022)
Due to the strategic nature of respondents, this
research adopted proportionate stratified random
sampling. The questionnaire was structured with most
questions closed and a few open-ended covering
issues on corporate entrepreneurship and employee
performance. The questionnaire has two parts: The
first gave information about the respondents’ personal
data, while the second dealt with questions. The data
collected were measured using a 5-point Likert-scale
ranging from 1 point for "strongly disagree" to 5
points for "strongly agree". Descriptive and inferential
statistics were applied to analyse the data using IBM
Amos version 25. The descriptive tools include mean
and standard deviation while structural equation
model (SEM) is employed to see whether the
hypotheses were supported by means of model
estimates. The Durbin-Watson Statistics is used to
ascertain the stability of the model and establish the
presence of any serial collection occasioned by
correlation of the independent variables. Also, the
variance inflation factor (VIF) is also used to check
the presence of the multicollinearity in the regressors
and thus to avoid misspecification of the model.
3.3 Model Specification Framework
This study adopted the model of [11], [13]. They
examined corporate entrepreneurship and service
firms' performance in Nigeria. The model specified
for this study is stated below:
 󰇛󰇜(1)
Equation 2 was transformed into the econometric
format with the introduction of a control variable-
training and development. This was adopted from
[14], [15] which examined the effect of corporate
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
44
Volume 20, 2023
entrepreneurship (CE) on service firm non-financial
performance.
  

(2)
Where:
PERF represents Performance (employee satisfaction)
β0 is the constant term
β1, β2, β3 are the coefficients of the estimator.
β1, β2, β3 > 0
PERF = Performance (Employees’ Satisfaction)
PR = Proactiveness
RT = Risk tolerance
CV = Corporate venturing
TR = Training and development
is the error term.
The a-priori expectation is such that corporate
entrepreneurship elements are expected to positively
affect employees’ performance such as employees’
satisfaction. Hence, the parameters of corporate
entrepreneurship elements (risk tolerance,
proactiveness and corporate venturing) should have a
positive significance on Employees’ Satisfaction. The
control variable (training and development) was also
expected to have a positive influence on employees’
satisfaction. It is believed that Training and
development would improve performance and further
give the staff confidence, hence boosting employee’s
satisfaction.
The pilot study was conducted to improve face
validity and content of the instruments. The researcher
pilot tested 60 staff in the organization being studied
using t-test statistical method for the purpose of
ensuring reliability of the questionnaire. The
reliability of the research instrument (questionnaire)
follows a statistical approach. Reliability test is
necessary to validate if the questions in the
questionnaire reliably measured the same variable in a
consistent manner.
4 Analyses of Results and Discussions
Data were processed using Amos version 14 to obtain
results for Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression
from the model earlier established. The study
conducted the descriptive statistics and reliability test
for the overall response of the questionnaire. These
results are posted in Table 4, which revealed the
summary statistics in Panel A and reliability test in
Panel B for the relevant variable included in the
research. In panel A of Table 2, the dependent
variable is represented by employee satisfaction which
is a measure of company performance in the selected
manufacturing firms in Nigeria and the mean value is
reportedly 4; while the standard deviation is
approximately 0.433 which yield a variance of 0.658
approximately. This result is with respect to the 372
questionnaires distributed and collected.
Variables
Mean
Std. Deviation
n
Employee Satisfaction
4.41
0.43
372
Proactiveness
4.05
0.65
372
Risk Tolerance
4.04
0.68
372
Corporate Venturing
4.20
0.41
372
Training and Development
4.02
0.58
372
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's Alpha Based on
Standardized Items
N of Items
n
0.889
0.871
6
372
The independent variable was proactiveness of the
Coca Cola Company. The mean is reportedly 4.05
while the standard deviation is 0.647 which yields a
variance of 0.804 approximately for proactiveness.
The second independent variable is Risk Tolerance of
the company. The means of these variables is 4.04 and
the standard deviation is 0.678 which give a variance
of 0.823 approximately. The third independent
variable is Corporate Venturing of the company. The
means of these variables is 4.202 and the standard
deviation is 0.405 which give a variance of 0.636
approximately. Finally, the Cronbach's Alpha for the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
45
Volume 20, 2023
two variables (dependent and independent) is 0.889
which is above the minimum requirement. Therefore,
the questionnaire passed the reliability test for the
pilot test for the entire questionnaire reported herein.
The individual variables have its Cronbach's Alpha. It
reflects that the results passed the reliability test for
each of the variables used in this research. It then
means that the responses were consistent enough to
exceed the minimum required Alpha coefficient.
4.1 Model Diagnostics
The estimated regression was used to test the
hypothesis in order to ascertain the effect of corporate
entrepreneurship on employee performance in Coca
Cola Company. The R-Square indicates that these
independent variables could influence the dependent
by 47.2 per cent. This explains the independent
variable have over 47 per cent influence on the
dependent variable. The Durbin Watson (DW) statistic
test reveals there is no autocorrelation in the residuals
from the statistical regression analysis. This is evident
with the value of 2.145 which is approximately 2.0
that reveals no autocorrelation detected in the selected
sample. Furthermore, the variance inflation factor for
all the variables are observed to be less than 5, thus
implying that there is no presence of multicollinearity
in the regressors. The residual plot (normal histogram
and P-P plot) of the model conforms with the
normality distribution assumption. Hence, the model
fitted is void of any linear model assumption
violations and thus inferences made about it is
reliable.
Fig. 2: Normality Histogram Plot
Fig. 3: Normal P-P Plot of the Regression Standardized Residual
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
46
Volume 20, 2023
4.2 Hypotheses Testing
Table 3. Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Corporate Entrepreneur and Performance
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Tolerance
VIF
1
(Constant)
0.594
0.096
6.178
0.000
Proactiveness
-0.008
0.021
-0.007
-0.364
0.716
0.740
1.351
Risk
Tolerance
0.123
0.025
0.106
5.006
0.000
0.650
1.538
Corporate
Venturing
0.277
0.019
0.294
14.522
0.000
0.702
1.424
Training and
Development
0.411
0.018
0.449
23.016
0.000
0.759
1.318
Model Summary
R
.687a
F-test
408.845
R Square
0.472
p-value
.000b
Adjusted
R Square
0.471
Durbin-
Watson
2.145
a Predictors: (Constant), Training and Development, Proactiveness, Corporate Venturing, Risk Tolerance
b Dependent Variable: Employee Satisfaction
Source: Amos 14, output
The first hypothesis of this research is to evaluate the
effect of proactiveness on employee satisfaction.
Proactiveness forms the first independent variable of
the research as included in the model. From table 4.2,
the coefficient for proactiveness is -0.008 and not
statistically significant at 5 percent. Thus, a unit
increase in proactiveness will cause -0.008 units
decrease in performance (employee satisfaction), all
things being equal. Although, the null hypothesis: there
is no significant effect of proactiveness on employee
satisfaction of Coca Cola Company was hereby
accepted. This result is therefore negating the study of
[16], [17] which explains that the impact of
proactiveness on business performance is positive. It,
therefore, implies that being proactive to adopting and
adapting to the new norms is not essential to business
growth and success in the study area [25][27].
The second hypothesis was to examine the effect of
risk tolerance on employee satisfaction. From table 4.2,
the coefficient for risk tolerance is 0.123 and
statistically significant at one percent. This is to say a
unit rise in risk tolerance will cause 0.123 units to
increase in employee satisfaction, all things being
equal. Therefore, the null hypothesis: Risk tolerance
does not significantly have effect on employee
satisfaction of Coca Cola Company is hereby rejected.
This result is in line with [14], [15], [19] which
emphases on the influence of risk tolerance on business
performance.
The third hypothesis of this study was to analyse the
effect of corporate venturing on the employee
satisfaction of Coca Cola Company. From table 4.2, the
coefficient for corporate venturing is 0.277 and
statistically significant at one percent. This is to say a
unit rise in corporate venturing will cause 0.277 units
to increase in employee satisfaction, all things being
equal. Corporate venturing has no significant effect on
employee satisfaction of Coca Cola Company is hereby
rejected. This result is in line with [21], [22] which
emphasised on the influence of corporate venturing on
business performance.
Lastly, the effect of the mediating variable “Training
and development” is also observed to have a positive
and significant effect on the existing relationship
between the corporate entrepreneur variables and the
enterprise performance variable.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
47
Volume 20, 2023
Fig. 4: Structural Equation Path for Corporate Entrepreneur and Performance Variables
The structure equation path diagram showing the extent
of the effects of the corporate entrepreneur variables on
the enterprise performance. The path shows the
independent variables coefficient and their
corresponding standard errors and covariance values
[4][7].
5 Discussion of Findings
The essence of this study was to establish the effect of
corporate entrepreneurship on employee performance
of Coca Cola Company. First, it is established that
proactiveness improves employee satisfaction. The
coefficient for proactiveness is 0.114 and statistically
significant at 5 percent. Thus, a unit increase in
proactiveness will cause 0.114 units increase in
performance (employee satisfaction), all things being
equal. This result is consistent with [20], [24] which
explains that the impact of proactiveness on business
performance is positive. Similarly, the effect of risk
tolerance on employee satisfaction is said to be positive
and statistically significant. The coefficient for risk
tolerance is 0.242 and statistically significant at one per
cent. This is to say a unit rise in risk tolerance will
cause 0.242 units to increase in employee satisfaction,
all things being equal. This result is in line with [9],
[11], [13], [15] which emphasised on the influence of
risk tolerance on business performance. Risk tolerance
identifies with a business preparation to seek after
circumstances in spite of vulnerability around the
inevitable achievement [28]. Nevertheless, corporate
venturing is established to have positive impact on the
employee satisfaction of the Coca Cola Company. The
coefficient for corporate venturing is 0.299 and
statistically significant at one per cent. This is to say a
unit rise in corporate venturing will cause 0.299 units
to increase in employee satisfaction, all things being
equal. This result is in line with [13], [14] and [1]
which emphases on the influence of corporate
venturing on business performance.
5.1 Conclusion
The study examined corporate entrepreneurship
(proactiveness, risk tolerance and corporate venturing)
and employee performance (employee satisfaction) in
the Coca Cola Company. The specific objectives of the
study were to evaluate the effect of proactiveness on
employee satisfaction; examine the effect of risk
tolerance on employee satisfaction; and investigate the
effect of corporate venturing on employee satisfaction.
The study concluded that corporate entrepreneurship is
very vital to sustainable employee performance in the
Coca Cola Company. In addition, proactiveness, risk
tolerance and corporate venturing as elements of
corporate entrepreneurship have the propensity of
boosting an existing market by entering new and
profitable development fields [29][31].
5.2 Recommendations
The study recommends as follows:
i. that the management of Coca Cola
Company should adopt and work more to
improve on the dimension of
proactiveness; this, in the long run, will
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
48
Volume 20, 2023
serve as a booster for employee
performance;
ii. that the level of risk-tolerance effort by
management in Coca Cola Company
should be significantly leveraged upon
with a view to helping employees and the
organisation sustain and continually renew
its methodology towards boosting its
performance and favourably compete in
the international market; and
iii. that the management of Coca Cola
Company should imbibe the culture of
corporate venturing with a view to
motivating the sustainability of employee
performance.
Acknowledgements:
We wish to acknowledge the Nile University of
Nigeria, Abuja for providing an enabling environment
for this study.
References:
[1] J. Adeoti, M. A.-A. J. of Entrepreneurship, and
undefined 2018, “Analysis of Dimensions of
Corporate Entrepreneurship and Organizational
Performance in Nigeria, amity.edu, Accessed:
May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://amity.edu/UserFiles/admaa/51503Paper
1.pdf
[2] S. Omisore, “Corporate Entrepreneurship,
Strategy Formulation, and the Performance of the
Nigerian Manufacturing Sector,” 2019,
Accessed: May 04, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/872vx
[3] S. Omisore, N. Madichie, A. Qingan, and S.
Nwankwo, “Corporate Entrepreneurship,
Environmental Influences, and the Performance
of the Nigerian Manufacturing Firms,” 2017,
Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nnamdi-
Madichie-
2/publication/326561130_Corporate_Entreprene
urship_Environmental_Influences_and_the_Perf
ormance_of_the_Nigerian_Manufacturing_Firms
/links/5b564b0745851507a7c400ba/Corporate-
Entrepreneurship-Environmental-Influences-and-
the-Performance-of-the-Nigerian-Manufacturing-
Firms.pdf
[4] Y. Kong, A. AntwiAdjei, J. B.-C. Social, and
undefined 2020, “A systematic review of the
business case for corporate social responsibility
and firm performance,” Wiley Online Libr.,
Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/c
sr.1838
[5]
[6] T. Lin, V. P.-J. of C. Finance, and undefined
2021, “The round number heuristic and
entrepreneur crowdfunding performance,”
Elsevier, Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online].
Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii
/S0929119921000146
[7] H. Guan, Z. Zhang, A. Zhao, J. Jia, S. G.-
Sustainability, and undefined 2019, “Research
on innovation behavior and performance of new
generation entrepreneur based on grounded
theory,” mdpi.com, Accessed: May 03, 2022.
[Online]. Available:
https://www.mdpi.com/465966
[8] C. Nwankwo, U. E.-of Entrepreneurship, and
undefined 2022, “Effect Of Entrepreneurial
Orientation On Performance Of Agro-Processing
Small And Medium Enterprises In Anambra
State,” researchgate.net, Accessed: May 03,
2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cosmas-
Nwankwo/publication/357367150_Effect_of_ent
repreneurial_orientation_on_performance_of_agr
o-
processing_small_and_medium_enterprises_in_a
nambra_state/links/61cabc74e669ee0f5c6bfb00/
Effect-of-entrepreneurial-orientation-on-
performance-of-agro-processing-small-and-
medium-enterprises-in-anambra-state.pdf
[9] B. E. A. Oghojafor, O. L. Kuye, and A. A.
Sulaimon, “Corporate entrepreneurship and
firms’ performance in the manufacturing sector
in Nigeria,” Int. J. Bus. Glob., vol. 6, no. 2, pp.
182197, 2011, doi: 10.1504/IJBG.2011.038489.
[10] N. Madichie, K. Mpofu, J. K.-E. in Africa, and
undefined 2017, “Entrepreneurship development
in Africa: Insights from Nigeria’s and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
49
Volume 20, 2023
Iskamto, Dedi & Ghazali, Puspa & Afthanorhan,
Asyraf. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for
Entrepreneur Competence and Entrepreneur
Performance: The Role of Gender. 10.37231/jmtp.
Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://journal.unisza.edu.my/jmtp/index.php/jmtp/
article/view/14
Zimbabwe’s telecoms,” library.oapen.org,
Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.
12657/51075/external_content.pdf?sequence=1#
page=186
[11] P. Igwe, N. Madichie, N. A.-S. E. Research, and
undefined 2020, “Transgenerational business
legacies and intergenerational succession among
the Igbos (Nigeria),” Taylor Fr., vol. 27, no. 2,
pp. 165179, 2020, doi:
10.1080/13215906.2020.1751692.
[12] E. O. Ekhator and I. Iyiola-Omisore, “Corporate
Social Responsibility in the Oil and Gas Industry
in Nigeria: The Case for a Legalised
Framework,” pp. 439–458, 2021, doi:
10.1007/978-3-030-56092-8_25.
[13] J. Abosede, J. Fayose, & B. E.-J. of E., and
undefined 2018, “Corporate entrepreneurship and
international performance of Nigerian banks,”
yadda.icm.edu.pl, Accessed: May 03, 2022.
[Online]. Available:
https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1
.element.cejsh-c3688ba3-cd6b-40f5-81e5-
2271dc5dedd6
[14] B. E.-E. E. M. Journal and undefined 2018,
“Corporate entrepreneurship and manufacturing
firms’ performance,” emaj.pitt.edu, vol. 7, no. 2,
2018, doi: 10.5195/emaj.2018.134.
[15] A. R. A. Kadir et al., “The Influence of
Intellectual Capital and Corporate
Entrepreneurship Towards Small and Medium
Enterprises’ (SMEs) Sustainable Competitive
Advantage: Building a Conceptual Framework,”
Proc. 2nd Adv. Bus. Res. Int. Conf., pp. 6777,
2018, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6053-3_7.
[16] A. Kallmuenzer, A. Strobl, and M. Peters,
“Tweaking the entrepreneurial orientation
performance relationship in family firms: the
effect of control mechanisms and family-related
goals,” Rev. Manag. Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 855
883, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/S11846-017-0231-
6.
[17] A. Omisade et al., “Data on modeling of nexus
between entrepreneurs׳ commitment and business
performance in a developing country,” data-in-
brief.com, vol. 19, pp. 10681072, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.102.
[18] “Survey data on bureaucratic processes and
entrepreneurial venture performance in SMEs in
Nigeria,” Elsevier, Accessed: May 03, 2022.
[Online]. Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii
/S2352340918308904
[19] A. Kahkha, A. Kahrazeh, H. A.-I. J. of, and
undefined 2014, “Corporate entrepreneurship and
firm performance important role of small and
medium enterprise,” m.masccom.com, Accessed:
May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://m.masccom.com/papers_submitted/916/C
orporate_Entrepreneurship_and_Firm_Performan
ce_Important_Role_of_Small_and_Medium_Ent
erprise.pdf
[20] S. Abdulrahaman, A. G.-K. J. of Humanities, and
undefined 2020, “Corporate Entrepreneurship
and Organizational Performance,” ijhumas.com,
vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 299307, Accessed: May 03,
2022. [Online]. Available:
http://ijhumas.com/ojs/index.php/kiuhums/article
/view/667
[21] D. F. Kuratko and M. H. Morris, “Corporate
Entrepreneurship: A Critical Challenge for
Educators and Researchers,” Entrep. Educ.
Pedagog., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4260, Jan. 2018,
doi: 10.1177/2515127417737291.
[22] E. Tijani and E. Akinlabi, “Driving competitive
advantage: The role of strategic entrepreneurship
in textile manufacturing firms in Lagos State,
Nigeria,” Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res., 2020.
[23] K. Chienwattanasook, A. L. Prianto, K.
Jermsittiparsert, and S. Wattanapongphasuk,
“Corporate Entrepreneurship and Business
Performance of Logistic Companies in
Indonesia,” researchgate.net, 2019, doi:
10.7232/iems.2019.18.3.541.
[24] O. Ijeoma, B. O.-J. of A. A. R. S., and
undefined 2018, “Corporate entrepreneurship and
organizational performance of the banking sector
in rivers state,” ijaar.org, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2488
9849, 2018, Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online].
Available: https://ijaar.org/articles/Volume4-
Number5/Social-Management-Sciences/ijaar-
sms-v4n5-may18-p16.pdf
[25] Y. Kong, A. Antwi-Adjei, and J. Bawuah, “A
systematic review of the business case for
corporate social responsibility and firm
performance,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ.
Manag., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 444454, Mar. 2020,
doi: 10.1002/CSR.1838.
[26] V. Veleva, G. B.-J. of C. Production, and
undefined 2018, “Corporate-entrepreneur
collaborations to advance a circular economy,”
Elsevier, Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
50
Volume 20, 2023
Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii
/S0959652618308679
[27] S. Sap, “Understanding the influence of
entrepreneur personality on product branding,
corporate brand image and SME performance,”
2019, Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online].
Available:
https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.eth
os.794613
[28] O. Ijeoma, B. O.-J. of A. A. R. S., and
undefined 2018, “Corporate entrepreneurship and
organizational performance of the banking sector
in rivers state,” ijaar.org, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2488
9849, 2018, Accessed: May 04, 2022. [Online].
Available: https://ijaar.org/articles/Volume4-
Number5/Social-Management-Sciences/ijaar-
sms-v4n5-may18-p16.pdf
[29] M. Altaf, W. Hameed, S. N.-S. A. J. of, and
undefined 2019, “Successful entrepreneurial
process as contributor towards business
performance in banking: moderating role of
passion for inventing,” sajms.iurc.edu.pk,
Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online].Available:
http://sajms.iurc.edu.pk/issues/2019a/SAJMS2.p
df
[30] P. Utomo, F. K.-C. Series, and undefined 2020,
“Investigating factors impelling the innovation
performance: A perspective from internal
corporate new business venturing on
manufacturing industry,” adi-journal.org,
Accessed: May 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.adi-
journal.org/index.php/conferenceseries/article/vie
w/405
[31] C. E. Hou, W. M. Lu, and S. W. Hung, “Does
CSR matter? Influence of corporate social
responsibility on corporate performance in the
creative industry,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 278, no.
12, pp. 255279, Jul. 2019, doi:
10.1007/S10479-017-2626-9.
Contribution of Individual Authors to the Creation
of a Scientific Article (Ghostwriting Policy)
1. Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade Supervision of
Ph.D. work, Conceptualization, Methodology,
Discussion, and proofreading.
2. Precious Uchechi Ikebujo - Writing of Original
Draft, Literature Review & Data Analysis.
3. Hauwa Lamino Abubakar Discussions,
proofreading and conclusion.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.5
Precious Uchechi Ikebujo,
Dorcas Omanyo Oluwade, Hauwa Lamino Abubakar
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
51
Volume 20, 2023
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
that are relevant to the content of this article.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US