Reviewers

First Name (Use only Latin Alphabet. Do not use extended latin alphabets)

Last Name (Use only Latin Alphabet. Do not use extended latin alphabets)

Academic Address (Only: University, Town, Country):

Email (only one E-mail)

ID Number of the Paper

Title of the Paper

Comments and Remarks (minimum 500 characters)
Minimum Characters 500

Have the authors published some papers recently in this area in the last 5 years? (Check with GoogleScholar)
YES
NO

References:
Do the authors use references in the WSEAS format i.e. [1], [2], [3], [4], ... ?
(We do not allow references (Authors'name, Year)).
Are the references relevant? Do they match the in-text citation?

For example if they have a Reference [n] in the references, they must report
the [n] in some place inside the main text of the article.
Note also that the Abstract must not contain connection to references, only the text after the Abstract.

Is the abstract thoroughly written? Does it represent the main text of the article?
YES
NO

Is the organisation (logical flow, use of headings) outstanding?
YES
NO

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?
YES
NO

Does the paper contain direction for future research and recommendations?

Is the English language appropriate?
YES
NO

Are the Sessions and their Paragraphs well and clearly written? Which Sessions and which Paragraphs of this paper need extensions and clarifications? Please, specify

Which mathematical equations in the article need clarifications? Which Theorems need clarifications and extensions? Are the mathematical theorems accompanied by the proper numerical examples? Please, specify.

For Experimental Work. Do you believe that these experiments were really held ? With what Equipment? Where? Are they accompanied with Photos, Tables and other Documentation? *

For Articles in Biomedical, Financial and Social Sciences we demand strong and well-documented Statistics. Have the authors carried out and included the right Statistical tests like: t-text, Chi Square etc? Please, check.

What Simulation / Statistics / Experiments / Experimental Analysis in the paper need extension and more clarifications? In which paragraphs? *

Can you check if the Figures and Tables of the article are dully illustrated and presented inside the text? Are they connected with the main text of the article?

Do the authors use abbreviations without the necessary explanations? If the authors use the abbreviation GOT, what GOT stands for?

Propose other colleagues that might review this paper:

Final Recommendation
Accepted after minor revision
Accepted after major revision
Rejected