Information about Reviewer (you):
Academic Address (Only: University, Town, Country):
Email (only one E-mail)
Information about Paper:
ID Number of the Paper
Title of the Paper
Select Title of the Journal:
--Title of the Journal:--
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE
MOLECULAR SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS
EARTH SCIENCES AND HUMAN CONSTRUCTIONS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS AND CONTROL
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BIOLOGY AND BIOMEDICINE
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ADVANCES in ENGINEERING EDUCATION
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED AND THEORETICAL MECHANICS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON FLUID MECHANICS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRONICS
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER RESEARCH
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS AND MUSIC
International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Computational Science and Systems Engineering
International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
International Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics & Computer Science
Your Review for the Paper:
Comments and Remarks (minimum 500 characters)
Have the authors published some papers recently in this area in the last 5 years? (Check with GoogleScholar)
Do the authors use references in the WSEAS format i.e. , , , , ... ?
(We do not allow references (Authors'name, Year)).
Are the references relevant? Do they match the in-text citation?
For example if they have a Reference [n] in the references, they must report
the [n] in some place inside the main text of the article.
Note also that the Abstract must not contain connection to references, only the text after the Abstract.
Is the abstract thoroughly written? Does it represent the main text of the article?
Is the organisation (logical flow, use of headings) outstanding?
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?
Does the paper contain direction for future research and recommendations?
Is the English language appropriate?
Are the Sessions and their Paragraphs well and clearly written? Which Sessions and which Paragraphs of this paper need extensions and clarifications? Please, specify
Which mathematical equations in the article need clarifications? Which Theorems need clarifications and extensions? Are the mathematical theorems accompanied by the proper numerical examples? Please, specify.
For Experimental Work. Do you believe that these experiments were really held ? With what Equipment? Where? Are they accompanied with Photos, Tables and other Documentation? *
For Articles in Biomedical, Financial and Social Sciences we demand strong and well-documented Statistics. Have the authors carried out and included the right Statistical tests like: t-text, Chi Square etc? Please, check.
What Simulation / Statistics / Experiments / Experimental Analysis in the paper need extension and more clarifications? In which paragraphs? *
Can you check if the Figures and Tables of the article are dully illustrated and presented inside the text? Are they connected with the main text of the article?
Do the authors use abbreviations without the necessary explanations? If the authors use the abbreviation GOT, what GOT stands for?
Propose other colleagues that might review this paper:
Accepted after minor revision
Accepted after major revision