present the perceptions of micro and small
enterprises staff in Kosovo, regarding the practice of
distributed leadership, the challenges of this
application and the conditions that permit the
improvement of enterprises leadership. In Kosovo
micro and small enterprises make up the majority of
companies operating in the market and serve as the
main source of employment for the Kosovo
population. Thus, examining the leadership issues of
these ventures would serve above all to their
effectiveness and success.
2 The Distributed Leadership,
Challenges of Application and
Conditions for Improvement
Discussions about the concept of leadership and
studies on leadership also are numerous. In its work
“The new work of educational leaders”, [1], states
that leadership as a process whereby an individual
influences a group of individuals to achieve a
common goal in the organization.
Despite the wide range of leadership typologies, the
two main types of leadership discussed in the recent
academic literature are the traditional leadership and
the distributed leadership. Traditional leadership is
about vertical top-down management, while
distributed leadership is a more democratic one. It is
known as shared leadership, participatory
leadership, or democratic leadership, [2]. According
to Harris, [3], distributed leadership is a form of
leadership when the influence is made on an
organization, and decisions are taken by several
persons, rather than managed by one person.
According to Elmore, [4], when distributed
leadership is implemented in an organization, it
enables an increase of employees' trust that the
company works honestly and this affects the
increase of the company's possibility for progress.
The author stressed that distributed leadership gives
importance to the communication and the
collaboration between members of the company and
to the learning from each other.
According to Harris, [5], there are different strategic
levels of leadership development. The first level is
superficial, which is related to the creation of a
team, and the division of tasks between their
members; the second level of the distributed
leadership, the subterranean level when sharing the
leadership is considered as a working norm and the
third level of the distributed leadership, deep
distributed leadership, where the leadership
becomes the culture of the organization.
Regarding the challenges that an enterprise faces
while applying the distributed leadership Harris,
[6], listed: (a) the distance, (b) the culture (the top
down model of leadership), (c) the enterprise
structure.
Summarizing the findings of some authors,
including Harris’s ideas, Dambrauskienė. [7], shows
the characteristics of distributed leadership, as
following: (a) the community members’
participation in the organization’s performance, (b)
communication and collaboration, (c)
teaching/learning from each other, (d) support for
the initiative, (e) involvement in decision making,
and (f) the distribution of power and activity among
other employees of the organization. These features
can be also considered as conditions that permit the
improvement of the MSE-s leadership and transform
it into a distributive leadership.
As North, [8], concludes, in an organization, where
the distributed leadership is applied, it is likely to be
a more effective development of new ideas and
knowledge, a faster change in people's worldview
and transition from a situation to common in that
culturally desired and also structural changes. As in
educational institutions, distributed leadership is
seen as very effective in the field of small and
medium enterprises (SME-s) management as well,
[9]. Some specifics that make small and medium
enterprises, including micro enterprises as well, as
suitable for the implementation of the distributed
leadership are: the management of the firm is
independent and usually the managers are the owner
of the enterprise; capital is usually owned by an
individual or a small group of individuals, the region
of extension is mainly small; the size of the
enterprise is small too, greater flexibility, faster
decision making, simple organizational structure,
the orientation toward the innovation especially for
small enterprises.
According to Cope, [10], in micro businesses, the
entrepreneur is not yet a leader because he has to be
involved in several roles, such as the role of
salesman, the role of specialist in public relations,
the role of accountant, manager, etc. As Kempser,
[11], argues, when the business grows, the
entrepreneur begins to position himself in the role of
leader. Throughout the life cycle of a business, the
leadership style in the business also changes, [12].
According to Ensley, [13], in the small business
start-up phase, vertical leadership takes on a special
importance, because it requires the entrepreneur to
create the vision of the company and lead others,
including employees to implement this vision.
Throughout the business growth phase, it seems to
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.167
Ariana Xhemajli, Mimoza Luta, Emin Neziraj