The Effect of Salary, Internal Communication, Motivation and
Working Hours on Job Satisfaction among Childcare Employees in
Kedah
YATY SULAIMAN1, NUR ZALIKHA 'AKALILI' MUHAMAD KASHFI1,
MOHD YUSRI SHAHRIL ISMAIL2, ARIANA ARIF3
1School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah,
MALAYSIA
2Southern Pipe Industry (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd,
4577, Mk. 15, Off Jalan Chain Ferry, 12100 Butterworth, Pulau Pinang
MALAYSIA
3Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Malaysia Sarawak,
94300 Kuching, Sarawak,
MALAYSIA
Abstract: - In this study, childcare employees of Kedah State are evaluated for their job satisfaction. Study
research on the connectivity between pay, internal communication, motivations, working hour, and job
satisfaction by using quantitative methods through questionnaires. 234 respondents are identified are the
sample of this study who are the employees the childcare center. The study discovered that internal
communication, motivations, and job satisfaction are correlated. However, pay and working hours are not
correlated. Satisfied employees found to work in the organizations. Research found a better knowledge of
factors influencing job satisfaction in childcare centers. The findings provide a better understanding to the
center, importantly to the management, in measuring their employees job satisfaction.
Key-words: Job satisfaction, salary, internal communication, motivation, working hour, childcare center.
Received: March 4, 2022. Revised: September 25, 2022. Accepted: October 26, 2022. Published: November 15, 2022.
1 Introduction
Job satisfaction is an accomplishment at work
which is connected to productivity and personal
affluence. Job satisfaction also proposes power and
satisfaction of a person’s job. It triggers
affirmation, salary, progression and achieving
various targets for accomplishment [1]. Job
satisfaction is a sentiments and feelings of a person
regarding their present job. A person’s level of job
satisfaction and employment fulfillment could vary
from extreme satisfaction to extreme
dissatisfaction. Every individual has a different
perception regarding employment in terms of their
work, colleagues, supervisor, subordinates, and
compensation [2].
Although job satisfaction is related to motivation,
this relationship is still unclear. Fulfilment is not
like encouragement. Job satisfaction is a whole
behaviour. For example, it can be related to
individual achievement, either quantitative or
subjective [3]. Job satisfaction is the inclination of
judgment that the activity provides for material and
mental needs [4]. Job satisfaction with a persistent
attitude needs constant management [5] [45] [46].
We often overcome news of employee
dissatisfaction at the workplace in electronic media.
There are issues on insufficient salary, work
overload, internal communication between
employees (e.g., unreasonable colleagues),
employers who lead without motivation, and poor
working conditions are among the most reported. In
addition, employees dissatisfaction also often
revolved around poor salaries by employers. These
factors led to unmotivated workers in the
workplace.
This type of employees is found to stay away from
job responsibilities, missing while working, surfing
the internet, chatting with others, or playing truant
by calling in sick. These are signs of decreased
productivity levels of workers because they are
unsatisfied with their job. A person’s behavior is
reflected in the action, attitude, or manner they are
engaged [6]. This will negatively affect their career
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1849
Volume 19, 2022
and organization growth. This scenario indirectly
affects Malaysia as being one of the growing
ASEAN countries.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Definition of Job Satisfaction
Job satisfaction is significant to measure an
organization success and employee’s satisfaction.
This will indirectly improve the organization’s
image and productivity and positively motivate the
employees. An organization with a lower job
satisfaction will not achieve its goal where it has
lower production, and demotivated workers to
improve their quality of work. A satisfied employee
person will bring changes because of joy of
working [7]. Job satisfaction is an effective tool to
some personal careers, as defined by [8], i.e., job
satisfaction is how an individual’s approach to their
job as well. Researchers use several terms to
describe job satisfaction. As mentioned by [9], job
satisfaction is how a person’s felt all about their
duties. Meanwhile, [10] quoted that satisfaction
will hold well only when a person has a positive
expectation.
Job satisfaction is associated with a helpful
workplace. Many organizations focus on achieving
a higher level of satisfaction as it is a crucial factor
[11]. A job has it types of methodologies in terms
of singular angle contrasts, needs, or similar
estimations of how it is done [12]. Job satisfaction
can be related to how a person feels about the work
as per their desire [13]. An employee may have a
few parts of obligations, e.g., salary rates,
inspiration, supervision, and partners, which could
affect workers’ perception on their work [14].
Supervisory supervision methods, collaboration
with partners, and extra advantages are types of
condition of a working environment.
Job satisfaction is a behaviour and internal state
[3], while [15] defined job satisfaction as
employees loving their work. It also related with a
person’s behaviour towards their work and at
where they are performing that given work.
Generally, job satisfaction is intrinsic and extrinsic
of feeling exhibited by workers [16].
2.2 Theory and Principles of Job
Satisfaction
2.2.1 Maslows Hierarchy of Needs Theory
Theory was introduced by [17], involving five
hierarchies of human behavior, i.e., natural human
necessity. Requirement ordering is according to a
hierarchy in which the least order is physiological
requirements, followed by security requirements
and social needs. While the need for appreciation is
in the fourth position, and the need for self-
perfection is at the top hierarchy. The theory states
that the lowest human needs, i.e., physiological
needs, must be first fulfilled before commencing to
the higher-level needs.
The theory positions the individual as integral,
related to personality and behavior, and emphasizes
motivation. An individual will continue to be
motivated to achieve a goal perceived as a
requirement that must be met regardless of
environment, generation, and cultural differences
[17]. Individual needs are also discussed, where it
emphasizes personalities associated with
personality development with motivation [17].
Motivation is driven by internal needs, which can
affect an individual’s behavior. An individual
should first think of reaching the second stage
before the first stage of physiological needs is met
[17]. In other words, if the first requirement does
not reach perfection, the second requirement will
not exist. The theory also states the difference
between the needs at the bottom level with high-
level needs.
2.2.2 Herzberg's Theory (Herzberg's Motivator-
Hygiene Theory)
Federick Herzberg presented this theory in 1957.
Motivation and environmental needs (hygiene)
influence an employee’s motivation [18]. Other
factors are achievement, responsibility, recognition,
positive feeling of work, respect, and self-growth.
Mentioned by [18], that a job with all of this factor
will give a satisfaction to that employee.
The second factor affecting job satisfaction is the
workplace environment. Absenteeism also causes
job dissatisfaction. Environmental is important for
job satisfaction, e.g., relationships with colleagues,
salaries, job security, corporate policies and
administration, work facilities, and also the
workplace environment. Job satisfaction is related
with workplace conditions which provides facilities
to employees [18].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1850
Volume 19, 2022
2.3 Demographic Factors on Job
Satisfaction
Demographic factors significantly influence a
person’s attitudes and behaviors [19]. Researchers
reported the connection among demographic
factors such as age, gender, religion, ethnicity,
marital status, and education with and job
satisfaction. Other studies findings mentioned that
gender affects commitment to the organization.
Other factors that are related are salary, promotion,
incidental advantages, leadership, work
undertakings, and socializing [20].
2.3.1 Age
Generally, work satisfaction is associated with
employees’ age. Longer serving employees found
to have extra added satisfaction and happier
compared to younger employees. Elderly
employees with a realistic experience have more
satisfaction compared younger counterparts. Young
workers have less experience than older workers
[21]. Studies showed that job satisfaction increased
around the age of 40 but declined in middle-aged
workers at least until 60. Employees are much
satisfied when they achieve their retirement age
with seniority and experience. They are also
intrinsic, autonomic, and skill factors besides
extrinsic factors such as salary.
2.3.2 Gender
Gender differences also found to determine job
satisfaction [22]. As an example, women focus on
social factors, while men are more focused on
salary, progress development and extrinsic aspect.
Major differences between men and women also
affect job satisfaction [22]. Men are more satisfied
working with their colleagues than women. A study
among bank managers in Nigeria examined gender
difference in salary and advancement and how this
distinction affects job satisfaction of both genders
[23]. The study revealed that satisfaction among
male managers higher than women managers on
promotion policies.
2.3.3 Marital Status
An employee’s satisfaction level is also affected by
marital status. Married workers are having higher
level of job satisfaction than unmarried workers.
[24], mentioned that married workers are having a
better and have a higher commitment than
unmarried employees. In conclusion this happens
because the commitment is also high.
2.4 Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction
2.4.1 Salary
Salary is a compensation workers received and
expressed in monetary paid by the employer for
working agreement service that have been or to be
done. This factor is also related to an employee’s
satisfaction, no matter it is subordinate or superior.
Wage also determines employee's job satisfaction
and often cause work dissatisfaction among
employee [18]. Salary is essential to them to satisfy
their economic needs [25]. Research that was done
among done among lecturers found that those
lecturers receiving higher income are having higher
satisfaction levels [26]. It is one of the excessive
forces for employees. Rewards in terms of money
and recognition are highly significant with highly
knowledgeable employees. Employee retention
occurs when there’s minimal recognition and
without salary paid. Salary and employee’s
performance motivates them to be more productive
and progress in work. Organization which has
concerns and leadership with them performs well
[27].
2.4.2 Internal Communication
A good inter communication highly expands
monetary outcomes with management solidness
[28]. Research was also done to find the connection
of correspondence adequacy, hierarchical turnover,
and financial performance [29]. Different work
level might have different satisfaction [30]. Internal
market orientation will have knowledge internally
to meet the requirement of employees [31].
Study by [32] found that the primary
communication procedure inspected by [33] is
honesty and openness of communication happened
in between boss and subordinate. A two-way
communication is related with predominant
subordinate job relationship.
2.4.3 Motivation
Expanding motivation, engagement, and
commitment levels are key organizational
viewpoints. Rewards and motivating forces would
help to achieve an objective. There are two types of
motivation, which are intrinsic and extrinsic. A
self-generated motivation that satisfies the
employees’ requirements is intrinsic motivation.
The amount of exertion an individual provides to
another to propel them is called as extrinsic
motivation. Reward basically motivates, attract,
and hold the workforce. Organization should have a
strategy to reimburse their employees and maintain
them encouraged [34].
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1851
Volume 19, 2022
Motivating expert workforces is like motivating
volunteers [35]. In 2004, a study revealed that
employees highly educated are less satisfied, and
education level does not affect intrinsic work
motivation [36]. Skilled employees were more
motivated. However, fewer satisfied with lower
educational level had no effect. This could be
presumed that experienced educated employees are
expanded with challenging tasks.
2.4.4 Working Hour
Working time satisfaction are imperative by self-
decided working hours. Individuals with
independence time of working able to take control
of their work arrangement. Meanwhile, those with
lesser self-sufficiency has lower level of
satisfaction.
Working time satisfaction are influenced by weekly
hours reduction which gives a positive effect. This
involved male and females also who work part-
time are enjoying and fulfilling their work [37].
There were no communication influences found for
gender. Over-work time and underemployment
impacts similarly among ladies. A man who is not
employed has higher satisfaction levels, but
however the impact is not measured critically. Job
satisfaction is emphatically influence by working
time also in extended working hours. Long work
hours will lead to lower profitability with lower
working environment ability [38].
3 Research Methodology
3.1 Research Framework
Study aimed to identify factors influencing job
satisfaction among childcare center employees.
Below framework used for this study was adapted
from [23]. Four categories are being studied
affecting job satisfaction: salary, working hours,
motivation, and internal communication, as shown
in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1: Research Framework
3.2 Hypothesis
H1: Salary is significant with job satisfaction.
H2: Internal communication is significant with job
satisfaction.
H3: Motivation is significant with job satisfaction.
H4: Working hour is significant with job
satisfaction.
3.3 Research Design
Research has used quantitative research design with
statistical data as the research medium. The
relationships between the variables were done
through quantitative date collection to describe
more on the investigation. Respondents from the
childcare centre are randomly selected. The
primary date of this study was collected through
questionnaires. According to [39], with this
method, respondents will be able to answer the
items provided. Biasness issue will be reduced as
the researcher does not influence the respondents
unless they are from the same location. He added
that researchers will have plenty of space to ask
questions compared to an interview, which will
instigate biasness besides time limitation.
3.4 Research Methods
Social Science (SPSS) software was conducted to
analyse the data obtained at the childcare centres in
Kedah. The conclusion of this research will depend
from the final findings of this research statistical
also from previous studies added as additional
inputs.
3.5 Analysis Units
The unit of analysis of this study are those
employees working in registered and licensed
childcare centres in Kedah, Malaysia. Those
employees that were chosen are the front-line
(teachers or better known as nannies in the
Malaysian context) who has the major role in
caring for and guiding the children. They are also
identified as the contact persons in between the
supervisors or managers, or owners of the childcare
centres and the parents of the children.
3.6 Sampling Design
The upcoming paragraphs will discuss on the
sampling design which is about the population,
sampling frame, sampling technique, and sample
size.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1852
Volume 19, 2022
3.6.1 Population and Sampling Methods
The population of this study is 209 childcare centre
workers registered under Jabatan Kebajikan
Masyarakat in the State of Kedah. The specific
population for the study should contain the number
of all employees of registered and licensed
childcare centres operating in Kedah.
3.6.2 Sample Size
According to [40], the sample size for the
population of 209 should be approximately 3 times
more for a childcare center; hence, 3 employees
209 yielded the population of 627. The population
was determined as the employees of childcare
centers around Kedah, with a sample size of 234
respondents, who were randomly selected to
answer the questionnaire.
3.7 Target Population
State of Kedah was chosen as the focus of the study
because the researcher’s hometown is in the state.
3.8 Questionnaire Design
Questionnaire is an efficient data collection tool
used in descriptive studies [41]. It has able to save
time and costs and collect larger amount of
quantitative data. Questionnaire of this study was
designed to investigate the factors that influence
job satisfaction in childcare centres among
employees. Respondents were asked to rate their
levels of agreement on the five-point Likert scale.
Likert scale represented by:
1- Strongly Disagree
2- Disagree
3- Agree nor Disagree
4- Agree
5- Strongly Agree
3.9 Data Analysis
3.9.1 Primary Data
Primary data are information attained from the
respondents. The questionnaire is bilingual, i.e.,
Bahasa Malaysia and English. It allows easy
understanding of the respondents.
3.9.2 Secondary Data
This study also uses secondary data to obtain more
in-depth information through journals, academic
reports, books, articles, and statistical data.
3.10 Research Instruments
Studies questionnaires has 33 items directed
bilingually. There are three sections that include
questions related to job satisfaction among
employees, i.e., parts A, B, and C. Part A contains
questions related to the respondents’ demographics,
part B contains questions related to job satisfaction,
and part C contains questions related to factors that
influence job satisfaction. Bahasa Malaysia is used
in this questionnaire is to ease respondents to
understand the questions and answers.
3.10.1 Part A: Demographic Measurement
Variables
Part of this study is about respondents’
demographic information such as gender, age,
marital status, ethnic group, religion, working year
experience, and higher education level of the
employees. This variable is measured through
nominal scales.
4 Findings
Figure 4.1 shows the respondents responses. The
questionnaire was distributed to 238 (S = 238)
employees in childcare centers in Kedah Darul
Aman. It was distributed from April 23 to March
15 by the researcher herself. 234 of questionnaires
were recovered, and 4 of them were not returned to
the researcher. All questionnaires were returned in
good condition.
4.1 Descriptive Analysis of Research
Variables
Descriptive statistical analysis was used to
measures the frequency mean score of research
main variables on factors that influence job
satisfaction. Mean score value of 3.00 and above
predicts that variables are at a reasonable level to
fair. Apart from that, mean value of below 3.00
indicates low forecast perception.
Table 1. Descriptive Analysis
Likert scale is used to measure the variable. In
Table 1, the mean value of dependent variables,
i.e., job satisfaction and independent variables
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1853
Volume 19, 2022
moderately influence work satisfaction. The mean
value for the dependent variable, M = 3.9826,
independent variables are salary (M = 2.6265),
internal communication (M = 4.2037), motivation
(M = 4.0553) and working hour (M = 2.2692).
With this, job satisfaction score is at a moderate
level and employees of childcare centers in Kedah
are moderately satisfied and both positively and
negatively as the mean value for salary factor and
working hour factor is in low forecast perception,
i.e., below 3.00. Standard deviation for job
satisfaction is 0.54758, and salary (0.35033),
internal communication (0.51636), motivation
(0.53334), and working hours (0.33714).
4.2 Pearson Correlation Analysis
Correlation indicates the connection between two
variables in one direction. In this analysis a
significant confidence level should be in between
0.01 to 0.05 (Reeves, 1992).
Table 2. Pearson Correlation Finding
** The correlation is significant at the 0.01 stage
(2-tailed)
From Table 2, salary, internal communication,
motivation, and working hour, are correlated with
job satisfaction, at 0.081, 0.636, 0.566, and 0.074.
The correlation between internal communication
and motivation, are associated with a moderately
strong coefficient. Meanwhile, the salary and
working hours exhibit low correlation coefficients.
Only internal communication and motivation are
significantly and positively correlated to job
satisfaction. The other variables, salary and
working hours, are insignificant and negatively
correlated to job satisfaction.
4.5.1.1 Hypotheses Development
Four hypotheses have been outlined to be tested.
Pearson correlation test has been used to test those
hypotheses.
i. Hypothesis 1
Table 3. Relationship between Salary Factor and
Job Satisfaction.
H1: There is no significant relationship between
salary and job satisfaction.
Table 3 shows salary is significant, p = 0.346 and P
> 0.01. Relationship between job satisfaction and
salary factor is very weak (r = 0.046). Once job
satisfaction increases, salary factor will also
increase, and vice versa. Therefore, H1 were
rejected. Findings shows salary factor alone is not
significantly affecting the job satisfaction.
ii. Hypothesis 2
Table 4. Relationship between Internal
Communication Factor and Job Satisfaction.
H2: There is no significant relationship between
internal communication and job
satisfaction.
Table 4 represent the internal communication factor
value, p = 0.000, P < 0.01 which shows a
significant relationship among internal
communication and job satisfaction. Internal
communication and job satisfaction are significant
(r = 0.571) simultaneously shows positive
correlations and interconnection with each other.
Researchers accepted H2. Results indicate that
internal communication factor has a moderate
relationship with job satisfaction.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1854
Volume 19, 2022
iii. Hypothesis 3
Table 5. Relationship between Motivation Factor
and Job Satisfaction
H3: There is no significant relationship between
motivation and job satisfaction.
Table 5 shows motivation factor and job
satisfaction are at a moderate correlation (r =
0.320), with the significant value motivation factor
of p = 0.000, P < 0.01. When job satisfaction score
increases, motivation also increases, and if the
work satisfaction score decreases, vice versa.
Therefore, H3 is accepted.
iv. Hypothesis 4
Table 6. Relationship between Working Hour
Factor and Job Satisfaction.
H4: Working hour is not significantly related with
job satisfaction.
Table 6 shows working hours and job satisfaction
are at a very weak correlation coefficient
satisfaction (r = 0.005), with a significant value for
the work factor of p = 0.260, p > 0.01.
4.5.2 Multiple Regression Analysis
According to correlation analysis only two
variables are significantly and positively correlated.
Another two variables are not significant with a
negative correlation. Regression analysis technique
is a best predictor of dependent variables from
independent variables (Rizaimy et al., 2012). Thus,
study was continued with this analysis.
Table 7. Summary of Multiple Regression
Table 7 shows the relationship between
independent variables, i.e., factors affecting job
satisfaction and job satisfaction as a dependent
variable (R = 0.669) or 66.9%. Meanwhile, the R2
value is 0.447 or 44.7%, indicating that only 44.7%
of changes in dependent variables (job satisfaction)
are due to the variation of independent variables
(factors that influence job satisfaction), while
55.30% are influenced by other factors apart of this
study.
Table 8. ANOVA Multiple Regression
Table 8 describes the results of ANOVA multiple
regression. The data display shows the extent to
which the model used by researchers in conducting
this investigation is significant or vice versa.
Referring to the ANOVA table, the value of F =
46.276 is significant at P = 0.000, P < 0.05. This
shows a correlation between the independent and
dependent variables at the significant level of p <
0.05. The results of this forecast indicate that
44.7% of the variance (R2) in job satisfaction is
significantly reflected by independent variables
(factors that influence job satisfaction). The
coefficient table above is the overall conclusion
beta value and significance of every independent
variable in this research. This table helps to explain
independent variables in explaining variance in job
satisfaction.
Table 9. Multiple Regression Analysis
Table 9 represent Beta and T values for dimensions
of factors affecting job satisfaction. The value for
salary is 0.046 and 1.744, while significant values
are 0.01 (p = 0.01, p < 0.05). Beta and T values of
internal communication are 0.461 and 7.082, with
significant values 0.000 (p = 0.000, p < 0.05). The
Beta and T values for motivation are 0.261 and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1855
Volume 19, 2022
4.022, with significant value of 0.000 (p = 0.000, p
< 0.05). The Beta value for working hour is 0.027
and 0.554 for T values, with an equal significant
value for both variables with 0.580 (p = 0.580, p >
0.05).
Identified that independent variables are related to
internal communication (p = 0.00), motivation (p =
0.00) significant with the p value where the p value
is smaller than 0.05 (p < 0.05) to job satisfaction.
H2 and H3 are accepted:
H2: There is a positive and significant relationship
between internal communication and job
satisfaction.
H3: There is a positive and significant relationship
between motivation and job satisfaction.
The salary (p = 0.346) and the working hour factors
(p = 0.580) show insignificant values, where the
value of P is greater than the value of 0.05 (P >
0.05). H1 and H3 are rejected:
H1: There is no significant relationship between
salary and job satisfaction.
H4: There is no significant relationship between
working hour and job satisfaction.
5 Discussion of Findings
Research firstly found salary and job satisfaction
are not significant. Only salary able to enhance job
satisfaction and reduce dissatisfaction [22]. Higher
salary increases employee’s productivity.
Satisfactory salary improves work quality and
encourage employees to perform better.
Internal communication positively affects
employee job satisfaction for this study.
Supervisors also tries to satisfy their subordinates’
needs and ensure the employees will fulfil and
remain at the workplace even though they are more
inclined to business, current work economic
situations or even competition inside childcare
industries. As mentioned by [42], childcare
employees are having job satisfaction with a good
supervisor focusing on essential angles identified
according to their needs.
Thirdly, motivators or satisfiers contributes to
dissatisfaction at work. Individual were challenged
to perform well to show their potential. There are
different range of angles in work motivation.
Intrinsic motivations are gotten from work.
Employee’s fundamental needs supposed to be
satisfied by work. Employees always wanted to be
appreciated. Gratefulness also contributes to job
satisfaction.
This study shows no association of working hours
with employee job satisfaction. Employees are
unsatisfied with long working hours at the centres,
although they enjoy the working environment.
Lesser working hours per week increases work
time satisfaction. These findings are in line with
[43], where women and men who worked part-time
are more satisfied compared to full time workers.
As mentioned by [44], working time satisfaction
tends to bring down with shift plans working time.
Upsetting jobs depicted by frequently skipped
breaks and unpaid extra time.
6 Conclusion
Study aims to find relationship of job satisfaction
between pay, internal communication, motivation,
working hours, and job satisfaction. should
completely focus on job satisfaction elements to
improve childcare employee’s quality work.
Inefficient management with poor planning,
organizations are likely to lose their employees.
Findings show that favorable working conditions
and good communication increase employee
loyalty.
In addition, an organization must also need attend
to take care the concerns of their employee’s
concerns, work assigned with proper understanding
of the job description, re-creating work schedules
in a better structure.
After all, job satisfaction is crucial to any business.
In this way, job satisfaction should come first to
encourage employees to continue to serve in the
organization. There are various reasons why
employees become disillusioned with their jobs
such as lack of recognition or limited opportunities,
long working hours, heavy workload, less pay, and
other reasons that pushed employees to leave the
company.
7 Recommendation for Future
Research
Future studies should look at the effects of longer
working hours or shifts on job satisfaction. For
example, childcare educators may have offered
with the best pay for fewer working hours with
morning and evening shifts, that give them work
satisfaction.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1856
Volume 19, 2022
Acknowledgment:
*Study is supported by the Ministry of Higher
Education (MoHE) of Malaysia through the
Fundamental Research Grant Scheme
(FRGS/1/2017/SS03/UUM/02/14).
References:
[1]
Kaliski, B. S. (2007). Encyclopedia of
Business and Finance, Second edition.
Detroit: Thompson Gale.
[2]
Bloomfield, G. (2021). Which is the key to
happiness: High salary or job satisfaction?
E&T Engineering and Technology Jobs,
retrieved by https://engineering-
jobs.theiet.org/article/which-is-the-reived by
key-to-happiness-high-salary-or-job-
satisfaction-
[3]
Mullins, J. (2002). Management &
organization behavior. (6th Ed). USA: Prentice
Hall.
[4]
Aziri, B. (2011). Job Satisfaction: A Literature
Review. Management Research and Practice,
3 (4), 77-86.
[5]
Sulaiman, Y., Othman, A. R., Perumal, S.,
Hussain, Z., (2013). Escalating the Employee
Job Satisfaction through Internal Market
Orientation: A Childcare Center Perspective.
Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering).
64 (2), 133-138.
[6]
Mat, N. K. N., Sulaiman, Y., Ghani, N. H. A.,
Mohamad, M. (2018). Halal Consumption
Pattern Determinants: Sequential Mediating
effects of Muslim Lifestyle, Trust and Risk
Perception. Journal of Social Sciences
Research, Special Issue (6), 444-453.
[7]
Sulaiman, Y., Masri, M., Yusr, M. M.,
Mustafa, S. A., Salim, N., (2017). The
relationship between marketing mix and
consumer preference in supplement product
usage. International Journal of Economic
Research, 14 (19), 381-393.
[8]
Kreitner Robert & Kinikci A. Irwin. (2000).
Organization Behaviour. (Ed. Ke-5). USA:
McGraw-Hill.
[9]
Hariandja, M. E. (2002). Manajemen Sumber
Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.
[10]
Sulaiman, Y., Jamil, N. A. M., Othman, A. R,
& Musa, R. (2020). The Influence of Green
marketing, Syariah Compliance, Customer’s
Environmental Awareness and Customer’s
Satisfaction towards Muslim Consumer
Purchasing Behaviour in Kedah. WSEAS
Transactions on Business and Economics, 17,
194-204.
[11]
Sulaiman, Y., Bakar, N. A. A., Ismail, M. Y.
S., Mat, N. K. N., Musa, R., (2017). The
function of marketing mix and consumer
preferences on healthy food consumption
among UUM students. International Journal
of Economic Research. 14 (19), 103-122.
[12]
Graham, M. W. & Messner, P. E. (1998).
Principal and job satisfaction. The
International Journal of Education
Management, 12(5), 196-202.
[13]
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management: An
Asian Perspective. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[14]
Carell, M. R., Jenning, D. F., & Heavin, C.
(1997). Fundamental of Organizational
Behavior. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
[15]
Rogers, J. D., Clow, K. E. & Kash, T. J.
(1994). Increasing job satisfaction of service
personnel. Journal of Services Marketing,
8(1), 14-26.
[16]
Mohammad, A. & Yarmohammadian, M. H.
(2006). A study of relationship between
managers‟ leadership style and employees
job satisfaction. Journal of Leadership in
Health Services, 19 (2), 1-18.
[17]
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human
motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-
396.
[18]
Herzberg, F. & Mausner. B. (1959). The
motivation to work. New York: John Willey
& Son Inc.
[19]
Sulaiman, Y., & Jauhari, N. (2021). The
Factors Influencing Mobile Banking Usage
among University Staff. WSEAS Transactions
on Business and Economics. 18, 179-189.
[20]
Tahir, P. G. (2015). Impact of working
environment on employee’s productivity: A
case study of Banks and Insurance Companies
in Pakistan. European Journal of Business
and Management Online, 7, (1), 329-346.
[21]
Robbins, S. P and Judge, T. A. (2009).
Organization Behavior (13th ed). New Jersey:
Pearson Prentice Hall.
[22]
Abuduaini, W. (2009). A study on the factors
affecting job satisfaction amongst employees
of fast food restaurants. Study of Human
Resource Management, 21-28.
[23]
Okpara, J. O. (2006). Gender and the
relationship between perceived fairness in
salary, promotion, and job satisfaction in a
sub-Saharan African economy. Journal of
Women in Management Review, 21(3), 224-
240.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1857
Volume 19, 2022
[24]
Meyer J. P., Allen N. J., and Smith C. A.
(1993). Commitment to organizations and
occupations: extension and test of a three-
component conceptualization. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538551.
[25]
Collin, L. C. (2018). The Influence of Job
Satisfaction on Employee Turnover Intention
in the Manufacturing Industry of Malaysia.
Journal of Arts & Social
Sciences, 1(2), 53-63.
[26]
Abu-Bakar, H., Hashim, M. (1985). An
analysis of job satisfaction among academic
staff of universities in Malaysia. PhD
Research, (abstract). University of Ohio. UTM
library. Malaysia
[27]
Gregory Kristen (2009). The importance of
employee satisfaction retrieved February 19,
2013, from
http://job.satisfaction.retrieved/html
[28]
Watson Wyatt Worldwide (2008, 2009). The
Communication ROI Study Report. Towers
Watson, 1-23.
[29]
Yates, K. 2006, „Internal Communication
Effectiveness Enhances Bottom-Line
Results‟, Journal of Organizational
Excellence, Summer, 71-79.
[30]
Miles, E. W., Patrick, S., & King, W .C.
(1996). Job level as a systematic variable in
predicting the relationship between
supervisory communication and job
satisfaction‟. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 69, 277-292.
[31]
Sulaiman, Y. Othman, A. R., Perumal, S. &
Hussain, Z. (2013), Escalating the Employee
Organisational Commitment through Internal
Market Orientation: Childcare Center’s
Perspective. International Journal of Business
and Social Science, 4 (6), 257-262.
[32]
Burke, R. J., & Wilcox, D. S.
(1969a). Characteristic of effective employee
performance review and development
interviews. Personnel Psychology, 22, 291
305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-
6570.1969.tb00334.x
[33]
Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization:
Its Management and Value, London:
McGraw-Hill.
[34]
Berger, B., & Lance, A. (2000). The
compensation handbook: A state-of-the-art
guide to compensation strategy. USA:
McGraw-Hill.
[35]
Drucker, P. F. (2008).
"http://www.edbatista.com/2008/10/drucker-
1.html." from
http://www.edbatista.com/2008/10/drucker-
1.html
[36]
Eskildsen, J. K., et al. (2004). Work
Motivation and job satisfaction in the Nordic
countries. Employee Relations 26(2): 122-136.
[37]
Booth Alison L; Van Ours, Jan C. (2009):
Hours of Work and Gender Identity: Does
Part-Time Work Make the Family Happier?
In; Economica, 76(301), 176-196.
[38]
Rogers, J. D., Clow, K. E. & Kash, T. J.
(1994). Increasing job satisfaction of service
personnel. Journal of Services Marketing,
8(1), 14-26.
[39]
Babbie, E. & Rubin, A. (1989). Research
Methods for Social Work. California:
Wadsworth.
[40]
Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970).
Determining Sample Size for Research
Activities. In Hill, R. (1998). “What Sample
Size is ‘Enough’ in Internet Survey
Research”? Interpersonal Computing and
Technology: An electronic Journal for the 21st
Century. Available at:
http://www.emoderators.com/ipct-j/1998/n3-
4/hill.hmtl
[41]
Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2013). Research
Methods for Business. (6th ed.). West Sussex:
John Wiley & Sons.
[42]
Sulaiman, Y. (2013). The Mediating Role of
Employee Job Satisfaction on the Relationship
between Internal Market Orientation and
Employees Organizational Commitment
within the Malaysia Childcare Sector. DBA
Thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
[43]
Booth Alison L; Van Ours, Jan C. (2009):
Hours of Work and Gender Identity: Does
Part-Time Work Make the Family Happier,
Economica, 76(301), p. 176-196.
[44]
Nakata, A. (2017), Long working hours, job
satisfaction, and depressive symptoms: a
community based cross-sectional study among
Japanese employees in small- and medium-
scale businesses. Oncotarget, 8 (32), 53041-
53052.
[45] Sulaiman, Y., & Lie, N. K. (2021). Quality
assurance among childcare employees in
Selangor. WSEAS Transactions on Business
and Economics, 18, 1498-1511.
[46] Sulaiman, Y., Md Basri, N. A., Ismail, M. Y.
S. & Arif, A. (2021). The effects of
caregivers, physical facilities, environment,
and food safety on the safety assurance level
at childcare centers. WSEAS Transactions on
Environment and Development, 18, 371-381.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1858
Volume 19, 2022
Contribution of Individual Authors to the
Creation of a Sci0entific Article (Ghostwriting
Policy)
-Yaty Sulaiman was responsible for
conceptualization, funding acquisition, project
administration, resources, and supervision.
-Nur Zalikha ‘Akalili” Muhamad Kashfi was
responsible for data curation, formal analysis,
methodology, validation, and writing the original
draft.
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail was responsible for
review of the article.
-Ariana Arif was responsible for editing of article.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in a
Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
*This research was supported by Ministry of
Higher Education (MoHE) of Malaysia through
Fundamental Research Grant Scheme
(FRGS/1/2017/SS03/UUM/02/14).
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.166
Yaty Sulaiman, Nur Zalikha 'Akalili' Muhamad Kashfi,
Mohd Yusri Shahril Ismail, Ariana Arif
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1859
Volume 19, 2022