Issues of Concern in Managing the Corporate Innovative Development
LILIYA HRYNASH
Department of Economy and Marketing,
Institute of Entrepreneurship and Perspective Technologies of Lviv Polytechnic National University,
Horbachevskoho Str, 18, Lviv,
UKRAINE
IHOR SKVORZOV
Department of Economy of the Enterprise and Investments,
Lviv Polytechnic National University,
Stepana Bandery Str, 12, Lviv,
UKRAINE
NAZARIY POPADYNETS
Department of Economy and Marketing,
Institute of Entrepreneurship and Perspective Technologies of Lviv Polytechnic National University,
Horbachevskoho Str, 18, Lviv,
UKRAINE
KATERYNA NAKONECHNA
Department of Global Economy,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
Heroyiv Oborony, Str, 15, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
KHRYSTYNA GORBOVA
Department of Finance, Accounting and Analysis,
Institute of Entrepreneurship and Perspective Technologies of Lviv Polytechnic National University,
Horbachevskoho Str, 18, Lviv,
UKRAINE
LINA ARTEMENKO
Department of Enterprise Management,
National Technical University of Ukraine „Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Politechnic Institute”,
Prosp. Peremohy, 37, Kyiv,
UKRAINE
OKSANA SVATIUK
Department of Personnel Management and Administration,
Lviv Polytechnic National University,
Stepana Bandery Str, 12, Lviv,
UKRAINE
ANATOLIY RYBCHUK
Department of Economics and Management,
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University,
Ivan Franko, Str, 24, Drohobych,
UKRAINE
IGOR SHCHUROV
Departments of Finance, Banking and Taxation,
National University "Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic",
Prospekt Pershotravnevyy, 24, Poltava,
UKRAINE
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1990
Volume 19, 2022
Abstract: - The method of researching the development of an innovative enterprise suggested in the paper
shows two possible ways to perform it: firstly, when the Competitiveness Commission regulates the excess
profits to avoid ageing of existing businesses, and secondly, when the process takes place without any
interference, leading to accumulation of fictitious capital and avoidance of obsolescence. The methods allow
calculating the pace of these processes. The method of researching the possible negative consequences of
corporate innovative development is suggested. The following two elements are the methodological basis of the
suggested method: development of the formalized economic conceptual framework and construction of
generalizing model of technical change by Hicks, Harrod, and Solow. Classical technical change models were
developed in the framework of production functions methodology based on the research of three main factors
capital and labor inputs, and output. The suggested conceptual framework largely eliminates these
shortcomings. The use of formalized economic categories fundamentally changes the opportunities of modeling
the production and financial-economic processes due to emerging opportunities to transfer from exogenous
parameters and processes to consideration of their endogenous properties. One of the possible approaches to
establishing the causes of fictitious capital accumulation and obsolescence of fixed assets of enterprises due to
innovative activity in the singled-out conditionally closed system (industry, market, etc.) is outlined. The
conditions and causes leading to the emergence of financial crises when fictitious capital grows by a significant
amount are shown. The nature of the “dichotomy (duality)” of an innovative process is specified the interests
of an enterprise do not meet the public interests, so the country has to prevent the conditions of financial crisis
emergence.
Key-Words: - Innovations, Innovative Process, Dichotomy of Economic Process, Fictitious Capital,
Obsolescence, Financial Crisis, Production Function.
Received: July 12, 2022. Revised: October 25, 2022. Accepted: November 26, 2022. Published: December 21, 2022.
1 Introduction
The need for corporate innovative development is
an obvious fact because it provides an opportunity
to support competitive advantages at enterprises.
Meanwhile, the enterprises failing to pay due
attention to the development will certainly get into
difficult situations that may end up with
bankruptcy. Therefore, most economic studies on
the subject offer almost a single thesis the need
for accelerated development of corporate
innovative processes.
Yet, the flaw of the approach lies in the fact that
the factors that can affect the overall condition of
the economic system an industry, national
economy, etc. are not considered. So the
researchers are rather one-sided in their approaches
to examining such a complex and multidimensional
process as corporate innovative development. In
reality, in addition to positive features, any
phenomenon or process inevitably generates
negative trends that can undermine all positive
achievements under appropriate conditions. In our
opinion, the global financial crisis observed in 2008
in most economically developed countries is an
example of such a course of events.
The main problem with managing the corporate
innovative development is that the process
generates the following negative phenomena:
fictitious capital accumulation and obsolescence of
fixed assets.
2 Problem Formulation
2.1 Literature Review
Nowadays, numerous economic studies address the
innovative process. О. Bilovodska et al. consider it
from the viewpoint of legal framework and creation
of additional analytical tools to evaluate innovative
business strategies, [1]. L. Frolova et al. suggests
the model of evaluating the opportunities to boost
corporate innovative activity based on the use of a
three-dimensional matrix of parameters for
evaluation of competitive attractiveness, [2]. Prima
project considers corporate sustainability and
innovation in SMEs from a more general point of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1991
Volume 19, 2022
view because the processes are examined from the
sustainable development perspective, [3], [4], [5],
[6], [7], [8]. М. Varis and H. Littunen, aims to
study the practice of getting the information
sources at SMEs regarding various types of
innovations, [9]. The structure of organizational
innovations and the results of their implementation
in SMEs are examined by S. Laforet, [10].
Innovative strategies implemented due to process
and product innovations are outlined, [11], [12],
[13], [14], [15], [16]. New opportunities for
researching operations management (ОМ) are
presented by H.L. Lee, [17], who considers
innovations in socially and environmentally
responsible value chains. The approaches to
Industry 4.0 management performed from the
perspective of human resources management are
addressed by S. Shamim et al., [18].
The specific feature of all these publications is
that they belong to empirical studies because they
are based on the processing of reporting and
statistical data or surveys. Such studies are most
assuredly an important and necessary element in
the development of any sciences. Yet, there is an
inevitable need to transfer to the next stage the
development of theoretical generalizing methods to
examine innovative processes.
There are also many studies on this subject but
they have some flaws related to the fact that
innovative process is examined only with the sign
“plus”. That is, any negative consequences of the
process are hardly considered. Y.V. Oliynyk, [19],
І.D. Skljar, [20], N.V. Shvecz, [21], mention the
obsolescence of fixed assets. Yet, the studies are
rather descriptive, i.e. the respective method to
calculate the obsolescence is not suggested and the
conditions for it to take place are not established.
The following can be noted regarding the fictitious
capital. Investment and technological activity of
corporate development is outlined in the works,
[22], [23], [24], [25]. In post-soviet countries, the
concept is used in economic literature by Hluxa
Kh.J. and E.M. Lymonova, [26], V.О. Mandybura
[27], О.О. Rosynka, [28], І.S. Kravchuk, [29], І.
Burdenko and I. Makarenko, [30], G. Swathi, [31]
T. Kulinich et al., [32], because it was actually first
used by К. Marx, but he didnt provide, in our
opinion, proper theoretical substantiation he
simply argued that the share capital that exceeds
the value of fixed assets is fictitious because only
the embodied form of capital can be the real
capital. Therefore, he didnt consider two forms of
value consumed and consumable, [33], but
concentrated only on the first form labor input.
Meanwhile, the consumable value determines the
value of operating capital, which is characterized
by the flow emerging from production. The bigger
is the flow especially the net cash flow (i.e. in the
form of net income) the higher is the value of
operating capital that can substantially exceed its
embodied form.
However, the research we have performed
shows that the growth of the value of functional
capital also has to have respective limits because
the conditions for the generation of fictitious capital
are created. The reason this capital, which has
nothing to do with the Marxist approach, is
accumulated is that the inflation process can
emerge on the stock market a fictitious increase
of the value of the operating capital. Unfortunately,
in Western economic literature, the concept of
fictitious capital is hardly used (it is the
consequence of an unreasonable Marxist approach).
Nonetheless, there is no research substantiating the
conditions of limiting the value of operating capital
to prevent the emergence of an inflation process on
the stock market. It leads to the situation when
most economists do not understand the complexity
of these processes, so they do not develop any
measures to prevent the repeat of 2008 financial
crisis (possibly, in tougher form).
The research aims to detect the causes of the
emergence of fictitious capital or obsolescence of
fixed assets, i.e. possible negative consequences
that can occur due to corporate innovative
development.
2.2 Materials and Methods
Nowadays, econometrics is considered the main
quantitative method in economics. Yet, the fact that
it is an empirical statistical method rather than
theoretical is not taken into account. Empirical
research is the necessary stage in any science but it
is the initial one that should inevitably transfer to
the next stage theoretical. It is also worth taking
into account that statistical methods play different
roles in different sciences. For example, for natural
science, it is the major method because it provides
an opportunity to experiment to repeat the same
phenomenon any number of times under the same
conditions. In economics, it is almost impossible to
experiment, so the collected statistical data cannot
be considered as justified. Therefore, the value of
observances after the concluded experiment and
collected statistical data is different.
The following are the main reasons the
economists cannot perform quantitative theoretical
research using mathematical apparatus: lack of
formalized quantitative economic conceptual
framework; misuse of natural laws of energy-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1992
Volume 19, 2022
saving, amount of movement, etc. adjusted to
economic conditions; lack of theoretically
substantiated constant parameters. These three
causes, in our opinion, are the most important and
prevent the transformation of economics into
theoretical science (the fulfilment of the latter
condition will make it theoretical-exact science).
The conditions of complex research of the
process of corporate innovative and investment
processes development were first described by us
in, where the law of saving the amount of
movement of an economic system was
substantiated [33]. The theoretical basis of these
methods includes the following elements:
1) suggesting the formalized economic
conceptual framework that generalizes most
economic parameters and singles out reserve”,
flow”, etc. in the spaces of natural and monetary
dimensions;
2) considering an inertial conditionally closed
economic system (company, industry), where the
output is constant Output = const, P0 the reference
limit value of profit flow; Тр estimated period of
the use of the company’s fixed assets (Fig. 1):
Fig 1: Main elements of the cost of output in an
inertial economic system
3) removing the neutral elements that do not
change in time from the production process: М
materials, W wages, and CFA the cost of the
use of fixed assets, and considering two elements
profits (Pr) and production cost (PC). The first
element (profit) generates the function of
investment cycle and the second the function of
depreciation cycle that defines the depreciation of
fixed assets;
4) simplifying the model of technical change by
Hicks, Harrod, and Solow developed in the
methodology of production functions to concepts
that use substantive parameters impacting the
investment process by transforming from
examining the production process (PF) to the
investment cycle function (Table 1).
Table 1. Neutral types of the production process
development (“neutral processes” do not change
the price)
Type of
technical
change
The fixed
parameter
Calculation formula
By Hicks
C01 = C02
P01·Тр1 = P02·Тр2 (1)
By
Harrod
Тр1 = Тр2
(2)
By Solow
P01 = P02
2
02
1
01
рр Т
C
Т
C
(3)
Generaliz
ing model
All
parameter
s change
02
202
01
101
C
ТP
C
ТPрр
(4)
Note: C01 and C02 initial cost of fixed assets before and
after innovations are implemented
The transition takes place the following way.
Three parameters are used in the PF: К the cost of
fixed assets, L the number of employees, and Y
output. The disadvantage of this approach is that К
and L are the reserves, while Y is a flow. The
model is transformed into flows: К Dd into
depreciation deductions; L→ Pw into wages flow,
but it is eliminated as a neutral element; Y→ P0
into profit flow. Next, we perform the invariant
transformation of functions Y = f(K, L) P0 =
f(Dd) = f(K0, Тр), since Dd = К0/Тр. The result is
that the graphs functions are invariant they are
similar and have the same mathematical properties,
i.e. the tangent lines to graphs intersect at the same
points. However, it is hard to explain the economic
content of these points according to the PF
methodology, while it is rather easy according to
the offered method, which is outlined in Table 1.
The major feature of suggested generalizing
dependence is that the same permanent parameter is
observed in it (as in all preceding ones)
investment’s rate of return that can be turned into
the constant one.
Having obtained the generalizing model of
technical change and established the theoretical
value of the investment’s rate of return (RoR)
amounting to RoR = е/2 = 2.718/2 = 1.359, where е
is a Eulerian number (formerly called the Neper
number), we have attempted to substantiate its
statistical value. Meanwhile, rather strict conditions
for the examined period must be observed: there
mustn’t be much inflation and crisis phenomena,
profit taxation mustn’t change, depreciation
CFA
W
М
Pr
PC
P
Т
Output
P0
Тр
0
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1993
Volume 19, 2022
deductions must be calculated following a unified
methodology, etc. (Table 2).
The research resulted in making the following
decision: the theoretical value of the investments
rate of return should be considered as the boundary,
and the actual value of 1.5 as the statistical average.
Table 2. The investments rate of return by types of economic activity (unit shares)
Years
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Total investment’s rate of return
1.410
1.408
1.450
1.561
1.617
1.660
manufacturing
1.534
1.441
1.531
1.568
1.581
1.488
agriculture
-0.048
0.687
0.969
1.062
1.022
1.183
construction
1.191
1.362
1.599
1.882
2.058
2.189
transport and communication
1.299
1.099
1.068
1.119
1.059
1.321
harvesting
1.655
1.354
1.222
0.929
1.134
1.151
supply and sale
1.724
1.921
3.608
3.176
3.463
3.397
trade
5.859
4.68
5.317
4.722
4.648
4.772
Source: compiled according to official data, [34].
The following algorithm is suggested to
quantitatively research the parameters of
obsolescence of fixed assets and plan the efficiency
of corporate investment activity in a long.
1. Average production conditions (APC) are
determined by sectoral efficiency (capitalization)
coefficient, while, according to the suggested
approach, it is the “capital turnover in relation to
marginal profit” Еоm
і
і
mC
P
Е
0
0
0
(5)
2. New annual profit (P0і) that will emerge at an
і enterprise is determined by price index (Іp),
,
оіоі PІpP
(6)
which is calculated by the formula
оm
оm
pЕ
Е
І
(7)
where sign “+ shows that a new parameter value
is considered.
3. We determine new rates for the operational
period of these enterprises. They are calculated
based on the parameter of “amortization
profitability” Ra, which is an economic acceleration
that defines the change of intensity of fixed assets
depreciation
рm
0m
Т
P
am
R
(8)
As a hypothesis, we assume that the rate for the
industry has a constant value (there are more
complex calculation methods when the new value
of the parameter can change as well).
Hence, an enterprise’s operational period can be
calculated by
a
і
рі R
P
Т
0
. (9)
After the calculation, the law of saving the
amount of movement of an economic system takes
action: efficiency (turnover) of the conditionally
closed economic system (industry) remains
unchanged if the efficiency of its components
(enterprises) changes.
The flaw of this wording is that the basic
provisions are declared but there isn’t any
mechanism of its practical implementation.
Therefore, most economists do not understand the
way it works. Most of them simply argue that the
law automatically takes action, and they have a
point in this.
3 Results and Discussion
Lets consider the development options of the
exogenous innovative process by the following
input data (Table 3).
Based on the input data, the following should be
accomplished:
1) calculating the rates of obsolescence at the
first enterprise when the antimonopoly committee
is taking actions;
2) examining what happens if the antimonopoly
committee does not regulate the process and
calculating the amount of fictitious capital.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1994
Volume 19, 2022
Option 1. The antimonopoly committee takes
actions (the basic methodology of calculations is outlined in [33]).
Table 3. Input data for enterprises
Parameters of enterprises
Reference
Measuremen
t units
Enterprise
existing
new innovational
Initial cost of fixed assets
C0
m
220
220
Initial value of annual income
P0
m/y
26
38
Operational period
Тр
y
27
27
Note: m abstract monetary unit of measurement; y year.
1.1. By formula (5), we calculate the initial
value of the industry coefficient of fixed assets
efficiency (although it is more correct to call them
turnover”) Е0m. It is worth considering the fact that
initially, one enterprise was functioning, so its
parameters matched the parameters in the industry.
Therefore, they amounted to
m
m
ym
ЕЕ m/11180
220
26
001 .
(10)
where Е01 and Е0m turnover of the first
enterprise (industry) in relation to marginal profit.
1.2. New value of the parameter will be
calculated by the same formula (6)
y
m
ym
Еm/11450
220220
3826
0.
(11)
Conclusion 1: industry turnover of fixed assets
has increased from the reference value of 0.118 to
new 0.145. The existence of another innovative
enterprise is the main reason for this growth. Its
reference value is Е02 = 38 : 220 = 0.173 (1/y). At
first glance, it seems to be a very positive trend.
Yet, according to the law of saving the amount of
movement in a conditionally closed system (in this
case, it is an industry), the efficiency should be
constant.
1.3. We determine the price index that should be
calculated by the antimonopoly committee by
formula (7)
81380
1450
1180.
.
.
p
І
(12)
This is the value by which the amount of
marginal profit in the price of output should
change.
1.4. We calculate new adjusted value of
enterprises’ marginal profit by formula (6)
01
P
= 26·0.8138 = 21.1588 m/y, (13)
02
P
= 38 · 0.8138 = 30.9244 m/y. (14)
Check: we should verify that industry efficiency
hasn’t changed
m
m
ym
C
P
Е
і
і
m11180
220220
924430158821
0
0
0.
..
(15) Conclusion 2: the actions taken by the
antimonopoly committee have equalized this
monopoly market but the changes impact the
activity parameters of individual enterprises and,
in the first place, their operational period Тр.
1.5. We determine new values of the
enterprises’ operational period.
First, by formula (8), we calculate the reference
value of amortization profitability of the first
enterprise (Fig. 2 а)
2
a1 963.0
27
26 ym
y
ym
RR mа
(16)
The operational period of an enterprise can be
determined by the formula (9) because Rа = Rа1 =
Rаm = const
y
ym
y972.21
963.0
1588.21
Т2
р1
, (17)
y
ym
ym 112.32
963.0
9244.30
Т2
р2
(18)
Conclusion 3: an operational period of the first
enterprise will reduce by 27 21.972 = 5.028
years. It is the consequence of the obsolescence of
the enterprise’s fixed assets. Instead, the
operational period of the second enterprise will
grow by the same period 5.028 years (Fig. 2 d).
Moreover, the Figure shows that the amortization
profitability Rаm in all final graphs (indicated by the
dashed line) coincides with the initial value on
Figure 2 а. Yet, the result can be different. Fig. 2
shows that if the commissioning time for the
second enterprise tc is getting closer to termination
of the operational period of the first one Тр1, the
decline in prices can force the first enterprise to
cease its activities because, at new prices, it will
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1995
Volume 19, 2022
become unprofitable (shifted graph is located
below the X-axis).
Option 2. The antimonopoly committee doesn’t
take any actions. In this case, the following
processes will take place.
2.1. No changes occur at the first enterprise.
Hence, no obsolescence takes place.
2.2. Efficiency of the second enterprise
calculated by the formula (5) is
y
m
ym
Е1173.0
220
38
02
(19)
2.3. Industry efficiency will grow as well
y
m
ym
Еm114545.0
220220
3826
0
(20)
2.4. As a result, inflationary money will begin to
accumulate at the enterprises in the amount of
ymPPP l8412.41588.2126
01011inf
(21)
ymPPP l0756.79244.3038
02022inf
(22)
Total amount of these money will be
Pinfl = 4.8412 + 7.0756 = 11.9168 m/y (23)
2.5. It will affect the stock market even more
because the fictitious capital will begin to
accumulate. If we assume that the bank interest is
Е% = 0.1 (10%), the capitalization of these
enterprises (value of their shares) can be calculated
by the traditional formula the ratio of profit to
bank interest. For these enterprises, it will be
mCs260
1.0
26
1
, (24)
mCs380
1.0
38
1
(25)
Theoretically justified value of shares is
 
 󰇛󰇜,  

󰇛󰇜 (26)
So the amount of fictitious capital will be
Cfict = (260 + 380) (211.588 + 309.244) =
119.168 m (27)
The following conclusions can be made: if the
current amount of fictitious capital accumulation is,
for example, 10 monetary units, it substantially
grows on the stock market up to 100 monetary
units; as a result, the fictitious capital, in case of its
accumulation, can lead to the crisis on the stock
Fig. 2: Possible consequences of price regulation by the antimonopoly committee that is necessary after a
new innovative enterprise starts operation, where tc is its commissioning time
Ram
t
Трm
0
P0m
P
Original graph of the profit change adjusted for
the obsolescence of fixed assets
а
t
1р
Ò
0
P01
P
New graph of the
profit change
b
Тр1
t
Тр1
0
P01
P
c
t
2р
Ò
0
P02
P
New graph of the
profit change
d
Тр2
tc
01
P
02
P
tc
New graph of the
profit change
Ram
Ram
Ram
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1996
Volume 19, 2022
and financial markets securities market and bank
institutions.
4 Conclusion
Unfortunately, it has been almost impossible to
carry out economic-statistical research in Ukraine
since it gained independence in 1991. Thats
because the war with Russia started the moment the
independence was declared. The first phase was the
financial-economic one. Since all main banks were
public and the headquarters were in Moscow, all
deposits were transferred to Moscow (“stolen”),
taking advantage of the fact that Ukraines banking
system wasnt fully formed. In 1992, Ukraine was
forced to start using its own means of payment
karbovanets represented by the National Bank’s
coupon. This volatile currency and other factors
caused hyperinflation that ended in 1996. The
monetary reform was conducted the same year, and
a new national currency was introduced hryvnya.
Canada helped Ukraine to issue its first hryvnyas.
Next, there were the financial crises of 1998 and
2008 and the beginning of military operations with
Russia in 2014, which grew into an active phase of
the war in 2022. During the entire period of
independence, Russia has never ceased its energy,
political, and information provocations against
Ukraine. All of the abovementioned did not
contribute to its economic development.
Based on the conducted research, the following
general conclusions can be made:
1) complex economic processes, including
investment, can be mathematically simulated and
examined only based on the formalized economic
apparatus because verbal and descriptive methods
used in traditional economics are inadequate;
2) innovative process constitutes a complex
multidimensional economic phenomenon that can
generate both positive features and negative
consequences obsolescence of existing
enterprises (some of them can prematurely cease
their activities) or accumulation of fictitious capital
that can cause an economic crisis. As a result, the
negative processes can undermine all positive
achievements obtained from innovative
development;
3) the interests of an enterprise and the country
in general in terms of innovative development are
considerably opposite the former tries to
maximize the amount of obtained excess profits by
implementing innovative activities and achieve
competitive advantages, while the state should
control and regulate the process (decrease the
amount of excess profits) because it can lead to
accumulation of substantial amounts of fictitious
capital and thus to the financial crisis in the
country;
4) to substantiate the methods of public control
and regulation of economic profit amount (excess
profit) obtained in various industries, additional
research should be conducted with consideration of
the following factors: industry and market features
monopoly (natural monopoly), oligopoly,
competitive market, etc.; whether an industry
(market) is new, starting to form and develop, or
exists for a long time; methodological
substantiation should be based on a unified
theoretical foundation..
References:
[1] Bilovodska, O., Kholostenko, A.,
Mandrychenko, Z., Volokitenko, O.
Innovation management of enterprises: Legal
provision and analytical tools for evaluating
business strategies. Journal of Optimization
in Industrial Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1,
2021, pp. 89-96.
[2] Frolova, L., Zhadko, K., Ilyash, O., Yermak,
S., Nosova, T. Model for opportunities
assessment to increase the enterprise
innovation activity. Business: Theory and
Practice, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1-11.
[3] Bos-Brouwers, H.E.J. Corporate
sustainability and innovation in SMEs:
Evidence of themes and activities in practice.
Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.
19, No. 7, 2010, pp. 417-435.
[4] Stashchuk, O., Shmatkovska, T.,
Dziamulych, M., Nikolaeva, A.,
Mostovenko, N., Zabedyuk, M., Ishchuk, L.
Assessment of joint stock companies finance
security risks in Ukraine. Accounting, Vol. 6,
No. 7, 2020, pp. 1181-1192.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.9.009
[5] Ilyash, O., Yildirim, O., Doroshkevych, D.,
Smoliar, L., Vasyltsiv, T., Lupak, R.
Evaluation of enterprise investment
attractiveness under circumstances of
economic development. Bulletin of
Geography. Socio-economic Series, Vol. 47,
2020, pp. 95-113.
[6] Shmatkovska, T., Dziamulych, M., Vavdiiuk,
N., Petrukha, S., Koretska, N. Bilochenko, A.
Trends and Conditions for the Formation of
Profitability of Agricultural Enterprises: On
the Case of the Lviv Region, Ukraine.
Universal Journal of Agricultural Research,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1997
Volume 19, 2022
Vol. 10, No. 1, 2022, pp. 88-98.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2022.100108
[7] Polishchuk, Ye., Ivashchenko, A. Machine
learning in estimating of SMEs investment
potential in Ukraine Proceedings of the
14th International Conference on ICT in
Education, Research and Industrial
Applications. Integration, Harmonization and
Knowledge Transfer. Vol. I: Main
Conference. Kyiv, Ukraine, May 14-17,
2018, pp. 77-93.
[8] Danylyshyn B., Olshanska O., Zabaldina Y.,
Mazurets R., Khlopiak S., Pivnova L.
Designing a Marketing Strategy for the
Development of Industrial Tourism in the
Region. Journal of Optimization in
Industrial Engineering, Vol. 14 (SI), 2021,
pp. 1-8. 10.22094/joie.2020.677809
[9] Varis, M., Littunen, H. Types of innovation,
sources of information and performance in
entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of
Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 2,
2010, pp. 128-154.
[10] Laforet, S. A framework of organisational
innovation and outcomes in SMEs.
International Journal of Entrepreneurial
Behaviour and Research, Vol. 17, No. 4,
2011, pp. 380-408.
[11] Goedhuysa, M., Veugelers, R. Innovation
strategies, process and product innovations
and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil.
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,
Vol. 23, No. 4, 2012, pp. 516-529.
[12] Horoshkova, L., Khlobystov, I., Danylyshyn,
B. Multifactor mathematical modelling of
ecological and economic systems (the
example of coal mining development)
Geoinformatics 2020 - XIXth International
Conference "Geoinformatics: Theoretical
and Applied Aspects" 2020, 17403.
[13] Irtyshcheva, I., Stehnei, M., Bogatyrev, K.,
Boiko, Ye., Kramarenko, I., Senkevicha, O.,
Hryshyna, N., Kozak, I., Ishchenko, O. The
effect of digital technology development on
economic growth. International Journal of
Data and Network Science, Vol. 5, No. 1,
2021, pp. 25-36. doi:
10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.11.006
[14] Dziamulych, M., Shmatkovska, T., Krupka,
M., Yastrubetska, L., Vyshyvana, B.,
Derevianko, S. Introduction of NSFR Ratio
in the Activities of Commercial Banks in
Ukraine. Universal Journal of Accounting
and Finance, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2021, pp. 1544-
1550.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090631
[15] Irtyshcheva, I., Kramarenko, I., Shults, S.,
Boiko, Y., Blishchuk, K., Hryshyna, N.,
Dubynska, І., Ishchenko, O., Krapyvina, D.
Building favorable investment climate for
economic development. Accounting, Vol. 6,
No. 5, 2020, pp. 773780. doi:
10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.006
[16] Kucher, A. V., Lialina, N. S., Kucher, L. Yu.
Investment attractive of land use of
agricultural enterprises. International Journal
of Ecological Economics & Statistics, Vol.
40, No. 1, 2019, pp. 118-130.
[17] Lee, H.L., Tang, C.S. Socially and
environmentally responsible value chain
innovations: New operations management
research opportunities. Management Science,
Vol. 64, No. 3, 2018, pp. 983-996.
[18] Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu, H., Li, Y.
Management approaches for Industry 4.0: A
human resource management perspective.
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary
Computation, CEC 2016. 7748365, 2016, pp.
5309-5316.
[19] Oliynyk, Y.V. Improvement of method of
analysis of fixed assets eproduction
processes. Economic analysis, Vol. 2, 2014,
pp. 195-200.
[20] Skljar, I.D. Depreciation as a regulator of
reproduction of capital company. Mechanism
of Economic Regulation, Vol. 3, 2008, pp.
149-153.
[21] Shvecz, N.V. Problematic issues analysis of
fixed assets. Business Inform, Vol. 8, 2012,
pp. 159-162.
[22] Irtyshcheva, I., Stehnei, M., Danylo, S.,
Rogatina, L., Bogatyrev, K., Boiko, Y.,
Hryshyna, N., Ishchenko, O., Voit, O.
Business Process Management in the Food
Industry Under the Conditions of Economic
Transformations. Management Science
Letters, Vol. 10, No. 14, 2020, pp. 3243-
3252. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.014
[23] Kalashnikova, T., Koshkalda, I., Тrehub, O.
Mathematical methods of data processing in
formation and evaluation of sectoral structure
in agricultural enterprises. Global Journal of
Environmental Science and Management,
Vol. 5(SI), 2019, pp. 87-95.
[24] Shults, S., Teslya, D., Bilyk, I., Kosar, N.,
Karpii, O., Kubrak, N. Factor determinants of
the consumer market development.
Accounting, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2021, pp. 563572
doi: 0.5267/j.ac.2021.1.002
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1998
Volume 19, 2022
[25] Popov, A., Koshkalda, I., Kniaz, O., Trehub,
O. Land fragmentation of agricultural
enterprises in the context of administration of
land. Economic Annals-ХХI, Vol. 176, No. 3-
4, 2019, pp. 80-90.
[26] Hluxa, Kh.J., Lymonova, E.M. Fictitious
capital: nature, essential properties and major
development trends. European vector of
economic development, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2009,
pp. 31-38.
[27] Mandybura, V.O. Fictitious capital and its
impact on the global financial system crisis.
Economic theory, Vol. 3, 2012, pp. 27-44.
[28] Rosynka, O.O. Features of transformation of
fictitious capital in virtual in globalization.
Theoretical and applied economic issues, No
24, 2010, pp. 307-314.
[29] Kravchuk, I.S. Financial and fictitious
capital: contemporary ontology. Science
young, Vol. 24, 2016, pp. 71-80.
[30] Burdenko, I., Makarenko, I. Derivative
financial instruments as form of fictitious
capital. Actual Problems of Economics, Vol.
11, 2010, pp. 181188.
[31] Swathi G, Sudha Rani Donepudi, K. Ramash
Kumar. Personified Behavioural Demand
Response Model for the Reduction of Peak
Time Energy Consumption Coincidence of
Domestic Sector with the Utility. WSEAS
Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 16,
2021, pp. 361-373.
[32] Kulinich, T., Yakimenko-Tereschenko. N.,
Melnyk, A., Vasina, A., Adamyk, V.
Challenges and Prospects of Applying the
Paradigm of Sustainable Development to the
Eastern Europe Economy. WSEAS
Transactions on Environment and
Development, Vol. 17, 2021, pp. 929-940.
[33] Skvorzov, I.B. Analytical methods in
econometrics Investment: Introduction to
analytical economics. Lviv: Publishing House
of the State University "Lviv Polytechnic",
1999.
[34] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Official site,
2022. Retrieved from:
http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.178
Liliya Hrynash, Ihor Skvorzov,
Nazariy Popadynets, Kateryna Nakonechna,
Khrystyna Gorbova, Lina Artemenko,
Oksana Svatiuk, Anatoliy Rybchuk, Igor Shchurov
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1999
Volume 19, 2022