The Effect of Affective Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and
Employee Engagement on Job Happiness and Job Performance on
Manufacturing Company in Indonesia
UNGGUL KUSTIAWAN, PARDAMEAN MARPAUNG, UNIK DWI LESTARI*,
EGI ANDIYANA
Esa Unggul University
Jalan Arjuna Utara No.9, Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta, 11510
INDONESIA
Abstract: This study examines the effect of affective organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and employee
engagement on job happiness and employees' performance in a manufacturing company. The research sample is the
employee with a minimum of two years of tenure at a manufacturing company. This research is quantitative
research using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) method. Results show that job satisfaction, employee
engagement, and affective organizational commitment play a vital role in improving employee happiness
performance at working place. This study utilized a total of 275 questionnaires that were administered to
respondents at a manufacturing company in Indonesia from May until July 2021. Research respondents were
selected using the purposive sampling method. These findings may guide the implementation of human resources
or other organization management in the manufacturing industry. For instance, they may use job happiness (mental
well-being) to predict employee behaviors and then formulate recruitment policies that will help maintain
employee happiness and satisfaction. This research aims to add information on human resources management
science and positive managerial implications on employee happiness and performance in the Indonesian
manufacturing sector.
Key-Word: Affective Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, Employee Engagement,
Manufacturing
Received: April 17, 2021. Revised: January 12, 2022. Accepted: January 26, 2022. Published: February 10, 2022.
1 Introduction
Job happiness and job satisfaction of workers are
important for the management of an organization
where this can be seen from several studies
conducted by researchers, academics, and
management leaders [1]. In addition, happiness at
work is a critical topic growing and requires attention
[2]. Then when it is viewed from the performance
aspect, the happiness of workers can improve the
performance of workers [3] [5]. Moreover, it
becomes interesting to be discussed and researched
since there is no single or dominant factor that can
determine the job happiness of workers. Further, the
level of satisfaction in family life affects workers'
happiness more than satisfaction obtained at work [6]
[7]. Hence, it is necessary to have a balanced
personal life, family, and social environment and a
sense of pleasure at work. It is the basis that
continuously produces positive affective feelings to
feel a meaningful life [8].
Along with the increasing satisfaction
experienced by employees through total rewards
perception, it is known to affect job happiness
mediated by employee engagement [9]. In another
aspect, intensive knowledge is very important in
determining the happiness of workers in the
workplace because it can provide good results and
become a source of pride [10] for the worker to
tackle the difficulties at the job site. Meanwhile,
transformational, and inspirational leadership is also
considered one factor that encourages happiness
[11]. Employee satisfaction can also be derived
through company activities, convincing the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
573
Volume 19, 2022
employees that there is organizational goodwill in
social activities [12].
Moreover, several important factors affect
employee happiness, including job satisfaction,
affective organizational commitment, and employee
engagement [13], which focus on this study. Several
previous studies explained that happiness and
satisfaction from nurses are known to close
associations [14]. Job satisfaction is expected to
boost job happiness in the workplace by increasing
positive attitudes by combining cognitive and
affective elements in providing a perspective on job
characteristics [11].
In addition, job satisfaction affects job happiness,
job performance, and turnover intention in workers in
the oil and gas industry [5]. Furthermore,
employment conditions, communication, working
relations, job characteristics, and organizational
culture are also known to affect job happiness [15].
[16], also claim that the amount of time and energy
spent at work also affects workers' happiness, viewed
from the social context, so workplace conditions
become essential. It should also be considered
important to the relationship between affective
organizational commitment and job performance
[17].
Numerous previous studies have explained the
relationship between job satisfaction and employee
engagement with job performance [18] [21].
However, not many studies demonstrated the
relationship between job satisfaction, affective
organizational commitment, and employee
engagement on job happiness and employee
performance simultaneously in Indonesia, especially
for manufacturing companies in the Tangerang
Industrial area, Banten province Indonesia.
Therefore, this study intends to explore the effect of
job satisfaction, affective organizational
commitment, and employee engagement on job
happiness and the impact of job satisfaction, job
happiness, and employee engagement on employee
performance.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Affective Organizational Commitment
Organizational commitment is a positive experience
that is believed to acknowledge organizational values
at work that tends to create an emotional attachment
to the organization [22]. Commitment can be
understood as a perceived obligation to remain in the
organization by employees [23]. Moreover,
commitment arises when workers feel that the
company is attractive in various ways that encourage
cognitive and feelings or bonds [17]. Organizational
commitment consists of three important components,
namely affective, normative, and continuous [24]. Of
these three components, the most favored in
organizational commitment is affective because it
represents the emotional bond inherent in
organizational members to remain part of the
organization [24]. Further, from the three
components of organizational commitment, only
affective organizational commitment is the most
effective because emotional bonds are formed.
Workers tend to work hard, exert maximum ability to
show more work performance, and contribute better
value to the organization [25].
Affective organizational commitment has
multidimensional traits that be affected by the
workplace circumstance [26], leadership [27],
leadership style [28],organizational support [29] for
instance: through training [30] - [31], work climate
[32] and benefits [33]. Therefore, organizations must
continue to try to recognize effects that may decrease
the affective organizational commitment, which can
lead to the loss of valuable employees in the
organization [34] instead of committed ones will
remain active and consistent in all organizational
programs to maintain the reputation and goals of the
organization [35].
2.2 Job Satisfaction
Job satisfaction is defined as a response to
perceptions of job characteristics [11]. Job
satisfaction is an essential parameter to the
organization's success [36]. Especially for the
employees in manufacturing companies [37]. Job
satisfaction is perceived as employees' response to
their work manifested in the form of positive
behavior towards norms determined by the
organization. Job satisfaction is obtained through
responses to which employees like the job [38]. The
reaction is the result of perceptions that are measured
by how well the work is done by employees [39].
Moreover, job satisfaction is employees' general
feelings about their work and work elements such as
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
574
Volume 19, 2022
work environment, working conditions, fair rewards,
and communication with colleagues [40].
Job satisfaction from employees is very influential
to their productivity. Then job satisfaction is believed
to minimize employee retention [41]. Job satisfaction
consists of affective (emotional condition) and
cognitive (satisfaction). Job satisfaction can be
increased by having affective job satisfaction.
Meanwhile, cognitive job satisfaction is needed to
help evaluate job aspects logically [41]. However, the
measure of job satisfaction must combine affective
and cognitive elements with supporting productivity
[38].
The magnitude of job satisfaction is determined
by countless factors and conditions [42]. Factors that
can affect job satisfaction include leadership style
[43], promotion, salary, career opportunities, payroll
system, compensation [44] [46], bonuses,
organizational conditions, leadership [47], flexible
working hours, good work team, working
environment conditions [48][49] and nature of work
[50]. Further, expressing dissatisfaction is hard to be
seen but can be felt [51]. The negative consequences
of dissatisfaction at the surface level are
characterized by decreased loyalty, increased
absenteeism, and a high number of workplace
accidents, which is the reason for the importance of
job satisfaction.
2.3 Employee Engagement
Employee engagement is characterized by
employees' efforts to express themselves when doing
their jobs [52]. There are needs to be a clear
distinction between engagement in work and
organization because the measure of employee
engagement must count from performance and
organization. Therefore, it is essential for employees
to work and the organization [53]. Meanwhile, the
part of a person is very diverse, and it is not limited
by the job [54]. Further, Employee engagement is a
total attachment psychologically, cognitively, and
emotionally at work and recognition of the
organization and work values [55].
Employee engagement with the organization is
reflected by having a sense of enthusiasm [56], the
optimism inherent in their work [57], and this is what
distinguishes whether employees can enjoy their role
at work or not [58]. Employees who already feel
attached to the company will demonstrate several
potential behaviors for the organization. It includes
going the extra mile, praising the company,
collaborating, proactive problem-solving, over time,
helping co-workers, sharing knowledge, offering
creativity, and participating in organizational
dialogue [59].
The reflection of employee engagement and role
is the positive involvement of the organization's
physical, cognitive, and emotional elements at work
[60]. Moreover, engagement is a psychological
condition that includes several factors such as
interest, absorption, enthusiasm, and enthusiasm
whose size can be embodied by several categories,
including job satisfaction, commitment, and work
involvement [61].
2.4 Job Happiness
According to Merriam-Webster, happiness is defined
as a state of well-being, health, and happiness. It can
also be construed as a condition of comfort, health in
the Oxford lexicon dictionary. And some opinions
define that happiness as a positive state resulting
from life experiences and cognitive assessments of
life [62].
Happiness has two views: the pleasure of life by
observing things that satisfy oneself, known as
hedonic. The other view is on the value and benefits
of energy known as eudemonic [63]. Job happiness is
not limited only to personal life but can also be
experienced in the work environment [64]. The
measure of worker happiness at work depends on the
wants and needs [65] obtained through work
activities. Job happiness is a combination of the
comfort of the work environment in the organization
and the meaning of work based on the type of work.
The approach to job happiness can also be applied
hedonic and eudemonic [66].
2.5 Job Performance
Measuring job performance in an organization using
precise apparatus is very important. It is essential
because of the characteristics of the job and its
variations [67]. Individual job performance is not
only emphasized on the nature of the job but also on
the construction of controlled behavior that has an
active and positive contribution to the organization
[68]. In its definition, job performance can be
interpreted as an individual's attitude or behavior that
is relevant to the goals of an organization in carrying
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
575
Volume 19, 2022
out tasks that require expertise, experience, good
mood, and motivation [69].
An organization must look at performance from
several dimensions. At least three essential measures
become the controlling tools in ensuring that
individual performance is still excellent or
counterproductive, namely: task performance,
contextual performance, and counterproductive
behavior. The three dimensions above have different
sizes. Task performance serves to measure technical
ability in completing a given task. Contextual
performance helps measure individual behavior that
supports the organization, social environment, and
psychological environment. And counterproductive
behavior serves to measure individual behavior that
endangers the survival and reputation of the
company. Performance emphasis is not always on
results but on works attitudes [69].
Suggested three slightly different performance
dimensions: task performance, adaptive performance,
and contextual performance [70]. Then version is
defined as the capability of employees to carry out
the workload assigned according to the resources
provided at the work location because Individual
work results are closely related to factors like the
workplace, work motivation, and the ability to do
work [71].
3 Hypotheses Development
3.1 Affective Organizational Commitment on
Job Happiness
Organizational commitment is an important variable
to understand the behavior of organizational
members that can potentially lead to consequences
that benefit the organization and at the same time
harm the organization [72]. Disloyalty is one element
that can be detrimental in organizations [73][74].
Affective organizational commitment is not only
an emphasis on loyalty to the organization but how
executive members can perform more. It is not based
on what will be received from the organization or the
encouragement of the necessities of life. Instead, the
relationship between affective organizational
commitment and job happiness lies in the worker's
response to the support of the corporate environment
and the workplace, an extrinsic element [75].
Some previous studies of affective commitment
are also strongly correlated and consistent with
organizational-relevant and employee-dependent
outcomes, whereas the relationship between these
outcomes is normative and continual commitment.
Each depends on factors outside the individual (e.g.,
social and labor market quality) tend to be
inconsistent and not as robust [76][77][78].
Meanwhile, individuals will show a change in
concern with increasing organizational
commitment[79] [80]. It is for this reason that many
researchers have focused on affective commitment,
from the three forms of organizational commitment
[76], [80] [84] in terms of the various factors that
exist in the organization and the employees
themselves affect job satisfaction. Thus, the
hypothesis is:
H1: Affective organizational commitment increases
job satisfaction.
3.2 Job Satisfaction on Job Happiness
Job satisfaction has a long history as an independent
and dependent variable in organizations. These
variables are cognitive and affective; The
construction of happiness in the workplace is formed
from several aspects, including job satisfaction, work
engagement, commitment [86]. Another argument
said that job satisfaction responds to the perspective
of work characteristics [11]. It means that the
response can be in the form of positive or negative
behavior. The measure of job satisfaction requires an
evaluation of job features, responses about work, and
emotional experiences at work and differs according
to the vision, mission, organizational transparency,
and social equality [87].
Job satisfaction and happiness have a positive
relationship with an equilibrium between work
situations and family life [7]. Happiness in the
workplace needs stimulation because it will
psychologically motivate work, increase
performance, and work consequences, and indicate
mental well-being, improving motivation, work
performance, and job satisfaction [88]. Increased job
satisfaction is based on salary, promotion
opportunities, co-workers, working conditions,
communication, personal growth, security, and work
environment and provides psychological and mental
satisfaction [88] [89]. Job happiness is produced by
deep job satisfaction through good work, good co-
workers, and no less important is the recognition
from parties outside the individual, both leaders and
organizations in general.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
576
Volume 19, 2022
In addition, other studies have found that factors
that can affect job satisfaction provide such as
promotions, salaries, career opportunities, payroll
systems, compensation [90] [92], bonuses,
organizational conditions, leadership, flexible
working hours, good work team, working
environment conditions [94][95][96] and nature of
work [97]. Moreover, expressing dissatisfaction is
not easy to see but can be felt [51]. The negative
consequences of job dissatisfaction, such as
decreased loyalty, increased absenteeism, and the
number of work accidents, often surface as reasons
for the importance of job satisfaction. On the other
hand, happy workers are more dedicated and engaged
in work, are more committed to their work, and
exhibit stronger performance [85], [96] [98]. So,
the hypothesis is proposed:
H2: Job satisfaction increases job happiness.
3.3 Employee Engagement on Job Happiness
Organizations must always realize that employee
engagement is a challenge that must always receive
attention, especially in human resources with high
talent, because it will significantly affect its
continuity [101]. A measure of employee
engagement is rationally and emotionally willing to
remain in the company and dedicated to their work
[102]. Employee engagement links individual
conditions and states of mind in positively
understanding and fulfilling a career. It is
characterized by absorption, dedication, and strength
and is an asset if appropriately managed [103].
This condition is a concept that examines the
psychological side that involves emotional, cognitive
dedication to work more focused [104]. But it does
not mean workaholism because it can cause
individuals to be trapped in personal goals or
interests, namely happiness that can be felt at work
[105]. Controlled psychological conditions will
create employee attachment through the needs
handled by employees and appear high trust in
company policies that will not harm the workers.
Moreover, the involvement of members of the
organization must be in synergy with the goals and
interests of the company. Employees will feel that
their existence, work results are noticed by the
organization so that there is a sense of calm and
happiness in the workplace [106]. Further, employee
involvement will increase satisfaction [107]. Then,
we hypothesized:
H3: Employee engagement increases job happiness.
3.4 Job Satisfaction on Job Performance
High employee performance cannot be detached from
employee job satisfaction. It is because maximum
work results are only found from satisfied employees
[108]. This supports the previous opinion that an
organization must ensure job satisfaction among its
employees [109]. Job satisfaction is essential for
organizations because job satisfaction is a collection
of individual perceptions of employees in the
company that will affect how they behave at work
[110]. Satisfied employees will have attitudes and
behaviors determined and regulated by the
organization [111]. The above opinion supports
previous research [112]. In general, employee work
performance is related to behavior correlated with
organizational goals, which are entirely the
responsibility of employees [113].
Several phenomena that occur in organizations
that affect job satisfaction such as promotions,
salaries, career opportunities, payroll systems,
compensation [91] [92] [93], bonuses,
organizational conditions, leadership, flexible
working time, good work team, working environment
conditions [95][96] and nature of work [97].
Several studies have shown a very close
association between job satisfaction and performance
[5] [114] [115] [116]). And the relationship with
organizational performance is very adjacent because
it is related to the activities and tasks carried out by
employees effectively and efficiently and determines
how much employees contribute to the organization.
Among employee contributions are the quantity of
output, work attendance, and accommodative attitude
[117]. Further, employees' financial or non-financial
results, which are closely related to organizational
performance and success, are also reflected in
employee performance [118]. Moreover, employee
satisfaction has a significant effect on improving
employee performance [108] [119]. Thus, the
hypothesis is proposed:
H4: Job satisfaction increases job performance.
3.5 Employee Engagement on Job
Performance
Changes in strategy are significant to be able to
respond to customers. A company needs to make a
company-oriented organization and transform it into
an organization that prioritizes the customer. It is
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
577
Volume 19, 2022
undeniable that the strategy will not succeed if there
is no organizational commitment to constantly
improving its human resources [120]. Hence,
performance improvement is closely related to the
level of commitment of an organization in enhancing
the reward system that can meet the intrinsic and
extrinsic needs of employees, increasing employee
involvement, and making the employees the center of
all activities in the company [121].
Employee involvement is the highest
commitment employees can give to the organization
[60]. Although there is a sense of enthusiasm[122]
[123] and optimism about their work [124], the roles
performed by employees can be different due to
different psychological states [125]. Hence, the
quality of involvement will be formed on both sides,
the employee and organization side [105]. It means a
need for a synergistic relationship between the
organization and its members. Or somewhat between
workers and companies. Employee involvement must
be driven by the company's commitment to
understanding and meeting individual needs
simultaneously intrinsic and extrinsic.
Several previous studies have shown that highly
committed employees want to stay with their current
company and work for organizational goals so, they
are less likely to leave the company [126]. Engaged
employees tend to exhibit positive organizational
outcomes, including more customer satisfaction,
higher productivity and profits, lower turnover
intentions [103], do more [127], are highly
committed [127], and have a sense of pleasure at
work and job happiness [128]. Increased satisfaction
in the workplace will improve organizational
performance and company branding [129]. With the
involvement felt by employees, they will voluntarily
try to do their best through behavior and work results,
encouraging individual performance.
Empirical evidence from several previous
researchers shows the relationship between employee
engagement and organizational performance, and the
factors that increase employee engagement with
improving employee performance are positive [130]
[131] [132][133][134] [135] [136] [137] [138]
[139][140]. Thus, we hypothesized:
H5: Employee engagement increases job
performance.
3.6 Job Happiness on Job Performance
One of the essential elements in maintaining the
company's operations is maintaining its employees'
job performance. The ability of a company to survive
is determined by the contribution of increasing
employee performance obtained through employee
responses in achieving organizational goals that are
realized through behavior and work results [141].
The behavior in question is individual behavior
relevant to organizational goals, namely individuals
who, in carrying out tasks, use their expertise,
experience, good attitude, and motivation [69].
Several other researchers also added the same
thing that improved working conditions and
environments would encourage the creation of
happiness [142] [143][144] [145] [146][147]
[103]. In addition, a developed workplace will open
more opportunities and expectations for employees to
grow, fulfill their needs and prosper [148].
Happy employees at work can set targets and
strive to achieve them [149], meaning an inner drive
and a sense of pride in their work [150]. Further,
work happiness can be obtained through
employment, recognition by the leadership, social
conditions in the organizational environment [62].
Some researchers found that having a job-happiness
relationship will improve work quality and results
[151]. Employees will maintain attendance and
behave loyally to the organization according to the
opinion of previous researchers, it will enhance job
performance, of course, by getting happiness at work
positively affects performance [5], [101], [140],
[144], [149] [154]. So, the hypothesis is
proposed:
H6: Job happiness increases job performance.
Based on the above hypothetical framework, the
research model can be described as shown in Figure
1 below:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
578
Volume 19, 2022
Fig. 1: Conceptual Model
4 Research Methodology
4.1 Research Methodology and Measurement.
Collecting data using a survey method by distributing
online questionnaires. Measurements were carried
out using the Likert scale of 1 7 with criteria (1 =
strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree). The
measurement of the affective organizational
commitment variable consists of eight questions
adopted from De Waal [17]. The job satisfaction
variable consists of ten questions adopted from
Sarmiento et al. [119]. The employee engagement
variable consists of eleven questions adopted from
Saks [106]. The measurement of the job happiness
variable consists of ten questions adopted from
Czerw [158]. The job performance variable consists
of eighteen questions adopted from Ramos et al.
[159].
The respondents of this study were conducted by
purposive sampling [160], while the sample criteria
were employees of manufacturing companies with a
minimum service period of two years in the
Tangerang Industrial area, Indonesia. The data
collection technique begins with distributing the
initial questionnaire (pre-test) to 30 respondents.
Then, the research was conducted quantitatively with
the SEM (Structural Equation Model) method. At the
pre-test, the researcher conducted a factor analysis to
test the validity and reliability with SPSS. The
validity test was carried out by looking at the
measurement values of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO)
and Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA). The
results of the KMO (0.730 to 0.821) and MSA (0.620
to 0.933) values are more significant than 0.5, which
means that the factor analysis is appropriate. The
reliability test uses Cronbach's Alpha measurement
where the results are (0.924 to 0.974) because it is
closer to 1, the better [161].
From the pre-test results using 57 questions with
operational definitions of variables. Several questions
are invalid: the affective organizational commitment
variable, one question is declared invalid, the job
satisfaction variable is three questions invalid, and
the job happiness variable is one question is invalid.
On the job performance variable, five questions were
declared invalid, so that the invalid variables were
ten variables. At the same time, the questions on the
other variables were declared valid. So, what was
said valid to be used as a questionnaire in this study
were 47 questions.
Because it uses SEM where the determination of
the number of research samples is at least 5 times the
number of questions [162], the number of pieces in
this study is 275 respondents by considering reserves
if there is a discrepancy in filling out the
questionnaire.
5 Results
A total of 275 respondents from 33 manufacturing
companies found that male demography was 61.8%
(170) and female was 38.2% (105). The age range is
dominated by productive age, 88.4% (243).
Meanwhile, the formal education of most
respondents was senior high school, 75.3% (207),
diploma 3.6% (10%), and undergraduate 19.6% (54).
The position level is group leader 67.3% (185),
supervisor 21.5% (59), supervisor 8.7% (24) and the
rest is management 2.5% (7).
Based on the analysis of the suitability test, most
of them showed a good match including X^2/df =
2.452; degree of freedom = 942; Chi-Square =
2432.11; RMSEA = 0.073; ECVI = 9.45; AIC =
2588,20; CAIC = 3229, 93; NFI = 0.94; Critical N =
118.83 and GFI = 0.73. Thus, there is a fit of the
overall model (Goodness of Fit) even though one
model is at the marginal fit level. The results are as
described in the PATH diagram in Figure 2. A
hypothesis testing model can be displayed in Table 1.
The results of the study are illustrated in the
following T-Value diagram:
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
579
Volume 19, 2022
Fig. 2: Results of the T-Value Path Diagram
Based on the T-Value Path Diagram as shown in
Figure 2 above, it is possible to present the
hypothesis testing of the research model as follows:
Table 1. Model Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesi
s
Relationship
T-
value
H1
AOC
JH
1,96
H2
JS
JH
3,23
H3
EE
JH
3,06
H4
JS
JP
4,42
H5
EE
JP
6,14
H6
JH
JP
2,09
Source: Lisrel 2021 processed data
Based on the hypothesis test table above, it is
known that all have a T-Value value of 1.96. Thus
the data in this study supports all the research
hypotheses that were built.
6 Discussion
As explained in the introductory section, the purpose
of this research has been to examine several
important factors that are suspected to be factors that
can lead to job happiness and job performance,
namely affective organizational commitment,
employee engagement, and job satisfaction. Hence
the results of the study that all hypotheses can be
accepted.
Affective organizational commitment to job
happiness, according to the results obtained, that
affective organizational commitment influences
increasing job happiness and supports previous
research [17]. The study found that affective
organizational commitment to job happiness is
indicated by the attitude of workers who proudly
share positive things in the company that makes
workers feel involved in solving problems within the
company. By itself, workers feel valued through the
results of their work, the efforts that have been
created. Happiness is also indicated if workers can
have the opportunity to develop through the
opportunities provided by the company to improve
their skills.
Another characteristic of happiness in the
workplace is that employees feel their role is needed,
improve their abilities, and work under their
expertise. In addition, happiness can be reflected
when employees can learn many things, feel that
their work is important for the survival of the
company, can rely on the support of colleagues, and
of course, supported by a friendly workplace
atmosphere. Job happiness will increase along with
the increase in affective organizational commitment.
In its effect on job performance, the happiness
obtained at work driven by affective organizational
commitment becomes more influential. Workers who
already feel attached to the company will feel happy
with their work. It will encourage increased job
performance so that job happiness can mediate
affective organizational commitment to improving
job performance.
Currently, with the development of information
technology, the distribution of information is very
fast. The slightest hint can easily be spread. Lousy
information will undoubtedly harm or damage the
reputation of the organization. Therefore, it is
essential to have a synergistic relationship with the
workers in manufacturing companies. There is an
excellent emotional bond so that both parties can
carry out their respective roles together. If workers
already commit to supporting company programs
such as work targets and productivity funds. Minor
issues that can trigger conflicts, the decline in
performance, and even the company's reputation can
be avoided and minimized.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
580
Volume 19, 2022
Based on the results obtained in the study that job
satisfaction influences increasing job happiness. It is
in line with and supports previous research [14] [15]
[11]. The study found that job satisfaction can be
seen from the satisfaction of workers with their work
due to the conditions of the work environment,
support from colleagues, achievement of results
during work, and awards from leaders at work
locations. This pleasure causes workers to enjoy their
work more so that there is a desire to update
information that supports increasing skills
continually. As a result, workers conclude that the
job is suitable and appropriate, making the job happy.
The most important form of happiness is that
employees can see their role in achieving the
company's goals. So that the more satisfied workers
feel because they had a role in achieving company
goals, the more pleasure or happiness they will feel
while at the work location. An example of that
condition is like a car company had plans to achieve
annual year sales, about 100 cars. One of the sales
employees targeted the company to sell 20 cars. He
can sell 25 cars in the closing year, and the company
can achieve its company sales target. They can sell a
total of 120 vehicles. The employee who can sell 25
cars will be satisfied because he can reach the
company target and think that he has a role. In that
case, that condition increases their happiness at work.
Conversely, the employee who cannot sell more than
their target sales will be dissatisfied with themselves,
and it will decrease their happiness.
In its influence on job performance, satisfaction
in the workplace makes workers try to complete it
according to the time and targets that have been set.
The desire to take on greater responsibilities, be
involved in company activities, improvise in every
work difficulty, try to find creative solutions, and
only focus on positive issues are characteristics that
can be seen in satisfied workers with their work. In
line with increased job satisfaction, work results also
increase. And complements the results of previous
studies [18] [21]; [155].
In the relationship between job satisfaction, job
happiness, and job performance, based on the results,
satisfaction will increase feelings of joy and
simultaneously increase the desire of workers to
improve work performance by the results found in
the study. The atmosphere of a pleasant work
environment triggers a sense of pleasure with his
work. This feeling of pleasure is a positive response
in the workplace. As a result, workers try to exert
their efforts and abilities in responding to the targets
set by the company. From this, job happiness can
mediate between job satisfaction and job
performance.
In a manufacturing company with workers who
come from various backgrounds, including gender,
education, years of service, and the number of
thousands, employee satisfaction is significant. Every
decision related to quality and quantity standards and
product completion time, especially those that still
rely on a labor-intensive system, is strongly
influenced by the workers' emotional conditions.
Small mistakes significantly affect the following
work process, so a pleasant working atmosphere is
good, safe production locations and pleasant, reliable
co-workers and leaders will make workers enjoy their
work. In this condition, workers feel happy to be at
the work location, concentrate on the results, and do
not complain about small things unrelated to the
direct work. Instead, they are more about finding new
ways to complete the work according to the target
time. Some of the observable characteristics of
satisfied and happy workers at work are avoiding
unnecessary activities at the work location, for
example, by spending time playing mobile phones,
taking breaks over time, avoiding the problems at
hand, and many more.
From what was obtained in this study, employee
engagement influences job happiness and follows
previous research [107]. The attachment of a worker
at the work location can be seen when the worker is
completely immersed in the work atmosphere,
involved in achieving results, and concentrating at
work. It becomes a joy when employees can play an
active role in every activity in the company
environment. Employee engagement cannot be
separated from organizational goals, policies, or an
organizational climate that is truly in favor of
employees. There is a strong sense of bond that
workers and the company have and need each other.
It makes employees feel interested and want to stay
in the company. So that the work that is the duty and
obligation of a worker becomes lighter even though it
takes up a lot of energy and attention.
And the effect of employee engagement is that
happiness at work can be felt when workers like
work, workers are involved in various activities
within the company, and workers are physically and
mentally present at work. This attachment cannot be
separated from the nature of work and an attractive
organizational climate that workers can feel directly
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
581
Volume 19, 2022
so that an understanding of the meaning arises that
their existence is considered and has meaning. This
makes workers feel a voluntary attachment that
makes them feel good at work. Moreover, with the
presence of an extension that produces dedication,
the tenacity of the worker becomes a joy that can be
felt in the workplace.
In its influence with job performance, the
attachment that employees have in dedication and
persistence while at work, focusing on working
becomes the principal capital for workers to make
plans, solutions, and efforts to achieve targets so that
workers have a lot of time to think about ways to
fulfill their obligations as employees. On the other
hand, the more attachment there is, the higher the
desire to develop through work. When workers feel
that challenges are not a burden, workers can easily
see creative and innovative solutions in completing
their tasks. Furthermore, it shows that work output
also increases in line with employee engagement.
These results support previous research [163].
In the relationship between employee
engagement, job happiness, and job performance,
based on the results, employee engagement will
increase feelings of happiness and simultaneously
support the desire of workers to improve work
performance by the results found in the study. The
bond between the company and the workers becomes
a joy because there is a harmonious atmosphere with
their respective responsibilities. Employees try to
encourage the success of every plan and target of the
organization with the belief that the company's
achievements will impact improving their welfare.
Feeling comfortable and happy with the
organizational environment, especially the work that
has been attached to the workers themselves, thinks
that the company needs the expertise of workers, the
results of work, so there is a desire to do optimally in
every activity which of course has a significant
contribution in improving work results. From this,
job happiness can mediate between employee
engagement and job performance.
By market dynamics, each company is currently
competing to answer market demand. Failure to
compete makes the company abandon customers
because they cannot answer customer requests
quickly. Companies must always be able to satisfy
customers through the products they produce. Non-
standard quality, the number of orders that do not
match will damage the company's good name if it
happens repeatedly. Therefore, it becomes necessary
that companies, especially manufacturing companies,
must maintain good relations with their workers. If
the relationship is well established, the company will
quickly understand if workers must work overtime,
work on holidays, and others. Without this
attachment, it will be difficult for the company even
though the wages paid are already high when
working outside the typical working day. When
workers feel there is an attachment, workers will
voluntarily follow the company's targets and goals
because they are afraid that the company's reputation
is at stake, employees feel that their presence is
needed, and their existence is not only a recipient of
wages but rises to a higher levelnamely work
partners.
From the results obtained from the research, job
happiness influences job performance. Some
previous support studies support this finding [1] [18]
[21] [2]. This study found that the feeling of
pleasure felt by workers increased awareness that the
tasks performed were vital for the company. In the
previous description, job happiness was found to
mediate job satisfaction, affective organizational
commitment, and employee engagement on job
performance.
Pleasure in the work environment is an essential
capital in achieving optimal work results from every
worker. In addition to the previous description, the
reflection of workers who feel happy while working
always feels consciously and voluntarily bound to the
company's targets and goals. Other than that, they
have commitment and concentration, care about work
results, work targets, and try to give maximum results
to each activity to avoid repetitive work or
improvements resulting in very low productivity.
Workers will always be more responsive in every
workplace rule and regulation, including work
attitudes and standard operating procedures,
complying with work safety rules. If the material and
psychological needs are present in every work
activity, from family to workplace, it can form
concentration.
In the company's context, it is necessary to
maintain and create a sense of comfort where the
psychological needs of employees are met so that
workers are ready to carry out their roles as workers.
For example, suppose the employees feel threatened
by the unprofessional manager conduct or feel
stressed because of unrealistic work targets or
unrealistic work hours. In that case, that condition
will make the psychological needs of employees not
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
582
Volume 19, 2022
fulfilled. As a result, it makes workers unable to
perform their roles well.
7 Conclusion
The conclusion drawn from this research is that the
six hypotheses were proved valid. The relationship in
each of the variables proposed in the hypothesis is
confirmed. The job happiness felt by workers at work
is influenced by affective organizational
commitment, job satisfaction, and employee
engagement. And job performance is also influenced
by job satisfaction, employee engagement, and job
happiness. The calculation results found that
employee engagement has the highest value,
followed by job satisfaction, affecting job happiness
and job performance. Therefore, it is important to pay
attention to organizations, especially companies
engaged in the manufacturing industry, to
consistently evaluate and pay attention in every
policymaking. As well as providing facilities that
support the improvement of employee conditions
regularly to ensure job satisfaction and job happiness
are well controlled so that employees' job
performance is maintained.
This research also has limitations that need
improvement in the future. The first limitation is that
the respondents come from several manufacturing
companies with diverse products. Hence, future
research should be done in similar manufacturing
companies like manufacturing companies that just
made shoes or steel. The second limitation is that in
this study, the research respondents were employees
from two different types of share ownership, namely
private company and public company. Therefore,
future research should consider making a study about
the comparison between the two types of companies.
The third limitation is that this research is still
tested by ignoring the demographic criteria of the
respondents, so what needs to be done is to improve
the analysis of how the effect of job happiness on
enhancing performance based on the demographics
of the respondents. In this case, the researcher
suggests that future research study the impact of a
demographic factor by adding demographic variables
as moderation variables like gender, age, or income.
Acknowledgment:
This work was funded by a research grant from the
Esa Unggul University, Indonesia.
References:
[1] W. Al-Ali, A. Ameen, O. Isaac, G. S. A. Khalifa,
and A. H. Shibami, “The mediating effect of job
happiness on the relationship between job
satisfaction and employee performance and
turnover intentions: A case study on the oil and gas
industry in the United Arab Emirates,” Journal of
Business & Retail Management Research, vol. 13,
no. 04, pp. 103116, 2019, doi:
10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-09.
[2] A. Salas-Vallina, J. Alegre, and R. Fernández
Guerrero, “Happiness at work in knowledge-
intensive contexts: Opening the research agenda,”
European Research on Management and Business
Economics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 149159, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.05.003.
[3] R. Magnier-Watanabe, T. Uchida, P. Orsini, and
C. Benton, “Organizational virtuousness and job
performance in Japan: does happiness matter?
International Journal of Organizational Analysis,
vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 628646, 2017, doi:
10.1108/IJOA-10-2016-1074.
[4] Z. Jalali and A. Heidari, The Relationship
between Happiness, Subjective Well-Being,
Creativity and Job Performance of Primary School
Teachers in Ramhormoz City,” International
Education Studies, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 45, 2016, doi:
10.5539/ies.v9n6p45.
[5] W. Al-Ali, A. Ameen, O. Isaac, G. S. A. Khalifa,
and A. H. Shibami, “The mediating effect of job
happiness on the relationship between job
satisfaction and employee performance and
turnover intentions: A case study on the oil and gas
industry in the United Arab Emirates,” Journal of
Business & Retail Management Research, vol. 13,
no. 04, pp. 103116, 2019, doi:
10.24052/jbrmr/v13is04/art-09.
[6] M. Nordenmark, “The Importance of Job and
Family Satisfaction for Happiness among Women
and Men in Different Gender Regimes,” Societies,
vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.3390/soc8010001.
[7] K. W. Jensen, Y. Liu, and T. Schøtt,
“Entrepreneur’s innovation bringing job
satisfaction, work-family balance, and life
satisfaction: In China and around the world,”
International Journal of Innovation Studies, vol. 1,
no. 4, pp. 193206, 2017, doi:
10.1016/j.ijis.2017.11.002.
[8] K. adnan Bataineh, “Impact of Work-Life Balance,
Happiness at Work, on Employee Performance,”
International Business Research, vol. 12, no. 2, p.
99, 2019, doi: 10.5539/ibr.v12n2p99.
[9] G. Gulyani and T. Sharma, “Total rewards
components and work happiness in new ventures:
The mediating role of work engagement,”
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
583
Volume 19, 2022
Evidence-based HRM, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 255271,
2018, doi: 10.1108/EBHRM-12-2017-0063.
[10] J. Barrena-Martínez, M. López-Fernández, and P.
M. Romero-Fernández, “Socially responsible
human resource policies and practices: Academic
and professional validation,” European Research
on Management and Business Economics, vol. 23,
no. 1, pp. 5561, 2017, doi:
10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.05.001.
[11] A. Salas-Vallina, J. Alegre Vidal, and R.
Fernandez, "On the road to happiness at work
(HAW): transformational leadership,
organizational learning capability, and happiness
at work," Personnel Review, vol. 46, no. 2, pp.
314338, 2017.
[12] W. Tao, B. Song, M. A. Ferguson, and S. Kochhar,
“Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions
through empowerment in CSR decision-making,”
Public Relations Review, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 667
680, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.002.
[13] M. Kiran and S. Khurram, “Flexitime and
employee happiness at workplace: A quantitative
study of software houses,” Pakistan Journal of
Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), vol. 12,
no. 3, pp. 10081024, 2018.
[14] A. B. Duche-Pérez and G. L. R. Galdos, “Job
satisfaction and happiness in Peruvian nurses,”
Enfermeria Global, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 353373,
2019, doi: 10.6018/eglobal.18.2.334741.
[15] K. Yingyong and N. Rojniruttikul, “Workplace
Happiness in Express International,” pp. 39,
2019.
[16] S. Im, Y. W. Chung, and J. Y. Yang, “The
mediating roles of happiness and cohesion in the
relationship between employee volunteerism and
job performance,” International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, vol.
15, no. 12, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122903.
[17] A. de Waal, “Increasing organizational
attractiveness: The role of the HPO and happiness
at work frameworks,” Journal of Organizational
Effectiveness, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 124141, 2018,
doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-10-2017-0080.
[18] M. I. Hendri, “The mediation effect of job
satisfaction and organizational commitment on the
organizational learning effect of the employee
performance,” International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, vol.
68, no. 7, pp. 12081234, 2019, doi:
10.1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0174.
[19] M. S. Mira, Y. V. Choong, and C. K. Thim, “The
effect of HRM practices and employees’ job
satisfaction on employee performance,”
Management Science Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp.
771786, 2019, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.3.011.
[20] H. N. Ismail, A. Iqbal, and L. Nasr, “Employee
engagement and job performance in Lebanon: the
mediating role of creativity,” International Journal
of Productivity and Performance Management,
vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 506523, 2019, doi:
10.1108/IJPPM-02-2018-0052.
[21] I. A. P. W. Sugianingrat, S. R. Widyawati, C. A.
D. J. da Costa, M. Ximenes, S. D. R. Piedade, and
W. G. Sarmawa, “The employee engagement and
OCB as mediating on employee performance,”
International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 319
339, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0124.
[22] J. P. Meyer and L. Herscovitch, “Commitment in
the workplace: Toward a general model,” Human
Resource Management Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp.
299326, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1053-
4822(00)00053-X.
[23] L. Rhoades, R. Eisenberger, and S. Armeli,
“Affective commitment to the organization: The
contribution of perceived organizational support,”
Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp.
825836, 2001, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825.
[24] N. J. Allen and J. P. Meyer, “The measurement
and antecedents of affective, continuance and
normative commitment to the organization,”
Journal of Occupational Psycholog, vol. 63, pp.
118, 1990.
[25] E. Alniaçik, Ü. Alniaçik, S. Erat, and K. Akçin,
“Does Person-organization Fit Moderate the
Effects of Affective Commitment and Job
Satisfaction on Turnover Intentions? Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 99, pp. 274
281, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.495.
[26] T. A. Wright and D. G. Bonett, “The moderating
effects of employee tenure on the relation between
organizational commitment and job performance:
A meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology,
vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 11831190, 2002, doi:
10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1183.
[27] R. Eisenberger et al., “Leader-Member Exchange
and Affective Organizational Commitment: The
Contribution of Supervisor’s Organizational
Embodiment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.
95, no. 6, pp. 10851103, 2010, doi:
10.1037/a0020858.
[28] T. A. Jackson, J. P. Meyer, and X. H. Wang,
“Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-
analysis,” Journal of Leadership and
Organizational Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 84106,
2013, doi: 10.1177/1548051812466919.
[29] W. G. Kim, J. K. Leong, and Y. K. Lee, “Effect of
service orientation on job satisfaction,
organizational commitment, and intention of
leaving in a casual dining chain restaurant,”
International Journal of Hospitality Management,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
584
Volume 19, 2022
vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 171193, 2005, doi:
10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.05.004.
[30] C. Bulut and O. Culha, “The effects of
organizational training on organizational
commitment,” International Journal of Training
and Development, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 309322,
2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00360.x.
[31] R. Cropanzano and M. S. Mitchell, "Social
exchange theory: An Interdisciplinary Review,"
Journal of Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 874
900, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602.
[32] K. Alfes and A. Shantz, “the Link Between
Perceived Hrm, Engagement and Employee
Behavior,” Kingston Business & Law Research
Conference, pp. 140, 2011.
[33] A. Al Adresi and M. R. Darun, “Determining
relationship between strategic human resource
management practices and organizational
commitment,” International Journal of
Engineering Business Management, vol. 9, pp. 1
9, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1847979017731669.
[34] M. Deery and L. Jago, “Revisiting talent
management, work-life balance and retention
strategies,” International Journal of Contemporary
Hospitality Management, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 453
472, 2015, doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2013-0538.
[35] R. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, T. Islam, and A. Kaleem,
“The nexus of corporate social responsibility
(CSR), affective commitment and organizational
citizenship behaviour in academia: A model of
trust,” Employee Relations, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 232
247, 2020, doi: 10.1108/ER-04-2018-0105.
[36] W. Yvonne, R. H. A. Rahman, and C. S. Long,
“Employee job satisfaction and job performance:
A case study in a franchised retail-chain
organization,” Research Journal of Applied
Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, no.
17, pp. 18751883, 2014, doi:
10.19026/rjaset.8.1176.
[37] R. Sarmiento, J. Beale, and G. Knowles,
“Determinants of performance amongst shop-floor
employees: A preliminary investigation,”
Management Research News, vol. 30, no. 12, pp.
915927, 2007, doi:
10.1108/01409170710833349.
[38] R. Sarmiento, J. Beale, and G. Knowles,
“Determinants of performance amongst shop-floor
employees: A preliminary investigation,”
Management Research News, vol. 30, no. 12, pp.
915927, 2007, doi:
10.1108/01409170710833349.
[39] F. Luthans, “The need for and meaning of positive
organizational behavior,” Journal of
Organizational Behavior, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 695
706, 2002, doi: 10.1002/job.165.
[40] W. G. Kim, J. K. Leong, and Y. K. Lee, “Effect of
service orientation on job satisfaction,
organizational commitment, and intention of
leaving in a casual dining chain restaurant,”
International Journal of Hospitality Management,
vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 171193, 2005, doi:
10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.05.004.
[41] “Impact of job satisfaction on employee
performance: An empirical study of autonomous
Medical Institutions of Pakistan,” African Journal
of Business Management, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2697
2705, 2012, doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.2222.
[42] A. Furnham, A. Eracleous, and T. Chamorro-
Premuzic, “Personality, motivation and job
satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five,”
Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 24, no. 8,
pp. 765779, 2009, doi:
10.1108/02683940910996789.
[43] S. D. Rosady and T. Y. R. Syah, “Work
Satisfaction Antecedents and Consequences: An
Analysis of Transformational Leadership Style,
Communication and Performance of the Nurses
(Study on the Hospital Nurses in Indonesia),”
Iarjset, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 5965, 2018, doi:
10.17148/iarjset.2018.599.
[44] O. C. Hee, H. S. Yi, L. L. Ping, T. O. Kowang, and
G. C. Fei, “Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in
the Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia,” International
Journal of Academic Research in Business and
Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 516527, 2019,
doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i2/5584.
[45] M. T. Tessema and J. L. Soeters, “Challenges and
prospects of HRM in developing countries:
Testing the HRM-performance link in the Eritrean
civil service,” International Journal of Human
Resource Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 86105,
2006, doi: 10.1080/09585190500366532.
[46] A. N. Nguyen, J. Taylor, and S. Bradley,
“Working Paper Relative pay and job satisfaction:
some new evidence,” management, no. February
2003.
[47] Nastohar and R. Anindita, “Transformation
Employee Performance During Leadership
Motivation Effect Over Kansai Prakarsa Coatings
Company,” Journal of Multidisciplinary
Academic, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 2730, 2019.
[48] A. P. Brief and H. M. Weiss, “Organizational
Behavior: Affect in the Workplace
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: Affect in the
Workplace,” Annu. Rev. Psychol, no. February
2002, pp. 279307, 2017.
[49] X. Wu, “Factors influencing employee turnover
intention in the Malaysian retail industry,” 2018.
[50] B. Aziri, “Job Satisfaction, a Literature Review,”
Management research and practice, vol. 3, no. 1,
pp. 7790, 2011.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
585
Volume 19, 2022
[51] J. N. Islam, H. K. Mohajan, and R. Datta, “A study
on Job Satisfaction and Morale of a Commercial
Banks in Bangladesh,” International Journal of
Economics and Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 153
173, 2012.
[52] A. M. Saks, “Antecedents and consequences of
employee engagement,” Journal of Managerial
Psychology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 600619, 2006, doi:
10.1108/02683940610690169.
[53] A. M. Saks, “Antecedents and consequences of
employee engagement revisited,” Journal of
Organizational Effectiveness, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19
38, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034.
[54] P. E. Anthony-McMann, A. D. Ellinger, M.
Astakhova, and J. R. B. Halbesleben, “Exploring
Different Operationalizations of Employee
Engagement and Their Relationships with
Workplace Stress and Burnout,” Computational
Complexity, 2016, doi: 10.1002/hrdq.
[55] L. Sun and C. Bunchapattanasakda, “Employee
Engagement: A Literature Review,” International
Journal of Human Resource Studies, vol. 9, no. 1,
p. 63, 2019, doi: 10.5296/ijhrs.v9i1.14167.
[56] J. K. Harter, F. L. Schmidt, and C. L. M. Keyes,
“Well-being in the workplace and its relationship
to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup
studies.,” Flourishing: Positive psychology and the
life well-lived., no. December 2013, pp. 205224,
2004, doi: 10.1037/10594-009.
[57] W. B. Schaufeli and A. B. Bakker, “Job demands,
job resources, and their relationship with burnout
and engagement: A multi-sample study,” Journal
of Organizational Behavior, vol. 25, no. 3, pp.
293315, 2004, doi: 10.1002/job.248.
[58] P. Beatty, Psychology Carleton University Ottawa,
Ontario ©2011 Peter Beatty. 2011.
[59] H. A. Witemeyer, “ScholarWorks @ Georgia State
University,” 2013.
[60] P. Kazimoto, “Employee Engagement and
Organizational Performance of Retails
Enterprises,” American Journal of Industrial and
Business Management, vol. 06, no. 04, pp. 516
525, 2016, doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2016.64047.
[61] W. H. Macey and B. Schneider, “<Macey &
Schneider. (2008). The Meaning of Employee
Engagement.pdf>,” Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 330, 2008.
[62] A. Czerw, “Diagnosing Well-Being in Work
Context Eudemonic Well-Being in the
Workplace Questionnaire,” Current Psychology,
vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 331346, Apr. 2019, doi:
10.1007/s12144-017-9614-8.
[63] R. Biswas-Diener, T. B. Kashdan, and L. A. King,
“Two traditions of happiness research, not two
distinct types of happiness,” Journal of Positive
Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 208211, 2009, doi:
10.1080/17439760902844400.
[64] P. O. Wesarat, M. Y. Sharif, and A. H. A. Majid,
“A conceptual framework of happiness at the
workplace,” Asian Social Science, vol. 11, no. 2,
pp. 7888, 2015, doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n2p78.
[65] S. Moccia, “Happiness at work,” Papeles del
Psicologo, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 143151, 2016, doi:
10.1002/9780470666845.oth1.
[66] A. Czerw, “Well-Being at Work the Essence,
Causes and Consequences of the Phenomenon,”
International Journal of Contemporary
Management, vol. 13, no. 2, 2014, doi:
10.5604/16435494.1130808.
[67] P. J. Ramos-Villagrasaa, J. R. Barradaa, E.
Fernández-del-Ríoa, and L. Koopmans, “Job
performance is considered the ‘ultimate dependent
variable’ in human resource management, turning
its assessment into a capital issue. The present
study analyzes the functioning of a brief 18-item
self-report scale, the Individual Work Performance
Que,” Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 2019.
[68] J. P. Campbell and B. M. Wiernik, The Modeling
and Assessment of Work Performance, vol. 2.
2015. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-
111427.
[69] L. Koopmans, C. M. Bernaards, V. H. Hildebrandt,
D. Lerner, C. W. De Vet Henrica, and A. J. Van
Der Beek, “Koopmansetal2016Cross-
culturaladaptationoftheIWPQ.pdf.” 2015.
[70] R. K. Pradhan and L. K. Jena, “Employee
Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and
Empirical Validation,” Business Perspectives and
Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6985, 2017, doi:
10.1177/2278533716671630.
[71] A. Yahaya and J. Ramli, “FACTORS THAT
CONTRIBUTED STRESS AMONG
SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN FOUR
STATES IN MALAYSIA,” Asia Pacific Journal
of Educators and Education, Vol. 25, 103136,
2010, vol. 25, pp. 103136, 2010.
[72] M. H. K. Naghneh, M. Z. Tafreshi, M. Naderi, N.
Shakeri, F. Bolourchifrad, and N. S. Goyaghaj,
“The relationship between organizational
commitment and nursing care behavior,”
Electronic Physician, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 43854840,
2017.
[73] M. Halter et al., “The determinants and
consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: A
systematic review of systematic reviews,” BMC
Health Services Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 120,
2017, doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0.
[74] P. W. Hom, T. W. Lee, J. D. Shaw, and J. P.
Hausknecht, One hundred years of employee
turnover theory and research,” Journal of Applied
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
586
Volume 19, 2022
Psychology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 530545, 2017,
doi: 10.1037/apl0000103.
[75] S. Singh and Y. Aggarwal, “Happiness at Work
Scale: Construction and Psychometric Validation
of a Measure Using Mixed Method Approach,”
Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 19, no. 5, pp.
14391463, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9882-
x.
[76] S. M. Elias, “Employee commitment in times of
change: Assessing the importance of attitudes
toward organizational change,” Journal of
Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3755, 2009, doi:
10.1177/0149206307308910.
[77] J. E. Mathieu and D. M. Zajac, “A Review and
meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and
consequences of organizational commitment,”
Psychological Bulletin, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 171
194, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171.
[78] J. P. Meyer, D. J. Stanley, L. Herscovitch, and L.
Topolnytsky, “Affective, continuance, and
normative commitment to the organization: A
meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and
consequences,” Journal of Vocational Behavior,
vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 2052, 2002, doi:
10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.
[79] I. Mihajlović, C. Djevojić, and M. Stanković, “Key
drivers of internal market changes and innovative
tools towards an efficient business climate,”
WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control, vol.
16, pp. 224243, 2021, doi:
10.37394/23203.2021.16.19.
[80] M. H. K. Naghneh, M. Z. Tafreshi, M. Naderi, N.
Shakeri, F. Bolourchifrad, and N. S. Goyaghaj,
“The relationship between organizational
commitment and nursing care behavior,”
Electronic Physician, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 43854840,
2017.
[81] K. Truss, E. Soane, R. Delbridge, K. Alfes, A.
Shantz, and G. Petrov, “Employee engagement,
organizational performance, and individual well-
being: exploring the evidence, developing the
theory,” The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 232
233, 2011, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.552282.
[82] A. Al Adresi and M. R. Darun, “Determining
relationship between strategic human resource
management practices and organizational
commitment,” International Journal of
Engineering Business Management, vol. 9, pp. 1
9, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1847979017731669.
[83] M. Deery and L. Jago, “Revisiting talent
management, work-life balance and retention
strategies,” International Journal of Contemporary
Hospitality Management, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 453
472, 2015, doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2013-0538.
[84] T. A. Jackson, J. P. Meyer, and X. H. Wang,
“Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-
analysis,” Journal of Leadership and
Organizational Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 84106,
2013, doi: 10.1177/1548051812466919.
[85] R. Cropanzano and M. S. Mitchell, "Social
exchange theory: An Interdisciplinary Review,"
Journal of Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 874
900, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602.
[86] C. D. Fisher, “Happiness at Work,” International
Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4,
pp. 384412, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-
2370.2009.00270.x.
[87] M. Yan and K. Shi, “Subjective Well-Being and
Job Types: New Evidence from China,”
Economics and Culture, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 2431,
2019, doi: 10.2478/jec-2019-0003.
[88] A. Awang, I. I. Ibrahim, M. N. Md Nor, M. F.
Mohd Razali, Z. Mat Arof, and A. R. Abdul
Rahman, “Academic Factors and Turnover
Intention: Impact of Organization Factors,” Higher
Education Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2444, 2015,
doi: 10.5539/hes.v5n3p24.
[89] D. M. Govender, “AN INVESTIGATION INTO
JOB SATISFACTION AND EMPLOYEE
PERFORMANCE AT STODELS RETAIL
NURSERIES- A CASE STUDY,” no. September
2013, 2013.
[90] Wu and Xiangping, “Factors Influencing
Employee Turnover Intention: The Case of Retail
Industry in Bangkok, Thailand," My base paper,
vol. 3, p. 108, 2012.
[91] O. C. Hee, H. S. Yi, L. L. Ping, T. O. Kowang, and
G. C. Fei, “Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in
the Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia,” International
Journal of Academic Research in Business and
Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 516527, 2019,
doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i2/5584.
[92] M. T. Tessema and J. L. Soeters, “Challenges and
prospects of HRM in developing countries:
Testing the HRM-performance link in the Eritrean
civil service,” International Journal of Human
Resource Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 86105,
2006, doi: 10.1080/09585190500366532.
[93] A. N. Nguyen, J. Taylor, and S. Bradley,
“Working Paper Relative pay and job satisfaction:
some new evidence,” management, no. February
2003.
[94] A. Katrodia, “Job stress and insecurity among the
employees in food delivery services,” WSEAS
Transactions on Environment and Development,
vol. 16, pp. 708717, 2020, doi:
10.37394/232015.2020.16.73.
[95] A. P. Brief and H. M. Weiss, “Organizational
Behavior: Affect in the Workplace
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: Affect in the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
587
Volume 19, 2022
Workplace,” Annu. Rev. Psychol, no. February
2002, pp. 279307, 2017.
[96] X. Wu, “Factors influencing employee turnover
intention in the Malaysian retail industry,” 2018.
[97] B. Aziri, “Job Satisfaction, a Literature Review,”
Management research and practice, vol. 3, no. 1,
pp. 7790, 2011.
[98] L. C. Walsh, J. K. Boehm, and S. Lyubomirsky,
“Does Happiness Promote Career Success?
Revisiting the Evidence,” Journal of Career
Assessment, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 199219, 2018, doi:
10.1177/1069072717751441.
[99] M. Tadić, A. B. Bakker, and W. G. M. Oerlemans,
“Work happiness among teachers: A day
reconstruction study on the role of self-
concordance,” Journal of School Psychology, vol.
51, no. 6, pp. 735750, 2013, doi:
10.1016/j.jsp.2013.07.002.
[100] P. O. Wesarat, M. Y. Sharif, and A. H. A. Majid,
“A conceptual framework of happiness at the
workplace,” Asian Social Science, vol. 11, no. 2,
pp. 7888, 2015, doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n2p78.
[101] A. Singh and B. Gupta, Commitment,
Professional Commitment, and Team Commitment
A Study of Benchmarking : An International
Journal Article information ," Benchmarking: An
International Journal, vol. 22, no. January 2015,
p. 1192, 2016.
[102] E. Karanges, K. Johnston, A. Beatson, and I.
Lings, “The influence of internal communication
on employee engagement: A pilot study,” Public
Relations Review, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 129131,
2014, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.003.
[103] J. K. Harter, F. L. Schmidt, and T. L. Hayes,
“Business-unit-level relationship between
employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and
business outcomes: A meta-analysis,” Journal of
Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 268279,
2002, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.
[104] K. Mishra, L. Boynton, and A. Mishra, “Driving
Employee Engagement: The Expanded Role of
Internal Communications,” International Journal
of Business Communication, vol. 51, pp. 183202,
2014, doi: 10.1177/2329488414525399.
[105] A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “Towards a model
of work engagement,” Career Development
International, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209223, 2008,
doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476.
[106] A. M. Saks, “Antecedents and consequences of
employee engagement revisited,” Journal of
Organizational Effectiveness, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19
38, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034.
[107] N. Santhanam and S. Srinivas, “Modeling the
impact of employee engagement and happiness on
burnout and turnover intention among blue-collar
workers at a manufacturing company,”
Benchmarking, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 499516, 2020,
doi: 10.1108/BIJ-01-2019-0007.
[108] K. Okta, N. Umar, AlMusadiq, N. Utami, and
Hamidah, “The Influence of Organizational
Culture and Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Job
Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and
Employee ' s Performance," vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 55
68, 2015.
[109] Y. Markovits, D. Boer, and R. van Dick,
“Economic crisis and the employee: The effects of
economic crisis on employee job satisfaction,
commitment, and self-regulation,” European
Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 413422,
2014, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.09.005.
[110] M. I. Hendri, “The mediation effect of job
satisfaction and organizational commitment on the
organizational learning effect of the employee
performance,” International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, vol.
68, no. 7, pp. 12081234, 2019, doi:
10.1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0174.
[111] M. Sony and N. Mekoth, “The relationship
between workplace spirituality, job satisfaction
and job performance,” International Journal of
Process Management and Benchmarking, vol. 9,
no. 1, pp. 2746, 2019, doi:
10.1504/IJPMB.2019.097819.
[112] A. E. Ellinger, D. J. Ketchen, G. T. M. Hult, A. B.
Elmadaǧ, and R. G. Richey, “Market orientation,
employee development practices, and performance
in logistics service provider firms,” Industrial
Marketing Management, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 353
366, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.01.002.
[113] B. J. Babin and J. S. Boles, “The effects of
perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor
support on service provider role stress,
performance and job satisfaction,” Journal of
Retailing, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 5775, 1996, doi:
10.1016/S0022-4359(96)90005-6.
[114] S. D. Rosady and T. Y. R. Syah, “Work
Satisfaction Antecedents and Consequences: An
Analysis of Transformational Leadership Style,
Communication and Performance of the Nurses
(Study on the Hospital Nurses in Indonesia),”
Iarjset, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 5965, 2018, doi:
10.17148/iarjset.2018.599.
[115] A. Vorina, M. Simonič, and M. Vlasova, “An
Analysis of the Relationship Between Job
Satisfaction and Employee Engagement,”
Economic Themes, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 243262,
2017, doi: 10.1515/ethemes-2017-0014.
[116] D. Guest, “Flexible employment contracts, the
psychological contract and employee outcomes:
An analysis and review of the evidence,”
International Journal of Management Reviews,
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
588
Volume 19, 2022
vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 119, 2004, doi:
10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00094.x.
[117] S. H. Abualoush, A. M. Obeidat, A. Tarhini, R.
Masa’deh, and A. Al-Badi, “The role of
employees’ empowerment as an intermediary
variable between knowledge management and
information systems on employees’ performance,”
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge
Management Systems, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 217237,
2018, doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2017-0050.
[118] J. Anitha, “Determinants of employee engagement
and their impact on employee performance,”
International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 308
323, 2014, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008.
[119] R. Sarmiento, J. Beale, and G. Knowles,
“Determinants of performance amongst shop-floor
employees: A preliminary investigation,”
Management Research News, vol. 30, no. 12, pp.
915927, 2007, doi:
10.1108/01409170710833349.
[120] M. I. Taba, “Mediating effect of work performance
and organizational commitment in the relationship
between reward system and employees’ work
satisfaction,” Journal of Management
Development, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 6575, 2018, doi:
10.1108/JMD-11-2016-0256.
[121] D. Zeglat and S. Janbeik, “Meaningful work and
organizational outcomes: The mediating role of
individual work performance,” Management
Research Review, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 859878,
2019, doi: 10.1108/MRR-05-2018-0206.
[122] Q. H. Do, A. T. Tran, and T. T. The “Financial
systems theory and control of finances: The
mediating role of psychological empowerment in
the relationship between transformational
leadership and employee engagement: An
evidence from Vietnam,” WSEAS Transactions on
Systems and Control, vol. 15, pp. 655664, 2020,
doi: 10.37394/23203.2020.15.65.
[123] W. B. Schaufeli and A. B. Bakker, “Job demands,
job resources, and their relationship with burnout
and engagement: A multi-sample study,” Journal
of Organizational Behavior, vol. 25, no. 3, pp.
293315, 2004, doi: 10.1002/job.248.
[124] J. K. Harter, F. L. Schmidt, and C. L. M. Keyes,
“Well-being in the workplace and its relationship
to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup
studies.,” Flourishing: Positive psychology and the
life well-lived., no. December 2013, pp. 205224,
2004, doi: 10.1037/10594-009.
[125] P. Beatty, Psychology Carleton University Ottawa,
Ontario ©2011 Peter Beatty. 2011.
[126] S. Xu, Y. Choi, and Q. Lv, “Subjective Well-
Being, Work Motivation and Organizational
Commitment of Chinese Hotel Frontline
Employees: A Moderated Mediation Study,”
Journal of Tourism Research & Hospitality, vol.
03, no. 02, 2014, doi: 10.4172/2324-
8807.1000137.
[127] W. B. Schaufeli, A. B. Bakker, and M. Salanova,
“The measurement of work engagement with a
short questionnaire: A cross-national study,”
Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol.
66, no. 4, pp. 701716, 2006, doi:
10.1177/0013164405282471.
[128] A. B. Bakker, E. Demerouti, and A. I. Sanz-
Vergel, “Burnout and Work Engagement: The JDR
Approach,” Annual Review of Organizational
Psychology and Organizational Behavior, vol. 1,
pp. 389411, 2014, doi: 10.1146/annurev-
orgpsych-031413-091235.
[129] A. de Waal, “Increasing organisational
attractiveness: The role of the HPO and happiness
at work frameworks,” Journal of Organizational
Effectiveness, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 124141, 2018,
doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-10-2017-0080.
[130] E. Suryanto, T. Y. R. Syah, D. A. Negoro, and S.
Pusaka, “Transformational Leadership Style and
Work Life Balance: The Effect on Employee
Satisfaction Through Employee Engagement,”
Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-
Economic Sciences, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 310318,
2019, doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2019-07.36.
[131] J. F. Hopstaken, D. Van Der Linden, and A. B.
Bakker, “Correction: Shifts in attention during
mental fatigue: Evidence from subjective,
behavioral, physiological, and eye-tracking data
[Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 42, 6, (2016), (878-
889)], doi: 10.1037/xhp0000189,” Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, vol. 42, no. 9, p. 1442, 2016, doi:
10.1037/xhp0000300.
[132] S. L. Albrecht, A. B. Bakker, J. A. Gruman, W. H.
Macey, and A. M. Saks, “Employee engagement,
human resource management practices and
competitive advantage: An integrated approach,”
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, vol. 2, no.
1, pp. 735, 2015, doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-
0042.
[133] J. F. Hopstaken, D. van der Linden, A. B. Bakker,
and M. A. J. Kompier, “A multifaceted
investigation of the link between mental fatigue
and task disengagement,” Psychophysiology, vol.
52, no. 3, pp. 305315, 2015, doi:
10.1111/psyp.12339.
[134] R. Chiva and J. Alegre, “Organizational learning
capability and job satisfaction: An empirical
assessment in the ceramic tile industry,” British
Journal of Management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 323
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
589
Volume 19, 2022
340, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2008.00586.x.
[135] S. Cartwright and N. Holmes, “The meaning of
work: The challenge of regaining employee
engagement and reducing cynicism,” Human
Resource Management Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp.
199208, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.012.
[136] D. A. Garvin, A. C. Edmondson, and F. Gino, “Is
Yours a Learning Organization? - Harvard
Business Review,” Harvard Business Review, pp.
110, 2008.
[137] M. F. Dollard and A. B. Bakker, “Psychosocial
safety climate as a precursor to conducive work
environments, psychological health problems, and
employee engagement,” Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp.
579599, 2010, doi: 10.1348/096317909X470690.
[138] A. Carmeli, D. Brueller, and J. E. Dutton,
“Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role
of high-quality interpersonal relationships and
psychological safety,” Systems Research and
Behavioral Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 8198,
2009, doi: 10.1002/sres.932.
[139] O. Tregaskis, K. Daniels, L. Glover, P. Butler, and
M. Meyer, “High Performance Work Practices and
Firm Performance: A Longitudinal Case Study,”
British Journal of Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp.
225244, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2011.00800.x.
[140] A. B. Bakker, H. Van Emmerik, and P. van Riet,
“How job demands, resources, and burnout predict
objective performance: A constructive
replication,” Anxiety, Stress and Coping, vol. 21,
no. 3, pp. 309324, 2008, doi:
10.1080/10615800801958637.
[141] J. P. Campbell and B. M. Wiernik, The Modeling
and Assessment of Work Performance, vol. 2.
2015. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-
111427.
[142] M. Kiran and S. Khurram, “Flexitime and
employee happiness at workplace: A quantitative
study of software houses,” Pakistan Journal of
Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), vol. 12,
no. 3, pp. 10081024, 2018.
[143] A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “Multiple Levels
in Job Demands Resources Theory: Implications
for Employee Well-being and Performance,”
Handbook of well-being, no. 2018, pp. 113, 2018.
[144] E. Demerouti, A. B. Bakker, and J. M. P. Gevers,
“Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of
work engagement and flourishing,” Journal of
Vocational Behavior, vol. 91, pp. 8796, 2015,
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001.
[145] M. van den Heuvel, E. Demerouti, and M. C. W.
Peeters, “The job crafting intervention: Effects on
job resources, self-efficacy, and affective well-
being,” Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp.
511532, 2015, doi: 10.1111/joop.12128.
[146] J. van Wingerden, A. B. Bakker, and D. Derks, “A
test of a job demands-resources intervention,”
Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 31, no. 3,
pp. 686701, 2016, doi: 10.1108/JMP-03-2014-
0086.
[147] A. B. Bakker, H. Van Emmerik, and P. Van Riet,
“How job demands, resources, and burnout predict
objective performance: A constructive
replication,” Anxiety, Stress and Coping, vol. 21,
no. 3, pp. 309324, 2008, doi:
10.1080/10615800801958637.
[148] G. R. Slemp, M. L. Kern, and D. A. Vella-
Brodrick, “Workplace Well-Being: The Role of
Job Crafting and Autonomy Support,” Psychology
of Well-Being, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015, doi:
10.1186/s13612-015-0034-y.
[149] S. Chang, K. Han, and Y. Cho, “Association of
happiness and nursing work environments with job
crafting among hospital nurses in South Korea,”
International Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 19, 2020,
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114042.
[150] G. R. Slemp, M. L. Kern, and D. A. Vella-
Brodrick, “Workplace Well-Being: The Role of
Job Crafting and Autonomy Support,” Psychology
of Well-Being, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015, doi:
10.1186/s13612-015-0034-y.
[151] A. Awang, I. I. Ibrahim, M. N. Md Nor, M. F.
Mohd Razali, Z. Mat Arof, and A. R. Abdul
Rahman, “Academic Factors and Turnover
Intention: Impact of Organization Factors,” Higher
Education Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2444, 2015,
doi: 10.5539/hes.v5n3p24.
[152] K. Daniels, “Measures of five aspects of affective
well-being at work,” Human Relations, vol. 53, no.
2, pp. 275294, 2000, doi: 10.1177/a010564.
[153] I. Silla, F. J. Gracia, and J. M. Peiró, “Job
insecurity and health-related outcomes among
different types of temporary workers,” Economic
and Industrial Democracy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 89
117, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0143831X05049404.
[154] E. Demerouti, A. B. Bakker, and J. M. P. Gevers,
“Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of
work engagement and flourishing,” Journal of
Vocational Behavior, vol. 91, pp. 8796, 2015,
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001.
[155] A. A. Muna, A. A. Zain, and G. Dr. Shaju, “Job
Satisfaction and Employee Performance: a
Theoretical Review of the Relationship Between
the Two Variables,” International Journal of
Advanced Research, vol. 943, no. 1, pp. 120,
2017.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
590
Volume 19, 2022
[156] M. van den Heuvel, E. Demerouti, and M. C. W.
Peeters, “The job crafting intervention: Effects on
job resources, self-efficacy, and affective well-
being,” Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp.
511532, 2015, doi: 10.1111/joop.12128.
[157] J. van Wingerden, A. B. Bakker, and D. Derks, “A
test of a job demands-resources intervention,”
Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 31, no. 3,
pp. 686701, 2016, doi: 10.1108/JMP-03-2014-
0086.
[158] A. Czerw, “Diagnosing Well-Being in Work
Context Eudemonic Well-Being in the
Workplace Questionnaire,” Current Psychology,
vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 331346, 2019, doi:
10.1007/s12144-017-9614-8.
[159] P. J. Ramos-Villagrasa, J. R. Barrada, E.
Fernández-Del-Río, and L. Koopmans, “Assessing
job performance using brief self-report scales: The
case of the individual work performance
questionnaire,” Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo
y de las Organizaciones, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 195
205, 2019, doi: 10.5093/jwop2019a21.
[160] I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling
and Purposive Sampling,” American Journal of
Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p.
1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
[161] J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson,
Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). 2014. doi:
10.1002/9781118895238.ch8.
[162] J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson,
Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). 2014. doi:
10.1002/9781118895238.ch8.
[163] M. Kiran and S. Khurram, “Flexitime and
employee happiness at workplace: A quantitative
study of software houses,” Pakistan Journal of
Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), vol. 12,
no. 3, pp. 10081024, 2018.
Sources of Funding for Research Presented in
a Scientific Article or Scientific Article Itself
This work was funded by a research grant from the
Esa Unggul University, Indonesia.
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_
US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.52
Unggul Kustiawan, Pardamean Marpaung,
Unik Dwi Lestari, Egi Andiyana
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
591
Volume 19, 2022