Trust Perception and Payment Method on Marketplace in Indonesia
(Study on Shopee)
AIDA SARI1, MUDJI RACHMAT RAMELAN2, DINA SAFITRI3, NUZUL INAS4
1,2,3,4 Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Lampung,
INDONESIA
Abstract: The rapid development of e-commerce in Indonesia has led to the emergence of competition. One of
the e-commerce platforms that is aggressive in promoting and widely used by Indonesian consumers is Shopee.
Shopee conducts promotions in Indonesia to bring new shopping experiences to facilitate easy sales and
provide shoppers with secure payment processes and integrated logistics arrangements.The research purpose is
to determine reputation’s effect, privacy, size, safeguard, web familiarity, and ease in creating a positive effect
on confidence; and trust variable will have a positive effect on payment methods using the electronic payment
system (EPS), credit cards and cash on delivery on product purchases at online shops in Indonesia. The
research methodology uses quantitative methods with a cross-sectional research design by distributing
questionnaires online with a Google Form, with 248 respondents. The study led to the findings of the
perceptions of trust significantly influenced by security, benefits, and convenience, while reputation, privacy,
size, and web familiarization do not affect trust. Furthermore, trust affects the electronic payment method
(EPS), credit card, and cash on delivery. The limitation of the study is in the sampling method which covers not
all regions in Indonesia. Contribution: as a company, Shopee should maintain security, the benefits, and
convenience to develop strategies using electronic payment methods.
Keywords: Online Shop, E-commerce, trust and method of payment.
Received: May 9, 2021. Revised: December 4, 2021. Accepted: January 3, 2022. Published: January 4, 2022.
1 Introduction
E-commerce has defined as buying process,
retailing, and commercialized the goods and
services electronically as business transaction,
both B2C and or B2B by using the internet. E-
commerce has become a business alternative in
the modern era which is in line with
increasingly dynamic market conditions and
competitive competition, resulting in changes in
consumer behavior.
According to Tech in Asia, there are five-
business models of E-commerce in Indonesia,
including classified ads, marketplaces C2C,
shopping malls, B2C stores, and online stores
on social media. One of the marketplace
applications currently being used in Indonesia is
Shopee, that benefits the E-commerce business
by using mobile devices. Shopee positions
itself as a marketplace application. Shopee
exists in Indonesia to bring a new shopping
experience, facilitate easy sales, and equip
buyers with secure payment processes and
integrated logistics arrangements.
Maqableh et al. (2015) stated that the
payment system that will be resolved through
the application system faces many threats;
therefore, the system of remittance is
deliberated to keeping the safeguard and data
protection, and has the technique to produce
reliable transaction records. The problem of
consumer confidence in safety of personal data
protection of online remittance is necessary
because electronic payment systems have been
habituated as a common media for banking
transactions. Some of banking activities such
as payments and transfers now shift to mobile
devices that offers more flexibility in time and
place. Mobile transaction is considered as an
effective and efficient way than the traditional
financial transactions.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
62
Volume 19, 2022
Sumanjeet (2009) stated that the electronic
payment system method is a challenge because
it includes elements of trust measurement as
part of customer payment services using
payment methods, and requires efforts to
convince people who have an experience of
being dissatisfied with online payment systems,
and prefer to make payments in cash due to the
consideration of the trust factor. The most
considerably reason is trust insufficiency from
the customers that experience frequent failures,
online fraudulence, the limited number of
electronic payments options, that breeds the
uncertainty of the users for using such of
technology. The product itself usually does not
exist during transactions through E-commerce
platforms, so the lack of trust and acceptance
becomes important for customers. This research
is expected to yield valuable insights into how
customers behave when using Shopee's
payment methods.
2 Problem Formulation
2.1 Problem formulation and Hypothesis
Some studies only link between the factors
that influence trust in the marketplace, and very
rarely in developing countries that focus on
trust factors that affect the payment system to
be made. Therefore, the formulation of the
problem in this study is whether perceptions of
reputation, privacy, size, security, benefits, and
convenience form a positive influence on
perceptions of trust and whether trust has a
positive effect on purchases using EPS
(Electronic Payment System), credit cards and
cash on delivery (COD).
Based on the description of the former
research, we construct the first hypothesis,:
H1: Perceptions of reputation, privacy, size,
security, benefits, website user friendly, and
convenience have a significant impact to
trust.
Kim et al. (2010) indicated that the payment
system is a perception of user friendly and
usefulness. There are six elements that affect
electronic payment systems, consisting of
safeguard, user friendly, trustworthiness,
interoperability, common problems, and
additional services. Based on the six factors
above, a lot of effort is needed to generate
mutual trust between traders and customers
in online shopping. Nuri (2014) stated that
security and trust contribute pivotal role to
Privacy standpoint
Claire (2004) explains that privacy is a form
of personality protection. This explanation
explains that privacy is a situation where
someone is allowed to keep individual
information. In addition, privacy is defined as
the ability of individuals to manage the
completeness of personal information, where
the information will be needed and used by
other parties (Ackerman and Culnan, 2002). In
e-commerce, privacy itself is defined as the
willingness of consumers to provide
information via the internet before deciding to
buy an item (Ackerman and Culnan, 2002).
Concerning other people, humans have a
reference to the level of privacy they want.
The relationship between privacy space in
e-commerce is that privacy is the willingness of
consumers to provide information via the
internet before someone decides to buy an item
(Ackerman, 2002); and Culnan (2000). Privacy
on the internet includes 'spam,' data, choices,
and information sharing with e-commerce
service providers. Consumers also ask for
assurances that the information they provide is
limited and regulated by the person concerned
(Belanger, 2002) and (Hoffman, 1999).
Everyone has severe protection of the
privacy of each individual. The information
they provide to sellers in e-commerce is given
by customers very carefully (Hoffman, 1997).
When a consumer maintains their privacy, they
usually prefer to provide incomplete
information to internet providers. The privacy
provided to a website carries a risk of misuse of
that information. In other words, the more a
person feels that a web address well guards the
information provided, the higher the level of
one's trust in a web address will be. (Franzak,
2001).
The privacy standpoint above raises one
hypothesis below, namely:
H2: Perceived privacy forms a positive
impact on trust
Measurement standpoint
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
63
Volume 19, 2022
Perception of size refers to a buyer's
perception of the company's size as being more
significant than the size of the existing
store/office (Jarvenpaa, 2000). According to
Doney (1997) in Jarvenpaa (2000), perception
is one metric by which a large company's size
can persuade other consumers to trust it, and
many companies are successful at it.
A large size indicates that the business can
handle product or service failures and
compensate its customers (Jarvenpaa, 2000). A
large company's characteristics must also
include controlling its suppliers and services, as
the more significant the company, the more
other parties invest in it.
Hypotheses that can be built from the
explanation above are:
H3: Perception of firm size forms a positive
impact on Trust.
Security standpoint
E-commerce security is a significant control
issue for companies that run e-commerce
(Laudon and Laudon, 2005). Data related to e-
commerce, such as buyer and seller data, must
be kept confidential when consumers are in
electronic transmission. Additionally, the
transmitted data must be protected from being
altered or modified by anyone other than the
sender (Belanger, 2002).
According to Audun (2007), security, in
general, can be interpreted as a state of being
free from danger. This understanding is
comprehensive and includes a person's sense of
protection from intentional and unintentional
crimes, such as natural disasters. A security
threat is defined as a situation, condition, or
event that has the potential to damage data or
networks, which can be in the form of
destruction, leakage, alteration, and misuse of
data (Kalakota and Whinston, 1996) in
(Belanger, 2002).
Consumer security concerns in e-commerce
can be addressed through the use of protection
technology. These technologies are categorized
as security features when they are used
(Belanger, 2002).
According to Icove (2000), based on
security holes, security can be classified into
four, namely: physical security (physical
security), security related to people (personnel),
data security (data security), and media and
communication techniques (communications). ).
Security in operations includes policies and
procedures used to set up and manage security
systems and post-attack recovery procedures.
The management of the security of the online
payment system can be seen from the side of
risk management. Rahardjo (2005) suggests
using the "Risk Management Model" to deal
with threats (managing threats).
Three components contribute to risk,
namely assets, vulnerabilities, and threats. E-
commerce network security that provides
features such as guarantees, contracts, or other
procedures ensures that payment security exists
and runs well (McKnight, 2002 and Shapiro,
1987).
Someone who has a high perception of
structural assurance will firmly believe that
internet technology (e.g., data encryption)
protects so that someone believes that
transactions via the internet can run safely
(McKnight, 2002).
Encryption, legal protection, and technology
safeguards keep consumers from losing money
and privacy. According to Gefen (2003),
security guarantees can be built into e-
commerce sites through collaboration with third
parties who have a good reputation in network
security issues and provide internet security
assurance standards with web assurance seals
such as Verisign E-TRUST, Good House
Keeping, and CPA Web Trusts.
Consumers who feel safe with the internet
environment will tend to trust websites that
provide electronic commerce services compared
to people who feel that the internet is not safe
because they do not believe that there is
adequate protection on e-commerce sites.
From this theory, the fourth hypothesis is
generated, namely:
H4: Perceived security has a positive impact
on trust
Benefit standpoint
Rahmatsyah (2011) defines perceived
usefulness as the subjective probability of
potential users using a particular application to
facilitate the performance of their work. This
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
64
Volume 19, 2022
simplified performance can produce better
physical and non-physical, such as the results
obtained will be faster and with more satisfying
results compared to not using the product with
the new technology. According to Mangin et
al., (2008:14).
Perception of benefits is defined as the
degree to which a person believes that using
technology will increase his/her performance at
work, meaning that the benefits of internet
banking facilities will be able to increase
performance productivity for people who use
the facility.
According to Almuntaha (2008:14), user
perceptions of the benefits of technology can be
measured from several factors:
The use of technology can increase user
productivity.
The use of technology can improve user
performance.
The use of technology can increase the
efficiency of user processes.
The hypotheses that can be built from the
literature review above are:
H5: Perceived benefits form a positive
impact on trust
Engagement standpoint
Marofi et al. (2012), examines and observes
consumer behavior and impressions of security
and trust in e-payment systems based on
proximity to the website. Rouibah (2012) found
several influencing variables, including internet
experience, personal innovativeness, habit,
tendency to trust. The presence of a third party,
the intention when using the e-payment system
through the connecting variables, the perception
of pleasure, the perception of risk, and trust.
Koufaris and Hampton-Sosa investigated
the level of consumer confidence in the
company's business website after the customer's
first visit to the company's website. The
investigation results found that consumer
perceptions of the company's reputation and
willingness to improve goods and services have
a tangible impact on consumer confidence.
In addition, usability, ease of use, and
security controls are also suspected of having a
significant impact on trust.
The hypotheses raised from the above
theory are:
H6: Familiarity with the website builds
consumer trust
Convenience standpoint
Jogiyanto (2009) states that perceived ease
of use is defined as the extent to which a person
believes that using technology will be free from
effort. As implied by definition, ease perception
is a belief about the decision-making process. If
a consumer believes an information system is
straightforward to use, he or she will use it.
Sun and Zhang (2011) identified the
dimensions of perceived ease, namely, ease to
learn (easy to learn), ease to use (easy to use),
clear and understandable (straightforward and
easy to understand), and become skillful
(becoming skilled).
The hypothesis that emerged from the
theory above is:
H7: Perceived convenience forms a positive
impact on trust
Trust standpoint
The primary determinant that affects e-
commerce is trust that the trust strongly
influences consumer behavior on the internet.
Besides that, it can increase social status and
make purchases in the marketplace (Gefen,
2000).
The study conducted by Tan and Thoen
(2001) focused on two main activities, namely
electronic payments, and cross-border trade,
introducing a model of the level of trust
depending on the individuals involved in the
transaction, that the two main factors of the
level of trust in transactions are the trust of
other parties and control mechanisms. Both of
these factors have objective and subjective
aspects.
With the high level of uncertainty and
dynamics in cyberspace, trust appears and is
determined as a direct determinant of attitude
(Gefen and Straub, 2003; Hassanein and Head,
2007; Lin, 2011).
Trust can also be referred to as one's belief
in trusting others which can be determined by
perceived integrity, benevolence, and
competence (McKnight et al., 2002; Lin, 2011).
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
65
Volume 19, 2022
Simply put, trust can be described as the
expectation that others will not behave
opportunistically and that the vendor will
deliver what has been promised (Gefen et al.,
2003).
Trust is emphasized as one factor that
significantly influences e-commerce (Abbad et
al., 2011), especially online shopping (Faqih,
2011). According to Abbad et al. (2011), trust
and security are among the primary constructs
for e-commerce.Higher quality e-commerce
sites usually result in higher perceptions of trust
(Hsiao et al., 2010).The context of building
trust is a very challenging process and critical in
shaping consumer attitudes in a developing
country (Lee et al., 2010; Al-Debei and Al-
Lozi, 2014).
Payment methods standpoint
Tsiakis and Sthephanides (2005) imply that
trust and security are two crucial and essential
determinants for any electronic payment system
used as a medium for financial transactions.
Kim et al. (2010) stated that the payment
system perceives ease of use and usefulness.
Nuri (2014) stated that security and trust were
found to play an essential role in attracting and
gaining customer loyalty.
The description of previous studies as
described above builds several hypotheses,
namely:
H8: Perceived trust has a positive impact on
purchase intention using EPS
H9: Perceived trust has a positive effect on
actual purchases using credit cards
H10: Perceived trust has a positive effect on
actual purchases using cash on delivery.
2.2 Research Method
The methodology that is applied for this
study is a quantitative method, that use a cross-
sectional research design where data collection
activities are carried out from one respondent at
a time. The population and sample of this
research are buyers at online Shopee in
Indonesia by applying non-probability sampling
or with a sampling method, which is
convenience sampling, namely members of the
population who are selected based on the
judgment from the researchers.
The number of samples in research using
PLS (partial least square) SEM must have a
minimum of five times the number of questions
in the questionnaire (Hair et al., 2014), so the
total number of questionnaires in this study is 5
x 44 questions so that the respondents in this
study are 220 respondents.
The research questionnaire was designed by
using closed questions in which each variable to
be examined using five measurement scales
(Likert). In distributing research questionnaires,
we use Google-Form by sending questionnaire
links online and explain what will be done to
respondents via social media such as
WhatsApp, Line, direct massage on Instagram
and other social media so that it can speed up
and also make it easier for respondents to fill
out them and the results will be stored digitally.
The components in this research were
adopted from the research of Maqableh et al.
(2015) which is closely related to trust
behaviour and online shopping payment
methods for Shopee in Indonesia (Appendix 1).
All constructs in this study were measured by a
Likert scale, and used a 5-point scale from 1
with information "strongly disagree" to 5
"strongly agree".
The fit test of the overall PLS SEM model
can be seen in TABLE 1, which shows the fit
results. It can be seen that the structural model
testing phase (inner model) can be done using
the following Good of Model Fit.
Table 1. Goodness of Model Fit
Goodness Model of Fit
Original Value (Saturated
Model)
Estimated Model
SRMR
0.067
0.099
d_ULS
4.430
9.688
d_G
1.537
1.703
Source: Data Analysed with Smart PLS Version 3
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
66
Volume 19, 2022
The result of the SRMR (referred to the
Standardized Root Mean Square Residual)
figure is the level of prediction error for the
independent variable on the dependant variable.
The residual estimate in this research is the
smaller original value of 0.1. d_ULS (The
Squared Euclidean Distance) and d_G (The
Geodesic Distance) define that a representative
research model must indicate the figure that is
bigger than 0.05 (if using a 95% confidence
interval) or >0.01 (if using a 99% confidence
interval). This means that the research model
has a low residual distribution. Then the
validity test is valid by looking at the square
root of average variance (AVE) value which has
a loading factor above 0.5 and the reliability test
results can be seen from the results of
composite reliability having a value above 0.7
or can also be strengthened by Conbach's
Alpha. (Appendix 2).
3 Problem Solution
The results of distributing questionnaires were
conducted on a non-probability basis through
Google-Form collected 248 which can be
processed into research data. The profiles of
respondents who filled out the questionnaire are
as follows:
Table 2. Respondent Characteristic
Type of Characteristic
Characteristic
Total
Percentage
Sex
Male
78
31,45%
Female
170
68,55%
Age
18 – 30 years old
194
78,23%
30 – 40 years old
15
6,05%
40 – 50 years old
21
8,47%
> 50 years old
18
7,25%
Occupation
Students
147
59,27%
Private-Company Employees
43
17,34%
Civil Servants
47
18,95%
State-owned Enterprise Employees
11
4,44%
Income
< IDR 3 millions
173
69,35%
IDR 3 millions up to IDR 6 millions
50
20,16%
IDR 6 millions up to IDR 9 millions
15
6,05%
> IDR 9 millions
11
4,44%
Shopping Frequency
< 3 times
87
34,68%
6 times
65
26,21%
9 times
20
8,06%
>12 times
77
31,05%
Shopping Cost
<IDR 1.5 millions
188
75,40%
IDR 1.5 millions up to IDR 3 millions
49
19,76%
IDR 3 millions up to IDR 4.5 millions
4
1,61%
> IDR 4.5 millions
8
3,23%
The results of the distribution of the
questionnaires of this study indicate that most
of the respondents who shop online at Shopee
are women with the respondents of the
millennial-age group, which is 78,23 percent
and the shopping frequency more than 12 times
of 31,05 percent. This group is the most active
in shopping online at Shopee. This happens
because consumer confidence in the security of
the online payment system is needed (Maqableh
et al., 2015).
Table 3. Determinant coefficients
Model
R Square
Perceived trust
0.644
Purchase intention to use EPS
0.438
Actual purchase using credit
0.016
Actual purchase using on
delivery
0.023
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
67
Volume 19, 2022
The findings of the coefficient of
determination show that the effect of total
reputation perception, privacy perception, scale
perception, safeguard perception, perceived
usefulness, user friendly perception, and trust
perception by 64,4% percent. The trust
perception variable intention to buy by EPS
contributed 43,8%. Trust perception towards
factual buying using credit card contributed
1,60 % and the variable trust perception
towards factual buying using on cash-on-
delivery contributed 2,30 %.
After going through the coefficient of
determination, the next stage is testing the
hypothesis, which is the last stage after all the
parameters have been known.
Table 4. Hypothesis Test
Model
Original
Sample
Mean of
the ample
Standard
Deviation
T-Value
P-Value
Note
Reputation perception -
> perceived trust
0.043
0.054
0.070
0.613
0.540
Not significant
Privacy perception
-> Trust perception
0.119
0.117
0.064
1.841
0.066
Not significant
Scale perception --
> Trust perception
0.003
0.002
0.059
0.047
0.963
Not significant
Privacy perception ->
Trust perception
0.456
0.452
0.059
7.749
0.000
significant
Perceived usefulness
(PU)-> Trust
perception
0.150
0.155
0.059
2.560
0.011
significant
User friendly
perception (PE) ->
Trust perception
0.030
0.020
0.082
0.363
0.716
Not significant
Perceived ease of use -
> Trust perception
0.156
0.162
0.070
2.227
0.026
significant
Perceived trust ->
Intention of buying by
employing EPS
0.662
0.665
0.032
20.645
0.000
significant
Perceived trust ->
Factual buying by
credit cards
0.127
0.134
0.064
1.986
0.048
significant
Perceived trust ->
Factual buying with
cash-on-delivery
system
0.152
0.157
0.061
2.484
0.013
significant
Hypothesis results
H1 Reputation Perception is not significant
to perceived trust seen from the P-value
0.540. The first hypothesis is not supported.
Unlike previous research conducted by
(Gul, Roshana 2014) proved that reputation
is positive and significant to trust.
H2 Privacy perception is not significant to
Trust perception seen from P-value 0.066.
Hypothesis 2 does not support
H3 Scale perception is not significant to
trust perception seen from the P-value
0.963. The third hypothesis does not support
H4 Privacy perception is significant to Trust
perception as seen from the P-value 0.000.
The 4th hypothesis supports
H5 Perceived usefulness is significant to
trust perception seen from the P-value of
0.011. The 5th hypothesis supports
H6 User-friendly perception is not
significant to Trust perception seen from P-
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
68
Volume 19, 2022
value 0.716. The 6th hypothesis does not
support
H7 Perceived ease of use is significant to
Trust perception as seen from the P-value
0.026. The 7th hypothesis supports
H8 Perceived trust is significant on
Intention of buying by employing EPS as
seen from the P-value 0.000. The 8th
hypothesis supports
H9 Perceived trust is significant to the
factual buying by credit cards seen from the
P-value 0.048. The 9th hypothesis supports
H10 Perceived trust is significant on factual
buying with cash-on-delivery system seen
from P-value 0.013
These results show that there is an
implication of belief-formers on online
shopping on Shopee application in Indonesia,
which is determined by safety, benefits, and
convenience factors that have a very significant
effect. This supports the research of Abbad et al
(2011) where trust and safeguard are two main
constructs for E-commerce. High calibre E-
commerce sites gain bigger perception of trust
from its customers (Hsiao et.al, 2010) and the
remarkable actions to gain customer’s trust will
form the consumer attitudes in a developing
country (Lee et al., 2010; Al-Debei and Al-
Lozi, 2014).
These results indicate that there are findings
related to the willingness of customers who
shop online through the Shopee application, is
that they will buy products from Shopee by
making payments via EPS. This finding
supports the research of Tsiakis and
Sthephanides (2005), the credence and
safeguard are most pivotal and indispensable
factors for electronic payment system that is
applied as the tool to financial activities. In
addition, Nuri (2014) stated that security and
trust are important roles in attracting and earn
customer loyalty.
The findings also prove the trust perception
is influenced by the safety, benefits, and
convenience of shopping online at Shopee in
Indonesia, and the perception of the payment
method for purchasing the most influential
factor is by using EPS. Therefore, marketplace
service providers such as Shopee might build
trust by focusing on the safety, benefits, and
convenience of doing online shopping. Further
for the long term, service providers may
develop payment methods through EPS.
Consumers will be most likely to make
purchases online at Shopee with a high level of
trust and payment methods via EPS. If trust,
security, ease of payment have been satisfied by
consumers, consumers will be directly
recommended about the online services offered
by shopee in Indonesia.
4 Conclusion
Based on the results of the research
conducted by using of PLS SEM, the trust
variable is a multidimensional construct
consisting of reputation, privacy, size, benefits,
security, benefits, web familiarity, and
convenience. This result shows that the p-value
is not all indicators that have loading to the
latent variable which is less than 0.05.
This research proves that the factors that
have a significant effect are the safety, benefits,
and convenience of using Shopee as an e-
commerce platform in Indonesia. In addition,
this research also shows an eloquent impact of
trust on payment methods using EPS, credit
cards, and cash on delivery.
The implication for Shopee is to provide
online shopping services such as how to build a
security strategy, benefits, and convenience for
consumers to access Shopee online and another
strategic implication is to develop an electronic
payment method (EPS). The use of EPS can be
relied on in the payment system for online
shopping and by providing a high-security risk
and convenience, consumers will certainly be
loyal to Shopee.
References:
[1] Abbad, M., Abbad, R., and Saleh, M.
(2011), “Limitations of e-commerce in
developing countries: Jordan case”,
Education, Business and Society:
Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues,
Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 280-291.
[2] Al-Debei, M.M. and Al-Lozi, E. (2014),
“Explaining and predicting the adoption
intention of mobile data services: a
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
69
Volume 19, 2022
value-based approach Computers in
Human Behavior, Vol. 35, pp. 326-338
[3] Audun. Josang, 2007. Trust and
Reputation System. The International
Journal of Management Science, pp. 725
737
[4] Belanger, France et al. 2002.
Trustworthiness in Electronic
Commerce: The Role of Privacy,
Security, and Site Attributes. Journal of
Strategic Information Systems, 11.
(Online), USA.
[5] D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W.
(2003), “Trust and TAM in online
shopping: an integrated model”, MIS
Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 51-90.
[6] Doney, P.M, & Cannon, J.P. (1997). An
Examination of the nature of trust in
buyer- seller relationships. Journal of
Marketing, Vol.30, Issue.2, MCB UP
Ltd.
[7] Slater (1997), “Developing a customer
value-based theory of the firm”, Journal
of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Vol. 25 pp.162 –167.
[8] Gefen, D. (2000) E-commerce: The Role
of Familiarity and Trust. The
International Journal of Management
Science, 28, 725-737.
[9] Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2003),
“Managing user trust in B2C e-
services”, E- service journal, Vol. 2 No.
2, pp.7-24.
[10] Gotsi, M. and Wilson, A. (2001),
"Corporate reputation: seeking a
definition", Corporate Communications:
An International Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1,
pp. 24-30.
[11] Hsiao, K., Lin, J., Wang, X., Lu, H. and
Yu, H. (2010), “Antecedents and
consequences of trust in online product
recommendations: an empirical study in
social shopping”, Online Information
Review, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 935-953.
[12] Jarvenpaa, S. L., 2000. Consumer trust
in an internet store. Information
Technology and Management, Volume 1,
pp. 45-71.
[13] Kim, C., Tao, W., Shin, N. and Kim,
K.S. (2010) An Empirical Study of
Customers’ Perceptions of Security and
Trust in E-Payment Systems.
Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications, 9, 84-95. use mobile
payment. Computers in Human
Behavior, 26, pp.310–32.
[14] Lee, I., Kim, J., Choi, B. and Hong, S.J.
(2010), “Measurement development for
cultural characteristics of mobile internet
users at the individual level”, Computers
in Human Behavior, Vol. 26 No. 6,
pp.1355-1368
[15] Lin, H.F. (2011), “An empirical
investigation of mobile banking
adoption: the effect of innovation
attributes and knowledge-based trust”,
International Journal of Information
Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp.252-260
[16] Mangin, Jean. P. L., Bourgault N., dan
Guerrero M. M. 2008. Modelling
Perceived Usefulness on Adopting
Online Banking Through the TAM
Model in A Canadian Banking
Environment. Journal of Internet
Banking and Commerce. (online), Vol.
16, No.1
[17] McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and
Kacmar, C. (2002), “Developing and
validating trust measures for e-
commerce: an integrative typology”,
Information Systems Research, Vol. 13
No. 3, pp.334-359
[18] Sarah Nyengerai, Divaries Jaravaza,
Paul Mukucha, Ranganai Chirimubwe
and Evans Manjoro. (2013).
Determinants of Perception towards
Private Label Brands in Zimbabwe: The
Role of Familiarity, Store Image,
Demographic Factors and Consumer
Characteristics. Greener Journal of
Business and Management Studies Vol.
3 (5), pp.224-230.
[19] Sumanjeet, S. (2009) Emergence of
Payment Systems in the Age of
Electronic Commerce: The State of Art.
Global Journal of International
Business Research,17-36.
[20] Tsiakis, T., & Sthephanides, G. (2005).
The concept of security and trust in
electronic payments. Computers &
Security, 24(1), 10– 1
[21] Faqih, K.M.S. (2011), “Integrating
perceived risk and trust with technology
acceptance model: an empirical
assessment of customers’ acceptance of
online shopping in Jordan”, 2011
International Conference on Research
and Innovation in Information Systems
(ICRIIS), I EEE, pp.1-5.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
70
Volume 19, 2022
[22] Nuri, H. (2014) A Study of Role of the
Factors Influencing the Acceptance of E-
Banking. No. 3, 521-525.
[23] Hoffman, L.D. and Novak T.P. 1998.
Building Consumer Trust in Online
Environment: The Case for
Information’s Security. Project 2000
Working Paper. (Online), Vanderbilt
University.
[24] Sun Zhang, 2011, Optimal VAr planning
in area power system. International
Conference on Power System
Technology.
[25] Ackerman, Marks S., and Donald T.
Davis, Jr. Privacy and Security Issues in
E-Commerce. The New Economy
Handbook. (Online), USA.
[26] Almuntaha, Eska. 2008. Faktor-Faktor
yang Mempengaruhi Pengadopsian
Teknologi Internet Banking oleh
Nasabah di Indonesia. Skripsi.
Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Islam Indonesia
[27] C.Laudon, Kenneth & P. Laudon, Jane.
2005. System Information Management
[28] Jogiyanto. (2008). Sistem Informasi
Keperilakuan. Yogyakarta: Andi.
[29] Maqableh, M. (2012) Analysis and
Design Security Primitives Based on
Chaotic Systems for eCommerce.
Durham University
APENDIX 1. Variable Operational
Perceived Reputation (PR): (Adapted from
Maqableh et al., 2015)
PR1 Shopee is most favorable website for
shopping online
PR2 Shopee is a trusted website for shopping
online
PR3 Shopee is the top-picked website for
shopping online
PR4 Shopee cares about online customers
Privacy perception (PP): (Adapted from
Maqableh et al., 2015)
PP1 I believe that I recognize all the
companies that benefited from data
collection that I supply during my
activities in Shopee
PP2 I understand the data that I have to supply
to Shopee during a transaction
PP3 I am sure that the data I provide to Shopee
is verifiable
PP4 I am convinced that my data will not be
disclosed by Shopee without my
permission
Scale perception (PS): (Adapted from
Maqableh et al., 2015)
PS1 Shopee is a giant firm
PS2 Shopee is one of biggest supplier’s in
industry for online shopping
PS3 Shopee is a huge platform
PS4 Shopee are available in regional and
global networks
Perceived security (PC): (Adapted from
Maqableh et al., 2015)
PC1 I think Shopee's electronic payment
system is safe.
PC2 I consider the data related to
customers’ transactions using
Electronic payment systems at Shopee
is safe
PC3 I presume that illegal parties are
banned to get my data that I supply
during transactions at Shopee
PC4 I do not worry of the hacker assault of
Shopee's electronic payment system
Perceived usefulness (PU): (Adapted from
Maqableh et al., 2015)
PU1 Buying at Shopee enhances my buying
performance
PU2 Buying at Shopee escalate my
purchase productivity.
PU3 Buying at Shopee escalate my
effectiveness
PU4 Buying at Shopee is practical
Habitual using the website (FW): (Adapted
from Maqableh et al., 2015)
FW1 It is common for me to use Shopee
FW2 I repeatedly is looking for an item at
Shopee
FW3 Buying process in Shopee is well-
known for me
FW4 It is a habitual for me to buy from
Shopee
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
71
Volume 19, 2022
User friendly perception (PE): (Adapted from
Maqableh et al., 2015)
PE1 It is a piece of cake for me to learn
about Shopee
PE2 My dealing with Shopee is transparent
and articulate
PE3 I hope no problem to be familiar to use
Shopee
PE4 Shopee is easy to use for online
consumers
Perceived trust (PT): (Adapted from Maqableh
et al., 2015)
PT1 I am convinced that my activities at
Shopee are secured
PT2 My activities with Shopee tend to be
reliable
PT3 Shopee will immediately notify me of
any transaction problems
PT4 I am sure my activities with Shopee
website or application will be crystal-
clear
Intention of buying by employing EPS (P1):
(Adapted from Maqableh et al., 2015)
P11 I will likely buy products from Shopee
P12 I will consider buying products from
Shopee from now on
P13 Probably I would purchase products
from Shopee from now on
P14 Every chance I have, I intend to buy
products from Shopee
Factual buying by credit cards (AP) : (Adapted
from Maqableh et al., 2015)
AP1 I often purchase online in Shopee by
using my credit cards
AP2 I made intensive online purchases at
Shopee using a credit card
AP3 Majority of my purchases in Shopee
are paid by credit cards
AP4 I would like to continue my purchasing
through Shopee by using credit card in
the future
Factual buying with cash-on-delivery system
(AO) : (Adapted from Maqableh et al., 2015)
AO1 I often make online purchases from
Shopee with money (cash-on-delivery)
AO2 I made intensive buying through
internet from Shopee using money
(cash-on-delivery)
AO3 Mostly, I purchased frequently through
Shopee by cash payment (cash-on-
delivery).
AO4 I would like to continue my purchasing
through Shopee by cash in the future
APENDIX 2. Validity and Reliability Test
Variable
Average Variance
Extracted (AVE)
Composite
Reliability
Cronbach’
Alpha
rho A
Perceived reputation
0,599
0,856
0,776
0,782
Perceived privacy
0,581
0,847
0,760
0,765
Perceived size
0,737
0,918
0,880
0.885
Perceived security
0,656
0,882
0,821
0,852
Perceived usefulness
0,720
0,911
0,870
0,873
Familiarity with the
web
0,750
0,923
0,889
0,923
Perceived user
friendly
0,736
0,918
0,880
0,887
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
72
Volume 19, 2022
Trust perception
0,613
0,864
0,791
0,807
Purchase intention to
use EPS
0,681
0,894
0,842
0,877
Actual purchase using
credit
0,880
0,967
0,954
0,967
Actual purchase usimg
cash delivery
0,901
0,973
0,964
0,990
Source: Data analyzed by using SmartPLS Version3
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0)
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
ed.en_US
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.7
Aida Sari, Mudji Rachmat Ramelan,
Dina Safitri, Nuzul Inas
E-ISSN: 2224-2899
73
Volume 19, 2022