Situational Leadership Role in Enhancing Organizational Performance
during Covid 19 Pandemic among a Sample of Kuwaiti SMEs
SALAH A. A. ALABDULJADER
The Department of Management and Marketing, College of Business Administration, Kuwait University, KUWAIT
Abstract:- COVID 19 hit the world during the end of 2019 and beginnings of 2020, the virus was deadly and
fast to spread which had caused a lot of disturbance among country in terms how to avoid such crisis and make
sure to get out of it with the least losses possible. The current research sought to examine the impact of
situational leadership theory and its dimensions (directive, supportive and delegative) in enhancing
organizational performance during COVID 19 pandemic, and how this type of leadership managed to preserve
the best performance of many organizations. Depending on quantitative approach and utilizing an electronic
questionnaire, researcher adopted a sample of (344) managers and leaders within Kuwaiti SMEs during the
fiscal year 2021-2022. SPSS was used to analyze collected primary data, and outcomes of analysis indicated
that situational leadership helped a lot during COVID 19 breakout as it saved and preserved an acceptable level
of performance among SMEs, in addition to that, it was seen that the directive leadership style of situational
leadership theory was the most influential in running a good and acceptable level of performance during the
pandemic.
Based on such results, current research recommended the need to increase attention to the fact that one of the
defects of situational leadership is its failure to identify the leadership skills required for certain situations, and
thus it is necessary to identify these skills and work on developing them among individuals.
Keywords: COVID 19, Pandemic, Situational Theory, Leadership, Delegation, Collaborative, Directive, SMEs,
Quarantine, Lockdown, Performance.
Received: October 17, 2019. Revised: September 11, 2022. Accepted: September 26, 2022. Published: October 21, 2022.
1 Introduction
With the end of the 40s of the last century, the
structural design of leadership and its relationship
to human behavior became an essential area of
study, and that the artificial distinction between
formal and informal organizations was treated less
than treating them in an integrated and non-separate
manner. Attention has shifted towards efforts to
understand the multiple roles of leadership and to
identify areas through which management can
effectively intervene to improve the performance of
employees [1], [19].
The subsequent stage of human relations moved the
leadership theory to a modern stage, which was
characterized by intellectual diversity in modern
leadership concepts and the information revolution
related to an expanding field of the leadership
phenomenon [2]. Among the most influential
branches of the modern approach to leadership
thought are the school of decision-making,
organizational psychology, open systems theory,
situational theory and the school of quantitative
management.
1.1 Problem Statement
[3] Leadership is the cornerstone of an organization
and especially in hard time where the organization
faces sudden and unpredicted events that may
negatively impact its performance. [4] and [5]
argued that during a crisis, leaders do not have to
apply a previously-prepared plan, on the contrary,
they have to prepare ideologies and mindsets that
are able to cope with changes and support their
approach to manage change resistance.
From that point, current research sought to examine
the impact and role of situational leadership on
preserving a good organizational performance
during COVID 19 pandemic among Kuwaiti SMEs.
The study launched its idea from that fact that
many organizations managed to preserve a good
level of performance through the pandemic which
helped in supporting its internal operation and
protect its external share of the market.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1706
Volume 19, 2022
2 Literature Review
2.1 Situational Leadership
It was seen through literature that there are many
leadership strategies and styles a leader can adopt
so as to be more leading in the work environment;
among these strategies and styles is the situational
leadership [5]. This type of leadership style
suggests that a good leader is a person who is able
to adjust their attitudes, behavior, feelings and
thoughts in accordance with the current and present
situation. Situational leadership [6] - refers to a
leadership approach in which the leader adopts and
copes their leadership ideologies in order to support
and uphold any emergent situation in the
organization, it doesn't have to be built on certain
set of skills, traits and characteristics, but rather the
ability of the leader to evaluate the situation and
adopt a leadership style that mostly suits the
present incident [7]. From another perspective,
situational leadership may also be seen in
connection to Situational Leadership Theory which
supports leaders to carry out evaluations to their
team members within the work place [8]; [1]; [2].
Situational leadership is basically built on the fact
that a good leadership has the ability to shift from
one style to another as a response to changing
situations [9]. In other words, it is based on leader's
ability to cope with different situations and
circumstances [10].
2.2 Situational Leadership Theory
Situational theory is said to be seen as the most
effective leadership theories, it launches from the
fact that there is no set of skills, traits or behavior
that a leader must have in order to be successful, it
is more dependent on a leader's ability to choose
what mostly suits the situation that is
happening[11]. Based on that, being a situational
leader means to gather all needed information
regarding the work environment, situation,
incidents and team members, and choose the best
practices that may help in adhering the most
suitable decision making in accordance with
collected data [12].
Situational leadership theory is one of the most
important leadership theories that exist in the
business world from an applied and academic point
of view. The academic and scientist Fiedler is the
first to touch on the concept of situational
leadership, which contributed to imparting
scientific and practical value to the concepts of
leadership and contemporary management thought
[13].
Situational leadership theory was distinguished for
Fiedler as the type of leadership that is flexible and
dynamic, and it is the type of leadership that adapts
to continuous changes and demands to find
solutions to deal with these changes according to
their different positions [14]. [15] indicates that
Fiedler divided leadership positions according to
the situational leadership theory into two types as
follows:
- Natural changes
It is usually the result of various natural
developments on the business environment in all its
dimensions and requires effective leadership
capable of keeping pace with changes in order to
maintain the competitive position of the
organization
- Crises
And it is that which occurs as a result of the
organization’s exposure to a crisis, which requires
the presence of a situational leadership capable of
helping the organization overcome the crisis and
get out of it with minimal losses.
2.3 Traits of Situational Leaders
Being a situational leadership means to have the
ability to shift and change in a way that responds to
the needs of work environment and incidents taking
place in the organization [16]. Based on that, it can
be said that situational leaders has to be flexible
lean and resilient in order to assist and be able to
take the right decision in order to be successful
[17]. Other traits of a situational leader that helps
with changing and shifting are [18; 19]:
- Directive
Being directive and having the ability to supervise
and lead towards the main goal is a very important
aspect of a situational leader.
- Flexible
A situational leader must be lean, flexible and
resilient, they must have the ability to shift and
change their personality in a way that suits the
current situation.
- Delegative
A situational leader must have the ability to
recognize their team members and classify them
according to their ability to complete tasks alone,
this can lead to delegation in which a leader can
adopt so as to delegate asks and save more time.
- Regular coaching
A situational leader must have the quality of a
tutor; they have to be able to teach other how to
complete tasks in a mature way.
- Courage
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1707
Volume 19, 2022
Unpredictable situations require a leader who is
courageous enough to take extreme measurements
and risks. This can only happen if a situational
leader is risky and welling to try new things.
- Clear vision
Choosing the most effective approach in leading
requires the leader to fully and clearly understand
the goal, the way the team in heading and the main
aim that the team has to achieve.
- Modesty
A situational leader has to be modest, a leader is
not necessarily a person who knows everything, it
is a good thing that a situational leader has the
ability to exploit all skills of their team and adapt
these skills to the needed goal.
2.4 Leadership during COVID 19 Pandemic
It can't be denied that COVID 19 imposed a huge
level of panic among many working sectors around
the world, this managed to change the environment
in which leaders work due to the loss in human
souls, in addition to the changes that accompanied
lockdowns and quarantines [28]. In that sense, the
importance of situational leadership appeared as a
response to the breakout of the virus and an answer
to what the next more has to be [20].
[21] Leaders realizing that they are facing a crisis,
they had to more into a situation where the work
wheel has to continue, especially in its beginning,
which almost resembled the outbreak of the
“SARS” epidemic between 2002-2003, and now
the Corona virus pandemic [22]. As for [23], it was
emphasized that the leaders would not have been
able to overcome the crisis had it not been for their
first recognition of its occurrence, and their attempt
to deal with it in all available ways and means,
including non-traditional and non-routine ways of
driving.
The leaders’ interaction during the COVID 19
pandemic was represented by following extreme
measures that was able to face the new situation of
lockdown and quarantine in addition to the new
rules and regulations regarding remote working and
the avoidance of gathering [24]; [25].
2.5 Organizational Performance
Performance represents the organization's ability to
reach its goals set in its strategy, i.e. the
organization's ability to reach long-term goals [30].
Organizational performance is seen as the outcome
of the organization's ability to work on the optimal
and best utilization of the resources it has in order
to be directed towards achieving the goal [31].
The distinctive capabilities of the organization, the
optimal use of its resources, is what determines the
efficiency of the organization in its performance,
[30, 33] in general, there are two types of
performance, which are financial performance, and
non-financial performance, in relation to financial
performance. To the organization's ability to
achieve the required financial performance, as the
organization that enjoys high financial performance
is more able than others to exploit the opportunities
that are available to it in facing the challenges it
faces in its external work environment, as it is
subjected to less pressure from stakeholders.
As for non-financial performance, it refers to non-
financial indicators such as market share, product
development, internal and external customer
satisfaction, in addition to other measures that are
related to the organization's level of performance
[34, 32].
3 Hypotheses Development
[26] aimed to show the impact of situational
leadership on the performance of working
individuals. By adopting the quantitative approach,
a questionnaire was distributed to a sample of
workers in one of the Kenyan organizations, and
the study came to the conclusion that the situational
leadership contributed to improving the
performance of working individuals through only
one aspect, which is the incentive, whereby
changing the behavior and traits of the leader to
confront An exceptional circumstance that
preserves employees in order to develop their
performance during that period only and not their
general performance.
[3] indicated in their study that the situational
leadership proved its worth during the crisis period
and achieved the goal that the organization aspires
to, which is to maintain performance during the
crisis period. It also helped in increasing the
confidence of working individuals in their skills
and abilities, in addition to improving the
foundations of conflict resolution and maintaining a
constructive work environment in the organization.
In addition, situational leadership helped mitigate
the severity of the crisis through a situational leader
who understands the needs of others and adjusts his
leadership approach to suit the current situation.
Study by [4] aimed to show the impact of
situational leadership on leadership style, work
discipline, and work motives within Bank Syariah
Indonesia Rantauprapat. Through the quantitative
approach and the application of a questionnaire to a
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1708
Volume 19, 2022
sample of the bank’s employees, the study proved
that the situational leadership contributed to
changing the leadership style of leaders and
maintaining a high level of organizational
performance, and the evidence for this was the
bank’s follow-up of a number of steps that
maintained business growth, such as opening
Electronic banking channels, changing the work
system to become remote in connection with the
bank’s website, and the commitment of customer
service to provide answers to customers’ inquiries
around the clock.
Study by [5] aimed to identify situational
leadership and its emergence during the period of
the COVID 19 pandemic, which led to situational
leadership being the new style of natural
leadership. By adopting the qualitative approach,
samples of school principals were interviewed
within Bulakan Prefecture in Japan during the year
2020-2021. The study proved that the situational
(peripheral) leadership was able to strengthen the
individual's chance of remaining committed to the
team, and it also helped the leader to be a vigilant
decision maker and planner.
Based on above hypotheses development,
following model described the relationship between
variables of study:
Fig 1: "The Study Model"
From above model, following hypotheses were
extracted:
Main Hypothesis:
H0: Situational leadership theory doesn't have a
statistically significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic in
Kuwaiti SMEs
Sub-Hypotheses:
H01: Directive leadership doesn't have a
statistically significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic in
Kuwaiti SMEs
H02: Supportive leadership doesn't have a
statistically significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic in
Kuwaiti SMEs
H03: Delegative leadership doesn't have a
statistically significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic in
Kuwaiti SMEs.
4 Methods
4.1 Methodological Approach
The current study appeared as an analytical
descriptive study that adopted the quantitative
approach and relied on numerical primary data,
which are later translated into results
commensurate with the phenomenon under study.
4.2 Study Tool
The questionnaire was adopted as a tool for the
study, where the questionnaire was built on the
five-point Likert scale (1) Strongly disagree; (2)
Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree;
(5) Strongly agree, using previous studies that dealt
with the research idea or part of it, and included
[3]; [27]; [26]. The questionnaire consisted - in its
latest version - of (27) paragraphs, and it was
distributed electronically through Google Forms in
line with health recommendations regarding
COVID 19 and the need for physical distancing.
Independent Variables
Dependent Variables
Situational leadership
theory
Directive leadership
Supportive leadership
Delegative leadership
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1709
Volume 19, 2022
4.3 Population and Sampling
The study population consisted of all owners of
SMEs in Kuwait, which gathered 33.000 projects
till 2022. A simple random sample of (384)
individuals was selected, and after applying the
study tool, (344) correctly filled out questionnaires
were obtained and can be analyzed, which
indicated that the response rate was (89.5%), which
is statistically acceptable.
4.4 Statistical Processing
SPSS was used to analyze the primary data and
reach the results of study, Cronbach alpha was used
to test the consistency of the scale, alpha value =
0.951 was accepted since it was greater than
accepted value 0.60 [29]. Other statistical tests
included:
- Mean and percentages
- Frequency and standard deviation
- Multiple regression
5 Results and Discussion
5.1 Demographic Results
Analyzing demographics of study sample, table 1
below indicated that majority of respondents were
males forming 74.1% of total sample, who were
within age range of more than 48 years old forming
42.4% of the sample. Results also indicated that
educational level of respondents was mostly BA
degree 51.2% and with an experience of more than
17 years forming 57% of total sample.
Table 1. Demographics
f
%
Gender
Male
255
74.1
Female
89
25.9
Age
30-35
24
7.0
36-41
62
18.0
42-47
112
32.6
+48
146
42.4
Educational Level
BA
176
51.2
MA
87
25.3
PhD
81
23.5
Experience
2-6
48
14.0
7-11
24
7.0
12-16
76
22.1
+17
196
57.0
Total
344
100.0
Statements of questionnaire were analyzed as
according to respondents' answers to them. It was
seen that all statements were well-received as they
all scored higher than mean of scale 3.00. However,
the highest mean was scored by statement
articulated "Supportive leaders were more able to
preserve good performance in their teams" scoring
4.52/5.00 compared to the least score by the
statement articulated "Situational leader has staff
report back after completing each step of their
work" scoring 3.50/5.00 but still positive from a
statistical point of view. Going deeper into analysis,
and looking at results of study variables, it was
seen that the dependent variable (organizational
performance) scored the highest mean 4.20/5.00
compared to directive leadership which scored the
lowest mean of 3.79/5.00 but still statistically
positive.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1710
Volume 19, 2022
Table 2. Questionnaire Analysis
Mean
Std. Deviation
The leader demonstrates each task involved in doing the job.
3.2762
.95796
Situational leadership asks staff to think ahead and develop long-term plans
for their areas.
4.0000
.84688
The leader sets down performance standards for each aspect of staff’s job.
4.0000
.84688
Situational leader always explain the benefits of achieving their work goals
to staff.
4.2180
.96082
Situational leader has staff report back after completing each step of their
work.
3.5000
.69568
Directive Leadership
3.7988
.55149
Periodic meetings were held to show support for organization policy and
mission.
3.6483
1.15104
The leader recognizes staff’s achievements with encouragement and
support.
4.2267
.62109
Situational leader always rotate the role of team briefer among the staff.
4.4070
.67228
The leader always checks on the team and makes sure they are on the right
path
4.1105
1.09571
The leader meets with staff regularly to discuss their needs.
3.6948
.83814
Supportive Leadership
4.0174
.64770
Leadership provides staff with clear responsibilities and allows them to
decide how to accomplish them.
3.7471
.75399
Leadership makes sure staff is aware of, and understands, all organizational
policies and procedures.
3.9826
.93193
The leaders discuss any organizational or policy changes with staff prior to
taking action.
3.7849
.90041
A situational leader expects staff to create their own goals and objectives
and submit them to them in finished form.
4.1512
.82267
A situational leader always empower their teams into being more
productive
3.5116
.79347
Delegative Leadership
3.8355
.75130
The pandemic caused a lot of disturbance and unstable environment for
organizations
4.1221
.76145
Immediate actions were needed at the beginning of the pandemic from
leaders and managers
4.3576
.83826
It was hard to preserve a good performance during distance working
3.8808
.58183
Leaders with good traits were able to manage the situation during the
pandemic hit
4.1221
.76145
Shifting from real to virtual work space needed a good leader to manage
3.9942
.84341
Employees' performance was the first to be influenced by the pandemic
3.6570
.64234
Leaders with good situational thinking appeared to handle the problem in a
good way
4.2035
.94415
Communications between leaders and staff helped in preserving a good
performance
4.4564
.88944
Delegative leaders were more able to preserve good performance in their
teams
4.4360
.94544
Supportive leaders were more able to preserve good performance in their
teams
4.5262
.76315
Directive leaders were more able to preserve good performance in their
teams
4.3750
1.06169
In general, leaders were ready to handle the stick during COVID 19
pandemic and preserved good performance
4.3343
1.09672
Organizational performance
4.2054
.63633
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1711
Volume 19, 2022
5.2 Hypotheses Testing Table 3. Hypotheses Testing
Coefficients
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
R
R Square
1
(Constant)
.608
.142
4.267
.000
.816a
.666
Directive
.399
.058
.346
6.903
.000
Supportive
.306
.050
.312
6.185
.000
Delegative
.221
.036
.261
6.159
.000
Multiple regression was performed to test the
hypothesis and r = 0.816 was determined to be
significant, indicating a strong link between the
independent and dependent variables. Additionally,
F = 226.048 was statistically significant at the 0.05
level, implying that the above hypothesis was
correct, namely that Situational leadership theory
had a statistically significant influence on
organizational performance during COVID 19
pandemic in Kuwaiti SMEs. Additionally, the t
values for each variable are significant at the 0.05
level, which means:
Directive leadership had a statistically
significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic
in Kuwaiti SMEs , since beta = 0.346 is
significant at 0.05 level
Supportive leadership had a statistically
significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic
in Kuwaiti SMEs since beta = 0.312 is
significant at 0.05 level
Delegative leadership had a statistically
significant influence on organizational
performance during COVID 19 pandemic
in Kuwaiti SMEs since beta = 0.261 is
significant at 0.05 level
The current study aimed at examining how
situational leadership managed to preserve good
performance of Kuwaiti SMEs during COVID 19
pandemic. Reaching the aim was done depending
on a quantitative approach, and a questionnaire
which was distributed on a sample of (344)
respondents among SMEs in Kuwait. SPSS was
used and results of study reached following
findings:
- Respondents appeared to have high level of
awareness regarding situational leadership
as they were able to respond to statement
of study in the best way possible and with
high level of knowledge and ability to
determine their answers
Based on the previous literature, and in addition to
the results of the above study, the study proved that
situational leadership was able to maintain
organizational performance during the pandemic
period, because the dynamic behaviors and
continuous changes in the nature of leadership in
the theory of situational leadership contributed
significantly to adding A lot of flexibility on the
leadership, which made it smooth and able to
control when the crisis entered. In addition, the
situational leadership facilitated the way for
organizations with all their teams to adapt to the
pace of the escalating changes from the beginning
of the pandemic to its climax, which was
represented by complete closures and remote work,
and this is consistent with [26]and [3].
On the other hand, the situational leadership was
able to adapt and maintain a good level of
performance because the leaders of the situational
leadership style had the flexibility to adapt to any
new crises in the organization, which is usually
coupled with the leaders having a different style of
dealing with different situations with different
skills than the employees. In addition, the study has
proven through its independent variables that
situational leadership increases productivity
because of the different characteristics and
behaviors of leaders in proportion to the different
new situations which agreed with what came along
with [4].
In general, situational leadership is considered one
of the most appropriate types of leadership used in
exceptional circumstances and situations as it is
able to overcome ambiguity and uncertainty, in
addition to being oriented towards relationships
with the team in order for the situation leader to
cooperate with team members and encourage self-
awareness by taking Responsible decision to
support team members when needed.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1712
Volume 19, 2022
6 Conclusion and Recommendations
Situational leadership is a people-oriented
leadership style, so it is easy for the leader to
involve the employees in his organizational
aspirations to implement the company's vision
smoothly and voluntarily, especially in exceptional
cases and force majeure circumstances that occur
suddenly and without prior warnings.
After conducting such a study of situational
leadership and its importance for organizations in
exceptional circumstances, the search for such
leaders becomes imperative for every organization
to deal with the difficult situations it faces.
Therefore, situational leadership is an effective
model for management in the modern business
world, and in order for organizations to be leaders
in this leadership style, they must learn the
mechanism of adapting their leadership style by
finding a balance between directing, delegating,
supporting and strengthening the team, and a
mediator must be found between meeting employee
needs and mission requirements depending on the
situation.
Based on results and discussion, current study
recommended:
- The need to pay attention to the fact that
one of the defects of situational leadership
is its failure to identify the leadership skills
required for certain situations, and thus it is
necessary to identify these skills and work
on developing them among individuals
- Before embarking on the adoption of
situational leadership, the environment of
the organization must be suitable for the
application of this type of leadership. The
appropriateness of the environment for
situational leadership is represented in the
presence of effective communication
systems between leaders and subordinates,
the ability to choose leaders with clear
leadership skills, and that the
organization’s environment be more
focused on Subordinates and their needs at
work.
References:
[1] Hashem, T., & Al-Aqrabawi, W. A. A.
(2013). The impact of Transactional
leadership on the marketing creativity in
Jordan commercial banks. Management,
Leadership and Governance, 152.
[2] Hawi, R. Hashem, T and Al-Khodary, D.
(2015). The Relationship between
Transformational Leadership and
Organizational Performance in Jordan
Universities from Middle Managers
Perspective, IJMBS, 5(4), 39-46
[3] Islam, Q., Juraybi, M. H., & Alraythi, Y. M.
(2021). Effectiveness of Situational
Leadership Style in Managing Workplace
Crisis. Saudi J Bus Manag Stud, 6(9), 362-
365.
[4] Siregar, N., Zebua, Y., & Nasution, S. L. A.
(2022). The Effect Of Situational Leadership
Style, Work Discipline And Work
Motivation On Employee Performance At
Rantauprapat Syariah Bank Indonesia.
International Journal of Science, Technology
& Management, 3(2), 443-452.
[5] Francisco, C. D., & Nuqui, A. V. (2020).
Emergence of a Situational Leadership
during COVID-19 Pandemic Called New
Normal Leadership. Online Submission,
4(10), 15-19.
[6] Walls, E. (2019). The value of situational
leadership. Community practitioner: the
journal of the Community Practitioners'&
Health Visitors' Association, 92(2), 31-33.
[7] Ruslan, R., Lian, B., & Fitria, H. (2020). The
Influence of principal’s situational leadership
and Teacher’s professionalism on Teacher’s
performance. International Journal of
Progressive Sciences and Technologies,
20(1), 135-143.
[8] Henkel, T., & Bourdeau, D. (2018). A field
study: An examination of managers
situational leadership styles. Journal of
Diversity Management (JDM), 13(2), 7-14.
[9] Lynch, B. M., McCance, T., McCormack, B.,
& Brown, D. (2018). The development of the
Person?Centred Situational Leadership
Framework: Revealing the being of
person?centredness in nursing homes.
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1-2), 427-
440.
[10] Cuaresma-Escobar, K. J. (2021). Nailing the
situational leadership theory by synthesizing
the culture and nature of principals'
leadership and roles in school. Linguistics
and Culture Review, 5(S3), 319-328.
[11] Rahadiyan, A., Triatmanto, B., & Respati, H.
(2019). The effect of motivation and
situational leadership style towards employee
performance through work satisfaction at
developer company. International Journal of
Advances in Scientific Research and
Engineering-IJASRE, 5(4), 249-256.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1713
Volume 19, 2022
[12] Francisco, C. D., Sagcal, N., & Nuqui, A. V.
(2020). Development and Validation of New
Normal Leadership Competency Scale: An
Offshoot of Emerging Type of Situational
Leadership in the New Normal Education.
International Journal of Academic
Multidisciplinary Research, 4(11), 51-55.
[13]Manyuchi, M., & Sukdeo, N.
(2021).Application of the Situational
Leadership Model to Achieve Effective
Performance in Mining Organizations
Teams. In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Industrial Engineering and
Operations Management (pp. 412-416).
[14] Hidayat, R., Hardhienata, S., Patras, Y. E., &
Agustin, R. R. (2020). The effects of
situational leadership and self-efficacy on the
improvement of teachers’ work productivity
using correlation analysis and SITOREM.
The International Journal of Counseling and
Education, 5(1), 6-14.
[15] Crosby, G. (2021). Lewin’s Democratic Style
of Situational Leadership: A Fresh Look at a
Powerful OD Model. The Journal of Applied
Behavioral Science, 57(3), 398-401.
[16]Arisman, T. W., & Prihatin, E. (2021,
February). Situational Leadership Readiness.
In 4th International Conference on Research
of Educational Administration and
Management (ICREAM 2020) (pp. 179-182).
Atlantis Press.
[17] Woods, T. B. (2019). An examination of the
suitability of transactional, transformational
and situational leadership theories in
evaluating the role of gender in determining
the leadership style: A comparison and
contrast of three leadership theories.
American Journal of Management Studies,
4(1), 1-11.
[18] Solihin, I., & AD, R. M. (2020). Influence of
Situational Leadership, Extrinsic Motivation,
and Intrinsic Motivation on Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in State Civil
Aparatures (ASN) In Local Government
Pandeglang District of Banten Province.
International Journal of Innovative Science
and Research Technology, 5(2), 246-257.
[19] Santoso, B., Imaniyati, N., Hufad, A., &
Rahmat, A. (2020). The effect of situational
leadership and motivation on employee
performance. Journal of Talent Development
and Excellence, 12(1), 4564-4573.
[20] Chamakiotis, P., Panteli, N., & Davison, R.
M. (2021). Reimagining e-leadership for
reconfigured virtual teams due to Covid-19.
International Journal of Information
Management, 60, 102381.
[21] Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19
school leadership in disruptive times. School
Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243-247.
[22] Wrosa, E., Schlak, A. E., & Rushton, C. H.
(2020). A blueprint for leadership during
COVID-19: minimizing burnout and moral
distress among the nursing workforce.
Nursing management, 51(8), 28.
[23] Al Saidi, A. M. O., Nur, F. A., Al-Mandhari,
A. S., El Rabbat, M., Hafeez, A., &
Abubakar, A. (2020). Decisive leadership is a
necessity in the COVID-19 response. The
Lancet, 396(10247), 295-298.
[24] Fernandez, A. A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020).
Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The
Coronavirus and COVID?19. Journal of
leadership Studies, 14(1), 39-45.
[25] Bartsch, S., Weber, E., Büttgen, M., &
Huber, A. (2020). Leadership matters in
crisis-induced digital transformation: how to
lead service employees effectively during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service
Management. 32 (1),71-85.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0160
[26] Wuryani, E., Rodlib, A., Sutarsib, S., Dewib,
N., & Arifb, D. (2021). Analysis of decision
support system on situational leadership
styles on work motivation and employee
performance. Management Science Letters,
11(2), 365-372.
[27]Thompson, G., & Glasø, L. (2018). Situational
leadership theory: a test from a leader-
follower congruence approach. Leadership &
Organization Development Journal. 39 (5),
574-591. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-
2018-0050
[28] Nicola, M., Sohrabi, C., Mathew, G., Kerwan,
A., Al-Jabir, A., Griffin, M., ... & Agha, R.
(2020). Health policy and leadership models
during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review.
International journal of surgery, 81, 122-129.
[29] Sekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for
business: A skill building approach. John
Wiley & Sons.
[30] Lee, K., Romzi, P., Hanaysha, J., Alzoubi, H.,
& Alshurideh, M. (2022). Investigating the
impact of benefits and challenges of IOT
adoption on supply chain performance and
organizational performance: An empirical
study in Malaysia. Uncertain Supply Chain
Management, 10(2), 537-550.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1714
Volume 19, 2022
[31] Sahibzada, U. F., Jianfeng, C., Latif, K. F.,
Shafait, Z., & Sahibzada, H. F. (2022).
Interpreting the impact of knowledge
management processes on organizational
performance in Chinese higher education:
mediating role of knowledge worker
productivity. Studies in Higher Education,
47(4), 713-730.
[32] Zhang, Q., Oo, B. L., & Lim, B. T. H. (2022).
Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR)
practices and organizational performance in
the construction industry: A resource
collaboration network. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 179, 106113.
[33] Chmielewska, M., Stokwiszewski, J.,
Markowska, J., & Hermanowski, T. (2022).
Evaluating Organizational Performance of
Public Hospitals using the McKinsey 7-S
Framework. BMC health services
research, 22(1), 1-12.
[34] Chouaibi, S., Festa, G., Quaglia, R., & Rossi,
M. (2022). The risky impact of digital
transformation on organizational
performanceevidence from
Tunisia. Technological Forecasting and
Social Change, 178, 121571.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.e
n_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.154
Salah A. A. Alabduljader
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
1715
Volume 19, 2022