<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<doi_batch version="5.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.4.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.4.0 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.4.0.xsd" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" xmlns:rel="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>NONE</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>20260629163745036</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>wseas/wseas</depositor_name>
      <email_address>content-registration-form@crossref.org</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>content-registration-form</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>International Journal of Applied Mathematics Computational Science and Systems Engineering</full_title>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2766-9823</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_article>
        <titles>
          <title>Improving Sociometric Measurements Through Modeling And Statistical Instruments to Support the Coherence and Effectiveness of Legislation</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Alkida</given_name>
            <surname>Llakaj</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Department of Economy, Mediterranean University of Tirana, Tirana, ALBANIA </institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Elmira</given_name>
            <surname>Kushta</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Department of Physics, University of Tirana, Tirana, ALBANIA</institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
          <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
            <given_name>Dodë</given_name>
            <surname>Prenga</surname>
            <affiliations>
              <institution>
                <institution_name>Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Vlora, Vlora, ALBANIA </institution_name>
              </institution>
            </affiliations>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract>
          <jats:p>Mathematical modelling, exhaustive techniques adopted for measuring latent behaviour alongside standard statistical analysis are being expanded continuously in studying legislative effectiveness, auditing policies, pre-post- and ex-post evaluations and several other assessments in behavioural and political sciences. The spreads of numerical approaches in socio-political features analysis are aligned with the necessities for quantitative answering of standard problems regarding the effectiveness of legislative packages and normative acts that might change frequently, their expediency to achieve target objectives, in establishing thought standards, in addressing society problems, for ensuring sustainable development, measuring social supportiveness and many other important indicators. In addition to the standard protocols that regulate measurement procedures for those features, the extraction of telling evidence from typically heterogenous and un-relaxed systems requires careful and well-adopted methodologies. This feature is boldened for measurement on systems representing transiting democracies features where frequent legislative revisions and legal challenges of normative acts infuriate the stability of the parameters and impede time dynamics on them. In this context, we have discussed some improvements in the generalised measurement procedures by contemplating physics’ instruments features, to diminish the effect of heterogeneity and dynamics. Consequently, non-objective answering in common questionnaires, lack of homogeneity and relaxation’s assumption, are balanced and corrected in the framework of the assessment and certification for instruments’ reliability, accuracy, resolution power etc. The result consists of enhanced measurement and reliable quantitative assessment for low scale measurement for the systems considered in this methodical analysis. It can be suggested for use in scientific measurement and research but also, it assist entities that operate in the field of measurement by conducting evidence-based analyses, to help boost the validity and generalizability of research findings, and to support governmental institutions in implementing cost-efficient legislative procedures. Also, improvements in classical sociometric techniques can be seen as adequate response of the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, intensification of the network-based interactions, and to count for complexity of opinion and belief formation within contemporary societies. Within this framework, the present work outlines several thematic considerations related to the implementation of direct and indirect measurement techniques in heterogeneous and non-relaxed environments. Particular attention is given to modelling approaches, the identification of characteristic statistical distributions and network properties, as well as the application of sequential measurement procedures in small communities where conventional sampling strategies are either impractical or prohibitively costly.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="print">
          <month>06</month>
          <day>29</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>06</month>
          <day>29</day>
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>1</first_page>
        </pages>
        <publisher_item>
          <item_number item_number_type="article_number">1</item_number>
        </publisher_item>
        <ai:program name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.37394/232026.2026.8.1</doi>
          <resource>https://wseas.com/journals/amcse/2026/a02amcse-001(2026).pdf</resource>
        </doi_data>
        <citation_list>
          <citation key="ref0">
            <unstructured_citation>Hitt, M. P., Volden, C., &amp; Wiseman, A. E. (2017). Spatial Models of Legislative Effectiveness. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 575–590.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref1">
            <unstructured_citation>Van Aeken, K. (2011). From Vision To Reality: Ex Post Evaluation of Legislation. legisprudence, 5(1), 41–68.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref2">
            <unstructured_citation>Kollman, Scott E. Page,Computational Methods and Models of Politics, Editor(s): L. Tesfatsion, K.L. Judd, Handbook of Computational Economics, Elsevier, Volume 2, 2006, Pages 1433-1463,</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref3">
            <unstructured_citation>Anglmayer, I., &amp; Scherrer, A. (2020). Ex-post evaluation in the European Parliament: an increasing influence on the policy cycle. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 26(3), 405–426.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref4">
            <unstructured_citation>Marco Battaglini Valerio Leone Sciabolazza Eleonora Patacchini. Effectiveness Of Connected Legislators Working Paper 24442 Http://Www.Nber.Org/Papers/W24442 National Bureau Of Economic Research 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2018</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref5">
            <unstructured_citation>A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286: 509, 1999.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref6">
            <unstructured_citation>J. J. Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. PNAS, 79: 2554, 1982</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref7">
            <unstructured_citation>N. R. Mantegna, E. H. Stanley, An Introduction to Econophysics, Correlations and Complexity in Finance, UK: Cambirdge University Press, (2000)</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref8">
            <unstructured_citation>A. L. Barab´asi, R. Albert (2002). "Statistical mechanics of complex networks". Reviews of Modern Physics. 74 (1): 47–94.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref9">
            <unstructured_citation>Trenton D. Mize, Bianca Manago (2022), The past, present, and future of experimental methods in the social sciences, Social Science Research, Volume 108, 2022, 102799,</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref10">
            <unstructured_citation>Hrba, M., Maciak, M., Peštová, B., &amp; Pešta, M. (2022). Bootstrapping Not Independent and Not Identically Distributed Data. Mathematics, 10(24), 4671.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref11">
            <unstructured_citation>Bhattacherjee, Anol. "Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices" (2012). Textbooks Collection.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref12">
            <unstructured_citation>Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in preclinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15. PMID: 33380887; PMCID: PMC7745163.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref13">
            <unstructured_citation>Lamprianou, I. (2019). Applying the Rasch Model in Social Sciences Using R. Routledge.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref14">
            <unstructured_citation>Taichi Yamashita, Analyzing Likert scale surveys with Rasch models, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2022, 100022, ISSN 2772-7661,</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref15">
            <unstructured_citation>Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., &amp; Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of modern physics, 81(2), 591-646.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref16">
            <unstructured_citation>Lyra, M., Costa, U. S., Costa Filho, R. N., &amp; Andrade, J. (2003). Generalized Zipf's law in proportional voting processes. Europhysics letters (Print), 62(1), 131-137.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref17">
            <unstructured_citation>Prenga, D., &amp; Ifti, M. (2012). Distribution of votes and a model of political opinion formation for majority elections. In International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 16, pp. 1-12). World Scientific Publishing Company.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref18">
            <unstructured_citation>Denaj, A., Prenga, D., &amp; Tahiri, V. (2023, September). General features of the time data series of Covid-19 in Albania. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2872, No. 1, p. 030003). AIP Publishing LLC.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref19">
            <unstructured_citation>Prenga, D., Peqini, K., &amp; Osmani, R. (2021, November). The analysis of the dynamics of the electorate system by using q-distribution-a case study. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2090, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref20">
            <unstructured_citation>Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–73.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref21">
            <unstructured_citation>Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, IV (pp. 321–334). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref22">
            <unstructured_citation>Mobilia, M. (2023). Polarization and Consensus in a Voter Model under TimeFluctuating Influences. Physics, 5(2), 517-536.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref23">
            <unstructured_citation>Mobilia, M. Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 028701.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref24">
            <unstructured_citation>Clara Monteiro Vieira, Elisabeth Costa Monteiro, Rasch model and anchoring vignettes for metrological characterization of a democracy measuring system: preliminary studies, Measurement: Sensors, Volume 38, Supplement, 2025, 101507.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref25">
            <unstructured_citation>John Cornish (2002). RESPONSE PROBLEMS IN SURVEYS Improving response &amp; minimizing the load.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref26">
            <unstructured_citation>Reed JE, Johnson JK, Zanni R, et al. Quality of locally designed surveys in a quality improvement collaborative: review of survey validity and identification of common errors. BMJ Open Quality 2024;13:e002387.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref27">
            <unstructured_citation>Giuliano, F., Soriano, M. A., Pino-Mulero, V., &amp; González-García, J. (2025). Testing Consistency: Analyzing the Reliability of Two Lower Limb Isometric Force Measurements in Strength-Trained Athletes. Applied Sciences, 15(1), 303.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref28">
            <unstructured_citation>Lea JWD, O'Driscoll JM, Coleman DA, Wiles JD. Validity and reliability of the 'Isometric Exercise Scale' (IES) for measuring ratings of perceived exertion during continuous isometric exercise. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5334. PMID: 33674722; PMCID: PMC7970867.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref29">
            <unstructured_citation>Todinov, M.T. (2020). Risk and Uncertainty Reduction by Using Algebraic Inequalities (1st ed.). CRC Press.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref30">
            <unstructured_citation>R.H. Riffenburgh, Statistics in Medicine (Third Edition), Academic Press, 2012,</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref31">
            <unstructured_citation>David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer. Phys. Teach. 30, 141 (1992).</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref32">
            <unstructured_citation>Noelle M. Crooks, Martha W. Alibali. Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. Developmental Review 34 (2014) 344–377</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref33">
            <unstructured_citation>Antti Savinainen and Philip Scott. The Force Concept Inventory: a tool for monitoring student learning. 2002 Phys. Educ. 37 45</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref34">
            <unstructured_citation>Llakaj, A., Prenga, D. (2025). Remarks on extension of common models for studying legislation, coherence and effectiveness. 3rd International Conference on Pioneer and Innovative Studies. October 06-07, 2025: Konya, Turkey</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref35">
            <unstructured_citation>Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B., &amp; Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 2(1), 010105.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref36">
            <unstructured_citation>Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–27.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref37">
            <unstructured_citation>Prenga, D., Kushta, E., &amp; Musli, F. (2023). Enhancing Concept Inventory Analysis by Using Indexes, Optimal Histogram Idea, and the Likert Analysis. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 4(1), 103-120.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref38">
            <unstructured_citation>M. Planinic. Assessment of difficulties of some conceptual areas from electricity and magnetism using the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 74(12), 1143–1148.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref39">
            <unstructured_citation>Coletta, V. P., &amp; Phillips, J. A. (2005). Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability. American Journal of Physics, 73(12), 1172-1182.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref40">
            <unstructured_citation>Nisbet, R., Elder, J., &amp; Miner, G. (2009). Numerical Prediction. Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications, 259– 284.</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
          <citation key="ref41">
            <unstructured_citation>McNabb, David E. (2010) Research methods for political science: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Political science— Methodology. JA71.5.M34 2009. 320.072— dc22 2008049000</unstructured_citation>
          </citation>
        </citation_list>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
