record on attributes of sold properties and their
position cannot be distinguished by a geographic
data framework, [15].
The objective of this paper is to empirically
demonstrate that, aside from location and address of
properties, there are other major factors that
influence the price of flats in Tirana and Durres by
developing a hedonistic pricing model.
2 Literature Reviews
The hedonic price method, or hedonic regression,
recognizes that heterogeneous commodities can be
specified by their attributes or characteristics. The
model is used for estimating the value of this good
or the demand for a good, which indirectly affects
its market price.
Even though most of the scholars agree that it was
the Court, [31] who first used the hedonic price
model (HPM) to decide the hedonic price index of
cars, there is no consensus among them as to who
first introduced this model. Haas, [32] and Wallace,
[33] first displayed the model with the evaluation of
agricultural land. One reason to consider the Court’s
study as a substantial contribution is that it deals
with problems of nonlinearity and with changes in
underlying goods bundles, [5].
Robert and Shapiro, [6], are two other scholars that
contended about the Court’s methodology, by
stating that “implicit price components for each of a
bundle of product characteristics are established by
a regression operation that phrases the price of a
product as a function of the coefficients associated
with each characteristic. The price of a new product
(or different product can then be compared with that
of the previously existing product when one utilizes
these coefficients…”
There is also a theory stated by Colwell and
Dilmore in [7] which shows that Haas conveyed a
hedonic study more than fifteen years prior to Court,
even though he never used the term ‘hedonic’. Haas
analyzed price/acre adjusted for year of sale, road
type and city size, using data on 160 sales
transactions gathered from farm sales in Minnesota.
While the depreciated cost of building per acre, land
classification index, soil productivity index and
distance to the city center were included as
independent variables. There are also many other
scholars who contributed to the HPM over the years.
Authors in [8] raised the HPM by further developing
Court’s study. His work imprinted technological
change and novelty into hedonic prices through
quality of goods. Griliches, [9], worked on
automobile price indices using automobile models
as a unit of analysis, and his study attracted
substantial consideration, [10], [11].
Lancaster’s consumer theory and Rosen’s model are
considered important contributions to the
development of HPM. In [12] the authors
characterized the idea of utility of the items through
the value of their extraordinary qualities,
considering that a linear relationship. Their review
depends on the hypothesis of utilization, under
which the demand for a heterogeneous item, for
example, real estate, relies upon its attributes.
According to this research, the Lancastrian index is
more appropriate for consumer goods. According to
authors in [13], properties are heterogeneous and the
absolute value is made up of the total of each
property’s characteristic value, implying that HPM
ought to be nonlinear. Rosen’s model looks
appealing to estimate demand for durable goods.
Rosen's model is divided into two stages. By
relapsing the cost of a product on its qualities, the
first stage estimates the marginal price for the
attribute of interest. The first stage establishes a
price measure but does not show the inverse demand
function immediately. The inverse demand curve,
also known as the marginal willingness to pay
function, is generated from the implicit pricing
function calculated in the first step of estimation,
[14].
Because Rosen factored income into the consumer's
budget constraint, as income rises, so does the
consumer's marginal willingness to pay for a
specific implicit feature. The buyer's demand or
desire to pay for a characteristic is considered to be
a function of the buyer's utility level, wealth, and
other variables that impact tastes and preferences,
such as age, education, and so on. Rosen believes
that utilizing the marginal price as an endogenous
variable in the second-stage synchronous condition
may be used to estimate the inverse demand
function, which considers changes in revenues and
utility levels. If the inverse demand function can be
traced back utilizing the implicit marginal price
function, the utility change with regard to specific
quality modifications may likewise be calculated by
coordinating the inverse demand function, [14].
Bartik, [30], disagreed with Rosen's method for
estimating the hedonic price model, claiming that
the hedonic estimation issue is not the consequence
of demand-supply interaction, because individual
consumers cannot influence providers.
Because of the diverse environment in which the
model takes place, determination of housing
characteristics in the hedonic model is different in
various countries. The existence of a lift, a garage or
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.163
Ines Nurja, Fatma Jaupi, Ogerta Elezaj