Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Case
of the Banking Sector in Vietnam
NGUYEN THI LIEN HUONG
Faculty of Finance and Banking
Thuongmai University
79 Ho Tung Mau st., Hanoi
VIETNAM
DANG THI MINH NGUYET*
Faculty of Finance and Banking
Thuongmai University
79 Ho Tung Mau st., Hanoi
VIETNAM
NGUYEN NGOC KHANH LINH
Faculty of Finance and Banking
Thuongmai University
79 Ho Tung Mau st., Hanoi
VIETNAM
NGUYEN THI HIEN
Faculty of Mathematics
Thuongmai University
79 Ho Tung Mau st., Hanoi
VIETNAM
DINH THI HA
Faculty of Management Information System and E-commerce
Thuongmai University
79 Ho Tung Mau st., Hanoi
VIETNAM
Abstract: This study aims to investigate the factors that influence corporate social responsibility disclosure
(CSRD) in the banking sector in an emerging country. The quantitative model is estimated for a sample of
banks in Vietnam for the period from 2013 to 2019. To explain the determinants of CSRD in banking,
regression analysis using panel data was employed while taking bank size, bank age, financial performance,
state ownership, and regulation as independent variables, and CSRD as a dependent variable. The results
revealed that bank size, bank age, and regulation have positive impacts on CSRD, whereas state ownership has
a negative impact, and financial performance was found to be insignificant. This study enriches the knowledge
of CSRD, and it contributes empirical evidence of the impact of bank characteristics on CSRD. Particularly,
empirical evidence suggests that regulation is an effective instrument for promoting the CSRD of banks in
Vietnam. Therefore, the study identified the need for government regulation to increase disclosure because
voluntary disclosure does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the desired results.
Keywords: CSR disclosure, Vietnamese banking sector, financial performance, state ownership, regulation
Received: April 27, 2021. Revised: December 2, 2021. Accepted: January 15, 2022. Published: January 16, 2022.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
338
Volume 19, 2022
1. Introduction
Banks are profit-driven businesses. However, to
make money, their operation must be focused on
"public confidence" [1]. They are supposed to
contribute more to this phase than other economic
organization due to their market's uniqueness [2].
Given the above, the banking industry's adoption of
the corporate social responsibility (CSR) principle is
critical. Other sectors are reactive to CSR because
of external stakeholder scrutiny, whereas the
banking industry plays an indispensable role in a
country's economic development and participates in
constructive CSR practices [3]. Because banks rely
heavily on their reputation as support for their
lending activities and remain stable sources,
becoming involved in environmentally responsible
operations has been seen as a method to gain social
legitimacy and enhance the banking industry's
image [4]. As a result, financial institutions usually
rank high on international CSR disclosure [5].
Banks rely heavily on their reputation to support
their lending activities with adequately reliable
sources, which in turn impact bank risk. As a result,
becoming involved in environmentally responsible
operations has been seen as a method for gaining
social legitimacy and enhancing the banking
industry's image.
Despite a growing interest in CSR, few studies
have examined the CSR activities of banks in a
developing economy from a multidimensional
perspective. Most previous studies have focused on
the problems in developed countries [6]. However,
applying the research results for developed nations
may not be appropriate for developing countries,
because their legal and institutional backgrounds are
different. Developing countries have a much weaker
relationship between investor responsibility and
employees, customers, and communities than do
developed countries [7]. Furthermore, stakeholders
in emerging markets may have less influence than in
developed markets. Considering these facts, this
study provides an exciting opportunity to deepen
our knowledge of CSR in an emerging market
context.
Over the past few years, Vietnam has been a
country that is strongly committed to the
implementation of sustainability goals through the
promulgation of the Vietnam Sustainable
Development Strategy, the Vietnam Sustainable
Development Strategy for the 2011 to 2020 period,
and most recently, the National Action Plan for the
Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development. The topic of CSR has become a
significant concern for the Vietnamese Government
and Vietnamese companies. However, the
regulations, policies, practices, and disclosures on
CSR in Vietnam are still in the early stages. The
first step forward in CSR regulations in Vietnam is
marked by the introduction of the Law on Securities
2006, which was amended and supplemented in
2010, and Circular 15/2015/TT-BTC issued on
06/10/2015 by the Ministry of Finance, replacing
Circular No. 52/2012/TT-BTC to guide corporate
sustainability information disclosure on the stock
market. However, the disclosure of CSR
information on the securities market still has some
shortcomings, which may affect the transparency,
publicity, and sustainable development of the
Vietnam stock market [8]. These have caused many
Vietnamese banks to declare CSR, but not
voluntarily.
To close this research gap, we used a sample of
28 of the 37 banks operating in Vietnam, and we
collected data from their annual reports to
investigate the current corporate social
responsibility disclosure (CSRD) situation and the
factors that impact the banking industry’s CSRD.
This study offers an interesting opportunity to
investigate the current evidence of CSR in Vietnam.
Thus, the results are particularly relevant for
developing economies, where insight into CSR
practices is still weak because these practices are
perceived as philanthropic and where the state still
holds a substantial share in the banks. Furthermore,
by testing the impacts of factors such as bank size,
bank age, financial performance, state ownership
and regulations in an emerging country, the study
adds to the literature and the understanding of
banks’ CSRD. In addition, there is a shortage of
studies that measure CSR through multiple
dimensions, especially in the banking sector.
Therefore, we introduce a way to calculate the
CSRD index by using data that is drawn from
quantitative, qualitative, and narrative information
in annual reports and that covers numerous aspects
of CSR: community, environment, and employment.
Finally, our findings can be of practical valuable
for stockholders, policymakers, professional
organizations, and the government in terms of
implementing CSRD.
The overall structure of this study includes five
sections. Whereas the first section is an
introduction, Section 2 presents a literature review
and the hypotheses. The sample, variables, and
methods for estimating the models are all covered in
Section 3. The fourth section analyses the results of
the proposed model, and Section 5 provides a
summary of the research findings.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
339
Volume 19, 2022
2 Literature review and hypotheses
Among the theories involved in CSRD, each CSR
theory provides all the factors connected to
earnings, political performance, social needs, and
ethics [9]. Agency theory holds that agency costs
arise from conflicts of interest and information
asymmetries between a company’s management and
its stockholders; therefore, CSRD contributes
significantly to a reduction in this asymmetry of
information. Furthermore, in terms of legitimacy
theory, CSRD is an instrument that legitimizes a
business, and it is within reach of society [10]. On
the other hand, stakeholder theory suggests that it is
necessary for an organization to build good
relationships with shareholders and stakeholders
through CSR reports [11]. According to signalling
theory, disclosing CSR information is a way to send
a message to interested parties about the company’s
economic, environmental, and social situation [12].
In summary, according to Cormier, Lapointe-
Antunes, & Magnan (2015), CSRD is a complicated
phenomenon that cannot be described by a single
theory [13].
There may be drivers behind CSRD that achieve
higher levels of application and ensure CSRD.
Therefore, several hypotheses are proposed in the
next part to identify significant determinants of
CSRD.
2.1 Bank size
According to certain research, bank size and CSRD
have a considerable positive correlation [14]. Larger
banks have larger budgets available for the
implementation of social and environmental
activities and for the disclosure of this information
in their publications to the community. Furthermore,
in accordance with legitimacy theory, large
enterprises usually draw greater attention to their
operations, especially to their social and
environmental impacts, so they may have to issue
more voluntary disclosures to make their activities
transparent [15]. Likewise, Mahadeo et al. (2011)
suggested that larger firms are required to achieve
higher-quality CSRD due to stakeholder demand in
order to legitimize their activities. A larger size
company will be able to improve financial
performance which in turn rise CSRD [16].
Moreover, a larger bank size reduces the costs of
reporting [14].
Based upon these theoretical and empirical
grounds, we assume that larger banks are more
likely to disclose CSR information. Therefore, the
statement of the first hypothesis is as follows:
H1: Bank size has a positive impact on CSRD.
2.2 Bank age
According to prior research, bank age is one of the
drivers of the CSRD index. The perspective of
legitimacy theory holds that an institution's
reputation is constructed over time [10]. Older
banks attempt to enhance their reputations from this
perspective by expanding CSR transparency and
revealing more CSRD than others because they have
more experience in identifying the resources that are
necessary for their survival and for maintaining their
reputation through their social actions [17].
Moreover, older banks are more publicly visible
than younger ones, and therefore have greater
incentive to publish CSR information to meet the
community’s expectations [17]. In this way, older
banks gain competitiveness in the market and
maintain their reputation in society. Similarly, [18]
discovered a positive relationship between bank age
and the CSRD of listed banks in Tunisia.
For the reasons mentioned above, a positive
association between bank age and CSRD is
expected, and the second hypothesis is as follows:
H2: Bank age has a positive association with the
bank’s level of CSRD
2.3 Financial performance
Previous studies have determined that the
relationship between a firm’s financial performance
and its CSR [19-20] has a favourable association
with future financial performance [19]. This shows
that present CSR actions have a long-term financial
impact. Other studies have found that activities that
represent the social responsibility of a company
improve its profitability when there exists a
competitive environment between businesses [20].
To explain this relationship, Legendre & Coderre
(2013) suggested that profitable corporations tend to
provide CSR information to legitimize their
operations [21]. Hence, financial performance may
be an important factor for CSRD [22]. In addition, a
profitable company's board of directors may want to
expose more CSR strategies to the public to
establish a favourable image [23]. Considering the
negative side of CSR strategy, Ruhnke & Gabriel
supposed that profitable corporations are more
financially sustainable for costly CSR initiatives and
in assuring community CSRD statement reports
[24].
As a result of the literature review, a third
hypothesis is proposed.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
340
Volume 19, 2022
H3: There is a positive correlation between
financial performance and CSRD.
2.4 State ownership
Only a few researchers have looked specifically at
the association between ownership type and CSRD
for state-owned businesses because this factor
depends on the characteristics of each country.
State-owned banks benefit from financial and
regulatory favour because of their inherent political
ties [25], and along with their profit maximization
goal, they are pressured to pursue political and
strategic aims [26]. Mohd Ghazali (2007) illustrated
that firms with a share of state disclosed more CSR
information in their annual reports [27]. With the
great impact of political interference on the
behaviour of companies, a high level of perceived
leadership is expected to lead to suitable
management efforts to meet government
expectations. The government, as the majority
shareholder of state-owned companies, has
incentives to divert wealth to achieve social stability
[28], which improves the disclosure of CSR
information. Sharing the same view, a study by Xu
and Zheng (2016) implemented this theory using a
sample of listed Chinese enterprises, and found a
significantly positive relationship between state
ownership and the quality of CSRD [29].
In addition to studies that indicate a positive
correlation between state ownership and CSRD,
some published research finds a negative association
between the two factors. Using sample data for
Chinese listed firms, a study by Shahab (2018)
demonstrated that firms with a share of the state
tend to have a low level of CSRD [30]. This view is
supported by Alotaibi & Hussainey [31], who argue
that governmental ownership reduces the CSR index
of firms in Saudi Arabia.
However, in the context of Vietnam, state-owned
banks can be expected to be more politically
sensitive, as the activities of these banks are in the
public eye. As a result, this form of bank may
engage more in socially responsible activities to
increase the visibility of social activities and thereby
legitimize its existence. For that reason, the
following hypothesis is proposed:
H4: There is a positive relationship between
state-owned banks and CSRD.
2.5 Regulations
A government's involvement in institutionalizing
CSR has been the subject of a growing body of
research [32]. Furthermore, governments may
encourage CSR through soft regulation that imposes
indirect penalties, such as labelling programs or
rewards [33].
Mandatory CSRD regulation has evolved as a
critical instrument of government CSR policy in this
setting. Transparency is promoted by this sort of
policy, which decreases information gaps between
firms and stakeholders [34]. Because firms may
more readily evaluate themselves against rivals and
foster debate about best practices or industry
standards, transparency may inspire improvements
in CSR operations [33]. More significantly,
stakeholders may become more effective in
recognizing CSR or imposing fines on companies
that engage in immoral business practices [35].
Using a database of 24 OECD countries, Jackson et
al. indicated that companies that are required to
practice information transparency adopt
significantly more CSRD [33].
In Vietnam, Circular 155/2015 from the Ministry
of Finance, which presents “Guidelines on
disclosure information on the stock market” is the
most important document for regulating CSR.
Therefore, this study anticipates a favourable
correlation between regulations and CSR reporting
before and after the time this document was issued.
Besides, listing companies need to strictly comply
with Security market regulations in CSR
transparency. For these reasons, the following two
hypotheses are proposed.
H5: Disclosure regulation has a significant
positive association with CSRD.
H6: Listing status has a significant positive
association with CSRD.
In short, the proposed conceptual model for the
determinants of CSRD is depicted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1: Conceptual model: Determinants of CSRD
Source: Author’s research
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
341
Volume 19, 2022
3. Research methodology
3.1 Data and sample
This study collected information relating to CSR
from the annual reports of 28 Vietnamese banks
during the period from 2013 to 2019, which
included 196 observations.
We chose 2013 as the starting point of the
research period, two years before the issuance of
governmental guidelines for social responsibility
information disclosure. The time range of the data
extends to 2019 to ensure appropriate time coverage
and to capture the changes in the CSR information
disclosure of banks before and after governmental
instruction. The research period is divided into two
stages: the stage before Circular 155/2015 from the
Ministry of Finance in Vietnam on “Guidelines on
disclosure information on the stock market” and the
time after Circular 155/2015 (2015 2019). In
Vietnam, 2015 marked a change in the regulation of
CSR information disclosure for banks. Therefore, it
is necessary to evaluate the level of CSR
information disclosure before and after 2015.
3.2 Variables
In this study, the level of CSRD in Vietnamese
banks’ annual reports is a dependent variable. This
index is calculated based on the indicators of three
criteria groups, which were built with reference to
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standard
combined with Circular 96/2020 and Circular
155/2015 of the Ministry of Finance of Vietnam on
"Guidelines on disclosure of information on the
stock market" and the document "Guidelines for
making sustainable development reports" of the
State Securities Commission in 2015. In each report,
we are interested in information related to three
categories of disclosure, concretized into a set of 29
indicators: community involvement disclosure that
focuses on local community, including sponsorship
and participation in educational, cultural, and other
societal events (6 indicators); human resources
disclosure consisting of information about the well-
being of employees and benefits in the workplace
(16 indicators); environmental disclosure, with a
focus on banks' CSR efforts for environmental and
natural resource protection (7 indicators).
Each indicator is qualitative data, and there is no
superiority between and no difference in ranking
among the different indicators. Therefore, to assess
the level of information disclosure, we use a
nominal scale with the following convention: First,
the researcher detects the absence or existence of
CSR information in relation to each indicator. Then,
if the sample annual report contains an indicator
included in the categories, it receives the value of 1,
or 0 otherwise. The numbers have no quantitative
relationship and cannot be used for algebraic
calculations. Their meaning indicates whether the
indicators are included in the annual report of the
banks. To assign values to each indicator, we
identified several important keywords associated
with each indicator for the information search. For
example, the indicator “The sponsorship of arts,
sports, and cultural activities'' was associated with
keywords such as “art,” “sport,” and “culture”; the
indicator "Preferential loans and policies for
employees" was associated with “preferential loans”
and “incentives for employees” as keywords in the
information search.
The CSRD represents the level of disclosure of
corporate social responsibility in Vietnamese banks.
It is calculated each year by the proportion of
disclosed indicators out of total 29 indicators in
three categories from the obtained data set, as
follows:


 (1)
Where:
CSRD can be expressed as a decimal or as a
percentage. The value of CSRD is in the range [0,1].
󰇛  󰇜: each ei represents each
indication (as presented in Appendix 1). ei = 1 if the
indication was published in the annual report of
bank each year.
e = 29: The maximum number of items a bank
can disclose.
In addition, we also collected important data
from the annual reports to analyse the determinants
of the level of information disclosure by Vietnamese
banks, such as bank size, bank age, financial
performance, state ownership, listed bank or
unlisted bank, and regulation between 2013 and
2019. A specific description of each independent
variable in the regression model is presented in
Table 1.
Table 1. Independent variables
Var
Variable full
name
Predicted
sign
SIZE
Bank size
+
AGE
Bank age
+
ROE
Financial
Performance
+
STATE
State
ownership
+
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
342
Volume 19, 2022
=1, bank has state
owner; if STATE =0,
otherwise.
REG
Regulation
+
REG is a dummy
variable; if REG =1,
bank is listed after
2015; if REG =0,
otherwise.
LIST
Listing
status
+
LIST is a dummy
variable; if LIST =1,
bank is listed, if LIST
=0, bank is unlisted
Source: Author’s research
3.3 Empirical model
According to the hypotheses mentioned above, we
propose a multivariable linear regression model with
panel data, in which the independent variables
represent six factors affecting the information
disclosure of the Vietnamese banks (Table 1).
   
   .
(2) Where:
i denotes banks and t represents time periods;
CSRDit is CSRD of bank i at time t;
β0 is the intercept; βj (j = 1, …, 6) is the
regression coefficient;
Ɛit is random error, which has an expectation of 0
and a variance that does not change.
The model was estimated by using the least
squares method and data was analysed on Stata
software.
4. Result
4.1 Descriptive statistics
To evaluate the level of CSRD of the banks in
Vietnam based on their annual reports from 2013 to
2019, this study applied a content analysis approach.
Fig. 2: Average CSRD of Vietnamese banks
between 2013 and 2019
Source: Author’s research
Figure 2 clearly illustrates a steady rise in banks'
average level of information disclosure over the
survey period, with a significant rise from 39.4% in
2013 to approximately 60% in 2019. The level of
CSRD in 2015 was noticeably higher than the level
of the two previous years by approximately 5%.
This can be explained by the fact that at the end of
2014, there were issuances of several governmental
guidelines on CSR information disclosure.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics by year
Source: Author’s research
The following Table 2 shows that the average
financial performance and size of banks increased
over time. In particular, the average financial
performance of banks doubled. The statistical
results also indicate that the average rate of listed
banks showed an upward trend and rose at a faster
pace after 2017, while the percentage of state-owned
banks remained unchanged during the study period.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of key variables
Variable
Obs.
Mean
Max
Min
Std. Dev
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2013201420152016201720182019
AVERAGE CSRD
YEAR
Average CSRD of Vietnamese banks
YEAR
CSRD
SIZE
AGE
ROE
STATE
REG
LIST
2013
0.394
18.37
21.8
0.056
0.18
0.00
0.29
2014
0.401
18.51
22.8
0.059
0.18
0.00
0.32
2015
0.446
18.62
23.8
0.054
0.18
0.29
0.32
2016
0.488
18.78
24.8
0.074
0.18
0.29
0.32
2017
0.532
18.96
25.8
0.101
0.18
0.36
0.43
2018
0.570
19.07
26.8
0.106
0.18
0.43
0.50
2019
0.599
19.20
27.8
0.118
0.18
0.43
27.8
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
343
Volume 19, 2022
CSRD
196
0.49
0.92
0.00
0.259
SIZE
196
18.8
21.1
16.5
1.092
AGE
196
24.8
62.0
5.00
10.26
ROE
196
0.08
0.66
0.0008
0.079
STATE
196
0.18
1.00
0.00
0.384
REG
196
0.26
1.00
0.00
0.437
LIST
196
0.38
1.00
0.00
0.487
Source: Author’s research
Table 3 summarizes information about the
number of observations and descriptive statistics of
key variables in the model. The figure reveals that
the banks disclosed 50% of the indicators in the
three groups. The oldest bank in Vietnam has been
operating for 62 years, and the youngest bank in the
sample has been established for 5 years. The
proportion of banks with state-owned capital in
Vietnam is not large, averaging about 18%. The
financial performance of banks in Vietnam was
quite low, with an average ROE of approximately
8.1%.
The correlations between the different variables
in our study are illustrated in Table 4. Except for the
strong correlation between LIST and REG (at
around 0.74), other explanatory variables were
found to have low correlation, with all correlation
values below 0.6. These results illustrate that there
was no multicollinearity problem in our case.
Regarding the correlation matrix, we noted that
CSR was positively correlated with all explanatory
variables. These results are in agreement with the
analysis in Table 2. Banks that have been operating
for a long time, have a large size, high debt, are
listed on the stock exchange, and have good
financial performance show high information
disclosure.
Table 4. Pearson correlation matrix
(*, **, *** represent the significance level of 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively)
Source: Author’s research
4.2 Estimation results
The coefficients in model (1) are estimated by the
panel least-squares method, and the results are
presented in Table 5.
It can be inferred from the table that ROE and
LIST are two variables that are not statistically
significant. For that reason, the hypotheses
regarding the positive correlations of CSRD and
banking profitability and listing status are not in line
with the data for banks in Vietnam during the given
period. The results illustrate a significant positive
correlation of the banks’ total assets with CSRD at a
1% significance level in terms of bank size.
Table 5. Results of the multivariate regression
model
Variables
Coefficient
P_value
C
-1.0223
0.0325
SIZE
0.0736
0.0062
AGE
0.0051
0.0171
ROE
0.2640
0.2815
STATE
-0.1660
0.0109
REG
0.1218
0.0418
LIST
-0.0561
0.3051
R-squared
0.2058
Adjusted R-squared
0.1806
Source: Author’s research
Table 5 also presents a positive impact of bank
age on CSR reporting. In addition, the figures from
Table 5 illustrate a significant positive association
between the REG variable and the CSRD index at a
5% significance level.
Variables
CSRD
BKSIZE
AGE
ROE
STATE
LIST
REG
CSRD
1
BKSIZE
0.3384***
1
AGE
0.3081***
0.5441***
1
ROE
0.2508***
0.4173***
0.2618***
1
STATE
0.0871
0.6402***
0.5291***
0.0991
1
LIST
0.2518***
0.5178***
0.355***
0.2035***
0.1811**
1
REG
0.3215***
0.4679***
0.403***
0.1628**
0.1855***
0.7433***
1
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
344
Volume 19, 2022
The REG variable differentiates between banks
listed before and after 2015 to determine whether
the regulations relating to CSRD issued in 2014 and
2015 for the listed firms affect the way banks
publish their information. Therefore, the results
from Table 5 suggest that governmental regulations
raised the CSRD quality of banks in Vietnam.
Table 6. Results of heteroscedasticity LR test
Panel Period Heteroscedasticity LR Test
Null hypothesis: Residuals are homoscedastic
Specification: CSRD C SIZE ROE STATE LIST REG AGE
Value
df
P-Value
Likelihood ratio
2.74
28
1.000
Source: Author’s research
We can see that the model indicates the
heteroscedasticity phenomenon. To overcome this
problem, we use the weighted least-squares method.
The results of the fixed model are as follows (Table
7).
Table 7. Results of the fixed model
Variable
Coefficient
P_value
C
-1.0446
0.0275
SIZE
0.0749
0.0049
ROE
0.2648
0.2682
STATE
-0.1688
0.0089
LIST
-0.0600
0.2459
REG
0.1262
0.0339
AGE
0.0053
0.0125
R-squared
0.2195
Adjusted R-squared
0.1948
Source: Author’s research
4.3 Discussion
Based on the results, we present the following
discussions.
Firstly, regarding Table 2, it can be implied that
the level of CSRD of Vietnamese banks is
improving over time. In addition, the considerable
rise in 2015 indicates the positive impact of the
guidelines on stock market information disclosure in
the way banks publish their CSR information. This
implies that the issuance of a policy on
sustainability disclosure has a significant impact on
the CSRD of banks.
Secondly, bank size and bank age all positively
affect the CSRD index. These results are in
agreement with legitimacy theory and the findings
of Mahadeo [15] that larger firms are required to
public higher quality CSRD due to stakeholder
demand to legitimize their activities, and that older
banks with longer experience in reporting may
disclose more CSR information [18].
Thirdly, there is a significant negative
association between state ownership and CSRD,
meaning that firms with a state share tend to
maintain a low level of CSRD. This result is an
exciting finding of the study, which is different from
Hypothesis 4 proposed above. However, this finding
is compatible with the study implemented by
Shahab [30] and Alotaibi et al. [31], indicating that
a higher percentage of state ownership may be
related to poor corporate governance, which
includes the implementation of CSRD. Furthermore,
another explanation for this may come from the fact
that state-owned banks have a higher rank in
comparison with commercial banks in terms of bank
size or reputation, and they have greater
opportunities to receive government priority. For
that reason, they do not have incentives to disclose
CSR information, which is considered a costly and
time-consuming process.
Fourthly, contrary to earlier findings [20, 24],
there is no evidence of a statistical association
between financial performance and CSRD. One
possible reason for this is that Vietnam is in the very
first stage of CSRD, and banks mostly focus on their
economic goals rather than on spending time and
money on social and environmental programs.
Therefore, the profitability of banks does not yet
have any impact on CSRD.
Finally, regulation shows a significant impact on
CSRD index. Only when the stock market applies
regulations on CSRD do banks increase their CSR
information disclosure. An implication of this
finding is that voluntary disclosure in developing
nations may not be sufficient to ensure the quality of
information disclosure. Therefore, it is necessary for
governmental authorities to issue additional
regulations relating to environmental and social
activities.
5. Conclusion
This research provided insight into how emerging
nations, particularly Vietnam, handle CSRD in the
banking industry. It makes four significant additions
to the literature on corporate transparency. First, by
investigating the effects of bank size, bank age,
financial performance, state ownership, and
regulation in an emerging country, the study
contributes to an understanding of the level of
banks' CSRD in Vietnam. Second, there is a scarcity
of research that measures CSR across various
dimensions, particularly in the banking industry.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
345
Volume 19, 2022
Therefore, we employed the CSRD index, which is
based on quantitative, qualitative, and narrative data
from yearly sustainability reports and covers a wide
range of CSR topics: community, environment, and
job opportunities. We also adjusted the CSR criteria
to suit the Vietnamese context. Third, bank size,
bank age and regulation are the most effective
instruments for increasing CSRD in emerging
countries. Therefore, investors, policymakers, and
the government can benefit from this research
regarding CSRD in the banking sector in Vietnam.
This underscores the need for the Vietnamese
Government to introduce additional CSRD
guidelines towards the goal of sustainable
development.
References:
[1] KRASODOMSKA, Joanna. CSR disclosures in
the banking industry. Empirical evidence from
Poland. Social Responsibility Journal, 2015,
11.3: 406-423.
[2] KORENIK, Dorota. Macroeconomic
responsibility versus social responsibility of a
modern commercial bank-theoretical and
cognitive aspect. Economics & Management,
2010, p118-122. 5p.
[3] DECKER, O. Sallyanne. Corporate social
responsibility and structural change in financial
services. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2004,
19.6: 712-728.
[4] GANGI, Francesco, Antonio Meles, Eugenio
D'Angelo, and Lucia Michela Daniele.
Sustainable development and corporate
governance in the financial system: Are
environmentally friendly banks less
risky?. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 2019, 26.3: 529-
547.
[5] PÉREZ, Andrea; DEL BOSQUE, Ignacio
Rodríguez. Measuring CSR image: Three
studies to develop and to validate a reliable
measurement tool. Journal of business ethics,
2013, 118.2: 265-286.
[6] ABAD-SEGURA, Emilio; CORTÉS-GARCÍA,
Francisco Joaquín; BELMONTE-UREÑA,
Luis J. The sustainable approach to corporate
social responsibility: A global analysis and
future trends. Sustainability, 2019, 11.19: 5382.
[7] ALI, Waris; FRYNAS, Jedrzej George;
MAHMOOD, Zeeshan. Determinants of
corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure
in developed and developing countries: A
literature review. Corporate Social
Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 2017, 24.4: 273-294.
[8] TRAN, Trung Tin. Corporate social
responsibility (CSR) situation in Vietnam.
2017. PhD Thesis. Saimaan
ammattikorkeakoulu.
[9] GARRIGA, Elisabet; MELÉ, Domènec.
Corporate social responsibility theories:
Mapping the territory. Journal of business
ethics, 2004, 53.1: 51-71.
[10] CRAIG, Deegan. Introduction. The
legitimising effect of social and environmental
disclosures-a theoretical
foundation. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 2002, 15.3: 282-311.
[11] LOURENÇO, Isabel C.; BRANCO, Manuel
Castelo. Determinants of corporate
sustainability performance in emerging
markets: the Brazilian case. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 2013, 57: 134-141.
[12] SPENCE, Michael. Signaling in retrospect and
the informational structure of
markets. American Economic Review, 2002,
92.3: 434-459.
[13] CORMIER, Denis; LAPOINTE-ANTUNES,
Pascale; MAGNAN, Michel. Does corporate
governance enhance the appreciation of
mandatory environmental disclosure by
financial markets?. Journal of Management &
Governance, 2015, 19.4: 897-925.
[14] JENNIFER HO, LiChin; TAYLOR, Martin
E. An empirical analysis of triple bottomline
reporting and its determinants: evidence from
the United States and Japan. Journal of
International Financial Management &
Accounting, 2007, 18.2: 123-150.
[15] MAHADEO, Jyoti Devi; OOGARAH-
HANUMAN, Vanisha; SOOBAROYEN,
Teerooven. Changes in social and
environmental reporting practices in an
emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the
relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy
theories. In: Accounting Forum. Taylor &
Francis, 2011. p. 158-175.
[16] ORBANINGSIH, D., SAWITRI, D. and
SUHARSONO, R.S., 2021. Determinants of
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A
Case Study of Banking Industry in Indonesia.
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and
Business, 8(5), pp.91-97.
[17] BACCOUCHE, C.; ERRAÏS, O.; MZOUGHI,
K. Determinants of voluntary CSR reporting:
the case of Tunisian companies." Intangible
Capital: status and prospects, Montpellier,
2010.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
346
Volume 19, 2022
[18] CHAKROUN, Raida, et al. Determinants of
CSR disclosure of Tunisian listed banks: a
multi-support analysis. Social Responsibility
Journal, 2017, 13.3: 552-584.
[19] HARUN, Mohd Shukor, et al. CSR Disclosure,
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: a study
on GCC Islamic Banks. International Journal
of Accounting and Information Management,
2020, 28.4: 607-638.
[20] KIM, Kwang-Ho; KIM, MinChung; QIAN,
Cuili. Effects of corporate social responsibility
on corporate financial performance: A
competitive-action perspective. Journal of
Management, 2018, 44.3: 1097-1118.
[21] LEGENDRE, Stéphane; CODERRE, François.
Determinants of GRI G3 application levels: the
case of the fortune global 500. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 2013, 20.3: 182-192.
[22] AKSU, Mine; KOSEDAG, Arman.
Transparency and disclosure scores and their
determinants in the Istanbul Stock
Exchange. Corporate Governance: An
International Review, 2006, 14.4: 277-296.
[23] ALSAEED, Khalid. The association between
firm-specific characteristics and disclosure:
The case of Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing
Journal, 2006, 21.5: 476-496.
[24] RUHNKE, Klaus; GABRIEL, Alexander.
Determinants of voluntary assurance on
sustainability reports: an empirical
analysis. Journal of Business Economics, 2013,
83.9: 1063-1091.
[25] WU, Shihwei; LIN, Fengyi; WU, Chiaming. A
study on Taiwanese corporate social
responsibility and ownership
structures. Corporate Ownership and Control,
2012, 9.3: 111-122.
[26] HU, Yuan Yuan, et al. Ownership influence
and CSR disclosure in China. Accounting
Research Journal, 2018, 31.1: 8-21.
[27] GHAZALI, Nazli A. Mohd. Ownership
structure and corporate social responsibility
disclosure: some Malaysian
evidence. Corporate Governance: The
international journal of business in society,
2007.
[28] BAI, Chong-En; LU, Jiangyong; TAO,
Zhigang. The multitask theory of state
enterprise reform: Empirical evidence from
China. American Economic Review, 2006, 96.2:
353-357.
[29] XU, Bixia; ZENG, Tao. Profitability, state
ownership, tax reporting and corporate social
responsibility: evidence from Chinese listed
firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 2016,
12.1: 23-31.
[30] SHAHAB, Yasir; YE, Chengang. Corporate
social responsibility disclosure and corporate
governance: empirical insights on neo-
institutional framework from
China. International Journal of Disclosure and
Governance, 2018, 15.2: 87-103.
[31] ALOTAIBI, Khaleed Omair; HUSSAINEY,
Khaled. Determinants of CSR disclosure
quantity and quality: Evidence from non-
financial listed firms in Saudi
Arabia. International Journal of Disclosure
and Governance, 2016, 13.4: 364-393.
[32] DENTCHEV, Nikolay A.; VAN BALEN,
Mitchell; HAEZENDONCK, Elvira. On
voluntarism and the role of governments in
CSR: Towards a contingency
approach. Business Ethics: A European Review,
2015, 24.4: 378-397.
[33] JACKSON, Gregory, et al. Mandatory non-
financial disclosure and its influence on CSR:
An international comparison. Journal of
Business Ethics, 2020, 162.2: 323-342.
[34] HESS, David. The future of sustainability
reporting as a regulatory mechanism. In: Law
and the transition to business sustainability.
Springer, Cham, 2014. p. 125-139.
[35] FERNANDEZ-FEIJOO, Belen; ROMERO,
Silvia; RUIZ, Silvia. Effect of stakeholders’
pressure on transparency of sustainability
reports within the GRI framework. Journal of
business ethics, 2014, 122.1: 53-63.
Author Contributions:
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong carried out the Literature
Review and reviewed final version.
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet has implemented the
Introduction.
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh carried out the discussion
and has reviewed first draft.
Nguyen Thi Hien was responsible for methodology.
Dinh Thi Ha has organized the result.
Sources of funding:
This research was funded by Vietnam Ministry of
Education and Training and Thuongmai University
under grant number B2020-TMA-03
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
347
Volume 19, 2022
APPENDIX
Table 8. Elements of CSR disclosure
Group
Code
Elements
Disclosures of
community
involvement
COM01
Donation to public health
COM02
Sponsorship to arts, sports and culture
COM03
Donation to education and training
COM04
Donation to environmental protection programs
COM05
Assistance to vulnerable groups (women, orphanage, disabled etc)
COM06
Charity and other community activities
Disclosures of
human
resource
EMP01
Training, seminar and workshop for employees
EMP02
Number of employees receive the training
EMP03
Employee academic level
EMP04
Internship program for university students
EMP05
Credit facilities under various loan policies
EMP06
Employee remuneration
EMP07
Employee family welfare
EMP08
Good working environment
EMP09
Employee health and safety
EMP10
Employee recreation
EMP11
Equal opportunities for employees
EMP12
Employee satisfaction
EMP13
Employee profitability
EMP14
Policy compliance
EMP15
Employees recruitment procedure
EMP16
Number of employees
Disclosures of
Environment
ENV01
Environmental standard consideration for extending loan
ENV02
Promoting environmental awareness
ENV03
Environmental protection activities
ENV04
Application of "Environmental and social risks management programs"
by the State Bank of Vietnam
ENV05
Working environment
ENV06
Environmental policies
ENV07
Compliance with environmental protection policy of the government
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.30
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong,
Dang Thi Minh Nguyet,
Nguyen Ngoc Khanh Linh,
Nguyen Thi Hien, Dinh Thi Ha
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
348
Volume 19, 2022