NONE 20260721105656901 wseas/wseas content-registration-form@crossref.org content-registration-form International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development 2945-0454 Huseynova Arzu Economic Scientific Research Institute, Ministry of Economy, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Azerbaijan Technical University, Baku, AZERBAIJAN https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-9923 Salimli Huseyn Azerbaijan Technical University Baku AZERBAIJAN Digital transformation is widely viewed as a productivity and competitiveness imperative, yet its diffusion remains uneven in many emerging economies where firms face binding constraints in skills, finance, infrastructure, governance, and digital trust. This article develops an evidence-based prioritization of digital transformation barriers for the Republic of Azerbaijan by integrating enterprise survey evidence with expert consensus building and multi-criteria decision-making. The empirical base combines a 2024 survey of 450 enterprises (200 medium and large firms and 250 SMEs) across key industries with a two-round Delphi exercise involving 15 experts from government, ICT industry, business associations, and academia. Barriers are prioritized using a hybrid Delphi-TOPSIS model under three implementation-oriented criteria (expected impact, feasibility, and cost/risk). The revised version strengthens the methodological explanation by clarifying Delphi expert-selection filters, expanding the interpretation of the methods section, adding scenario-based robustness discussion, and linking observable adoption indicators such as ERP/CRM and cloud use to barrier severity. Results indicate that the shortage of qualified digital personnel is the most critical barrier (closeness coefficient 0.78), followed by limited financial resources for digital investments (0.75), weak regional digital infrastructure (0.62), cybersecurity readiness gaps (0.59), and organizational resistance to change (0.55). The ranking implies that Azerbaijan’s transition is constrained less by connectivity alone than by complementary intangible inputs - skills, financing and managerial capability - that determine firms’ absorptive capacity. The study contributes a context-specific prioritization and validation procedure suitable for emerging economies and translates rankings into targeted policy and managerial packages, including a sequenced implementation roadmap and monitoring indicators. 07 21 2026 07 21 2026 127 15 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US 10.37394/232029.2026.5.15 https://wseas.com/journals/asd/2026/a30asd-015(2026).pdf E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, W. W. Norton, 2014. T. H. Davenport and J. Harris, Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning, Harvard Business Press, 2007. OECD, Promoting Enterprise Digitalisation in Azerbaijan, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. P. C. Verhoef, T. Broekhuizen, Y. Bart, A. Bhattacharya, J. Q. Dong, N. Fabian, and M. Haenlein, “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 122, pp. 889–901, 2021. G. Westerman, D. Bonnet, and A. McAfee, Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation, Harvard Business Review Press, 2014. A. Bharadwaj, O. A. El Sawy, P. A. Pavlou, and N. Venkatraman, “Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 471–482, 2013. H. A. Linstone and M. Turoff (eds.), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Addison-Wesley, 1975. C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer, 1981. A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software, Wiley, 2013. R. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega, vol. 53, pp. 49–57, 2015. H. Gupta, S. M. Kusi-Sarpong, and J. Rezaei, “Barriers and solutions to green innovation in SMEs: a Delphi–BWM–Fuzzy TOPSIS approach,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 648, pp. 1224–1235, 2019. J. Brodeur, L. A. Lacerda, and R. J. Rabelo, “Operationalization of critical success factors to manage Industry 4.0 transformation in manufacturing SMEs,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, 8954, 2022. World Economic Forum, Investing in the Digital Economy of Azerbaijan (IDEA), WEF White Paper, 2024. United Nations, E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development, UN DESA, New York, 2024. Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Strategy for the Development of the Digital Economy in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2026–2029, Baku, 2025. G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019. D. Plekhanov, H. Franke, and T. H. Netland, “Digital transformation: A review and research agenda,” European Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 821–844, 2023. OECD, The Digital Transformation of SMEs, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2021. OECD, Beyond COVID-19: Advancing Digital Business Transformation in the Eastern Partner Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. OECD/EBRD, SME Policy Index: Eastern Partner Countries 2024: Building Resilience in Challenging Times, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2024. R. Martínez-Peláez, M. A. Escobar, V. G. Félix, R. Ostos, J. Parra-Michel, V. García, A. Ochoa-Brust, P. VelardeAlvarado, R. A. Félix, S. Olivares-Bautista, V. Flores, and L. J. Mena, “Sustainable Digital Transformation for SMEs: A Comprehensive Framework for Informed Decision-Making,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, 4447, 2024. H. W. Volberda, S. Khanagha, C. Baden-Fuller, O. R. Mihalache, and J. Birkinshaw, “Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms,” Long Range Planning, vol. 54, no. 5, 102110, 2021.