of fifteen Portuguese Hospitals S.A. that went through this contracting process from 2003 to 2017, in order to
calculate the four indicators, such as: Return On Assets (ROA); Return On Equity (ROE); Economic Value
Added (EVA) and the Market Value Added (MVA). For each of these indicators, were analyzed and compared
the resulted effects between the period of two years before and two years after the contracting process. From the
obtained results, we can conclude that contracting process had little impact on the economic performance of
Portuguese Hospitals and the resulting impact was not favorable.
Key-Words: Contracting, Economic performance, Health System.
Received: May 7, 2021. Revised: December 8, 2021. Accepted: December 30, 2021. Published: January 3, 2022.
1 Introduction
Health is a vital sector in the economy and society. It
has a significant impact not only on a personal level
but also on a social level, in the development of
companies, in the State itself, and its economic,
financial, political, scientific, and technological
growth. Efficiency in allocating resources has always
been a desirable goal over the years, but it is not easy
to achieve. The truth is that there is a lot of loss in the
allocation of resources.
All health systems currently in existence were based
on their development and evolution on two primary
models: the Bismarckian Model and the Beveridgean
Model. These models are based on the principle
that access to health care does not depend on
citizens' ability to pay, but only on their needs,
so the contribution depends on income
(Carrondo, 2014) [1].
The Bismarckian Model was first adopted in
Germany in 1883, with Chancellor Otto Bismarck,
who inaugurated and developed this system, which
today still influences central Europe's health systems.
This social security model, imposed by the State, is
based on the following characteristics: insurance is
mandatory; intends to guarantee the risk coverage of
workers for others; its funding comes from social
contributions based on wages, in charge of employers
and workers, and the management of each benefit is
organized in boxes, which are managed by the State,
with the participation of taxpayers.
Although it is based on social insurance, where
access to citizens is universal, this insurance is
conditioned by the employment situation - once it is
supported by the contributory effort of wages and
employers. In this way, the model benefits the most
disadvantaged workers, not leaving aside those
workers who have more fair wages through this
health insurance scheme [2] (Simões, 2004). This
model was adopted and adapted by other countries,
like Austria, Holland, or Switzerland [3].
The Beveridgeano Model originated in England and
has as main characteristics universal rights, intended
for all citizens, limited by the financial, human, and
technical resources available, but ensuring social
minimums for all, in conditions of need. It is a public
system based on four basic principles: universal
access, the inclusion of all treatments, free of charge,
and financing from the general state budget. Its
financing derives from tax taxes, in which the right to
health is independent of work and employment,
which corresponds to the well-known national health
services [3].
Some countries, such as France, Belgium, and Japan,
represent a mixed model, which, although inspired by
the Bismarckian system, associates the compulsory
insurance principle with social protection, opening
up numerous non-contributory benefits to the most
disadvantaged [3]. These two models forced
employers and employees to discount health
insurance in a combination of public and private
providers to ensure citizens' health.
Due to several economic, political, and social factors,
there was a need to resort to mixed models that result
from the combination of the Bismarck and Beveridge
Models, bringing typical market mechanisms to the
traditional health system. In this context, the Market
Model emerges, which is structured according to the
purchasing power of health insurance by individuals
and companies; that is, adherence depends on
citizens' consumption capacity [4] (Dinis, 2013).
The United States of America (USA) does not have a
public health system similar to the European one, as
it is not based on the Beveridge Model or the
Bismarck Model. Its health system has a mixed social
and private insurance system, in which systems are
opposed [3]. This model is organized based on the
ability of individuals and companies to purchase
health insurance.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.37394/23207.2022.19.2
Gualter Couto, Maria Rocha,
Pedro Pimentel, Jacinto Garrido Velarde,
Rui Alexandre Castanho