.
Bennett, McGarvey, Ali, Syme, Williams (2021);
Winkler, Shanley, Schank, Crowley, Mattock,
Green, Madison, McDonald, Steinberg (1999);
Drain, Sampson, Billing, Burley, Linnane, Groeller
(2015); Shanley, Winkler (1999); Mcardle, Kehr,
Colabatistto (2020); Brading (2020).
Among Ukrainian scientists, the relevant studies
were: Bielileskov (“The main problem of our army
is limited resources. Official website of the Ministry
of Defense of Ukraine”); Krasota, Trakaliuk,
Shtanko (“Experience of reforming the human
resource management system in the Armed Forces
of Ukraine”); Medvid, Polovinkin (“Human
resource management system in the Armed Forces
of Ukraine: features of development”); Коval
(“Improving the state human resourse policy in the
Armed Forces of Ukraine”); Gozuvatenko
(“Enchancement of the military training and career
growth system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
taking into account the experience of leading
countries”); Hetmanchuk, Fakhurdinova (“Ukraine
and NATO standards: what has been done during
Zelensky's presidency?”); Komisarova (“How close
the Ukrainian army is to NATO standards. The
Deputy Minister of Defense is responsible”);
Berezynsʹkyy (“Improving military social standards:
what they plan to change”). It is worth paying
special attention, firstly, to “The Vision of the
General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for
the development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for
the next 10 years” from the Ministry of Defense of
Ukraine, and secondly, supported by The
International Renaissance Foundation research:).
Why are servicemen discharged from the army?
Public version. The International Renaissance
Foundation. (2021) and Why are servicemen
discharged from the army? (2021).
This article describes ways to improve
management, such as personnel administration
planning, improving training methods in military
schools, implementing individual plans in the
training process, and retraining / advanced training
of Ukrainian army personnel in the context of its
institutional and organizational reform.
2 Analysis of Recent Research and
Publications
Attention to the issue of ensuring effective human
resource management of the AF of Ukraine is due to
the importance of the human factor in building the
defense potential of the state. The issue of
transformation of human resource management
principles in the AF of Ukraine is a promising
subject of research and has its own specifics. When
studying the human resource management system in
the armed forces, one should take into account the
differences between the military and corporate
sector.
Patrichi, analyzing the difference between
human resource management in military and non-
military organizations, identifies the following
shortcomings of the defense sector: lack of
flexibility, longer terms for recruitment and
recruitment only for the entry level, and not for any
level, as in corporate organizations, promotion
begins within the system and only rank by rank [3].
However, notes that it is impossible to reject the
general principles of human resource management,
which must be adapted to the defense sphere,
outlines the tasks of human resource management in
the armed forces which is a development of a
human resource management system capable to
provide the necessary training, build an effective
structure of the armed forces with proper
distribution of specialists according to the
specification, motivate servicemen to serve and
perform their work properly.
Krasota, Trakaliuk, Shtanko describe the
tendencies that determine the impact of the
personnel management system of NATO member
states on the staffing system of the AF of Ukraine
and note that the main resource of the Allied armies
is human resource, therefore, the development
effective human resource management in the
countries of the North Atlantic Treaty is given
considerable attention [4].
Narang also notes that the most important
resource in an organisation, particularly in the
armed forces, is people. According to the researcher,
human resource management in the armed forces
can be considered in terms of a soft and hard
approach. A hard approach sees servicemen as a
resource for achieving organizational goals, while a
soft approach provides incentives to achieve results
[5]. Considering the functions of human resource
management in the armed forces, Narang identifies
the following subsystems:
1) planning, resource allocation;
2) recruitment and selection;
3) education, training and development;
4) remuneration;
5) relationships with employees.
Goede, considering the subsystems of human
resource management in the armed forces, identifies
the following: working conditions and the
environment; guarantee of social protection and safe
workplace; providing opportunities for education
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.44
Vita Halushka, Hryhorii Tikhonov,
Ivan Tikhonov, Yurii Mykolenko, Liudmyla Drok