Information about Reviewer (you):
Profile (URL) in Publons
Information about Paper:
ID Number of the Paper
Title of the Paper
Your Review for the Paper:
Comments and Remarks (minimum 500 characters)
Have the authors published some papers recently in this area in the last 5 years? (Check with GoogleScholar)
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?
Is the abstract thoroughly written? Does it represent the main text of the article?
Is the organisation (logical flow, use of headings) outstanding?
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?
Does the paper contain direction for future research and recommendations?
Is the English language appropriate?
Are the Sessions and their Paragraphs well and clearly written? Which Sessions and which Paragraphs of this paper need extensions and clarifications? Please, specify
Which mathematical equations in the article need clarifications? Which Theorems need clarifications and extensions? Are the mathematical theorems accompanied by the proper numerical examples? Please, specify.
For Experimental Work. Do you believe that these experiments were really held ? With what Equipment? Where? Are they accompanied with Photos, Tables and other Documentation? *
For Articles in Biomedical, Financial and Social Sciences we demand strong and well-documented Statistics. Have the authors carried out and included the right Statistical tests like: t-text, Chi Square etc? Please, check.
What Simulation / Statistics / Experiments / Experimental Analysis in the paper need extension and more clarifications? In which paragraphs? *
Can you check if the Figures and Tables of the article are dully illustrated and presented inside the text? Are they connected with the main text of the article?
Do the authors use abbreviations without the necessary explanations? If the authors use the abbreviation GOT, what GOT stands for?