Humbatova and others (2019) [10] studied the
dependence of GDP, national income, consumer
price index, fixed assets, as well as investment on
oil production and oil prices on world markets in
Azerbaijan. The study identified the main factors
affecting oil production, as well as the main factors
that depend on oil prices by econometric methods.
Regression equations covering some
macroeconomic indicators related to factors
affecting oil production and oil prices allow
determining the dependence of the manat on the
dollar and the consumer price index. The results of
the study were compared with previous years and
the base (2000 = 100).
In Chad, Gadom and others (2018) [11] studied the
socio-economic impacts of oil production by
conducting a household survey. The main purpose
of the study was to study the impact of oil revenues
on welfare. The study used a multidimensional
wellbeing index for households and a differentiated
approach) [12]. The main result of the study is that
in Chad, the regions that receive oil transfers have
the highest multidimensional welfare index.
Therefore, in order to ensure economic inclusion,
the state should reconsider the policy of distribution
of oil revenues and take into account the needs of
those regions. This study also argues that the impact
of oil revenues on the social sphere depends on the
current institutional situation.
The study of the socio-economic effects of oil
revenues is especially relevant. Because the main
goal of any state is to protect the security of its
citizens in all areas, including socio-economic
security. Although the inflow of oil revenues into
the country creates new opportunities for solving
social problems, it has a serious impact on the
emergence of intersectoral unemployment and
income inequality in most oil-exporting countries.
At first glance, the inflow of foreign currency into
the country through the export of oil is formally
similar to the inflow of currency into the country
from the export of other commodities. However, the
socio-economic effects of the former differ sharply
from those of the latter. The main reason for this is
most likely due to the fact that oil revenues are
mainly controlled by the state and enter the real
economy mainly through fiscal mechanisms. In the
case of redistribution of oil revenues through fiscal
mechanisms, not all social groups and households
can benefit equally from oil revenues. In the case of
export diversification, more groups of the
population will be able to benefit from export
revenues. On the other hand, such revenues are
more quickly and efficiently distributed in the
market because they are not managed by the state.
That is why in the case of export diversification, the
"Dutch syndrome" almost does not occur. The
inflow of more foreign currency into the economy in
a short period of time from oil and gas revenues
causes the "Dutch syndrome".
According to a study by Ismail (2010) [13], a sharp
increase in exports in the resource sector reduces the
conversion capacity of the non-resource sector, and
the economy becomes more specialized on one
resource. In this case, the economy depends on this
resource. Negative effects of Dutch syndrome on
economic growth, in the long run, Arezki and van
der Ploeg (2010) [14]; Baggio and Papyrakis (2010)
[15]; Extensively studied in Mursheb and Serino
(2011) [16] and other studies.
Studies on the socio-economic effects of natural
resource exports show more clearly that poor
revenue management can have a negative impact on
well-being and the Human Development Index. In
developing oil-exporting countries, poor governance
and corruption are just some of the causes. A study
by Daniele (2011) [17] shows that the dependence
of mineral resources on export earnings has a
negative impact on the Human Development Index.
The inflow of oil revenues into the country also
affects income inequality in the country. Although
research on this issue has attracted relatively little
attention to other issues, in the particular, economic
growth of oil revenues, investment activity, etc., it is
increasingly attracting the attention of researchers.
In fact, revenues from the export of natural
resources allow the state to achieve a more equitable
redistribution of income through fiscal policy.
However, in reality, very few developing countries
are rich in natural resources. Because the oil and gas
sector, which initially requires large investments,
attracts the bulk of the budget and hinders the
development of other sectors. At the same time, the
government is still not interested in investing in the
development of the non-oil sector. Thus, there are
significant differences between employment-related
and, as a result, employment income, directly and
indirectly, related to these sectors. This problem has
been studied by Fum və Hodler (2010) [18], Parcero
və Papyrakis, (2016) [19], Dizaji S.F., (2016) [20],
Farzanegan və Krieger (2017) [21], and others.
Farzanegan and Krieger (2017) examine how the
level of inequality in Iran reacts to the positive
shocks of oil rents in the post-sanctions period for
the period 1973-2012, concluding that a 10%
increase in oil rents per capita increases long-term
inequality. Increases by 1.1%. The study used a
vector autoregression method based on the impulse
response function. Changes in inequality over a
period of up to 4 years (lag=[1;4]) after a positive
shock of oil rents were analyzed by the ARDL
method.
The most controversial point about the economic
and socio-economic effects of oil revenues is the
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.42
Mayis G. Gülaliyev, Rahima N. Nuraliyeva,
Ruhiyya A. Huseynova, Firudin E. Hatamov,
Alikhanli S. Yegana, Elvin S. Abdullayev