Mapping the Literature on Financial Behavior: a Bibliometric Analysis
Using the VOSviewer Program
MAKSYM DUBYNA
Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance,
Chernihiv Polytechnic National University,
Chernihiv, 14039, UKRAINE
OLHA POPELO
Department of Management and Civil Service,
Chernihiv Polytechnic National University,
Chernihiv, 14039, UKRAINE
NATALIIA KHOLIAVKO
Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance,
Chernihiv Polytechnic National University,
Chernihiv, 14039, UKRAINE
ARTUR ZHAVORONOK
Department of Public, Corporate Finances and Financial Mediation,
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University,
Chernivtsi, 58029, UKRAINE
MAIIA FEDYSHYN
Department of Public, Corporate Finances and Financial Mediation,
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University,
Chernivtsi, 58029, UKRAINE
INNA YAKUSHKO
Department of Management,
IHE “Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University”,
Kyiv, 02000, UKRAINE
Key-Words: - Financial Behaviour, VOSviewer, Bibliometric, Economic Agents, Households, Financial
Services Market, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection.
Received: July 4, 2021. Revised: December 6, 2021. Accepted: January 12, 2022. Published: January 14, 2022.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
231
Volume 19, 2022
Abstract: The objective of the article is to study the current state of researches of financial behaviour. The article
is conceptual and based on the use of the methodology of the bibliometric analysis. The analysis is based on
data retrieved from functionalities of the Scopus and Web of Science platforms. The VOSviewer program is
used for network visualization of keywords in scientific publications. Key findings are the number of
publications directly study the nature and features of the financial behavior formation of various economic
agents is insignificant, but is constantly growing. An important role in this process is played by digitalization
processes of financial services, which have an important impact on the models transformation of both financial
behavior of economic agents, and changes in the model of the financial services provision to customers by
financial institutions.
1 Introduction
Development of the financial services market is an
important component for ensuring stable and
progressive development of the national economy.
Each country is trying to create such conditions for
the financial services development, the availability
of which will improve the quality of work,
especially of financial institutions, increase the
efficiency of their work through continuous
improvement of their own activities. A special role
in the development of the financial services market
is played by households, which are able to ensure
the financial system functioning of the state through
temporary use by credit and investment institutions
of their funds. In the vast majority of developed
countries it is the funds of population that are the
basis for the development of the national economy,
form a stable and longterm financial resource for
economic development [1].
The leading role of households’ funds in the
development of the national economy is also
important from the standpoint of these resources
stability in the financial system of the state [2]. In
fact, the formation of adequate and clear rules for
the work of financial institutions, which play an
indirect role between the owners of funds and those
entities that need them, allows to ensure the
effectiveness of the transformation mechanism by
transforming financial resources of households into
credit and investment funds [3], [4]. However, the
complexity of the outlined mechanism due to the
involvement of a large number of economic agents,
among which households play an important role,
makes this mechanism vulnerable to various
dissipative, turbulent factors, processes may occur
in the households’ financial system and in the
financial system of the country in general [5-6]. The
complexity of the situation is exacerbated by the
fact that predicting the actions of households from
the standpoint of the system analysis within the
country is quite difficult, and sometimes impossible,
given the wide range of individual factors that affect
each person in making their own financial decisions
[7-9].
Today, the financial market, the financial
services market develop in rather difficult,
transformational conditions of own functioning. The
main reason for this against the background of basic
traditional reasons (economic downturn, rising
unemployment, changes in raw materials, goods,
etc.) are informatization processes [10-14],
digitalization [15-20], innovation renewal [21-29],
active introduction of the latest technologies in all
spheres of these markets functioning. Accordingly,
these processes affect the development of
households, processes of their own financial
decisions-making, form new requirements to the
work of financial institutions, financial products and
services. These processes will continue in the future,
and that is why the issues of conducting research in
this sphere, systematizing the results that have
already been obtained by scientists are becoming
relevant.
However, as at the beginning of any study, there is
always a categorical vacuum and the need to clarify,
to specify and find new approaches to understanding
the object of the study. It is quite clear that as of
today economics has already formed a powerful
system of economic categories that have their own
ontological connections, a logical structure that
allows them to be considered as a holistic, universal
space of economic knowledge. However, this
system is constantly evolving. That is why the
traditional question arises when conducting research
in fairly new areas of economics, which include
behavioral finance [30-32], namely: what is
financial behavior as an economic, financial
category and why today it is important to study its
essence [33]. Issues of studying the nature and
structure of financial behavior of households,
current state of conducting researches in this sphere
are of particular relevance. Thus, the purpose of the
article is to study the trends in the study of financial
behavior, conducting a bibliographic analysis of this
category.
2 Literature review
It is well known among economists that research in
the field of knowledge of the peculiarities of various
models formation of the economic agents’ behavior
began to be actively conducted in the late twentieth
century and gained considerable popularity. This
situation is primarily due to the fact that within new
conceptual provisions put forward by scientists the
attempt is made to explain those economic
processes and phenomena, which could not have
been explained so far by classic, traditional theories
[34-36].
On the other hand, new concepts have not only
given an understanding of what is happening in the
financial market, within individual economic
systems, but also have put forward and successfully
proved new hypotheses and concepts based on the
results of numerous experiments, surveys,
sociological studies in which thousands of
respondents were involved. It is the synthesis of
methodological constructions of several sciences
that allowed economists to gain new knowledge
and, most important, to adapt it for practical use in
the work of financial institutions, to form new
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
232
Volume 19, 2022
approaches to the regulation of financial relations.
Considerable attention in the process of studying
behavior of economic agents and the possibility of
influencing it was paid namely to psychological
aspects of their decision making on the management
of their own financial resources [7; 37-42]. Thus,
the theory of behavioral finance was gradually
formed.
In the theory of behavioral finance in the late
twentieth century, a significant amount of research
was conducted on the behavior of households and
other economic agents in different types of financial
markets. The results of these studies confirmed that
people’s behavior is not rational in making financial
decisions, can be spontaneous, illogical and
unpredictable [39; 43-45]. Accordingly, it
complicates the processes of modeling the
functioning and development of the financial
market, markets of individual financial assets, even
in the conditions of relatively stable economic
development in the country [36; 46-48].
However, in a significant number of papers by
scientists in the field of behavioral economics, much
attention is paid primarily to the study of
peculiarities of the formation and transformation of
the behavior of investors [6; 49-51], who are active
in the stock market either independently, or using
the services of professional financial advisors. Nagy
& Obenberger [52] paid significant attention in their
research to the identification and description of the
characteristics of the influence of various factors on
the formation of different types of investors’
behavior. The outlined issues are reflected in
scientific works of Lodhi [49], Sarwar and Afaf
[50]. Orden-Cruz and Díaz-Iglesias [53] carried out
the bibliometric analysis of the investors’
protection. Jureviciene and Jermakova [54]
investigate the impact of financial behavior of
individuals on investment decisions made by them.
Thus, within many scientific researches it is very
often possible to meet the identification of concepts
of financial and investment behavior, in other case,
the researches at all do not give own definition of
the financial behavior essence. Accordingly, the
question arises: and in the countries where the stock
market is not developed, what model of financial
behavior is inherent in economic agents and how is
it formed? These issues among a significant number
of scientific papers in the field of financial behavior
are not sufficiently clear.
In general, in the field of studying financial
behavior, a number of studies have already been
conducted, but all of them are fragmentary in nature
and reveal some features of this concept. For
example, O’Neill and Xiao [55] carried out a
thorough study based on the results of online
surveys of the peculiarities of the financial behavior
formation of households before a financial crisis in
2007 and afterwards. More than 10,000 respondents
took part in the survey. The authors highlight both
negative and positive consequences of this crisis,
which affected the behavior of citizens in the credit
and deposit markets. Fred van Raaij [56] conducts a
detailed analysis of the formation of irrational and
rational behavior of the consumers of financial
services, determines the importance of marketing
tools in shaping the model of this behavior,
considers specific features of citizens’ behavior in
different financial services markets (Saving
Behavior; Credit Behavior; Insurance Behavior;
Investment Behavior; Tax Behavior; Responsible
Financial Behavior). Madrian [57] focus on the
public focus features in the field of regulation of
financial institutions, the prevention of financial
fraud and combating financial fraud in order to
create conditions for the formation of rational
financial behavior of citizens in evolving them in
further transformation into investment resources.
Strömbäck [51; 58] focus on the study of the
financial behavior model, individual internal factors
of the person that influence its formation. The
authors pay considerable attention to the issues of
self-control in spending money, rationality in their
own costs, optimism, and deliberative thinking.
In the process of the financial behavior study,
special attention is paid by scientists to the issues of
financial literacy and its role in shaping financial
behavior of households. Carlo de Bassa Scheresberg
[6] examines the role of financial literacy in shaping
financial behavior of young people. The outlined
matters were also investigated by Lajuni [59], who
studied the impact of religion, financial knowledge
on the formation of financial behavior among
millennial generation and specific features of the
emergence of financial difficulties by them. Special
attention is paid to financial behavior of the youth in
scientific works of A. da Silva [60]; Marcellia [61];
Deventer [62]. Within the paper of Daqar [63], the
issues of the attitude of Millennials and generation Z
to Fintech and the impact of these technologies on
the formation of their financial behavior are studied.
In addition, research in the field of the financial
literacy impact on the formation of financial
behavior of households and certain categories of
citizens was carried out by Hasibuan [64]; Andarsari
and Ningtyas [65]; Rai [66]; Arifin [67]. For
example, Komara [68] study in their work features
of the financial literacy impact on financial
decision-making in Indonesia.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
233
Volume 19, 2022
There is a significant amount of scientific works
in the field of describing financial behavior of the
citizens of specific countries. In particular, Sudindra
[69] considers financial decision-making by
households and conducts an empirical study of the
formation of the financial behavior model of 378
working women serving in information technology
services in India. Zulaihat and Widyastuti [70]
conduct research on the factors influencing on the
financial behavior formation of households in
Indonesia. The scientists carry out online survey of
citizens and use 21 indicators to describe the
financial behavior model. Jurevicienè and Gausienè
[71] investigate the peculiarities of the financial
behavior formation in Lithuania and state that
citizens mostly strive to meet short-term goals and
do not care about savings for retirement, do not use
all available investment instruments to increase their
savings. Xiao and Porto [72] consider the formation
of financial behavior in China. The authors as a
result of the study conclude that most citizens form
a model of financial behavior, in which they prefer
current costs than savings. Ismail [73] carried
research in the field of The Relationship between
Financial Attitude and Financial Goal Towards
Financial Behaviour, which was implemented on the
base of a survey of citizens in Malaysia. The study
proved that financial attitude is significant to
financial behaviour.
However, despite numerous scientific works of
scientists, systematic theoretical and methodological
research in this area, as noted, is absent, which
updated this area of research and justified the need
for conceptual analysis of the state of scientific
developments in the study of financial behavior.
This contributed to the choice of the article’s topic.
Preliminary analysis of the state of scientific
developments in the field of knowledge of the
nature and peculiarities of the model formation of
financial behavior showed that there is a large
number of scientific papers that analyze the state of
scientific developments in general in the field of
financial behavior. For example, Paule-Vianez [74]
in the paper “A bibliometric analysis of behavioural
finance with mapping analysis tools” consider the
works for the period 1987-2017 in the sphere of the
irrational investors’ behavior and its impact in
financial markets, and highlight 13 directions in the
behavioral finances sphere, namely: Investor
sentiment, disposition effect, Overconfidence and
Expected Return Stocks as motor themes; Arbitrage,
Biasand Model as basic and transversal themes;
OPI, Weather and Mutual Funds as specialized
themes; Strategies, Attention and Portfolio Selection
as emerging or declining themes. The authors state
that issues of the investment behavior analysis are
central among the works in this area. Fakhry [75]
provides a literature review of the behavioral
finance theory and analyses existing theories to
explain the mechanism of the investors’ response to
information on how asset prices are formed in
investment markets. The author notes that
determining or forecasting such prices is tentatively
possible only using both traditional theories of the
explanation of price settings in the financial market,
and by taking into consideration certain provisions
of behavioral finance. Joo and Durri [76] investigate
the state of research by analyzing the psychological
factors impact on the decision-making process of
investors. Pimenta and Famá [77] review scientific
papers in the field of behavioral finance from 1993
to 2012, study the most cited scientific papers [78-
95], the number of authors, scientific publications
where they are published.
However, given that the range of different areas
in the behavioral finance theory is quite significant,
it is the matter of specifying the essence of financial
behavior, the study of the scientific works state in
this field is not given due attention. Therefore, we
will try to answer the following questions:
RQ1: is the number of scientific papers by
studying financial behavior sufficient, given high
level of the scientists’ interest in conducting
research in the field of financial behavior?
RQ2: is there systematic and thorough scientific
research that would form a holistic theoretical basis
for further research of financial behavior, whether
its essence and ways to describe its forms are
specified?
RQ3: are the issues of financial behavior mostly
studied in the countries where the stock market is
developed, and does the research focus primarily on
studying investment behavior of economic agents?
3 Methodology
The methodological basis of the study is a range of
general scientific research methods, which include
observation, measurement, and comparison. The
methodology of the system approach, comparative
analysis, statistical research methods is being
actively used. The VOSviewer toolkit was used to
visualize analytical information. MS Excel functions
were used for corresponding graphic analytical
researches.
The information base of the research is the
results of analytical study of the data of information
retrieval functionalities of Scopus and Web of
Science scientific platforms on the number of
publications in the field of financial behaviour
research. The availability of this information
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
234
Volume 19, 2022
allowed us to single out all articles in the entire
scientific array of scientific publications, which,
firstly, concerned the study of in the field of
behavioral finance in general and, secondly, to
analyze in detail the state of research exclusively in
the field of financial behavior. This was done by
defining a sample of scientific papers according to
the following criteria: simultaneous use of the words
"financial" and "behavior" exclusively in the title of
the article; the period is 1970-2020. For such
parameters as scientific field, type of documents,
sources of publications, country, additional selection
parameters were not used. A similar approach was
used to search for publications in two databases,
namely: Scopus and Web of Science.
The application of grouping and comparative
analysis methods as well allowed to conduct
research on the main scientific areas within which
the study financial behavior are researched, and
analyze the countries in which the world’s major
research centers are concentrated where the above
issues are studied.
4 Results and Discussion
Understanding the essence of financial behavior as a
universal category is the first step towards finding
new methodological concepts for studying behavior
of economic entities in the financial services market,
identifying the features of its change in the
digitalization era, specifying new threats and
benefits for customers that have digitalization
processes of the financial services sphere,
understanding the differentiation of the financial
behavior model between different generations,
countries.
The potential of the behavioral economy theory
was really extremely large, and this is confirmed by
a large number of scientific works that have been
done in this area for recent 50 years (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Number of publications in the Scopus data
in the behavioral finances sphere
Source: сompiled by the authors based on the analysis of the
Scopus database
Actually, the data in Fig. 1 confirm active
development of research in the field of financial
economy and behavioral finance. If in 1970 in the
Scopus database, only one paper was registered in
this field, then in 1980 4 works, in 1990 7
works, and already in 2000 20 publications, in
2010 165 works, and in 2019 488 scientific
works. It is worth noting that most of these studies
were conducted by scientists working in the
countries with developed financial markets, and this
was also one of the reasons for active development
of research in this area.
In Fig. 2, a cognitive model of the interaction
between key words in publication relating research
of individual issues in the sphere of behavioral
finance is presented.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
235
Volume 19, 2022
Figure 2. Graphic map of the interaction between key words in publications relating research in behavioral
finance sphere
Source: compiled by the authors based on the analysis of the Scopus database and using tools of the VOSviewer program
In Fig. 2, a cognitive model of the interaction
between key words in publication relating research
of individual issues in the sphere of behavioral
finance is presented.
Therefore, analyzing the information in Fig. 2,
we can say that in publications relating to the study
of certain aspects of the behavioral finance
direction, scientists pay the most attention to the
following spheres: investing, e-commerce,
financing, making investment and financial
decisions in general, and scientific issues of the
analysis of the behavior models of economic agents.
In total, this sample included 60 key words that are
most often mentioned in publications on behavioral
finances. We’d also like to note that the behavioral
finances field is of great significance today, and
within relevant researches, a very large list of
problems by ensuring the efficiency of financial
markets, the formation of appropriate institutional
support for their development, the search for
optimal models in first turn of investment behavior,
is being studied.
However, the analysis of the financial behavior
essence as a complex economic category, as noted,
is insufficiently studied even within the above
publications. The data of Fig. 3 confirm insufficient
study within the behavioral economy theory namely
on the issues of the essence concretization of
essence of the category “financial behavior”.
The data in Fig. 3 allow us to conclude that the
number of scientific papers, which titles contain the
words “financial” and “behavioral”, is also growing
in line with the number of scientific publications in
the behavioral economy field.
Figure 3. Number of scientific publications, in
which titles the words “financial” and “behavioral”
are simultaneously met
Source: compiled by the authors based on the analysis of the
Scopus database
If in 1972 in the Scopus database only one paper
was registered in this sphere, then in 1981 – 1 work,
in 1991 4 works, and already in 2001 12
publications, in 2011 52 works, and in 2019 112
scientific works. This tendency is also confirmed by
the analysis of the number of scientific publications,
in which titles the words “financial” and “behavior”
are simultaneously met, and which are kept in the
Web of Science database (Fig. 4).
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1967
1970
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
2015
2018
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
236
Volume 19, 2022
Figure 4. Number of scientific works, in which titles
the words “financial” and “behavior” are
simultaneously met
Source: compiled by the authors based on the analysis of the
Web of Science database
Accordingly, if in 1972 only one work in this
sphere was registered, in 1981 3 works, in 1991
5 works, then in 2001 already 8 publications, in
2011 42 works, and in 2019 115 scientific
works.
The outlined statistical data also confirm the
relevance of the study of the financial behavior
essence, increasing the interest of scientists to this
phenomena research, peculiarities of the formation
of its various models. However, the number of
publications in this sphere remain insignificant,
even compared to the array of works in the field of
behavioral finance in general.
In Fig. 5, information on the proportion of
scientific publications that deal with both words
“financial” and “behavior” in the total number of
papers related to the behavioral finance research is
presented.
Figure 5. The share of scientific publications, in
which titles the words “financial” and “behavior”
in the total number of works relating the
financial behavior research are simultaneously
met
Source: compiled by the author based on the analysis of the
Scopus database
The data in Fig. 5 show that, on average, only
35.0% of scientific publications devoted to the study
of behavioral finance also relate to the consideration
of certain provisions of financial behavior.
This only confirms the fact of insufficient
research of this part of the behavioral economy
theory. Although, in our opinion, the very
understanding of the essence of financial behavior,
its peculiarities and types is the most important
component of the whole theory of behavioral
finances. In Fig. 6, a graphic map of key words, in
which topics the words “financial” and “behavior”
are met, is presented.
Let’s consider in detail current trends in the study
of financial behavior through the analysis of
scientific publications in this field. As already
mentioned, the methodology of behavioral economy
is synthesizing and is based on a combination of
research methods of economy, sociology and
psychology.
This only confirms the fact of insufficient
research of this part of the behavioral economy
theory. Although, in our opinion, the very
understanding of the essence of financial behavior,
its peculiarities and types is the most important
component of the whole theory of behavioral
finances. In Fig. 6, a graphic map of key words, in
which topics the words “financial” and “behavior”
are met, is presented.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
0,00
50,00
100,00
150,00
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
0,00
10,00
20,00
30,00
40,00
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
237
Volume 19, 2022
Figure 6. Graphic map of key words in publications, in which topics the words “financial” and “behavior”
are simultaneously met
Source: compiled by the author based on the analysis of the Scopus database and using the tools of the VOSviewer program
Let’s consider in detail current trends in the
study of financial behavior through the analysis of
scientific publications in this field. As already
mentioned, the methodology of behavioral economy
is synthesizing and is based on a combination of
research methods of economy, sociology and
psychology.
This combination has allowed scientists to form
a different view on the functioning of classical
processes and systems, especially to explain how
households behave and change when making
decision about using their own financial resources,
and how to use them in the best way to generate
income in long run.
It is interdisciplinary nature of behavioral
economy that explains the existence of scientific
publications on the study of financial behavior in
completely different fields of study. In Table 1,
relevant information is presented.
Table 1. Number of publications by spheres of scientific research
Science
Number
of
publicatio
ns
Pos.
No.
Science
Number
of
publicatio
ns
Sphere of behavioural finances in general
Publications, in which titles the words “financial” and
behaviour” are met
Economics, Econometrics and
Finance
2082
1
Economics, Econometrics and
Finance
555
Business, Management and
Accounting
1259
2
Business, Management and
Accounting
397
Computer Science
609
3
Social Sciences
270
Social Sciences
568
4
Psychology
143
Psychology
534
5
Computer Science
126
Engineering
348
6
Medicine
105
Mathematics
322
7
Mathematics
93
Medicine
309
8
Engineering
84
Decision Sciences
280
9
Physics and Astronomy
61
Environmental Science
104
10
Decision Sciences
50
Arts and Humanities
87
11
Arts and Humanities
45
Physics and Astronomy
67
12
Environmental Science
44
Energy
62
13
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
27
Multidisciplinary
60
14
Multidisciplinary
22
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
238
Volume 19, 2022
Neuroscience
49
15
Energy
21
Agricultural and Biological
Sciences
46
16
Biochemistry, Genetics and
Molecular Biology
17
Nursing
42
17
Earth and Planetary Sciences
12
Earth and Planetary Sciences
41
18
Materials Science
9
Biochemistry, Genetics and
Molecular Biology
35
19
Neuroscience
8
Materials Science
24
20
Nursing
7
Source: compiled by the authors based on the analysis of the Scopus database
Thus, the data in Table 1 confirm that scientific
works in the financial behavior sphere occur in
many scientific fields. We’d like to note that within
this analysis, first of all, publications in the Scopus
database, in which titles the words “financial” and
“behaviour” are met, were took into consideration.
It is quite logical that the majority of these
publications were in the sphere of Economics,
Econometrics and Finance (2082 and 555) and
Business, Management and Accounting (1259 and
397). This situation is common for behavioral
finances and research in financial behavior. In
addition, the data in Table 1 allow us to conclude
that a considerable number of scientific publications
relating behavioral finances were written in the
sphere of Computer Science (609), Social Sciences
(568), Psychology (534). However, the majority of
research of financial behavior was carried out in
Social Sciences (270), Psychology (143), Computer
Science (126). Accordingly, the share of scientific
publications that study financial behavior in the total
number of scientific works in the behavioral
finances field is as follows: Economics,
Econometrics and Finance 26,7 %; Business,
Management and Accounting 31,5 %; Social
Sciences 47,5 %; Psychology 26,8 %; Computer
Science – 20,7 % (see Table 1).
The structure of publications in the Web of
Science database by spheres, in which individual
aspects of financial behaviour are researched, is as
follows: Economics 385 pcs.; Business Finance
182 pcs.; Business 175 pcs.; Management 129
pcs. In other scientific fields, the number of
publications is relatively small. However, the
number of such scientific fields remains quite
significant, which confirms the interdisciplinary
potential of relevant research.
Let’s carry out the analysis on the distribution of
the number of publications, in which titles the words
“financial” and “behavior” are met by countries, in
which these publications were published. First, the
leaders in this research are scientists from the USA
371 publications, Great Britain 114 publications
and China – 113 publications.
In Table 2, the more detailed distribution of
relevant publications by countries is presented..
Table 2. Number of publications, in which titles the words “financial” and “behavior” are simultaneously met
Pos. No.
Country
Number of
publications
Pos. No.
Country
Number of
publications
1
United States
371
13
Canada
32
2
United
Kingdom
114
14
South Korea
32
3
China
113
15
Spain
27
4
Germany
50
16
Russian Federation
24
5
Malaysia
46
17
Japan
23
6
Netherlands
46
18
Turkey
23
7
Australia
40
19
Belgium
16
8
Italy
39
20
Brazil
16
9
India
37
21
Swеden
16
10
France
36
22
Greece
13
11
Taiwan
36
23
South Africa
12
12
Indonesia
34
24
Poland
12
Source: compiled by the authors based on the analysis of the Scopus database
In addition, in Fig. 7, the relationship between
the authors of scientific publications in the financial
behavior field, who conduct research at educational
and research institutions in different countries of the
world, is shown.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
239
Volume 19, 2022
Figure 7. Graphic map of the interrelation between scientists of different countries, who conduct their research
in the financial behavior sphere
Source: compiled by the authors based on the analysis of the Scopus database and using the tools of the VOSviewer program
The analysis of first ten positions on the number
of publications in the financial behavior field shows
that this area is actively studied in European
countries (Germany 50 publications; the
Netherlands 46 publications; Italy 39
publications; France 36 publications). Increased
interest in these studies is observed in countries such
as Malaysia, Australia, India, Taiwan, and
Indonesia. This indicates a global trend of increased
interest of scientists in the study of theoretical
provisions of the financial behavior essence, the
search for new methods for its study. All this is due
to awareness of the importance of the behavioral
aspects understanding by population in the financial
sector, the possibility of using new knowledge in
this area to prevent destructive, systematic and
financial crises, identifying their preconditions.
The analysis of first ten positions on the number
of publications in the financial behavior field shows
that this area is actively studied in European
countries (Germany 50 publications; the
Netherlands 46 publications; Italy 39
publications; France 36 publications). Increased
interest in these studies is observed in countries such
as Malaysia, Australia, India, Taiwan, and
Indonesia. This indicates a global trend of increased
interest of scientists in the study of theoretical
provisions of the financial behavior essence, the
search for new methods for its study. All this is due
to awareness of the importance of the behavioral
aspects understanding by population in the financial
sector, the possibility of using new knowledge in
this area to prevent destructive, systematic and
financial crises, identifying their preconditions.
5 Conclusion
Thus, within the article, the current state of research
in in the field of knowledge of the financial
behavior essence is considered. It is established that
up to date the scientists have already formed a
significant array of scientific publications in the
behavioral finance field. However, only some of
them study the essence of financial trust from a
theoretical point of view, describing ontological
characteristics of this behavior, determining the
specific features of the behavior of individual
economic agents in financial markets.
The use of analytical tools of the Scopus and Web
of Science scientometric databases allowed to
analyze publishing activity in the financial behavior
study, the identify the basic world centers where
such research is conducted. The analysis of
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
240
Volume 19, 2022
scientific works from 1967 to 2019 gives grounds to
assert active development of research in the
behavioral finance field, especially starting from
1999-2000. An important role in increasing the
scientists’ interest in this topic was played by the
global finance crisis of 2007-2008, which confirmed
that scientists know quite a bit about the
peculiarities of financial behavior of different
economic agents. Rather destructive impact of the
mentioned crisis on the financial security level of
households also played a positive role in the
increase of scientific publications that studied
financial behavior of citizens in different conditions
of economic development.
The analysis of information of the Scopus database
suggests a significant increase in the number of
scientific papers in 2003-2019, in which titles the
words “financial” and “behavior” are met, as well. If
in 2001, there were 12 publications of this kind,
then in 2011 52 papers, and in 2019 – already 112
scientific works. This tendency also gives grounds
to claim that the scientists’ interest in conducting
research in this direction will only increase.
In addition, within the article, the analysis of
scientific directions within which research of
financial behavior is carried out, and it is established
that the majority of these publications were written
in the sphere of Economics, Econometrics and
Finance 555) and Business, Management and
Accounting (397). Among countries, the above
direction is being mostly directed in the USA, Great
Britain and China.
Therefore, further research, in our opinion, should
determine the essence of financial behavior as a
separate category, a description of its features and
factors of formation. There is also a need to develop
a single concept for describing the financial
behavior model among citizens of individual
countries, and individual social groups. It is quite
logical that financial behavior from a theoretical and
methodological point of view is a very complex and
multifaceted phenomenon, many aspects of which
today require new research.
Acknowledgment
This research is carried out within the framework of
the scientific project “Transformation of
households’ behaviour in the financial services
market in the context of digitalization” with the
support of the Ministry of Education and Science of
Ukraine.
References:
[1] B. R. Avery & A. B. Kennickell, “Household
saving in the U.S.,” Review of Income and
Wealth, 37(4), 409-432, 1991.
[2] L. Shkvarchuk & R. Slav’yuk, “The Financial
Behavior of Households in Ukraine,” Journal
of Competitiveness, 11(2), 144-159, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.03.09
[3] A. H. Marianne & M. H. Jeanne, “Household
Financial Management: The Connection
between Knowledge and Behavior,” Federal
Reserve Bulletin, 309-322, 2003. URL:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2
003/0703lead.pdf
[4] S. Shkarlet & M. Dubyna, “Features of the
cognitive approach application to the essence
of the financial services market identification,”
Economic Annals-XXI, 158(3-4(2)), 70-74,
2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-16
[5] L. Marina, N. Irawati, I. Sadalia & I. Muda,
“The Financial Behavior Traits Impact On
Financial Distress At Small Medium
Enterprises (The Relationships Between The
Industry And Sustainable Development In
Indonesia),” International Journal of Scientific
& Technology Research, 8(04), 27-30, 2019.
[6] N. Suppakitjarak & P. Krishnamra, “Household
Saving Behavior and Determinants of the
Forms of Saving and Investment in Thailand,”
Journal of Economics, Business and
Management, 3(3), 326-330, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.204
[7] B. Dervishaj, “Psychological Biases, Main
Factors of Financial Behavior - A Literature
Review,” European Journal of Natural
Sciences and Medicine, 2(2), 54-64, 2018.
URL:
https://journals.euser.org/files/articles/ejmn_v2
_i2/Dervishaj.pdf
[8] P. Dolan, A. Elliott, R. Metcalfe & I. Vlaev,
“Influencing Financial Behavior: From
Changing Minds to Changing Contexts,”
Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13(2), 126-142,
2012.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2012.680995
[9] Ye. Polishchuk, S. Onikiienko, A.
Ivashchenko, A. Kornyliuk & N. Demchyshak,
“Prior credit assessment of long-term SME
projects with non-standard cash flows,” Banks
and Bank Systems, 16(2), 148-158, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.14
[10] N. Kholiavko, T. Chekhovych, O. Mirshuk &
V. Vovk, “Integrated model of the competitive
higher education: Legal, economic and psycho-
pedagogical aspects,” International Journal of
Industrial Engineering and Production
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
241
Volume 19, 2022
Research, 31(4), 535-545, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.22068/ijiepr.31.4.535
[11] N. Kholiavko, L. Popova, M. Marych, I.
Hanzhurenko, S. Koliadenko & V. Nitsenko,
“Comprehensive methodological approach to
estimating the research component influence on
the information economy development,”
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho
Universytetu, (4), 192-199, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/192
[12] O. Lagovska, V. Ilin, M. Kotsupatriy, M.
Ishchenko & L. Verbivska, “Priority directions
of tax policy change in the information sphere,”
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho
Universytetu, (3), 183-190, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-3/183
[13] K. Shaposhnykov, O. Kochubei, O. Grygor, N.
Protsenko, O. Vyshnevska & A. Dzyubina,
“Organizational and Economic Mechanism of
Development and Promotion of IT Products in
Ukraine,” Estudios de economía aplicada,
39(6), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i6.5264
[14] O. Zybareva, L. Verbivska, I. Lopashchuk, O.
Kalaman, T. Derkach & N. Smentyna,
“Strategically-oriented enterprise management
through information systems,” International
Journal of Recent Technology and
Engineering, 8(2), 3014-3017, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrteB2900.078219
[15] C. de Bassa Scheresberg, “Financial Literacy
and Financial Behavior among Young Adults:
Evidence and Implications,” Numeracy, 6(2), 5,
2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1936-
4660.6.2.5
[16] H. Carlsson, S. Larsson, L. Svensson & F.
Astrom, “Consumer Credit Behavior in the
Digital Context: A Bibliometric Analysis and
Literature Review,” Journal of Financial
Counseling and Planning, 28(1), 76-94, 2017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.28.1.76
[17] M. Dubyna, A. Zhavoronok, N. Kudlaieva & I.
Lopashchuk, “Transformation of household
credit behavior in the conditions of
digitalization of the financial services market,”
Journal of Optimization in Industrial
Engineering, 14(1), 97-102, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.22094/JOIE.2020.677835
[18] M. M. Gobble, “Digitalization, Digitization,
and Innovation,” Research-Technology
Management, 61(4), 56-59, 2018.
[19] S. Shkarlet, M. Dubyna, K. Shtyrhun & L.
Verbivska, “Transformation of the Paradigm of
the Economic Entities Development in Digital
Economy,” WSEAS Transactions on
Environment and Development, 16, 413-422,
2020.
[20] M. Zveryakov, V. Kovalenko, S. Sheludko &
E. Sharah, “FinTech sector and banking
business: competition or symbiosis?” Economic
Annals-XXI, 175(1-2), 53-57, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-09
[21] O. Popelo, S. Tulchynska, O. Garafonova, L
Kovalska., S. Khanin, “Methodical approach to
assessing innovative development efficiency of
regional economic systems in the conditions of
the creative economy development,” WSEAS
transactions on environment and development,
17, 685-695, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.66
[22] S. Tulchynska, O. Popelo, O. Vovk, B.
Dergaliuk, I. Kreidych, T. Tkachenko, “The
Resource Supply of Innovation and Investment
Strategies of the Microeconomic Systems
Modernization in the Conditions of
Digitalization,” WSEAS transactions on
environment and development, 17, 819-828,
2021.
https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.77.
[23] O. Vovk, M. Kravchenko, O. Popelo, S.
Tulchynska, M. Derhaliuk, “Modeling the
Choice of the Innovation and Investment
Strategy for the Implementation of
Modernization Potential,” WSEAS transactions
on systems and control, 16, 430-438, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.37394/23203.2021.16.38.
[24] O. Popelo, S. Tulchynska, V. Marhasova, N.
Ivanova, H. Samiilenko, “An innovative
approach to determine the sustainable
development of regions by harmonization of
the economic, social and environmental
components,” Journal of Management
Information and Decision Sciences, 24(S4), 1-
9, 2021. https://doi.org/1532-5806-24-8-340.
[25] S. Tulchynska, O. Popelo, O. Garafonova, I.
Yaroshenko, I. Semyhulina, “Modeling the
influence of innovative factors on sustainable
development of regions in the context of
digitalization,” Journal of Management
Information and Decision Sciences, 24(S5), 1-
8, 2021. https://doi.org/1528-2635-24-8-367.
[26] S. Tulchynska, O. Popelo, O. Garafonova, V.
Marhasova, T. Tkachenko, “The impact of
modernization on the competitiveness increase
of the enterprise and provision of its economic
security,” Journal of Legal, Ethical and
Regulatory Issues, 24(S5), 1-9, 2021.
[27] A. Revko, M. Butko, O. Popelo, “Methodology
for Assessing the Influence of Cultural
Infrastructure on Regional Development in
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
242
Volume 19, 2022
Poland and Ukraine,” Comparative Economic
Research, Central and Eastern Europe, 23(2),
21-39, 2020. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-
2008.23.10
[28] C. Skinner, “Digital Human: The Fourth
Revolution of Humanity Includes Everyone.”
UNKNO, 2018.
[29] O. Zybareva, I. Kravchuk, Y. Pushak, L.
Verbivska & O. Makeieva, “Economic and
Legal Aspects of the Network Readiness of the
Enterprises in Ukraine in the Context of
Business Improving,” Estudios de economía
aplicada, 39(5), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.4972
[30] J. Y. Huang, J. C. P. Shieh & Y.-C. Kao,
“Starting points for a new researcher in
behavioral finance,” International Journal of
Managerial Finance, 12 (1), 92-103, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-05-2015-0111
[31] D. Jureviciene & O. Ivanova, “Behavioral
Finance: Theory and Survey,” Science Future
of Lithuania, 5(1), 53-58, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2013.08
[32] I. Shkolnyk, V. Chernadchuk & V. Sukhonos,
“The notion and content of financial system in
the context of financial law of Ukraine,”
Problems and Perspectives in Management,
15(2-1), 234-245, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2-1).2017.07
[33] V. Ricciardi & H. K. Simon, “What is
behavioral finance?,” Business, Education and
Technology Journal, 2(2), 1-9, 2000.
[34] W. DeBondt, W. Forbes, P. Hamalainen & Y.
Gulnur Muradoglu, “What can behavioral
finance teach us about finance?,” Qualitative
Research in Financial Markets, 2(1), 29-36,
2010.
[35] A. Tversky & D. Kahneman, “The Framing of
Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,”
Science, 211(4481), 453-458, 1981.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
[36] V. Vovk, A. Denysova, K. Rudoi & T.
Kyrychenko, “Management and legal aspects
of the symbiosis of banking institutions and
Fintech companies in the credit services market
in the context of digitization,” Estudios de
economía aplicada, 39(7), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i7.5013
[37] D. Kahmeman & A. Tversky, “On the
Psychology of Prediction,” Psychological
Review, 80(4), 237-251, 1973.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
[38] D. Kahneman. “Maps of Bounded Rationality:
Psychology of Behavioral Economics,” The
Americal Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-1475,
2003. URL:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3132137
[39] D. Kahneman, “Thinking, fact and slow.” NY:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
[40] G. Muradoglu, N. Harvey, “Behavioral finance:
the role of psychological factors in financial
decisions,” Review of Behavioral Finance,
4(2), 68-80, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1108/19405971211284862
[41] M. Sadeghnia, A. H. Hooshmand & Habibniko,
“Behavioral Finance and Neuro Finance and
Re-search Conducted in this Area,”
Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary
Research in Business, 4(12), 793-801, 2013.
URL: https://journal-
archieves31.webs.com/793-801.pdf
[42] K. C. Tseng, “Behavioural Finance, Bounded
Rationality, Neuro Finance and Traditional
Finance,” Investment Management and
Financial Investments, 3(4), 7-18, 2006.
[43] D. Duxbury, “Behavioral finance: insights from
experiments I: theory and financial markets,”
Review of Behavioral Finance, 7(1), 78-96,
2015.
[44] R. H. Thaler, “The End of Behavioral Finance,”
Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6), 12-17, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n6.2310
[45] R. H. Thaler, “Misbehaving. The making of
Behavioral Economics.” NY, London: WW
Norton & Company, 2015.
[46] E. Dinga, N. Pop, M. Dimitriu & C. Milea,
“Modeling financial behavior of population
conceptual assignations,” Romanian Journal of
Economic Forecasting, 3, 239-254, 2011.
URL:
http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef3_11/rjef3_2011p239
-254.pdf
[47] D. Vaganov, E. Sheina & K. Bochenina, “A
comparative study of social data similarity
measures related to financial behavior,”
Procedia Computer Science, 136, 274-283,
2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.270
[48] V. Vovk, Y. Zhezherun, O. Bilovodska, V.
Babenko & A. Biriukova, “Financial
monitoring in the bank as a market instrument
in the conditions of innovative development
and digitalization of economy: Management
and legal aspects of the risk-based approach,”
International Journal of Industrial Engineering
and Production Research, 31(4), 559-570,
2020. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijiepr.31.4.559
[49] S. Lodhi, “Factors Influemcing Individual
Investor Behavior An Empirical Study of City
Karachi,” Journal of Business and
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
243
Volume 19, 2022
Management, 16(2): I, 68-76, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-16236876
[50] A. Sarwar & G. Afaf, “A comparison between
psychological and economic factors affecting
individual investor`s decision-making
behavior,” Cogent Business & Management, 3,
1232907, 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1232
907
[51] C. Strömbäck, K. Skagerlund, D. Västfjäll &
G. Tinghög, “Subjective self-control but not
objective measures of executive functions
predicts financial behavior and well-being,”
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental
Finance, 27, 100339, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100339
[52] R. A. Nagy & R. W. Obenberger, “Factors
Influencing Individual Investors Behavior,”
Financial Analysts Journal, 50(4), 63-68, 1994.
https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v50.n4.63
[53] C. Orden-Cruz & S. Díaz-Iglesias. Bibliometric
analysis on investor protection. Revista de
Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época, (1),
137-154, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.17561//ree.v2020n1.9
[54] D. Jureviciene & K. Jermakova, “The Impact
of Individuals' Financial Behavior on
Investment Decisions,” Electronic
International Interdisciplinary Conference,
242-250, 2012. URL:
https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/business-systems-and-
economics/article/view/275/301
[55] B. O’Neill & J. J. Xiao, “Financial behaviors
before and after the financial crisis: Evidence
from an online survey,” Journal of Financial
Counseling and Planning, 23(1), 33-46, 2012.
URL:
https://my.afcpe.org/system/journals/v23_j3.pd
f
[56] W. F. V. Raaij, “Consumer Financial
Behavior,” Foundations and Trends(R) in
Marketing, 7(4), 231-351, 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000039
[57] B. C. Madrian, H. E. Hershfield, A. B.
Sussman, S. Bhargava, J. Burke, S. A. Huettel
& S. B. Shu, “Behaviorally informed policies
for household financial decision making,”
Behavioral Science & Policy, 3(1), 27-40,
2017. URL:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5704141c
746fb969109c9a6b/t/5997491fbe42d6618fc46a
2a/1503086915785/Madrian+et+al_BSP+2017.
pdf
[58] C. Strömbäck, L. Thérèse, K. Skagerlund, D.
Västfjäll & G. Tinghög, “Does self-control
predict financial behavior and financial well-
being?” Journal of Behavioral and
Experimental Finance, 14, 30–38, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.04.002
[59] N. Lajuni, I. Bujang, A. A. Karia & Y. Yacob,
“Religiosity, financial knowledge, and financial
behavior influence on personal financial
distress among millennial generation,” Jurnal
Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 20(2), 92-98,
2018. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.20.2.92–98
[60] F. A. da Silva, M. G. Filho, L. M. M. das
Graças, J. M. Tomazela, R. I. de Oliveira, E. R.
dos Santos, F. C. de Campos, “Analysis of
financial behavior of young people between 20
and 30 years,” International Refereed Journal
of Engineering and Science, 3(12), 55-64,
2014. URL: http://www.irjes.com/Papers/vol3-
issue12/Version%201/I3125564.pdf.
[61] S. Marcellia, “Financial Behavior and Problems
Among College Student in Indonesia: the Role
of Financial Knowledge,” International
Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, 133-
137, 2018. URL:
https://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/ijet/a
rticle/view/17531
[62] М. V. Deventer, “African Generation Y
students` personal finance behavior and
knowledge,” Investment management and
Financial Innovations, 17(4), 136-144, 2020.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.13
[63] M. A. M. A. Daqar, D. Arqawi, S. М. A.
Karsh, “Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and
Generation Z (The financial behavior and
Fintech perception),” Banks and Bank Systems,
15(3), 20-28, 2020.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.03
[64] B. K. Hasibuan, Y. M. Lubis & H. R. Walad
Altsani, “Financial Literacy and Financial
Behavior as a Measure of Financial
Satisfaction,” Advances in Economics, Business
and Management Research, 46, 503-507, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.2991/ebic-17.2018.79
[65] P. R. Andarsari & M. N. Ningtyas, “The Role
of Financial Literacy on Financial Behavior,”
Journal of Accounting and Business Education,
4(1), 24-33, 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v4i1.8524
[66] K. Rai, S. Dua & M. Yadav, “Association of
Financial Attitude, Financial Behavior and
Financial Knowledge Toward Financial
Literacy: A Structural Equation Modeling
Approach,” FIIB Business Review, 8(1), 51-60,
2019.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714519826651
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
244
Volume 19, 2022
[67] A. Z. Arifin, “The Influence of Financial
Knowledge, Control and Income on Individual
Financial Behavior,” European Research
Studies Journal, XX (3A), 635-348, 2017.
[68] R. Komara, A. Widyastuti &
Layyinaturrobaniyah, “Does Financial Literacy
Impact Financial Decision Making Among The
Government Employee,” In Proceedings of the
Journal of Contemporary Accounting and
Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session
for Indonesian Study (JCAE 2018)
Contemporary Accounting Studies in
Indonesia, 174-184, 2018. URL:
https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2018/70188/
70188.pdf
[69] V. R. Sudindra, “Financial Behavior and
Decision-Making,” International Journal of
Creative Research Thoughts IJCRT, 6(1),
1426-1435, 2018. URL:
https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT1802182.pd
f
[70] S. Zulaihat & U. Widyastuti, “Determinants of
consumer financial behavior: Evidence from
Households in Indonesia,” Journal of
Accounting, 6(7), 1193-1198, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.9.008
[71] D. Jurevicienè & E. Gausienè, “Peculiarities of
individuals' financial behavior,” Business:
Theory and Practice, 11(3), 222-237, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2010.25
[72] J. J. Xiao & N. Porto, “Present bias and
financial behavior,” Financial Planning
Review, 2(2), e1048, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1048
[73] S. Ismail, F. A. Faique, M. H. Bakri & Z. M.
Zain, “The Relationship between Financial
Attitude and Financial Goal Towards Financial
Behavior: An Empirical Investigation,” The
Social Sciences, 12(1), 43-47, 2017. URL:
http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/ssci
ence/2017/43-47.pdf
[74] J. Paule-Vianez, R. Gómez-Martínez, C. Prado-
Román, “A bibliometric analysis of behavioral
finance with mapping analysis tools,”
European Research on Management and
Business Economics, 26(2), 71-77, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.01.001
[75] B. Fakhry, “A Literature Review of Behavioral
Finance,” Journal of Economics Library, 3(3),
458-465, 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jel.v3i3.929
[76] B. A. Joo & K. Durri, “Comprehensive review
of literature on behavioral finance,” Indian
Journal of Commerce & Management Studies,
VI(2), 11-19, 2015. URL:
http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/vi
ew/139/133
[77] A. Pimenta & R. Famá, “Behavioral finance: a
bibliometric mapping of academic publications
in USA since 1993,” 2014. URL:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstrac
t_id=240676 3
[78] O. Pasko, I. Balla, I. Levytska, N.
Semenyshena, “Accountability on
Sustainability in Central and Eastern Europe:
An Empirical Assessment of Sustainability-
Related Assurance”, Comparative Economic
Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 24(3),
pp. 27–52, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.20
[79] K. Shaposhnykov, A. Abramova, A.
Zhavoronok, P. Liutikov, I. Skvirskyi & O.
Lukashev, “Ecosystem of VAT Administration
in E-Commerce: Case of the Eastern Europe
Countries”, Estudios de economía aplicada,
39(5), 2021.
http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.4909
[80] M. Dubyna, N. Kholiavko, A. Zhavoronok, Y.
Safonov, D. Krylov, Y. Tochylina, “The ICT
Sector in Economic Development of the
Countries of Eastern Europe: a Comparative
Analysis,” WSEAS Transactions on Business
and Economics, vol. 19, pp. 169-185, 2022
[81] A. Viknianska, D. Kharynovych-Yavorska, M.
Sahaidak, A. Zhavoronok, & V. Filippov,
“Methodological approach to economic
analysis and control of enterprises under
conditions of economic systems
transformation”, Naukovyi Visnyk
Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 4, pp.
150-157, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-4/150
[82] R. Biloskurskyy, A. Verstiak, I. Vinnychuk,
“Sectoral Analysis of Environmental
Economics: The View from Ukraine”,
Scientific Annals of Economics and Business,
66(3), pp. 321-334, 2019.
[83] O. Mykytiuk, Z. Varnalii, D. Nikytenko, S.
Gedek, L. Pashnyuk, “Investment determinants
of economic growth: World experience and
Ukraine”, Intellectual Economicsthis, 2020,
14(2), pp. 106–123, 2020.
[84] V. Lytvynenko, D. Nikytenko, M. Voronenko,
N. Savina, O. Naumov, “Assessing the
Possibility of a Country's Economic Growth
Using Dynamic Bayesian Network Models”,
International Scientific and Technical
Conference on Computer Sciences and
Information Technologies, 1, 9321995, pp. 36–
39, 2020.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
245
Volume 19, 2022
[85] O. Pasko, L. Zhang, K. Bezverkhyi, D.
Nikytenko, L. Khromushyna, “Does external
assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its
higher quality? Empirical evidence from
China”, Investment Management and Financial
Innovations, 18(4), pp. 309-325, 2021.
[86] A. Kornyliuk, Y. Polishchuk, I. Lopashchuk,
A. Pinchuk, “SMEs debt financing in the EU:
on the eve of the coronacrisis,” Banks and Bank
Systems, 15(3), 81-94, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.08
[87] O. Dyba, Y. Polishchuk, A. Ivashchenko,
“Smart-contracts via blockchain as the
innovation tool for smes development,”
Ikonomicheski Izsledvania, 28(6), 39-53, 2019.
[88] B. Danylyshyn, M. Dubyna, M. Zabashtanskyi,
N. Ostrovska, K. Blishchuk, I. Kozak,
“Innovative Instruments of Monetary and
Fiscal Policy,” Universal Journal of
Accounting and Finance, 9(6), 1213-1221,
2021.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090601
[89] N. Ostrovska, N. Hrapko, “Condition and
dynamics of lending analysis in Ukraine (2011-
2013),” Economic Annals-XXI, 9-10(2), 15-18,
2014.
[90] A. Ivashchenko, I. Britchenko, M. Dyba, Ye.
Polishchuk, Yu. Sybirianska, Yu. Vasylyshen,
“Fintech platforms in SME’s financing: EU
experience and ways of their application in
Ukraine,” Investment Management and
Financial Innovations, 15(3), 83-96, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.07
[91] V. Margasova, Y. Kovalenko, O. Bereslavska,
O. Muravskyi, M. Fedyshyn, O. Kolesnik,
“Instruments of monetary-and-credit policy in
terms of economic instability,” International
Journal of Management, Volume 11(5), 43-53,
2020.
https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.5.2020.005
[92] I. Tkachuk, “Asset operations of Ukrainian
banks on the current stage of banking system
development,” Banks and Bank Systems, 12(1-
1), 119-127, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(1-1).2017.04
[93] O. Pasko, F. Chen, A. Oriekhova, A. Brychko,
I. Shalyhina, “Mapping the Literature on
Sustainability Reporting: A Bibliometric
Analysis Grounded in Scopus and Web of
Science Core Collection,” European Journal of
Sustainable Development, 10, 1, 303-322,
2021.
[94] E. Baraibar-Diez, M. Luna, M. D. Odriozola, &
I. Llorente, “Mapping Social Impact: A
Bibliometric Analysis,” Sustainability, 12(22),
9389, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229389
[95] M. Rodrigues, & L. Mendes, “Mapping of the
literature on social responsibility in the mining
industry: A systematic literature review,”
Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 88-101,
2018.
Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0 (Attribution 4.0
International , CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.22
Maksym Dubyna, Olha Popelo,
Nataliia Kholiavko, Artur Zhavoronok,
Maiia Fedyshyn, Inna Yakushko
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
246
Volume 19, 2022