4 Convergence analysis
The convergence follows directly from that of the
classic ADMM because the problem is convex and
the variables can be grouped into two
blocks and For fixed values of
, the updates of are independent of
one another. Because of this, the above iteration is
a direct application of ADMM.
Theorem 4.1. For and
then ADMM (11) converges.
Proof. By letting
in (8), and the
Lagrangian function be of the form
the convergence analysis of the classical results from
current ADMM, [10], [12], [13], [14], yields the fol-
lowing result.
5 Numerical experiments
In this section, we show some numerical examples us-
ing the Algorithm 1 in image restoration compared
with TV-ADMM and ADMM.
Our hybrid model is implemented via the alternat-
ing minimization method with the equivalent param-
eters and
Moreover, the regularization coefficients are firmly
chosen as and
The Peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) in decibel (dB)
as follows:
where is an original image and is an estimated
image at iteration respectively.
The stopping criteria of the algorithm is
All codes were written
in Matlab 2017b and run on Dell i-5 Core laptop.
Experimental results are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2,
Figure 3 and Figure 4 in the Appendix.
6 Conclusions
We propose an algorithm to perform second order to-
tal generalized variation using shearlet regularization.
We compared its results with those of TV-ADMM and
ADMM on four images. On the contrary, the TGV-
ADMM had a better than two methods .
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by (i) Rambhai Barni Ra-
jabhat University (RBRU), (ii) Thailand Science Re-
search and Innovation (TSRI), and (iii) National
Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF)
4369065 (Grant number 1121/2566).
References:
[1] A. Tikhonov and V. Arsenin, Solution of ill-
Posed Problems, Winston, Washington, DC,
1977.
[2] L. Rudin, S. Osher and E. Fatemi, Nonlin-
ear total variation based noise removal algo-
rithms, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Vol.
60, No.1-4, 1992, pp. 259-268.
[3] J. E. Aujol, G. Gilboa, T. Chan and S. Os-
her, Structure-texture image decomposition-
modeling, algorithms, and parameter selection,
Int. J. Comput. Vision, Vol.67, 2006, pp. 111-
136.
[4] F. Knoll, K. Bredies, T. Pock and R. Stoll-
berger , Second order total generalized vari-
ation (TGV) for MRI, Magn. Reson. Med.,
Vol.65, No.2, 2011, pp. 480-491 .
[5] W. Guo, J. Qin and W. Yin, A new detail-
preserving regularization scheme, SIAM J.
Imaging Sci., Vol.7, No.2, 2014, pp. 1309-1334
.
[6] T. Jia, Y. Shi, Y. Zhu and L. Wang, An image
restoration model combining mixed fi-
delity terms, J. Vis. Commun. Image R., Vol.38,
2016, pp. 461-473.
[7] X. Liu, Augmented Lagrangian method for to-
tal generalized variation based Poissonian im-
age restoration, Comput. Math. Appl., Vol.71,
No.8, 2016, pp. 1694-1705.
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BIOLOGY and BIOMEDICINE
DOI: 10.37394/23208.2024.21.20
Anantachai Padcharoen, Duangkamon Kitkuan